The Stewardship Report

Home Blog Page 42

White House Proposes Steep Fees on Chinese Cargo Ships

0

Washington, D.C. — The Trump administration has proposed punitive new fees on international shipping that would target vessels owned by Chinese companies or manufactured in Chinese shipyards, promising to dramatically alter the economics of global trade.

The new policy would charge Chinese-owned cargo ships, as well as third-country flagged vessels built in China, $1 million or more per port-of-call in the U.S.

Large container ships often make multiple stops when delivering goods to the U.S., and would face new fees at each port.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) published the proposal Friday, tying it to an investigation into allegations by several U.S. labor unions that China has unfairly distorted the international shipbuilding industry.

The investigation, conducted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, determined that the Chinese government has pursued a policy of subsidizing its domestic shipbuilding industry with the aim of “targeting for dominance” the global market.

Growing market share

The investigation pointed out that over the past 25 years, China’s share of the global shipbuilding industry has exploded. China accounted for about 5% of the total tonnage of ships manufactured in 1999. By 2023, the Chinese share of the market surpassed 50%.

The USTR found that Chinese policy “burdens or restricts U.S. commerce by undercutting business opportunities for and investments in the U.S. maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors; restricting competition and choice; creating economic security risks from dependence and vulnerabilities in sectors critical to the functioning of the U.S. economy; and undermining supply chain resilience.”

The results of the investigation, which began during President Joe Biden’s administration, were announced last month.

The proposal is open for public comment until March 24, at which point the administration will determine whether or not to implement it.

Chinese reaction

On Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian sharply criticized the U.S. move.

“[T]o serve its political agenda at home, the U.S. has abused Section 301 investigation[s], which seriously violated WTO [World Trade Organization] rules and further undermined the multilateral trading system,” he said. “We call on the U.S. side to respect facts and multilateral rules and immediately stop its wrongdoings.”

The China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI) and China Shipowner Association had previously blasted the USTR investigation as being “conclusions full of lies and distortion of facts.”

In a statement issued when the results of the investigation were released, CANSI said, “Development of China’s shipbuilding industry strictly follows the international trading rules and is the result of collaboration with global partners, as well as the tech innovation, and the hard-wording and excellent performances of Chinese industry players.”

Complex new rules

The USTR proposal contains a number of complicated elements that made it unclear precisely how any new regime of port fees would be administered.

Each ship owned by a Chinese entity would be charged a $1 million fee on entering a U.S. port, though the proposal also appears to consider a different fee calculation of $1,000 per ton of capacity, which could add up to considerably more for large ships that carry thousands of tons of cargo.

Chinese-built ships operated by non-Chinese shipowners would be subject to a $1.5 million fee, which could be adjusted, depending on the percentage of Chinese-built ships in that shipowner’s fleet. This would apply even if the ship’s cargo was not manufactured in China.

Ships owned by companies that have existing orders for new ships pending with Chinese shipbuilders could be hit with an additional $1 million fee per entry at U.S. ports.

The rule also provides for “refunds” of a similar amount each time a shipping company sends a U.S.-built cargo ship into a U.S. port.

Economic justifications hazy

Mary Lovely, a senior fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said it was difficult to find an economic justification for the proposal.

“The thing that’s really disturbing is that it’s not linked to any particular policy that would benefit American businesses or consumers,” she said.

International trade will continue to flow to the United States, but through more convoluted routes that add time and expense. For example, Lovely predicted that many shipping firms would explore the possibility of diverting their ships to ports in Mexico and Canada, and trucking the cargo into the U.S.

“It seems to me that this is just a tremendous way to reduce volume and employment at U.S. ports and basically force trade to take transportation routes and transportation modes that are clearly going to raise prices for U.S. businesses and consumers,” Lovely said. “There’s no way around it.”

In an email exchange with VOA, Joe Kramek, World Shipping Council president and CEO, echoed those concerns.

“USTR’s proposed draconian $1 million-plus per U.S. port visit fees on ships that carry the large majority of the U.S. trade, if they are Chinese-built or –operated – or on any ship operator from any country that has even a single Chinese ship in its fleet or on order – if carried forward, would cause broad economic harm across all sectors of the U.S. supply chain,” wrote Kramek, whose organization represents shipping companies.

“The fees would result in fewer U.S. port calls, higher prices for U.S. consumers, and severe impacts for exporters, particularly American farmers,” he wrote.

Unlikely to benefit US shipbuilders

Though ostensibly aimed at helping U.S. shipbuilders, the law is unlikely to have a significant impact on that industry, said Marc Levinson, a Washington-based economist and historian who has written two books about container shipping.

“This is not likely to do much for U.S. shipbuilding,” Levinson told VOA. “U.S. commercial shipbuilders are very far away from global scale. They don’t produce anything that is competitive on the international market for commercial oceangoing vessels.”

“The winners of this policy would be Japan, Korea, the Philippines, other countries where commercial shipbuilding is on a larger scale today than the United States,” Levinson said. The losers, he added, will include U.S. consumers, as the port fees are passed on in the form of higher prices for imported goods.

In an email exchange with VOA, the National Retail Federation registered its opposition to the policy, writing, “NRF strongly opposes a port fee remedy, which will do nothing to force China to change its behavior and practices. It will only increase shipping costs for retailers and further disrupt the maritime market.”


Germany’s Fascist AfD and the Shadow of Anti-Nazi Laws


AfD’s Rise, Supported by Elon Musk, Tests Germany’s Anti-Nazi Legacy

More controversial #AfD election ads. Left: “New Germans? We make them ourselves.” Right: “Islam? Doesn’t fit in with our cuisine.”

Berlin — In the heart of Berlin, where history whispers through every cobblestone and monument, a political storm brews. The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), a far-right party founded in 2013, has risen from obscurity to prominence, shaking the foundations of Germany’s post-war political consensus.

AdF anti-Islam political ad: “Islam? Doesn’t fit in with our cuisine.”

Once a fringe group railing against the Eurozone, the AfD has morphed into a powerful voice for nationalism, anti-immigration sentiment, and skepticism toward the European Union.

Yet, its ascent is shadowed by Germany’s stringent anti-Nazi laws, a legal framework born from the ashes of the Third Reich, designed to prevent the resurgence of extremism. This clash between a modern political movement and a nation’s resolute past forms a narrative as complex as Germany itself.

The AfD’s rise began modestly, fueled by economists and Euroskeptics frustrated with Germany’s role in bailing out struggling EU economies. But by 2015, as refugees streamed into Germany amid Angela Merkel’s open-door policy, the party pivoted. Leaders like Alexander Gauland and Björn Höcke seized the moment, amplifying fears of cultural erosion and crime.

Their rhetoric—often steeped in nostalgia for a “pure” Germany—resonated with voters in the former East, where economic stagnation and disillusionment with reunification lingered. By 2025, the AfD commands significant support, polling over 20% nationally and dominating regional parliaments in states like Thuringia and Saxony.

Yet, this success comes with a cost

Germany’s anti-Nazi laws, enshrined in the Grundgesetz (Basic Law) and the Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code), are a bulwark against the ghosts of 1933. Section 130 prohibits incitement to hatred, including the dissemination of Nazi propaganda, while Section 86 bans the public use of Nazi symbols like the swastika, except for art or historical purposes.

These laws reflect Germany’s Vergangenheitsbewältigung—its reckoning with the past—and are enforced with vigilance. For the AfD, this legal landscape is a minefield. Höcke, a former history teacher, faced fines in 2024 for invoking the banned Nazi slogan “Alles für Deutschland” during a rally. He argued it was a patriotic call, not a Nazi echo, but courts disagreed, citing his knowledge of its historical weight.

AdF anti-immigrant political ad: “New Germans? We make them ourselves.”

The AfD walks a tightrope

Its leaders decry these laws as stifling free speech, claiming they’re wielded as political weapons by the establishment. Supporters see the party as a defender of German identity against globalization and multiculturalism, while critics—including intelligence agencies like the Verfassungsschutz—label factions of the AfD as extremist. The Thuringian branch, under Höcke’s influence, is officially monitored as a threat to democracy, its members accused of “whitewashing” Nazi crimes. This scrutiny fuels the party’s narrative of victimhood, rallying its base even as it alienates moderates.

In a small town near Dresden, Anna Müller, a 34-year-old nurse, embodies the AfD’s appeal. Raised in the post-reunification chaos of the East, she feels forgotten by Berlin’s elite. “The AfD listens,” she says, sipping coffee in a café adorned with faded DDR-era posters. “They’re not afraid to say what we’re all thinking: too many foreigners, too little for us.” Anna dismisses Nazi accusations as overblown. “Höcke’s fined for a phrase? That’s history, not today.” Her vote, like millions of others, propels the AfD forward, even as protests erupt in cities like Munich, where students chant “Nie wieder!”—never again.

The anti-Nazi laws, however, are not relics but living tools

In 2025, a court in Leipzig sentences a low-level AfD organizer to six months in prison for distributing pamphlets denying aspects of the Holocaust—a crime under Section 130. The ruling sparks outrage online, with AfD sympathizers decrying “thought police,” while human rights groups hail it as a necessary stand. Chancellor Lisa Kaufmann, a centrist grappling with a fractured coalition, defends the laws. “Our democracy was forged in the ruins of tyranny,” she declares in a televised address. “We cannot gamble with its soul.”

Yet, the AfD’s influence grows, exploiting cracks in Germany’s social fabric. Its policies—deporting undocumented migrants, exiting the EU, prioritizing “native” Germans—ignite fierce debate. In parliament, AfD MPs clash with rivals, their speeches often skirting the edge of legality. When Gauland once mused that the Nazi era was “a speck of bird droppings” in Germany’s history, he narrowly avoided prosecution, claiming metaphor, not denial. Such moments test the boundaries of free expression versus historical responsibility.

In Berlin’s Reichstag, where b once consolidated power, the AfD’s presence feels like an irony too bitter to swallow. Lawmakers from the Greens and SPD accuse the party of undermining the very democracy that hosts it. Meanwhile, the Verfassungsschutz warns of rising far-right violence—attacks on refugee centers, synagogue vandalism—linked to rhetoric the AfD denies inspiring. The laws, though robust, strain under modern pressures: digital platforms amplify extremist voices, and enforcement struggles to keep pace.

As Germany approaches its next election, the AfD’s fate—and the resilience of its anti-Nazi framework—hangs in balance. For supporters like Anna, it’s a fight for sovereignty; for opponents, a battle against history’s repetition. In this tension lies a nation’s soul, wrestling with how to honor its past while facing an uncertain future.

Germany’s Fascist AfD and the Shadow of Anti-Nazi Laws (Feb. 25, 2025)


#AfDGermany #AntiNaziLaws #GermanPolitics #FarRightRise #HistoryMatters

Die Linke Rises as SPD, Greens Falter in German Election Upset

Germany’s Left Reborn: Die Linke Surges Amid Political Shake-Up, Socialism Resurgent

Berlin — In a surprising twist in Germany’s political landscape, the socialist party Die Linke has emerged as an unexpected beneficiary of growing voter discontent, while the traditional center-left heavyweights, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens, face a stark decline.

As of late February 2025, the shifting tides of public opinion have propelled Die Linke to newfound prominence, capitalizing on dissatisfaction with the outgoing coalition government and broader anxieties over immigration, economic stagnation, and international conflicts.

The SPD, led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz until the collapse of his “traffic light” coalition with the Greens and the Free Democrats (FDP) in late 2024, has seen its support plummet. Final election results from February 23, 2025, reveal the SPD slumping to a historic low of 16.4%, a drop of nearly 10 percentage points from its 2021 performance.

The Greens, once heralded as the rising stars of progressive politics, also stumbled, landing at 11.6%, down from their previous highs. Meanwhile, Die Linke surged to 8.8%, a remarkable turnaround for a party that many had written off as a relic of the past, especially after the departure of prominent figure Sahra Wagenknecht to form her own rival movement, the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW).

Analysts point to several factors fueling Die Linke’s resurgence. The party’s sharp critique of the mainstream parties’ handling of migration and economic policy resonated with voters disillusioned by the SPD and Greens’ centrist shift. During the campaign, Die Linke positioned itself as a staunch defender of progressive values, attracting younger voters and urban dwellers—particularly in Berlin, where it emerged as the strongest party. Its opposition to German complicity in international conflicts, such as unwavering support for Israel’s actions in Gaza, further distinguished it from the SPD and Greens, who have largely aligned with the establishment line.

The election, triggered by the disintegration of Scholz’s coalition amid disputes over budget and climate policies, exposed the vulnerabilities of the ruling parties. The SPD’s tougher stance on border controls and deportations failed to win back voters who had drifted to the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which secured a record-breaking 20.8% of the vote, placing second behind Friedrich Merz’s victorious CDU/CSU bloc at 28.5%. Meanwhile, the Greens’ focus on climate initiatives, including controversial renewable heating mandates, alienated some of their former base, particularly among younger voters who turned to Die Linke instead.

Die Linke’s gains were not just numerical but symbolic

Once considered a fringe player with roots in East German communism and dissident SPD factions, the party has undergone a quiet reinvention. Its campaign, bolstered by a late surge in the final weeks, tapped into a wellspring of frustration with rising rents, stagnant wages, and a perceived disconnect between the political elite and ordinary Germans. “We’ve become the voice for those who feel left behind,” remarked a party spokesperson, echoing the sentiment that propelled Die Linke’s unexpected success.

For the SPD and Greens, the election results signal a moment of reckoning. The SPD, Germany’s oldest political party with a proud history of resisting Nazism, now faces questions about its identity after years of drifting toward the center.

The Greens, once the darlings of the progressive youth, have lost ground among their core demographic, with their participation in a government that pushed stringent asylum policies proving a liability. “The coalition’s collapse was the final straw,” said one Berlin voter, a former Green supporter who switched to Die Linke. “I wanted a party that still stands for something.”

Die Linke’s Policy Positions: A Closer Look

Die Linke’s resurgence can also be attributed to its distinct policy platform, which sets it apart from both the centrist establishment and the rising populist right.

On Russia, Die Linke has consistently condemned the invasion of Ukraine while advocating for a nuanced stance that critiques Western escalation. The party supports sanctions against Russia but opposes military buildup, such as the €100 billion special fund for the German armed forces, arguing instead for diplomatic solutions and investments in social programs over armament. This position has drawn criticism from rivals who accuse it of being soft on Moscow, yet it has resonated with voters wary of escalating tensions and economic fallout from sanctions, such as soaring energy costs.

On immigration, Die Linke stands in stark contrast to the AfD and even Wagenknecht’s BSW, which has taken an anti-immigrant tack. The party champions an open, inclusive approach, opposing deportations and advocating for expanded rights for refugees and migrants. This stance has bolstered its appeal among urban progressives and immigrant communities, particularly in cities like Berlin, though it risks alienating some working-class voters in eastern Germany who favor stricter border controls.

Regarding nuclear energy, Die Linke remains steadfastly opposed to its expansion, pushing for an immediate and irreversible phase-out. Even as energy prices spike and Germany’s industrial base falters, the party argues that nuclear power is neither safe nor sustainable, favoring a rapid transition to renewables like wind and solar. This contrasts with calls from some quarters to reconsider nuclear power amid the energy crisis, a debate Die Linke dismisses as shortsighted.

On electric vehicles (EVs), Die Linke supports the shift to greener transport but emphasizes public over private solutions. Rather than subsidizing EV production for companies like Volkswagen, which recently announced site closures, the party calls for massive investments in free or affordable public transit powered by renewable energy. It critiques the current EV push as benefiting corporations and the wealthy while neglecting broader accessibility—a populist twist that aligns with its labor-focused agenda.

When it comes to labor, Die Linke has positioned itself as the unequivocal champion of Germany’s working class, rolling out an ambitious slate of policies that have rekindled its appeal among unions, precarious workers, and those battered by decades of neoliberal reforms. The party calls for a nationwide minimum wage hike to €15 per hour—well above the current €12.41—arguing that stagnant pay has fueled inequality and eroded purchasing power amid rampant inflation.

It also demands the reinstatement of full collective bargaining rights, weakened under past SPD-led governments, and the abolition of temporary contracts that leave workers vulnerable to exploitation. A cornerstone of its platform is the complete repeal of Hartz IV, the controversial welfare overhaul from the early 2000s that slashed benefits and forced the unemployed into low-wage jobs; Die Linke proposes replacing it with a universal basic income pilot to guarantee dignity and security.

Beyond wages and welfare, Die Linke advocates for a 35-hour workweek with no loss in pay, claiming it would boost productivity, reduce burnout, and create jobs by redistributing work hours. The party has also zeroed in on Germany’s industrial crisis, exemplified by Volkswagen’s looming layoffs, demanding nationalization of key sectors to protect jobs rather than letting corporations dictate terms. “The market has failed our workers,” a Die Linke campaign ad declared, pledging to tax corporate profits and the ultra-wealthy—proposing a 75% tax on incomes over €1 million—to fund public-sector hiring in healthcare, education, and transport.

This labor agenda has struck a chord in eastern Germany, where deindustrialization and wage stagnation have long festered, helping Die Linke claw back support from the AfD among disillusioned blue-collar voters. In cities like Leipzig and Dresden, party rallies drew crowds chanting for “work with dignity,” a sign of its growing traction.

These labor policies, rooted in Dresden’s socialist heritage, contrast sharply with the SPD’s cautious centrism and the Greens’ focus on green jobs over broader worker protections. While critics argue the proposals are fiscally unfeasible—pointing to Germany’s debt brake and budget woes—supporters see them as a bold antidote to a system that has prioritized corporate interests over human lives. “Die Linke is the only party talking about us, not just the CEOs,” said a factory worker in Thuringia, encapsulating the sentiment driving its labor-fueled resurgence.

These positions collectively paint Die Linke as a party of radical alternatives, appealing to those disillusioned with the status quo yet unwilling to embrace the far-right’s nationalism. While not without controversy—its anti-nuclear stance, for instance, clashes with Germany’s energy realities—the platform has given Die Linke a clear identity in a crowded political field.


#DieLinkeRising, #GermanElection2025, #LeftComeback, #SPDDecline, #GreensFall, #WorkersRights, #BerlinRed, #SocialismGermany, #BundestagShift, #LaborPower

Resegregation: Trump’s DEI Assault Threatens Civil Rights Gains


The Civil Rights Movement’s Unfinished Business

New York, N.Y. –– The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s dismantled legal segregation, but systemic inequities persist. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives emerged as tools to address these gaps, fostering workplaces and institutions where marginalized groups could thrive.

President Donald Trump’s recent executive orders targeting DEI programs, however, signal a dangerous regression—a deliberate effort to undo progress and resegregate American society.

Executive Orders as a
Blueprint for Regression

On his first day in office, Trump signed orders to eliminate federal DEI programs, calling them “radical and wasteful” and “shameful discrimination.” These directives mandate federal agencies to terminate DEI-related grants, contracts, and staff positions, effectively dismantling decades of equity-focused policies.

A second order revoked affirmative action protections and required federal contractors to certify they do not operate DEI programs that “violate federal anti-discrimination laws.” The administration claims these actions target “illegal” discrimination, but critics argue they weaponize civil rights laws to suppress diversity efforts.

Legal Pushback and the Battle for Free Speech

A federal judge in Baltimore blocked Trump’s orders, ruling they likely violate free speech protections by intimidating federal contractors and employees. Yet the damage is already done. The White House’s social media post declaring “DEI is dead” emboldens anti-DEI rhetoric, while military leaders and federal employees face purges for supporting equity initiatives. This chilling effect extends to private companies, which now face investigations for DEI programs deemed “discriminatory.”

The Private Sector’s Dilemma

Trump’s orders task federal agencies with identifying “egregious”DEI practitioners in industries like tech, healthcare, and education. Companies like Costco have reaffirmed DEI commitments, but many are retreating, fearing lawsuits or reputational harm. The administration’s framing of DEI as “immoral” shifts the narrative from equity to division, pressuring employers to abandon inclusive practices.

A Threat to Meritocracy and Democracy

Proponents of Trump’s policies argue they restore “merit-based opportunity,” but this ignores systemic barriers that DEI aims to address. By equating equity with discrimination, the administration undermines efforts to create fair access to education, employment, and leadership. The FAA crash blame on “diversity over merit” exemplifies this flawed logic, scapegoating DEI for systemic failures.

The Road Ahead: Resistance and Resilience

While courts have temporarily stalled Trump’s orders, the cultural shift is clear. DEI advocates must defend these programs as vital to democracy, not “wasteful” bureaucracy. Universities, corporations, and civil rights groups must resist federal overreach, leveraging public support (52% of workers still view DE positively) to counter anti-equity narratives.


#DEI #CivilRights #Resegregation #TrumpAdministration #DiversityMatters


Dying to Leave: Why Pakistanis are Risking Their Lives to Reach Europe


Islamabad — When Amir Ali left the narrow alleys of his village in Pakistan’s Punjab province last summer for the plazas of Spain, he thought his dream of a better life was finally coming true. The 21-year-old had failed seven times before to get a visa for countries in Europe and the Middle East.

Six months later, in mid-January, Ali was one of 22 Pakistani men whom Moroccan authorities rescued from a stranded migrant boat in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of West Africa.

At least 43 Pakistanis were among 50 men who perished from hunger, dehydration and physical torture at the hands of human smugglers.

Limping with an injured foot in his home in Gujranwala district, Ali said he felt lucky to be alive.

“It’s not as if we survived because of some food or water,” he said. “Not at all. It’s just that God wanted to save us, so we survived.”

Since December 2024, dozens of Pakistanis have died as boats carrying migrants to Europe have run into accidents.

While Pakistan does not rank among the top 10 countries from which migrants attempting irregular entry into Europe come, thousands of its nationals risk their lives every year to reach the continent.

Human smugglers are becoming savvy too, officials say, as kingpins move abroad to evade an ongoing crackdown, and rely on digital currencies to transfer the proceeds of their crime.

A harrowing journey

Ali’s trip began more than 1,200 kilometers south of Gujranwala in Karachi, where he boarded a plane to Senegal on a visa that smugglers had arranged.

“I didn’t even know that a country with that name existed,” Ali told VOA.

From Senegal he obtained a visa to enter Mauritania, where he stayed in a safe house with dozens of other migrants for almost five months.

The dream journey was turning into a nightmare.

“There were so many boys in one room, there was no room to sit,” Ali said. “It was mentally very tough.”

In the wee hours of the morning on Jan. 2, he was stuffed with more than 80 others on a boat headed from Nouakchott, Mauritania, to Spain’s Canary Islands.

After a day of travel, the boat ran out of fuel. To lighten the load, Ali said, the smugglers threw away the passengers’ belongings and took away their meager rations.

“On the fourth day on the boat, a man went crazy because of hunger. He jumped into the ocean. We all got very scared thinking about what was going to happen next,” Ali said.

Smugglers, the survivor said, thrashed anyone who complained or didn’t comply.

“The smugglers told us to throw the dead bodies in the water,” said Ali. “When we refused, thinking how could we throw our brothers, they beat us up a lot.”

The ordeal ended almost two weeks later when Moroccan authorities rescued the survivors after a fishing boat spotted them.

Ali’s family sold livestock and precious agricultural land and took loans to raise nearly $10,000 to get their son to Spain. His mother is worried about the debt but delighted that her son is alive.


A roadside sign leading to Dhola village, Gujarat district, Pakistan, commemorates Chaudhry Atif Morsi and Chaudhry Sufyan Gorsi as martyrs, Feb. 4, 2025. The men died on a stranded boat in the Atlantic Ocean on their way from Mauritania to Spain’s Canary Islands in January.
A roadside sign leading to Dhola village, Gujarat district, Pakistan, commemorates Chaudhry Atif Morsi and Chaudhry Sufyan Gorsi as martyrs, Feb. 4, 2025. The men died on a stranded boat in the Atlantic Ocean on their way from Mauritania to Spain’s Canary Islands in January.

Who is leaving?

Almost two hours away in Gujrat district of Punjab, Haji Shaukat Ali is devastated. His son Chaudhry Atif Gorsi and nephew Chaudhry Sufyan Gorsi did not survive.

A roadside sign leading to their village commemorates the two as martyrs.

“We sent them because of our weakness,” said Ali, sitting among a group of mourners, some of whom had come from Europe. “The weakness is money.”

Studies conducted by Gallup Pakistan and the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, or PIDE, in recent years show lack of jobs as the primary reason for wanting to leave a country where economic growth is barely keeping up with population growth.

According to Pakistan’s Bureau of Emigration and Overseas Employment, more than 65,000 people left legally to work abroad just in January 2025. Between 2022 and 2024, an average of roughly 800,000 nationals moved abroad for work annually. Most went to the Middle East but a few to Europe.

Pakistanis also made nearly 5,000 attempts to enter Europe illegally in 2024, data from the EU’s border and coast guard agency Frontex indicates.

Amir Ali’s home district of Gujranwala and the Gorsi cousins’ home district of Gujrat, lead in migration trends, along with nearby Sialkot, Mandi Bahauddin and Faisalabad districts, despite being hubs of agriculture and industrial activity.

“They are not the poorest of the poor,” said demographer Durre Nayab, pointing to the ability of migrants from this region to pull together thousands of dollars to fund their journey.

“But it’s not just the financial aspect,” Nayab, who was involved in the PIDE study, told VOA. “The two other aspects that came out were lifestyle, and somehow, they thought they would gain more respect out of [the] country.”

Many Pakistanis wanting to leave felt poorly treated compared to their wealthier countrymen, Nayab explained.

“This difference made them disillusioned about the whole system,” the demographer said.

The PIDE study showed 37% of Pakistanis would leave, if given a chance.


Does life get better?

Kashif Ali, a cousin of the deceased Gorsis, spent hundreds of dollars to arrange a sponsor for a work permit to Italy a decade ago.

“In Pakistan, a middle-class laborer earns around $3 a day. For that same work, they make $20 to $25 overseas,” said Ali, who works in boat making.

His family in Pakistan now has a new home and a car.

Kashif Ali, shown in this undated photo, works in boat making in Italy. He spent hundreds of dollars to get a work permit to the European country almost a decade ago. He told VOA he earns much more there than he could in Pakistan.
Kashif Ali, shown in this undated photo, works in boat making in Italy. He spent hundreds of dollars to get a work permit to the European country almost a decade ago. He told VOA he earns much more there than he could in Pakistan.

Such a turn of fortune is on display across small towns and villages in central Punjab. Experts say it inspires many others to risk their lives to reach Europe.

It was a similar story of success that made Ishraq Nazir move from Mandi Bahauddin to Greece. He entered the European country after a brief stay in Turkey as a tourist in 2009.

It took Nazir a decade to get a Greek residency permit after his asylum request was rejected.

For years he worked odd jobs like herding cows and painting trees to get by. Now he works in a packaging factory earning almost $60 a day and said he finally feels settled.

“I had to face a lot of difficulties, but the fact is that if I had stayed in Pakistan, I would have not gotten anything given the type of jobs they have,” Nazir told VOA on the phone while packing disposable plates. “My friends are still where they started.”

Umar Shaid from district Sialkot arrived illegally in Greece by boat from Libya in October.

“I am struggling. It’s very hard to find work. There are very few opportunities. I don’t have any friends or relatives to seek help from,” Shaid said by phone over the sound of the Athens metro.

Shaid said he has spent around $15,000 to pay smugglers and take care of his day-to-day expenses.

“Honestly, I believed the stories people told me and took this silly decision,” said Shaid. Still, he said he was not planning to go back to Pakistan.


Pakistanis are among the top three users of Eastern Mediterranean and Central Mediterranean migrant routes.
Pakistanis are among the top three users of Eastern Mediterranean and Central Mediterranean migrant routes.

Crackdown on smugglers

This month, Pakistan’s Senate passed three bills to toughen anti-human smuggling laws, increasing fines and jail terms.

Pakistan began cracking down on human smuggling after hundreds of its nationals died off the coast of Pylos, Greece, in June 2023 in one of the worst migrant boat disasters.

A report by Pakistan’s National Commission for Human Rights says after that disaster, authorities arrested 854 suspected human smugglers.

Frustrated by recent incidents, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif formed a high-level task force in January, with himself as the head, to combat human smuggling.

The Federal Investigation Agency, or FIA, has ramped up efforts, arresting dozens of alleged human smugglers and confiscating the assets of others to force them out of hiding.

“For the first time we have seen that they [smugglers] are using Bitcoin and digital currency. They have shifted away from traditional ways of money laundering.” Bilal Tanvir, FIA deputy director for the Gujrat region, told VOA.

However, he said a lack of resources and low rate of conviction of alleged criminals posed a challenge in curbing the crime.

The FIA is also facing increased scrutiny. Sharif’s government removed the agency head at the end of last month. More than 100 officials have been fired, suspended or blacklisted for alleged involvement in and insufficient action against human smuggling.

Survivor Ali told VOA his group of migrant men faced no hurdle boarding the flight for Senegal at the Karachi airport.

“Someone connected with the agents came, held our hand and told us to come after him. Wherever we went, we followed him,” Ali said. “Nobody stopped us.”

Tanvir defended his agency, saying officers focus on those entering the country more than those on their way out.


The impact of tragedies

Surrounded by friends and neighbors, Ali looked disappointed. He told VOA he would not recommend attempting to reach Europe by boat.

Others in the room felt differently.

In this image taken from video, Amir Ali, second from right, rests as friends look at his injured foot on Feb. 3, 2025, at his home in Gujranwala district, Pakistan. Despite Ali’s horrific experience, his friends say they want to try getting to Europe.
In this image taken from video, Amir Ali, second from right, rests as friends look at his injured foot on Feb. 3, 2025, at his home in Gujranwala district, Pakistan. Despite Ali’s horrific experience, his friends say they want to try getting to Europe.

“Why should I lie?” said Tariq Bajwa, who supports his young sons’ plan to head to Europe illegally in a few years. “Looking at others, we are willing to try as well.”

Several young men in the room agreed.

Why Europe? “Just because,” said Hamza Qayyum, the son of a farmer. “There’s farming in Europe. I don’t feel like doing it here,” the 20-year-old with a sixth-grade education explained.

Asked if they would risk drowning in the sea, Muhammad Zohaib, whose brothers work in the Middle East asked, “Why not?”

“Planes crash too, so what’s the big deal if a boat sinks?” the 20-something said. “One can run into an accident right outside the house.”


Dying to Leave: Why Pakistanis are Risking Their Lives to Reach Europe (Feb. 25, 2025)

Maddow Breaks Ranks, Calls Out MSNBC’s Diversity Problem


“I Do Not Defend It”: Maddow Slams Network Over Firing of Non-White Hosts

New York, N.Y. – In a stunning display of solidarity, MSNBC‘s primetime star Rachel Maddow publicly criticized her own network for its recent decision to cancel the shows of two non-white hosts, Joy Reid and Alex Wagner. Maddow’s remarks came on the heels of Reid’s final broadcast of “The ReidOut” and the announcement that Wagner would not be returning to host the 9 p.m. hour on weeknights after Maddow’s show.

“That feels indefensible, and I do not defend it,” Maddow stated emphatically during her broadcast. Her comments, unexpected and pointed, immediately reverberated across social media and within the news industry.

The cancellations have sparked internal and external criticism, raising questions about MSNBC‘s commitment to diversity in its primetime lineup. Reid, who has hosted “The ReidOut” since 2020, has been a prominent voice on the network, known for her sharp commentary and insightful analysis of political and social issues. Wagner, who filled in for Maddow on several occasions and hosted her own show, was also a rising star at the network.

Maddow’s public rebuke of her employer is a rare and significant move

While the specific reasons behind the cancellations remain undisclosed by MSNBC, Maddow‘s strong words suggest a deep concern about the network’s direction. Her statement has amplified the voices of those who believe the network’s actions undermine its stated commitment to diversity and inclusion.

The timing of Maddow‘s comments, directly following Reid‘s emotional farewell to viewers, added weight to her message. Reid, during her final show, thanked her team and viewers for their support and emphasized the importance of diverse voices in media.

The future of MSNBC’sprimetime lineup and the network’s response to the criticism remain to be seen. Maddow‘s unprecedented public stance has undoubtedly put pressure on network executives to address the concerns raised and to reaffirm their commitment to showcasing a diverse range of perspectives. The incident has also ignited a broader conversation about representation and inclusivity within the media landscape.

Maddow Breaks Ranks, Calls Out MSNBC’s Diversity Problem (Feb. 24, 2025)


#MSNBC #RachelMaddow #JoyReid #AlexWagner #DiversityInMedia #MediaRepresentation #Woke #Journalism #News #CancelCulture #CorporateMedia #SpeakUp #Solidarity

Beyond Belief: Finding Meaning in a Seemingly Meaningless World


Navigating Existentialism, Nihilism, and Absurdism

New York, N.Y. — In a world increasingly defined by rigid ideologies and polarizing labels, the search for personal meaning can feel like navigating a minefield.

Raised in the Episcopal tradition, I found myself increasingly alienated from the tenets of Judeo-Christianity. The inherent contradictions, the reliance on blind faith, and the disconnect from my own lived experience created a chasm I couldn’t bridge.

Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam – each offered a different path, yet none resonated with the core of my being.

Can Life Have Meaning?

The analogy of cats watching a play has become a touchstone for me. It encapsulates the human condition in the face of the divine: we perceive fragments, glimpses of a grander design, but the true essence remains elusive.

The sheer scale of the universe, with its unfathomable number of stars dwarfing the neurons in our brains, underscores our inherent limitations.

We are tiny observers in a cosmic drama, struggling to decipher a script written in a language we barely understand.

This realization led me down the rabbit hole of existential philosophy. In my youth, Existentialism’s emphasis on individual freedom and responsibility felt empowering.

But as time passed, the weight of that freedom, the constant need to create meaning in a seemingly indifferent universe, became burdensome. Now, I find solace in Absurdism.

Existentialism

Existentialism asks: Can life have meaning? It insists we’re free to define our purpose in a world without inherent meaning. It’s empowering but daunting—Jean-Paul Sartre called it “condemned to be free.”

Nihilism

Nihilism takes a darker turn, rejecting meaning altogether. It counters with the notion that life is inherently devoid of purpose. Friedrich Nietzsche warned of its abyss, where nothing matters, not even our despair.

Absurdism

Absurdism, my current haunt, sits between them. Albert Camus, its champion, saw life as a clash between our craving for meaning and the universe’s silence. His solution? Embrace the absurd, live defiantly, find joy in the struggle—like Sisyphus rolling his boulder with a grin.

Absurdism, with its acceptance of the inherent conflict between humanity’s search for meaning and the universe’s lack thereof, feels more authentic.

It acknowledges the inherent “bullshit” of existence, the endless cycle of rituals that define our lives, from the mundane to the monumental.

By embracing the absurd, we choose to create meaning in our everyday actions, transforming life’s inherent emptiness into an opportunity for joy and human solidarity.

Absurdism walks a middle path—acknowledging both the absence of universal meaning and the importance of creating personal significance. It suggests that even if our search for meaning is, at its core, absurd, there is still profound beauty in the human experience.

We find meaning not because it exists independently, but because we invest our lives with rituals that bind us to one another.

Birth, death, morning coffee, holidays – all are rituals, attempts to impose order on chaos. And in the face of this absurdity, we can choose to find joy, to embrace the fleeting moments of connection and beauty.

But beyond these grand gestures, we can find meaning in the small, everyday acts of kindness, in the shared laughter with friends and family, in the quiet moments of contemplation. We can find joy in the rituals that bind us, in the shared human experience that transcends belief systems and political labels.

Rituals and Revelations

These rituals, while seemingly trivial, offer us a structure to our days and a framework to share with others. They become a testament to our resilience, a shared language that conveys both our struggles and our joys.

In this light, the repetitive cycle of birth, routine, and death is transformed from an existential void into a canvas upon which we paint our personal narratives.

And we hold dear to the belief that even in a world that may seem dominated by chaos and insignificance, there remains hope.

The arc of the moral universe, as Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, bends toward justice. History is replete with examples where the forces of truth and love have ultimately triumphed over tyranny and cruelty.

While despotic figures may appear invincible for a time, their reign is invariably transient. Mahatma Gandhi’s quiet determination and unwavering faith in humanity serve as powerful reminders that even the most entrenched systems of oppression are subject to change.

In the end, whether we find solace in the structured rebellion of Existentialism, the bleak clarity of Nihilism, or the ironic liberation of Absurdism, we are united by our shared search for meaning in an incomprehensible cosmos.

We may never fully grasp the grand design of the universe—if such a design exists at all—but in our collective striving, there is hope, there is love, and above all, there is life.

The search for meaning is not a linear journey. It is a winding path, fraught with doubt and uncertainty. But in embracing the absurdity of existence, in finding joy in the present moment, we can create our own meaning, our own sense of purpose. Perhaps, in the end, that is all that truly matters.


#Existentialism, #Nihilism, #Absurdism, #Philosophy, #Spirituality, #MeaningOfLife, #Humanism, #NonBeliever, #Agnostic, #Universe, #Cosmos, #Rituals, #MLK, #Gandhi, #Woke, #PersonalPhilosophy, #FindingJoy #CosmicPerspective, #NoFaith, #WokeDebate, #RitualsOfLife, #MLKQuote, #GandhiWisdom, #NewYorkLife #CosmicPerspective, #NonBeliever, #ModernPhilosophy, #Woke

Tags: Philosophy, Existentialism, Nihilism, Absurdism, Spirituality, Atheism, Agnosticism, Humanism, Personal Essay, Meaning of Life, Universe, Cosmos, Social Commentary, Absurdism, Existentialism, Nihilism, Zora Neale Hurston, philosophy, spirituality, human consciousness, universe scale, social justice, personal essay, New York, Trumpism, woke culture, MLK, Gandhi, philosophy, spirituality, nonbelief, existentialism, absurdism, modern thought, secular, cosmic, cultural commentary

Trump’s Return Upends Global Order: Return to Imperial Ambitions


From Diplomacy to Domination: Critics Decry Trump’s ‘Might Makes Right’ Worldview


Washington, D.C. — In his first month back in office, President Donald Trump has sparked international alarm by dismantling decades of U.S. foreign policy norms, reviving a 19th-century-style approach to global power that prioritizes military might, territorial expansion, and coercive diplomacy.

Analysts warn that Trump’s aggressive posturing—including threats to withdraw from NATO, impose sweeping tariffs on allies, and tacitly endorse territorial grabs by authoritarian regimes—marks a stark departure from the multilateral frameworks that have shaped international relations since World War I.

“This isn’t diplomacy; it’s a throwback to empire-building,” said Dr. Eleanor Chang, a historian at Georgetown University. “Trump is channeling an era where superpowers strong-armed weaker nations into submission, demanded tribute, and redrawn maps by force.”

Recent moves include publicly urging Russia to “do whatever it wants” to NATO members that fail to meet defense spending targets, a remark that drew bipartisan condemnation. Meanwhile, the administration has floated recognizing disputed territories annexed by authoritarian allies, a policy critics liken to legitimizing conquest.

The shift has rattled global leaders

European diplomats privately describe emergency meetings to counter Trump’s “transactional demands,” while Asian allies brace for renewed trade wars. Even within Trump’s party, skepticism simmers. “This isn’t ‘America First’—it’s chaos,” said Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT). “Abandoning alliances that stabilized the world for 100 years risks empowering China and Russia.”

Yet Trump’s base hails the strategy as a long-overdue rejection of globalism.

“Why should we bankroll Europe’s defense or let Mexico benefit from our markets for free?” said Mark Harris, a Trump campaign advisor. “The president’s saying what no leader’s had the guts to: power rules, and America’s done playing nice.”

Trump’s Return Upends Global Order: Return to Imperial Ambitions (Feb. 23, 2025)


#TrumpDoctrine, #GlobalShift, #PowerPolitics, #ForeignPolicyUpheaval, #NewWorldOrder, #EmpireEra, #DiplomaticChaos


Tags: U.S. Foreign Policy, Trump Administration, Global Power Dynamics, NATO, International Relations, Imperialism, Geopolitical Strategy, Multilateralism

Power, Politics, Cyber Warfare: Zero Day is TV’s Smartest Thriller


Robert De Niro Shines in Netflix’s “Zero Day”—A Must-Watch Political Drama

New York, N.Y. Netflix’s latest limited series, Zero Day, starring the legendary Robert De Niro, is an absolute knockout. Released February 20, 2025, this political thriller grips you from the very first frame and refuses to let go. It’s intense, intelligent, and incredibly well-crafted—a must-watch for anyone who craves drama with substance.

De Niro delivers a powerhouse performance as George Mullen, a former U.S. president pulled back into action to counter a devastating cyberattack. His portrayal feels like a fascinating blend of Barack Obamas calm, calculated charisma and Bill Clinton’s crisis-handling charm and grit. He embodies a leader who seems both familiar and elusive, making Mullen a character you can’t take your eyes off.

Adding to the intrigue is the current president, Angela Bassett plays the president with a presence striking a mix of Michelle Obama’s poise and moral conviction with Joe Biden’s seasoned, steady leadership. She exudes resilience, a leader who’s weathered political storms and still stands firm.

Meanwhile, Matthew Modine plays the Speaker of the House practically channels Mitch McConnell, with the same shadowy, calculating demeanor that makes you question every move he makes. The casting (or perhaps writing) cleverly mirrors real-world political dynamics, making it all the more compelling.

Angela Bassett in Zero Day (2025). Photo by Jojo Whilden/Jojo Whilden/Netflix – © 2023 Netflix, Inc.

The series is a masterclass in tension—razor-sharp dialogue, unpredictable twists, and a relentless pace that keeps you on edge. But Zero Day isn’t just another thriller; it’s a cerebral powerhouse, tackling themes of power, technology, and human nature in ways that feel eerily relevant. It is a commentary on the political status of 2025.

Robert De Niro, Jesse Plemons, and Cuyle Carvin in Zero Day (2025). Photo by Jojo Whilden/Jojo Whilden/Netflix – © 2024 Netflix, Inc.

This is truly television at its finest—a show that respects its audience’s intelligence and delivers a gripping, thought-provoking experience. If you’re searching for a binge-worthy series that stimulates both your mind and your adrenaline, Zero Day is it. Five stars, without hesitation.


#ZeroDayNetflix #RobertDeNiro #PoliticalThriller #CyberWarfare #NetflixSeries #MustWatch #TVReview #JimLuceReviews #PowerAndPolitics #SmartTV #BingeWorthy #StreamingNow #TechVsPower


@Netflix @RobertDeNiroOfficial @NetflixFilm @NetflixOriginals

Power, Politics, Cyber Warfare: Zero Day is TV’s Smartest Thriller (Feb. 23, 2025)

Choosing Sobriety Amidst the Pandemic: A Personal Journey


Five Years Ago: From Hospitalization to Healing: Embracing an Alcohol-Free Life During COVID-19

New York,. N.Y. — In late February 2020, as winter’s chill still gripped New York City, I found myself grappling with an unrelenting fever, persistent cough, and overwhelming fatigue. The city’s first official COVID-19 case was yet to be announced, but the virus was already silently weaving its way through our lives.

On February 24, my symptoms escalated to the point where I could barely muster the strength to climb the subway stairs leading to Lenox Hill Hospital’s emergency room.

Upon arrival, I was met with a medical community unprepared for the invisible threat.

Despite my evident distress and the emerging reports of COVID-19 cases in cities like Seattle and Boston, the prevailing belief was that the virus hadn’t reached New York City. Consequently, the medical staff, constrained by limited testing capabilities and strict guidelines, declined to test me for COVID-19.

Instead, they administered a regimen of antibiotics, provided oxygen support, and hydrated me intravenously over the course of eight hours before discharging me.

As part of my treatment plan, I was prescribed medications that necessitated abstaining from alcohol. At that time, drinking was a regular part of my routine, a social lubricant that seamlessly integrated into my interactions and personal habits. However, faced with the immediate need to prioritize my health, I made the conscious decision to cease alcohol consumption entirely.

The initial days of sobriety were challenging. Alcohol had been a familiar companion, a means to unwind after demanding days and a fixture in social gatherings. Its sudden absence left a palpable void, both physically and emotionally. Yet, as days turned into weeks, I began to notice subtle but significant changes. My mind felt clearer, my energy levels more consistent, and a sense of resilience started to take root.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic brought about unprecedented changes to daily life.

Social distancing measures, remote work, and the closure of public venues drastically altered the social landscape. In this new context, the temptation to drink diminished. Virtual gatherings replaced in-person meetups, and the usual triggers associated with social drinking were no longer present. This shift provided a unique opportunity to redefine my relationship with alcohol without the usual societal pressures.

As I navigated this journey, I became increasingly aware of the broader health implications of alcohol consumption, especially in the context of a global pandemic. Research indicates that alcohol can weaken the immune system, potentially exacerbating the severity of infections like COVID-19 and prolonging recovery times. This knowledge reinforced my commitment to sobriety, as I recognized that abstaining from alcohol was a tangible way to support my body’s ability to heal and protect itself.

Reflecting on my social circles, particularly within the vibrant Asian communities in Queens, I observed a collective reevaluation of drinking habits. The pandemic prompted many to prioritize health and well-being, leading to a noticeable decline in social drinking. This communal shift not only provided additional support for my personal decision but also fostered a shared sense of resilience and mutual care.

In the years following my hospitalization, the choice to remain alcohol-free has yielded profound benefits. Physically, I’ve experienced improved sleep, better concentration, and a general sense of vitality that had been dulled by regular drinking. Emotionally, I’ve cultivated healthier coping mechanisms, relying on mindfulness practices, physical activity, and meaningful connections to navigate stress and uncertainty.

Moreover, my decision aligns with a broader societal trend.

Recent studies have shown that alcohol consumption has been declining, particularly among younger adults. This shift is attributed to a growing awareness of health and wellness, as well as changing social norms that increasingly support sober lifestyles. The emergence of alcohol-free social spaces and events has further validated the choice to abstain, offering inclusive environments where the focus is on connection rather than consumption.

My unexpected encounter with COVID-19 in February 2020 served as a catalyst for a significant lifestyle change. What began as a medically necessitated break from alcohol evolved into a deliberate and empowering commitment to sobriety.

This journey has not only enhanced my physical health but also enriched my emotional well-being and social connections. Embracing a life without alcohol has been a transformative experience, one that I carry forward with gratitude and a renewed sense of purpose.


#SobrietyJourney, #PandemicRecovery, #SoberLife, #HealthOverAlcohol, #COVID19Sobriety, #SoberInTheCity, #RecoveryIsPossible, #AlcoholFreeLiving, #SoberCommunity, #WellnessWarrior

SoberNation, RecoveryTodayMag, TheFix, SoberGrid, Soberistas, AddictionCenter, SMARTRecovery, SoberEvolution, SheRecovers, ThisNakedMind

Rails to Roads: Corporate Conspiracy Shaped America’s Cities


Tracks were ripped up overnight, power lines scrapped, and streetcars replaced with buses

Los Angeles, CA — Think Los Angeles chose cars over trains? Think again. As Russell Mokhiber revealed in Corporate Crime and Violence, the city’s world-class electric train system—once the largest globally, linking 56 towns and carrying 80 million passengers yearly—wasn’t abandoned by public choice but dismantled by corporate design.

Before World War II, streetcars and brollies crisscrossed nearly every U.S. city, many owned by electric utilities to boost power sales. But in 1935, Congress’s antitrust laws forced these companies to sell off transit holdings amid the Great Depression. Enter General Motors (GM), desperate to revive auto sales. Mokhiber writes, “GM knew that without efficient rail systems, city-dwellers would need alternatives—so they set out to destroy them.”

In 1932, GM launched United Cities Motor Transit (UCMT), buying and converting rail lines to buses in Ohio and Michigan, then mandating GM-only purchases upon resale.

After a failed attempt in Portland—thwarted by the American Transit Association—GM pivoted. Partnering with Omnibus Corporation, it gutted New York’s massive trolley network in just 18 months.

By 1937, GM escalated nationwide, using National City Lines (NCL) as a front. Joined by Greyhound, Firestone, Standard Oil, Phillips Petroleum, and Mack Manufacturing, NCL raised $10 million to buy and dismantle transit systems in over 45 cities—New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Los Angeles among them.

Tracks were ripped up overnight, power lines scrapped, and streetcars replaced with buses. By war’s end, NCL had slashed a 40,000-strong streetcar fleet to 5,000.

Suspicion mounted. Internal documents later revealed the companies anticipated losses on NCL but banked on future profits from bus sales. Contracts locked transit firms into buying only from investors, banning electric streetcars. In 1949, a federal court convicted GM and its partners of antitrust violations under the Sherman Act. The punishment? A mere $5,000 fine per company, with guilty executives paying $1 each.

Mokhiber’s verdict is stark: “The people of L.A. had no say.” Once the rails were gone, the conspirators dumped their stocks, leaving cities car-dependent and smog-choked—a legacy still felt today.

Rails to Roads: Corporate Conspiracy Shaped America’s Cities (Feb. 23, 2025)


#MassTransit, #GMConspiracy, #Streetcars, #NationalCityLines, #CorporateGreed, #LAHistory, #Antitrust, #UrbanPlanning, #BigOil, #TransportationHistory

RAdm. Luce on Cdre. Biddle’s Failed Visit to Japan Before Cdre. Perry


Little did we suspect that, under this dignified bearing and polished manner, lay concealed the military spirit of one of the most warlike races of all time.

Color lithograph: Passing the Rubicon. Lieut. S. Bent in the Mississippi’s first cutter forcing his way through a fleet of Japanese boats while surveying the Bay of Yedo, Japan, July 1853.

Washington, D.C. Wikipedia writes in it’s entry on the U.S.S. Columbus, “After embarking Commodore James Biddle, Commander, East India Squadron, she sailed on 4 June 1845 for Canton, China, where on 31 December Commodore Biddle exchanged ratified copies of the first American commercial treaty with China. Columbus remained there until April 1846, when she sailed for Japan to attempt opening that country to American commerce. She raised Uraga Channel on 19 July in company with Vincennes, but achieved no success.”

The truth is that the mission was an utter failure. The U.S.S. Columbus and its companion ship U.S.S. Vincennes were immediately surrounded by dozens of Japanese boats when they entered Tokyo Harbor, then called Edo Bay as well as Yeddo Bay. It took a month for their written request to the Emperor to open commerce between Japan and America to reach him and return an answer. The answer was no. All commerce, he stated, was between Japan and the Dutch only – and solely conducted through the harbor village of Nagasaki far to the south of Tokyo (Edo). The two ships were then escorted with over 100 Japanese boats back out to sea.

Seven years later Commander Matthew Calbraith Perry. Perry, like his predecessor, sailed direct to Yedo Bay to carry on negotiations, but, unlike Biddle, he adopted an extremely formal tone, allowing no Japanese except officials of considerable rank on board and refusing audience to any below the grade of cabinet minister. Perry’s exclusiveness and great formality encouraged the Japanese to open their “hermit kingdom’ to the United States, ending the Meiji Era and isolation.

Tokugawa Yoshinobu leaving for Edo (today’s Tokyo).

U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Stephen Bleecker Luce, founder of the Naval War College, wrote in the Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute, Annapolis (vol. xxxi-31, 1905) about his 1846 voyage as a midshipman in his youth with Commodore James Biddle to Edo Bay — modern Tokyo — seven years before Admiral Perry‘s better known voyage that opened Japan and ended the feudal era there in 1853.

Commodore Luce wrote,

“The influence of the West upon the ancient civilization of Japan, and the phenomenal progress made by that country toward becoming a formidable naval power, furnishes one of the most remarkable epochs of modern times.”

Luce continued, “Any account, however dry and meagre, detailing the earlier steps taken by the government of the United States to cultivate friendly relations with that wonderful country must prove of more or less interest.

“As far as can be ascertained from official sources the question of the United States government opening communication with Japan with a view to negotiating a treaty of commerce originated with Mr. Caleb Cushing, one of the most eminent jurists and scholars of his day.

“In 1843, Mr. Cushing was appointed commissioner to China and negotiated the first treaty between the United States and that Empire.

“During his sojourn in China Mr. Cushing conceived the idea that Japan might be induced to follow the example of China and throw open her ports to American commerce. His views on the subject were communicated to the President.

“In answer to his letter he received the following reply from the Secretary of State, Mr. John C. Calhoun, under date of August, 1844:

“The President has taken into consideration your suggestion in your private letter to him, of the propriety of giving you authority to treat with Japan should an opportunity offer. It is apprehended that little probability exists of effecting any commercial arrangements with that country, but as you think it may possibly be accomplished, a full power to treat with the Japanese authorities is herewith transmitted to you in accordance with your desire.”

“…The U.S.S. Columbus, a ship of the line, and one of the largest and finest vessels of war known to the maritime world of that day, was to take passage to China. The Columbus… bore the broad pennant of Commodore James Biddle, U.S. Navy, a distinguished veteran of the War of 1812.

The instructions to Commodore Biddle went on to say: “In an especial manner you will take the utmost care to ascertain if the ports of Japan are accessible. Should (you) incline to make the effort of gaining access there, you will hold your squadron … for that purpose. If you see fit, persevere in the design, yet not in such a manner as to excite a hostile feeling, or a distrust of the government of the United States.”

“One can scarcely fail to note the very friendly attitude towards Japan assumed by the United States government on this occasion.

Commodore Biddle was careful to carry out the spirit of the instructions, and from his report to his government it may be readily seen that by his courtesy and conciliatory bearing towards the Japanese officials a most favorable impression was made and one which could not fail of predisposing them to look with favor on those Americans who might subsequently visit Japan.

“The Columbus, accompanied by the Vincennes, Captain Hiram Paulding, sailed from the Chusan Islands, China on the 7th of July, 1846, and on the 20th anchored in Jeddo Bay. Before reaching the anchorage a Japanese officer, accompanied by a Dutch interpreter, came on board the Columbus to inquire as to the object of the ships visiting Japan.

[Editor’s note: Of course, the Dutch wanted no competition for the Japan trade and yet the Dutch were the ones translating the American diplomatic offer.]

“He was informed by Commodore Biddle that he came as a friend to ascertain whether Japan had, like China, opened her ports to foreign trade, and, if she had, to arrange by treaty the conditions on which American vessels might trade with Japan. The officer requested that this answer might be put in writing, which was done.

“On anchoring, the ships were at once surrounded by a vast number of armed boats. The ship was soon thronged with Japanese visitors. They were permitted to come on board in large numbers, that all might be convinced of our friendly disposition. Permission to land was denied. We did not land, nor was any attempt made to disregard the wishes of the local authorities.

“The morning following our arrival a Japanese officer, apparently of higher rank than the one of the preceding day, came on board. He stated that foreign ships, upon entering Japanese ports, always landed their guns. He was told that it was impossible for us to do so, to which was added the assurance that we were peaceably disposed.

“He then informed the Commodore that his letter of the previous day had been transmitted to the Emperor, who was at some distance from Jeddo, and that an answer would be received in five or six days. Upon being asked why we were surrounded by so many boats he replied “that they might be ready in case we wanted them to tow the ship.”

“This was a mere subterfuge. The real reason was to prevent us from communicating with the shore. When our boats were sent out to take soundings at some distance from the ships Japanese boats followed, without, however, attempting to molest them. During our entire stay these boats continued about the ships day and night.


Pictorial record of U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry’s second visit to Japan in 1854. Ink, colour, gold and silver pigment on paper (絵巻説明書).

“On the 27th a Japanese official of rank, accompanied by a suite of eight persons, came on board with the Emperor‘s answer, which, as translated by the interpreter, ran as follows:

“According to Japanese laws, the Japanese may not trade except with the Dutch and Chinese. It will not be allowed that America make a treaty with Japan or trade with her, as the same is not allowed to any other nation.

“Concerning strange lands, all things are fixed at Nagasaki, not here in the bay; therefore you must depart as quickly as possible and not come any more in Japan.”

“The officer was informed that the United States wished to make a treaty of commerce with Japan, but not unless Japan also wished a treaty. Having ascertained that Japan was not ready to open her ports to foreign trade, the officer was further informed that the ships would sail the following day.

“On the 29th of July, both ships got under way. As the wind was very light the Japanese boats took our lines to tow us out. Drawings were made of the ships as they appeared at anchor and while being towed out. On reaching the United States these drawings were lithographed. Two of these are now in my possession. Quite recently I had them photographed and copies sent through the usual official channels to the Japanese government. The receipt of the photographs was promptly and politely acknowledged by the Secretary of the Imperial Navy of Japan.


The USS Columbus (1819) and a crewman in Edo Bay in 1846.

“Attached to each picture is the following legend:

“On the 20th of July, 1846, United States Ships Columbus, 80 guns, and Vincennes, 20 guns, entered the bay of Jeddo, or as the Japanese call it Yeddo. The ships stood well up the bay until the Japanese who had come on board motioned that they must not proceed further, and the Commodore, not wishing to give offence, anchored abreast a village, and about three miles from the shore.

As soon as the ships anchored they were surrounded by a large number of boats, from whose warlike appearance much difficulty was not anticipated. Shortly after the sails were furled the commanders were politely requested to land their guns, ammunition, muskets, and everything in the shape of a weapon, which request was as politely refused.

“The anchorage was about fifteen miles to the south and east of Yeddo, which was hidden by a high point of land making out into the bay. The country around was beautifully green, and the fields, as well as could be distinguished from the ships, were in fine order, and to all appearance well cultivated. No person was allowed to land, and boats passing between one ship and the other were always followed by at least four Japanese armed boats to prevent their landing; and therefore there was no good opportunity of judging as to what the real state of the country might be.

“The visit altogether was one of the most novel kind. The people were polite, amiable, and exceedingly jealous of their customs, and adhered strictly to the long established one of not receiving the slightest remuneration for anything that they gave. The visitors were politely informed that as soon as their wants were made known they would be attended to, and that done they were desired to leave and never return again. The ships sailed from there on the twenty-ninth, after an interesting stay of nine days, during which time hundreds of Japanese visited the ships, and to hasten their departure formed a line of several hundred boats to tow the vessels out to sea, and left rejoicing that they had rid themselves so easily of such a number of barbarians.

“To Commodore James Biddle, this view of the Columbus and Vincennes in Japan is respectfully dedicated by S. F. Rosser.”

Such is the history, in brief, of the effort of the United States government to negotiate a treaty of commerce with Japan previous to the visit, some seven years later, of Commodore Perry.

“There can be no doubt but that the interchange of civilities between Commodore Biddle and his officers, and the Japanese officials and the total absence on the part of the American officers of any hostile intention, must have impressed the Japanese officials with our friendly disposition and disposed them to receive with favor the overtures of the American officers who visited Japan a few years later.

“My interest in the events just recited lies not merely in the fact that I was one of the junior officers of the Columbus, and to this day retain a vivid impression of the dignified bearing of the Japanese officials, their affability and polished manners; but in my desire that, in any history of modern Japan that may be written, due recognition be given to the able and tactful manner in which the negotiations referred to were conducted by the distinguished officer under whom I had the honor to serve.


“A little incident in this connection may not be altogether out of place here.

“A few years ago, while in Washington, and wishing to see the Washington correspondent of the New York Herald, I was directed to his office on Fifteenth Street. On presenting my card, the gentleman at the desk looked up and asked: “Are you Stephen B. Luce?” I said that that was my name. He then asked: “Were you a midshipman on board the Columbus during her cruise around the world ? ” On my replying in the affirmative, “Well,” said he, “I am Charles Nordhoff; and I was a powder-boy in Lieutenant Percival Drayton‘s division and you were a midshipman in the same division.” Tableau!

Charles Nordhoff was, in some respects, a remarkable man. An omnivorous reader from early youth, particularly of works of travel and including such books as the novels of Cooper and Marryat, he soon became possessed of the idea of going to sea. He said of himself: “Sleeping or waking, I thought of nothing but the sea, ships and sailors, and the wonders of foreign lands.”

“About this time,” he writes (March, 1845), “a paragraph went the rounds of the press to the effect that the United States Ship Columbus, of seventy-four guns, had just been put in commission under the command of Commodore Biddle and would shortly proceed on a voyage to China and Japan, making some stay in the East Indian seas, and, finally, return by way of Cape Horn, thus circumnavigating the globe.”

“Fired with the idea of availing himself of such a good opportunity of seeing the world he at once applied at the naval rendezvous, but being a minor, and a very small one at that, his request to be “shipped” was peremptorily refused. He was not to be deterred, however. Through the influence of Mr. Lewis C. Levin, editor of the Philadelphia Daily Sun, in whose office he was then employed, an order for his enlistment was procured from Commodore Jesse D. Elliott, then in command of the Navy Yard, Philadelphia, and, at the age of fourteen, he was forthwith shipped as a “first-class” boy for general service, on board the U.S. Receiving Ship Experiment, then lying off the Navy Yard.

From the Experiment he was soon sent with a draft of seamen to New York as part of the crew of the Columbus, 74, then fitting out for the China station, as already stated. A few years after the expiration of that cruise, Mr. Nordhoff published his first book, Man-of-war Life: A boy’s experience in the United States Navy. In this little book is given a history of the cruise of the Columbus, including such an intelligent and appreciative account of our visit to Japan, that I take leave to transcribe a portion of it, showing, as it does, how our strange visitors were regarded from the “bluejacket” point of view.

“we were forced to admit that the JAPANESe were a far better developed race, both mentally and physically, than we had met with since leaving the United States.” * *

“A nobler or more intelligent looking set of men than were those of the better class that we saw, it would be difficult to conceive of.

“There was not one, old or young, whose appearance would not command respect in any society.

“Their frank and open countenances, their marked politeness towards each other, and towards us, strangers, as well as degree of intelligence , prepossessed all hands greatly in their favor.”

“During our stay in Yeddo Bay,” he writes, “great numbers (of the Japanese) visited the ship, our decks being crowded each day with men of all ranks; but no ladies made their appearance. Judging of the people generally, from the specimens which came under our observation, we were forced to admit that they were a far better developed race, both mentally and physically, than we had met with since leaving the United States.” * *

“A nobler or more intelligent looking set of men than were those of the better class that we saw, it would be difficult to conceive of. There was not one, old or young, whose appearance would not command respect in any society.” * * * “Their frank and open countenances, their marked politeness towards each other, and towards us, strangers, as well as the degree of intelligence evinced in their observations on all they saw on board, prepossessed all hands greatly in their favor.”


“Little did we suspect that, under this dignified bearing and polished manner,
lay concealed the military spirit of one of the most warlike races of all time.


Commander Luce Recounts Little Know Story of Japanese American Translator, Samurai Nakahama Manjiro

The description from which the above extract is taken, together with the sketches of Eastley, and the drawings of Rosser, all three enlisted men, are the only accounts, as far as known, of that singularly interesting visit, saving the official report of Commodore Biddle. Of the midshipman and the powder-boy, the latter was, by far, the more apt scholar. Of the officers of the two ships I believe I am the sole survivor.

“One of the many difficulties under which Commodore Biddle labored, in carrying on negotiations, was the absence of a good interpreter. A Dutchman whose knowledge of English was very imperfect was the only medium of communication. Not so with Commodore Perry. Prof. John S. Sewall, who was on board the U.S.S. Saratoga, one of Commodore Perry’s squadron, has given such a very interesting account of the interpreter, Nakahama Manjiro, that I cannot resist the temptation to reproduce it in full.

Japanese warship Hōō Maru (Hou-Ou Maru). 1855 painting. This is Japan’s first domestic sailing ship. In addition to the Hinomaru flag, the black line in the white sail is the banner of the Tokugawa Shogunate.

“Meanwhile, as in all historical movements,” he writes, “other influences were at work behind the scenes. It was only another part of the mystery brooding over this strange land that things we did not suspect should be working for us in the dark. Not till years after did it transpire what an unknown friend the American fleet had in Nakahama Manjiro.

“The story of this young Japanese waif reads like a romance. In 1838, while out fishing with two other boys, their boat was carried out to sea by the current and wrecked on a desolate island. Here they lived a Robinson Crusoe life for half a year, and were then picked off by an American whaler and carried into Honolulu.

Nakahama remained with his new friends, acquired the language, and ultimately reaching the United States, received an education. Another whaling voyage, a visit to the California mines, and he was back in Honolulu, anxious to re-visit the scenes of his childhood. Nothing could deter him; the representations of his friend, Dr. Damon—the distance and perils of the way, the risk of being beheaded for his pains in case he should succeed—no argument or obstacle could stand for a moment before his unutterable longing for home.

“Dr. Damon set to work; and in due time Nakahama and his two companions, now grown from lads to young men of twenty-five, were equipped with a whaleboat, a compass, a Bowditch’s Navigator, and a sack of hard bread, and were put on board an American merchantman bound for Shanghai. A few miles from Lu-Chu (Liu-Kiu) they and their whaleboat were launched and committed to the waves. A hard day’s rowing brought them to the shore.

“Six months later they were forwarded in a trading junk to Japan. They did not land with impunity. An imprisonment of nearly three years was needed, before the authorities could decide whether it was a capital crime to be blown off the coast in boyhood and return in manhood. The year 1853 came round. The great Expedition (Commodore Perry’s) had come and gone, and was to come again. Here was a prisoner in their dungeons who had actually lived in the country of the western barbarians, spoke their language, and knew their ways. It would not be wise to behead such an expert. Let him come to court, and tell us what he knows.

“He was summoned accordingly, and the court made large drafts upon his stores of information. From a prisoner he was transformed into a noble, elevated to the rank of the Samurai, and decorated with the two swords. His whaleboat was made the parent of a whole fleet of boats constructed exactly like it, even to the utmost rivet. His Bowditch’s Navigator he was required to translate; and a corps of native scribes under his direction made some twenty copies of it for use in the Samurai. One of these copies Samurai afterwards gave to his friend, Dr. Damon, and it was on exhibition at the Samurai in Philadelphia in 1876.

“Dr. Damon had often inquired after the three adventurers, but had never learned their fate. Years after the treaty had been signed, a fine Japanese man-of-war, the Kan-Rin-Maru, anchored in the harbor of Honolulu, and the commander came on shore to call on Dr. Damon. It was no other than Nakahama, now an officer of high rank in the Japanese navy. The mutual inquiries and explanations can be imagined.

“Where were you at the time of the Expedition?” asked Dr. Damon. “I was in a room adjoining that in which the interview took place between Commodore Perry and the Imperial commissioners. I was not allowed to see, or to communicate with, any of the Americans; but each document sent by Commodore Perry was passed to me to be translated into Japanese before it was sent to the Imperial authorities; and the replies thereto were likewise submitted to me to be translated into English before they went to Commodore Perry.”

Nakahama was more than interpreter. His knowledge did not stop with the mere idioms of the language. He knew the American people, their ways, their manner of life, their wealth and commerce, the magnitude of their country, their power and national prestige. He was the divinely appointed channel through which American ideas naturally flowed into Japan. A mind endowed with faith can easily recognize a plan and purpose in the whole training of Nakahama, from the moment when he was driven from his country by what appeared to be only accident. It was a case of providential selection.”

RAdm. Luce on Cdre. Biddle’s Failed Visit to Japan Before Cdre. Perry (Feb. 23, 2025)

#RAdmLuce, #CdreBiddle, #CdrePerry, #USNavyHistory, #EdoBay, #Japan1853, #NavalDiplomacy, #MeijiEra, #USSColumbus, #AmericanExpansion


See also

Japan Closes Port to Biddle, Luce in 1845; Opens to Perry in 1854 (J. Luce, June 28, 2018)

Legacy and Poetry of Victorian-era Nancy Luce, of Martha’s Vineyard

Early animal activist wrote:
Consider how you would feel yourselves to be crueled. The greatest sin is to cruel the poor harmless dumb creatures. They cannot speak, nor help themselves.

From Complete Edition of the Works of Nancy Luce (1875), published by Luce Publications

New York, N.Y. Nancy Luce, a reclusive Victorian-era poet from West Tisbury, lived a life marked by solitude, chronic illness, and an extraordinary affection for her bantam hens. Once a misunderstood figure on Martha’s Vineyard, she eked out a modest living by selling self-penned poetry booklets to Methodist tourists visiting the island.

Today, her story has found a warm reception among locals. Her grave, adorned with chicken figurines, draws visitors, and the annual Nancy Luce Day has become a beloved tradition. Yet, amid this appreciation, her poetic works have largely escaped serious study.

Susan Johnson, a Martha’s Vineyard resident and recent master’s graduate from Northeastern University, seeks to change that. Her thesis, which examines Luce’s “Hen-Elegies,” offers the first scholarly dive into the poet’s artistry. “So much focus has been on her quirks or her role as a creative woman in a tough era,” Johnson explains. “But her poems deserve respect as art, not just footnotes to her eccentricity.”

Johnson’s work, titled Reading the Laments and Hen-Elegies of Nancy Luce: Labor, Duty, and the Power of Words, explores the poet’s writings on their own merits. For Johnson, a lifelong island artist, the project caps years of academic exploration and a personal connection to Luce’s creative spirit.

Johnson’s own path mirrors Luce’s in some ways. She began as a painter, trained at the Pratt Institute, and sold her artwork at the Chilmark Flea Market upon returning to the Vineyard. “I saw myself in her,” she says. “She was an entrepreneur, using her talents to survive.” After years studying philosophy, visual arts, and English in graduate programs, Johnson turned to Luce’s poetry. An earlier project analyzing Monet’s water lilies through a philosophical lens shaped her approach. “I love uncovering the vitality beneath familiar surfaces,” she notes. A visit to Luce’s grave sealed her resolve: “I told her I’d do this for her—and I did.”

In her analysis, Johnson frames Luce’s poems as laments, akin to the Psalms she likely knew well. These verses catalog Luce’s struggles—illness, isolation, and the devastating loss of her hens. In one poem, Trouble, Luce writes of neighbors who ignored her plight: “They never came to help in my sickness or ease my troubles… it wore me down, body and soul.” Johnson highlights the rhythm in these lines, seeing them as more than complaints. “Lament lets her turn pain into something brighter through her craft,” she says.

Johnson’s thesis also traces possible influences on Luce, from religious traditions to the domestic imagery woven into her work. She considers how the Vineyard’s shift from a quiet rural community to a tourist hub shaped Luce’s life. “The market went from spiritual seekers to sightseers chasing curiosities,” Johnson observes. “That’s a unique tension here.”

Now back on the island after earning her degree, Johnson teaches in the high school’s special education program. Her studies of language, perception, and Vineyard life inform her work. “I’m putting theory into practice,” she says. “It’s rewarding to bring what I’ve learned out into the world.”

Nancy Luce’s afterlife on Martha’s Vineyard thrives through chicken statues and festivals, but Johnson’s scholarship invites a deeper look—at a poet whose words, born of hardship, still echo with transformative power.


#NancyLuce, #MarthaVineyard, #HenElegies, #FolkPoetry, #VictorianEra, #WomenWriters, #IslandHistory, #SusanJohnson, #PoetryScholarship, #CreativeLegacy


Legacy and Poetry of Victorian-era Nancy Luce, of Martha’s Vineyard (Feb. 23, 2025)

Rolling the Boulder: What Camus Teaches Modern Change-Makers


What Young Global Leaders Can Learn from Albert Camus:

Leadership isn’t just Sacrifice—it’s also about Sustaining Passion and Hope

Leadership isn’t about sainthoodbut striving despite flaws and evolving


ParisAlbert Camus (1913–1960), the French-Algerian philosopher, novelist, and Nobel laureate, remains a towering figure in 20th-century thought. Known for his existentialist and absurdist writings—like The Stranger, The Myth of Sisyphus, and The PlagueCamus grappled with life’s deepest questions: the search for meaning in a seemingly indifferent universe, the ethics of rebellion, and the resilience required to face suffering.

For Young Global Leaders (YGLs)—a cohort of innovative thinkers and change-makers under the banner of both the World Economic Forum and J. Luce FoundationCamus offers timeless lessons. His philosophy, rooted in courage, compassion, and clarity, provides a roadmap for navigating today’s complex, often absurd global landscape.

Embracing the Absurd Without Despair

Camus famously articulated the absurd: the tension between humanity’s desire for meaning and the universe’s silence. In The Myth of Sisyphus, he imagines Sisyphus, condemned to roll a boulder uphill only for it to tumble back down, as a symbol of this struggle. Yet Camus rejects nihilism, urging us to live defiantly in the absurd’s shadow.

For YGLs tackling climate crises, geopolitical instability, or technological disruption, this mindset is invaluable. The world’s problems may feel Sisyphean—endless and unyielding—but Camus teaches that meaning emerges not from solving everything but from persistent effort. Luce Leaders can inspire action not by promising utopia, but by embracing reality’s messiness and forging ahead with purpose.

Rebellion with Integrity

In The Rebel, Camus explores chttp://rebellion as a constructive act—not blind destruction, but a refusal to accept injustice coupled with a commitment to human dignity. He critiqued both oppressive systems and the excesses of revolutionaries, advocating a balanced defiance.

YGLs, often at the forefront of social and economic transformation, can draw from this. Whether challenging corporate greed or authoritarian regimes, Camus reminds them to ground their rebellion in ethics, not ideology. A tech innovator disrupting outdated industries, for instance, must weigh profit against societal good, ensuring their rebellion builds rather than breaks communities.

Solidarity in Crisis

Camus’s novel The Plague allegorizes human resilience amid calamity. In the quarantined town of Oran, characters like Dr. Rieux fight a relentless disease not out of heroism, but out of duty to their fellow humans. Today’s leaders face metaphorical plagues—pandemics, inequality, misinformation—and Camus’ call to solidarity resonates.

YGLs can learn to prioritize collective well-being over individual gain, fostering collaboration across borders and sectors. A biotech founder developing affordable vaccines or an activist amplifying marginalized voices echoes Rieux’s quiet, steadfast compassion. Camus shows that leadership in crisis isn’t about grand gestures but consistent, unglamorous effort.

Rejecting Extremes

Camus’ life was marked by his refusal to align with dogmatic camps. During the Cold War, he criticized both Soviet authoritarianism and Western complacency, earning enemies on all sides. His fallout with Jean-Paul Sartre over communism underscored his independence—he valued truth over tribalism.

For YGLs navigating polarized debates—be it climate policy or AI ethics—this is a clarion call. Leadership demands rejecting binary thinking and seeking nuanced solutions. A policymaker crafting regulations for AI, for example, might balance innovation with accountability, avoiding the extremes of laissez-faire or overreach. Camusintegrity offers a model for staying principled amid pressure.

Image by United Press International, via Wikimedia Commons.

Living Authentically

In The Stranger, Meursault’s detached honesty—however alienating—reflects Camus’ emphasis on authenticity. He believed in living true to one’s values, even when society demands conformity.

YGLs, often under scrutiny in high-stakes roles, face similar tests. The pressure to appease stakeholders or chase trends can erode personal conviction, but Camus urges leaders to anchor themselves in what matters.

An entrepreneur might forgo a lucrative but unethical deal, or a diplomat might speak candidly against a popular but flawed policy. Authenticity builds trust—a currency more enduring than fleeting applause.

Finding Joy in the Struggle

Camus wasn’t dour; he found beauty in life’s imperfection. A soccer player in his youth and a lover of the Mediterranean sun, he wrote, “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer.”

For YGLs burned out by relentless challenges, this is a lifeline. Leadership isn’t just sacrifice—it’s also about sustaining passion and hope. A social entrepreneur might draw strength from small victories—like a community lifted by their work—mirroring Camus’ belief that joy coexists with struggle. This balance prevents cynicism, keeping leaders human and relatable.

Contextualizing Camus for Today

Born in colonial Algeria to a poor family, Camus understood marginalization firsthand. His outsider perspective fueled his empathy and skepticism of power—traits YGLs can emulate. Today’s globalized world, with its stark inequities, demands leaders who amplify the voiceless, as Camus did in his journalism on Algerian struggles. His 1957 Nobel Prize speech emphasized art’s role in truth-telling, a reminder for YGLs in creative or influential fields to wield their platforms responsibly.

Yet Camus wasn’t flawless. His ambivalence toward Algerian independence frustrated critics, and his personal life—marked by infidelity—clashed with his moral stance. These imperfections humanize him, offering YGLs a lesson in humility. Leadership isn’t about
but striving despite flaws, acknowledging missteps, and evolving.

Practical Applications: One Boulder at a Time

How might YGLs apply Camus’ wisdom? A climate activist could adopt his absurd defiance, pushing for change despite political gridlock, finding motivation in the act itself. A startup founder might channel his ethical rebellion, innovating responsibly in industries rife with exploitation. A diplomat facing a refugee crisis could embody his solidarity, prioritizing human lives over bureaucratic inertia. And all could heed his call to authenticity, leading with conviction in a world of posturing.

Camus died tragically in a 1960 car crash at 46, yet his voice endures. For Young Global Leaders, his philosophy isn’t abstract—it’s a toolkit for action. In an era of uncertainty, where AI reshapes economies, climate alters landscapes, and populism tests democracy, Camus offers clarity: meaning isn’t found; it’s made. Through rebellion, resilience, and a stubborn love for humanity, YGLs can craft a future that honors his legacy—one boulder at a time.

Rolling the Boulder: What Camus Teaches Modern Change-Makers (Feb. 22, 2025)


#AlbertCamus, #YoungGlobalLeaders, #Surrealism, #ThePlague, #TheStranger, #LeadershipLessons, #Absurdism, #GlobalChange, #EthicalRebellion, #WEFYGL

U.N. Explainer: Five Common Myths about Child Marriage


New York, N.Y. — Every day, almost one in five young women are married off while still children, according to the U.N. reproductive and sexual health agency, UNFPA, which is urging countries to say “I don’t” to child marriage, an illegal practice that is almost universally condemned and yet remains widespread globally.

“I was married at 14, and I lost my first child at 16 during pregnancy,” Ranu Chakma said. Child marriage is common in her village of Teknaf Upazila, on the southern coast of Bangladesh, even though it is illegal and a human rights violation.

Those violations occur even at a time when many countries are banning the illegal practice, most recently in Colombia, where a law came into effect earlier this month.

Here are five common misconceptions about child marriage:

Myth 1: It’s always illegal

Child marriage is banned under many international agreements, from the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women to the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994. Still, there are 640 million women and girls in the world who were child brides, with more child marriages taking place every day.

How is that possible? Many countries ban child marriage in principle, but define the permissible age of marriage as something other than 18 or permit exceptions with parental consent or under religious or customary law. In many cases these marriages, and marriages in general, are not legally registered, making enforcement of the law difficult.

Addressing child marriage requires more than laws; it requires rethinking how society values girls.

Programmes like Taalim-i-Naubalighan, in Bihar, India, where two in five children marry before age 18, are having an impact. These programmes encourage young people to think about topics such as gender roles and human rights.

“That’s why I was able to help my sister,” said Altamash, a male student whose sister wanted to avoid child marriage and continue her studies. “When I understood her desire and how it would help her, I advocated for her to my father. She is now going to complete her education, and I am so proud of her.”

In Madagascar, information sessions are key in changing minds and raising awareness about child marriage and other harmful practices.
In Madagascar, information sessions are key in changing minds and raising awareness about child marriage and other harmful practices. © UNFPA Madagascar.

Myth 2: Sometimes child marriage is necessary

Child marriage remains pervasive in part because it is seen as a solution to other problems.

In humanitarian crises, child marriage rates often rise, with parents believing marriage will secure a daughter’s future by making a husband responsible for economically supporting her and protecting her from violence. Child marriage is seen as a solution that will preserve the honor of a girl and her family after – or in some cases before – she becomes pregnant. In developing countries, the majority of adolescent births take place within a marriage.

Yet, child marriage is not a real solution to any of these issues. Child marriage itself leads to girls experiencing high levels of sexual, physical and emotional violence from their intimate partners. Pregnancy is dangerous for girls; complications of pregnancy and childbirth are one of the leading causes of death among adolescent girls. Child brides and adolescent mothers are often forced to drop out of school, upending their future prospects.

Nicolette, 16, in Madagascar was so accustomed to seeing her classmates disappear from school after marrying and becoming pregnant, she never thought to question the practice. That’s until she attended a UNFPA-supported awareness session.

“I didn’t know that we could be victims of child marriage,” she said. Now, she wants all the girls in her community to know: “Everyone has the right to realise their ambitions, and marriage is a choice.”

More than three quarters of girls in Niger are married while they are still children.
More than three quarters of girls in Niger are married while they are still children. © UNFPA Niger.

Myth 3: This problem is going away

Child marriage may sound like a problem of the past or of faraway places, but in fact it remains a serious threat to girls around the world.

While global child marriage rates are slowly falling, the places with the highest rates also have the most population growth, meaning the absolute number of child marriages is expected to increase.

The problem is indeed global. The largest number of child brides live in the Asia and Pacific region, the highest rate of child marriage is seen in sub-Saharan Africa and lack of progress in Latin America and the Caribbean mean that this region is expected to have the second highest prevalence of child marriage by 2030.

Yet, the issue is not limited to developing nations. It takes place in countries like the United Kingdom and United States, too.

“I was basically introduced to somebody in the morning, and I was forced to marry him that night,” Sara Tasneem said, recalling her marriage, first an informal spiritual union at age 15 then legally at age 16. “I got pregnant right away, and we were legally married in Reno, Nevada, where it only required permission signed by my dad.”

To change this, actions must be accelerated to end child marriage, especially by empowering girls.

“I was 13 years old when my father gave my hand in marriage to a cousin,” 16-year-old Hadiza, in Niger, said. Fortunately, she had access to a safe space through a UNFPA-supported youth programme. “I spoke to a safe space mentor, who, with the help of the neighbourhood chief, negotiated with my parents to postpone the wedding.”

Today, Hadiza is an apprentice to a tailor, learning the skills to become economically self-sufficient. “In three years I plan to get married to the man I love,” she said.

Nurse Suvannah Sinakaaba attends to pregnant teenagers at the UNFPA-supported mobile clinic in Namalyo village, Zambia.
Nurse Suvannah Sinakaaba attends to pregnant teenagers at the UNFPA-supported mobile clinic in Namalyo village, Zambia.© UNFPA Zambia/Julien Adam

Myth 4: It’s a cultural or religious issue

Child marriage is sometimes misrepresented as a religiously or culturally mandated practice. But, there are no major religious traditions that require child marriage.

In fact, cultural and religious leaders around the world often take a strong stance against child marriage, especially when provided evidence about the consequences of the practice.

“We have always taught young people that, both religiously and legally, it was not advisable,” Shirkhan Chobanov, the imam of Jumah Mosque in Tbilisi, Georgia, said. “We also explained to those young people that they had to accomplish other tasks, primarily concerning their education, before thinking about starting a family.”

UNFPA works with faith leaders around the world who are working to end child marriage, including priestsmonks, nuns and imams.

“We are seeing very good results as far as warding off child marriage is concerned,” said Gebreegziabher Tiku, a priest in Ethiopia.

Myth 5: It only happens to girls

While the vast majority of child marriages involve girls, boys can also be married off.

Globally, 115 million boys and men were married before age 18, according to 2019 data. These unions are also linked to early fatherhood, constrained education and reduced opportunities in life.

Still, girls are disproportionately affected by the practice, with about one in five young women aged 20 to 24 years old married before their 18th birthday, compared to one in 30 young men. Child marriage rates for boys are very low even in countries where child marriage among girls is relatively high.

Youth empowerment programmes are reaching all adolescents with information about their human rights in Nicaragua, which has one of the highest rates of child marriage among boys.
Youth empowerment programmes are reaching all adolescents with information about their human rights in Nicaragua, which has one of the highest rates of child marriage among boys. © UNFPA Nicaragua.

No matter the gender of the child affected nor the country in which the union takes place, child marriage is a harmful practice that requires addressing a common set of root causes. They include economic inequality, limited access to sexual and reproductive health services and information, and factors such as conflict. One of the biggest root causes – gender inequality – requires urgent and renewed focus.

“While we have abolished child marriage, we have not abolished predatory masculinity,” said Dr. Gabrielle Hosein, director of the Institute of Gender and Development Studies at the University of the West Indies, in Trinidad and Tobago, shortly after that country had outlawed child marriage.

Kevin Liverpool, an activist with the advocacy group CariMAN, said men and boys have a critical role to play.

“It’s important to raise awareness among these groups, among these individuals, about what feminism is, why gender equality is important for women, but also for men and for all of society,” he said.

U.N. Explainer: Five Common Myths about Child Marriage (Feb. 22, 2025)


Vietnam’s Railway Drive Raises Risk of Mismanagement, Analysts Say


Ho Chi Minh City — Analysts are pointing to management and funding issues for Vietnam’s planned north-south, high-speed rail initiative and express concerns over potential “debt traps” and growing Chinese influence as Beijing funds a railway connecting the two countries.

The comments come as Vietnam is expanding its infrastructure by building railways using Chinese and Vietnamese funding, projects that could help the country’s outlook in the long term. As part of the effort, Vietnam’s National Assembly on Feb. 19 gave near-unanimous approval to legislation allowing the country to use Chinese loans for a new $8.3 billion rail link from the port city of Haiphong to China.

Nguyen Hong Minh, then the transport minister, announced Vietnam’s plans to use the Chinese loans for the 391-kilometer passenger and freight line from Lao Cai on the Chinese border and passing through Hanoi.

“Vietnam’s current railway system is outdated, and the country needs a new system to support its economic development,” Minh, now the construction minister, said, adding that construction is expected to begin this year and be completed by 2030.

The National Assembly vote followed its November approval of construction of a high-speed railway connecting Hanoi to the country’s southern economic hub, Ho Chi Minh City. That project is Vietnam’s most ambitious infrastructure initiative to date and is projected to cost Vietnam $67 billion. Authorities said construction should begin in 2027 and be completed by 2035.

Ha Hoang Hop, chair of the Hanoi-based Think Tank Viet Know, told VOA on Feb. 17 that while both projects could modernize the country’s transport network and improve its economy, “public sentiment is cautious.”

“There have been several publicly funded railway and infrastructure projects in Vietnam that have led to public frustration due to delays, cost overruns and poor-quality outcomes,” Hop said.

“Public skepticism is also fueled by fears of debt traps associated with Chinese loans,” he said.

Hop cited fear the construction of the high-speed rail project could be dogged by the country’s “historical issues with project management and corruption.”

“There is indeed concern that the north-south, high-speed rail could face similar challenges given the scale and complexity of the project,” Hop said.

Mismanagement and corruption

Albert Tan, associate professor at the Asian Institute of Management in Manila, told VOA on Feb. 18 that while Vietnam’s railway modernization will improve the country’s supply chain efficiency, the major problem is corruption.

“The corruption level in Vietnam is so high that when you have that amount of money that the Chinese are pumping in, I’m sure there will always be leakages,” he said.

Tan said railway funds ending up in “someone’s pocket” have caused delays and cost overruns for Vietnam’s two city Metro lines. In 2021, the Chinese-funded Cat Linh-Ha Dong Metro line began running in Hanoi, five years behind its originally planned opening. The first line of the Ho Chi Minh City Metro, primarily funded by Japan, opened in December 2024, six years behind schedule. Costs ballooned for both Metro lines while under construction and delayed payments to contractors slowed the process.

“Somehow the money doesn’t go back to the contractor. Money goes somewhere to other stakeholders,” Tan said.

For the north-south, high-speed rail, Hop said the country is planning to rely on domestic funding with capital likely to come in the form of “government bonds, public investment and possibly some low-interest loans.”

“A $67 billion project will still be a significant challenge requiring careful financial management,” Hop said.

Chinese influence

Hanoi’s decision to pursue domestic funding for its high-speed rail shows the country’s drive to “maintain strategic autonomy,” Hop said. As it looks to Chinese loans for another rail project, though, “there remains a significant portion of the populace wary of increasing economic dependency on China,” he added.

Tran Anh Quan, a Vietnamese social activist currently living in exile, told VOA on Feb. 18 he fears the Chinese-funded railway will leave Hanoi indebted to Beijing and could be a weak point if conflict were to break out between the countries.

“This is definitely a debt trap,” he said. “Expanding the railway to China would be very dangerous if China attacked Vietnam.”

Tan also shared concerns over the “one-way” flow of money. He said the Chinese loans are likely to be paid to Chinese firms that will “retain control over construction and maintenance, with little technology transfer to local engineers.”

Joshua Kurlantzick, senior fellow for Southeast Asia and South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations, told VOA that Chinese influence in the region is already “massive.” He said Chinese funding for the Vietnamese railway is in line with Beijing’s goal to expand its influence in Southeast Asia.

The railway “fits right into China’s efforts to link the Mekong region, and to connect them to China,” he wrote in an email.

Kurlantzick said that in Vietnam’s delicate balancing act between Washington and Beijing, China is taking the upper hand as he sees U.S. influence waning with the withdrawal of funding to Vietnam through USAID and weakening public diplomacy more broadly.

“China is by far the dominant economic power in Southeast Asia already, increasingly the dominant security power, and now, with the U.S. giving up its soft power in the region, China will increasingly bolster its soft power in the region, too, making it even more dominant,” Kurlantzick said.

Minh Son To, a research assistant focused on Vietnamese and Chinese politics at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University, told VOA February 20 Hanoi has looked to Laos with concern after a China-funded high-speed rail threw the country into an “existential debt crisis.” Still, he said many are eager to see Vietnam develop.

“Any ‘China’ label is bound to evoke some concern, though I wouldn’t overstate that,” he told VOA. “Vietnamese know that they need development and infrastructure, regardless of where it comes from.”


André Breton: Rebel Poet Who Dreamed Surrealism into Existence


Paris –André Breton (1896–1966) stands as one of the most influential figures in 20th-century art and literature, a poet and theorist whose radical ideas birthed the surrealist movement. Known as the co-founder, leader, and principal theorist of Surrealism, Breton’s legacy is etched in his groundbreaking writings, including the Surrealist Manifesto of 1924, where he famously defined surrealism as “pure psychic automatism.” This concept—unleashing the unconscious mind to create art free from rational constraints—revolutionized creative expression and cemented Breton’s status as a titan of modernist thought.

Born in Normandy, France, to a modest family, Breton’s early life foreshadowed his unconventional path. His father, a policeman and staunch atheist, and his mother, a former seamstress, provided a grounded upbringing. Yet Breton’s intellectual curiosity led him to medical school, where he developed a fascination with mental illness—an interest that would later inform his surrealist explorations. World War I interrupted his studies, thrusting him into a neurological ward in Nantes. There, he encountered Jacques Vaché, a provocative figure whose disdain for artistic norms and tragic suicide at 23 left a lasting imprint on Breton’s worldview.

Breton’s journey into the avant-garde began in earnest with the Dada movement. In 1919, alongside Louis Aragon and Philippe Soupault, he launched the review Littérature, collaborating with Dadaist Tristan Tzara. However, Breton soon transcended Dada’s nihilism, seeking a more constructive vision. In 1924, he published the Surrealist Manifesto, founding La Révolution surréaliste magazine and the Bureau of Surrealist Research. A constellation of writers—Paul Éluard, Antonin Artaud, Robert Desnos, and others—rallied around him, forming the nucleus of the surrealist movement.

Breton’s ambition extended beyond art; he sought to fuse personal transformation, inspired by Arthur Rimbaud, with Marxist politics. Joining the French Communist Party in 1927, he aimed to align surrealism with revolutionary ideals. Yet his fiercely independent spirit clashed with party dogma, leading to his expulsion in 1933. This tension surfaced again in 1935, when Soviet writer Ilya Ehrenburg’s scathing critique of surrealists as parasitic deviants prompted Breton to slap him publicly—an act that saw surrealists barred from a writers’ congress.

Breton’s literary output was as provocative as his politics.

His 1928 novel Nadja, a dreamy recounting of an encounter with a woman descending into mental illness, showcased his mastery of surrealist narrative. Yet controversy shadowed his career. The 1929 Second Surrealist Manifesto included a notorious line—“The simplest surrealist act consists… of descending into the street and shooting at random… into the crowd”—drawing ire from peers like Albert Camus and sparking a 1930 pamphlet, Un Cadavre, denouncing his leadership. Breton later clarified this as a rhetorical flourish, not a literal call to violence, but the rift among surrealists deepened.

The 1930s brought personal and global upheaval.

Economic depression forced Breton to sell his vast art collection—over 5,300 items amassed in his Paris apartment on rue Fontaine—though he later rebuilt it. In 1938, a French government commission took him to Mexico, which he declared “the most surrealist country in the world.” There, he met Leon Trotsky, co-authoring the Manifesto for an Independent Revolutionary Art with Diego Rivera, advocating for art’s liberation amid rising totalitarianism.

Hector Hyppolite — Erzulie.

World War II forced Breton into exile.

Escaping Vichy France’s ban on his “subversive” writings, he fled to the United States in 1941 with aid from Americans Varian Fry and Hiram Bingham IV. In New York, he organized a landmark surrealist exhibition at Yale in 1942 and collaborated with artists like Wifredo Lam. His encounter with Martinican writers Aimé and Suzanne Césaire enriched his work, as did his 1945–46 visit to Haiti. Martinican literature is primarily written in French or Creole and draws upon influences from African, French and Indigenous traditions, as well as from various other cultures represented in Martinique.

In Haiti, Breton connected surrealism to Vodou and the Haitian Revolution, championing painter Hector Hyppolite’s vivid depictions of lwa deities. His lectures inadvertently fueled a student uprising that toppled President Élie Lescot, though Breton downplayed his role, crediting the Haitian people’s pent-up frustration.

Returning to Paris in 1946, Breton opposed French colonialism—signing the Manifesto of the 121 against the Algerian War—and nurtured a second wave of surrealists through exhibitions and the review La Brèche (1961–65). A lifelong atheist like his father, he supported the Anarchist Federation, rejecting authoritarianism in all forms. Breton died in 1966 at 70, leaving an indelible mark on art, literature, and revolutionary thought.

Breton’s life was a tapestry of contradictions: a medical student turned poet, a communist expelled for nonconformity, a leader both revered and reviled. His surrealism—wild, dreamlike, and defiant—challenged the status quo, inviting creators to plumb the depths of the unconscious. From Nadja to his Mexican epiphanies, from Parisian studios to Haitian streets, André Breton remains a towering figure whose vision continues to inspire.


#AndreBreton, #Surrealism, #SurrealistManifesto, #FrenchLiterature, #20thCenturyArt, #AvantGarde, #Nadja, #ArtRevolution, #ParisArt, #TrotskyMexico


André Breton: Rebel Poet Who Dreamed Surrealism into Existence (Feb. 21, 2025)

For Male Rape or Sexual Abuse Survivors: Five Things to Know


Cleveland, OhioCleveland Rape Crisis Center reports on its website: Below are five things for male survivors of rape to know if they’re thinking about reaching out for help.

1. You are not alone.
Rape or sexual abuse of males is more common than many people may realize. In fact, 10% of the clients that Cleveland Rape Crisis Center serves are men.

2. Recognizing that you might need help is a sign of strength, not weakness.
Survivors of any gender may have emotions and feelings about the assault, and that’s normal. You are not weak because of the incident or because you want to come forward. Getting help is a way to process the trauma and begin to heal.

3. Being a survivor of rape or sexual abuse does not determine your sexual orientation.
Sexual orientation is not determined by the encounters you have. Whether or not your body responded doesn’t mean that you wanted it to happen.

4. It’s never too late to get help.
Rape and sexual abuse affect everyone in different ways, and there is no right or wrong way to begin to heal. Recovery is possible by learning about trauma and making a plan to develop and implement specific skills. Options such as individual counseling and support groups can help you determine the best path to healing for you.

5. You deserve to heal from the trauma.
No one chooses to be a victim of rape or sexual abuse, and it was never your fault. And, survivors do not have to suffer from trauma for the rest of your life. Survivors of rape and sexual abuse have the power within themselves to recover and live happy and healthy lives.

Male Survivors
At least 1 in 71 men in Ohio are survivors of rape. Cleveland Rape Crisis Center offers services for male survivors of rape and sexual abuse.

What Are the Options?

Cleveland Rape Crisis Center provides comprehensive services to survivors of rape and sexual abuse of any gender identity:


U.N.: Russian Invasion of Ukraine Sows ‘Psychological Terror’


New York, N.Y. — In the nearly three years since the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, the country’s people have endured continuous attacks, “psychological terror…displacement and hardship,” top U.N. aid coordinator Matthias Schmale said on Friday.

Briefing from Ukrainian capital Kyiv after another night of “air sirens and more loud explosions,” Schmale noted that the crisis began in 2014, with Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea. “So, all children that were born since – all children up to the age of 11 – have never experienced their country at peace,” he said.

According to the U.N. aid coordination officeOCHA, 2024 saw a 30% increase in civilian casualties compared to 2023. “The humanitarian situation is worsening, especially in frontline areas,” it said in an update, highlighting that a full 36% of Ukraine’s population – 12.7 million people – needs humanitarian aid this year.

“There are very strong pushes by the armed forces of the Russian Federation along the front line and evacuations are ongoing,” Schmale explained. 

“We are supporting people with essential goods, including cash assistance, as they are on the move to transit centers, collective sites and wherever they end up being.”

Speaking from Zaporizhzhia in southeast Ukraine, Toby Fricker from the U.N. Children’s Fund (UNICEF) said that more than 2,520 children have been killed or injured since the start of the full-scale Russian invasion.

“The real number is likely far higher and it’s getting worse”, said Fricker, chief of communication in Ukraine

“There was a more than 50% increase in child casualties in 2024 compared to 2023 and what we see is no place is safe: schools, maternity wards, children’s hospitals, all have been affected by attacks.”

Behind battle lines

Underscoring the essential role played by women in Ukraine “beyond the battlefield”, UN Women Geneva Director Sofia Calltorp explained that “there is another story unfolding, and that is the story of all those women and girls who are bearing the brunt of this war.”

In 2024, the number of people killed and injured in Ukraine increased by 30%, Calltorp noted. “Of them, 800 women lost their lives and more than 3,700 women were injured last year in Ukraine. We also know that the vast majority of Ukrainian refugees and displaced persons are women, and 6.7 million women are in need of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.”

Funding crisis

Responding to questions about the impact of the U.S. funding freeze on humanitarian work, Ukraine Humanitarian Coordinator Schmale expressed “hope that U.S. funding will become part of the equation. Last year, it made up 30 per cent of what we spent on the humanitarian side, 10 per cent on the development side.”

The U.N.’s top aid official in Ukraine added: “We are of course worried about the funding freezes; as we all know, it’s not the end of the day yet, there are a lot of discussions going on. We have some of our partners, including within the U.N., that have received some exemptions from the general freeze of funding, but so far, no money has been flowing as a result of those exemptions.”

In addition to repeated attacks on energy infrastructure across Ukraine, other public facilities have also been targeted, with 780 health centres and more than 1,600 schools damaged or destroyed, according to the U.N. World Health Organization (WHO).

“In Odessa this week we saw a health clinic providing care for 40,000 children and a kindergarten serving 250 of the youngest children were severely damaged in an attack,” said Dr. Jarno Harbicht, WHO Country Representative for Ukraine. 

“When a children’s hospital is hit, a school shelled or electric grid destroyed, children suffer even when they survive.”

Haunted by drones

The mental stress faced by millions of Ukrainians because of the war is real and debilitating, the WHO official continued: “Imagine a young mother in Kharkiv region in Ukraine, her days interrupted by air raid sirens and her nights haunted by drones. Each day is a struggle balancing her children’s safety with their anxiety that has become her constant companion.”

Rising toll

The U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission (HRMMU) has confirmed the killing of more than 12,654 civilian men, women, girls, and boys since the full-scale Russian invasion on 24 February 2022, with nearly 30,000 injured. Eighty-four per cent of the casualties happened in territory controlled by the Ukrainian government and 16% in territory occupied by .

“Three years of full-scale conflict in Ukraine have wrought persistent and escalating human rights violations and breaches of international humanitarian law,” said Danielle Bell, Chief of HRMMU. “As the civilian toll grows heavier, the human rights of all those affected must remain at the forefront of any negotiations for sustainable peace.”


U.N.: Russian Invasion of Ukraine Sows ‘Psychological Terror’ (Feb. 21, 2025)

Dadaism: What is the Meaning of Seemingly Meaninglessness Art?

0

New York, N.Y. Dadaism is one of the most unconventional and Avant-garde art and cultural movements of the 20th century. Prompted by the European social climate following the First World War, Dadaism rejected wartime politics, bourgeois culture, and capitalist economic system. The name Dada has various meanings in different languages, but also no meaning. In essence, Dadaism offered nihilistic and anti-rationalist critiques of the status quo. Using non-traditional materials, nonsensical content, satire, and the fantastic, Dada artists turned the known into the unknown.

What Is Dadaism?

The first shoots of Dadaism sprung up in Switzerland during the First World War. As a neutral country, many artists and intellectuals who opposed the war sought refuge in Zürich. The movement arose as a reaction to the nationalism that many believed resulted in the war. The powerful influence of Dadaism spread quickly throughout Europe and the United States, with each city forming its own group.

Dadaism found influence in several other Avante-Garde movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These movements include Futurism, Expressionism, Cubism, and Constructivism. A common thread that runs throughout these movements and Dadaism is that of cultural critique.

Dadaism was as untraditional in its output as it was in its material use. Works of Dada art range from photography to painting, sculpture, performance art, collage, and poetry. Through these works, Dada artists made a mockery of nationalist and materialist attitudes.

Although perhaps difficult to comprehend, Dadaism inspired many other artistic and cultural movements in the 20th century, including Surrealism, Abstract Expressionism, and even Punk Rock.

The Key Ideas of Dadaism

Defining Dadaism is a difficult task because, in a sense, it has no logical order or universally defining characteristics. So what is Dadaism? There are four key ideas that can help give insight into the Dadaism mind. These ideas include the use of readymades, the fascination with chance, the upending of bourgeois sensibilities, and the opposition of almost everything.

Dada artists created the readymade, an everyday object that they could buy, manipulate very little, and present as a work of art. The readymades bring to light one of the principal ideas of Dadaism, highlighting the artist’s intention as the artwork, as opposed to the object they create. We cannot appreciate the form or aesthetic of readymade works. Instead, these pieces prompt questions about the very definition of art, artistic creativity, and the purpose of art in societ

Another integral idea in Dadaism is the use of chance. Many Dada artists, including Hans Arp, created works of art by incorporating random chance. Creating without a plan or overarching intention worked against the grain of traditional art production. This artistic process was yet another way for Dada artists to challenge the status quo and question the artist’s place in creativity.

Dada ArtConstellation According to the Laws of Chance, aluminium sculpture by Jean Arp (Hans Arp), c. 1930; Wmpearl, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

As we discuss some of the most famous works of Dada art, you will notice that much of it is not aesthetically pleasing. Artists were not concerned with creating works of art that appealed to social consciousness. Instead, Dada artists preferred to create artworks that upended the sensibilities of the bourgeois. Confronting artworks stimulated difficult questions about society and the purpose of art and the artist.

In fact, Dada artists were so intent on opposing all the norms and traditions of bourgeois society and culture that they were barely in favor of themselves. Many Dada artists would cry that even “Dada is anti-Dada.”

The founding place of Dadaism, in the Cabaret Voltaire, was appropriate in this sense. The French satirist, Voltaire, gave his name to the Cabaret from his novel that made fun of the idiocies of his society. Famous Dada artist Hugo Ball was a founder of Dada and the Cabaret, and he wrote that Dada was the Candide against the current times.

The Birth of Dadaism The term Dada in colloquial French means “hobby horse”. It also means various other nonsensical things in other languages, but its meaning was of no interest to Dada artists. As a reaction to elements of the modern age, including the degradation of art and the capitalist culture. Dadaism is a form of anti-art, intending to draw attention and contemplation to the importance of art in society.

Switzerland, the birthplace of Dadaism, was neutral during the First World War and had limited censorship rules. In 1916, Emmy Hennings and Hugo Ball founded the Cabaret Voltaire on 5 February. Ball published a press release to attract other intellectuals and artists. A growing group of young writers and artists began forming under this name.

The group run by artists would attract guest artists to perform readings and musical entertainment at the daily meetings. Alongside Hennings and Ball, artists like Richard Huelsenbeck, Hans Arp, Marcel Janco, and Tristan Tzara were present from the beginning.

Dada Movement“Grand opening of the first Dada exhibition, Berlin, 5 June 1920. The central figure hanging from the ceiling was an effigy of a German officer with a pigs head. From left to right: Raoul Hausmann, Hannah Höch (sitting), Otto Burchard, Johannes Baader, Wieland Herzfelde, Margarete Herzfelde, dr. Oz (Otto Schmalhausen), George Grosz and John Heartfield.”; Unknown authorUnknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Ball read the first Dada manifesto on the first Dada evening in July of 1916. There is wide contention regarding the choice of the word Dada, but the most common origin story relates that Richard Huelsenbeck randomly plunged a knife into a dictionary.

Dada is reminiscent of the first words of a young child. With their keen interest in putting distance between the sobriety of conventional society and themselves, the group found this sense of childish absurdity appealing. The word Dada may also mean nothing or the same thing in all languages was vital for the frankly internationalist artists collective.

The groups’ intentions were twofold. Firstly, they wanted to help put an end to the war. The second aim of the Dada group was to challenge and express their frustrations towards the bourgeois and nationalist attitudes that they believed led to the war. The group was erratic in their organization, as their anti-authoritarian stance opposed any form of guiding ideology or group leadership.

 International Dadaism At its heart, Dadaism was an international movement. In Zürich, Dada artists spread their anti-art and anti-war messages via exhibitions and the Dada magazine. Hugo Ball left Zürich in 1917 to pursue journalism, but Tristan Tzara facilitated further Dada evenings on Bahnhofstrasse at the Galerie Dada. As a result, Tzara became the leader of the movement, and he started a merciless crusade spreading the ideas of Dada throughout Europe. Part of the crusade was a torrent of letters written to Italian and French artists and writers.

In 1918, following the end of the war, many Dada artists returned to their home countries. In April 1919, the Dada artists held a four-five Dada event in Zürich which, as was intended, ended in a riot. Tzara believed that this event would further undermine conventional art practices by involving the audiences in art production.

DadaistPortrait of Tristan Tzara (1923) by Robert Delaunay; Robert Delaunay, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

This practice would, in turn, encourage the growth of Dadaism. This event began as a Dada event, but eventually, over 1000 people attended. A closed-minded speech concerning the value of abstraction in art began the event and was meant to rile up the audience. Discordant music and several readings intending to rile up the crowd followed the speech, and it was successful. The active involvement of the audience in art production completely negated the norms of traditional art.

Shortly after the riot, Tzara journeyed to Paris. It was in Paris that Andre Breton and Tzara met. The theories drawn up by these two artists would later underlie the Surrealist movement. While the spread of Dadaism throughout Europe was not a self-conscious or intentional process, a few principal artists spread the ideas throughout several European cities.

Each artist would inform their group, and the cities would themselves influence the Dada aesthetics.

 German Dadaism Dadaism reached Germany in 1917, following Huelsenbeck’s return. Once in Berlin, Huelsenbeck founded the Club Dada. The club was active between 1918 and 1923 and had many famous attendees, including Raoul Hausmann, Johannes Baader, Hannah Hoch, and George Grosz.

The art produced by Dada artists in Berlin was significantly more political than that of the founding members because of their proximity to the war zone. Satirical collages and paintings created using political cartoons, government officials, and imagery from the war publically rebelled against the Weimar Republic.

Huelsenbeck spoke publicly in Berlin about Dadaism for the first time in 1918. The speech was published in several magazines and journals, including Der Dada and Club Dada. During this period in Berlin, Dada artists began developing the first photomontage techniques.

Dada Art MovementJean Hans Arp’s woodcut and collage for the cover of Dada 4-5 (Tristan Tzara dir.), Zurich, 1919; crédit photo : Mathieu Bertola, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

1919 saw the founding of a separate Dada group by Kurt Schwitters in Hannover. Schwitters was not welcome in the Berlin group, possibly as a result of his links to Expressionism and the Der Sturm gallery. Berlin Dadaism stood firmly in opposition to both of these institutions because they focused on aesthetics and were too Romantic. Schwitters was the only member of this Dada group, and his artwork was much less political. Instead, Schwitters investigated the preoccupation of Modern art with color and shape.

Yet another Dada group sprung up in Cologne in 1918. Johannes Theodor Baargeld and Max Ernst were responsible for forming this group. These two artists were joined by Hans Arp a year later. Hans Arp, within this group, made several discoveries in his experiments with collage, and the anti-bourgeois artworks from this group centered around nonsensical art.

The police closed down one of this group’s 1920 exhibits, and when German Dada began to dwindle in 1922, Ernst moved to Paris, and the group dissolved. Dada artists began to take an interest in other art groups, including Constructivism and Surrealism.

 Parisian Dadaism Paul Eluard, Louis Aragon, and Andre Breton heard of the birth of Dadaism art in Zürich and set about to create a group of their own. Tzara returned to Paris in 1919, and in the following year, Arp joined the group. In May of 1920, many of the originators of the movement attended the first Parisian Dada festival. Performances, exhibitions, and various presentations occurred, and the artists published several journals and manifestos, including Le Cannibale and Dada.

The Parisian Dada scene did not last very long, and by 1921, several members, including Breton and Picabia, had left. Picabia became so disillusioned with Dadaism art that he claimed that the movement had become the very thing it had fought against in a special issue of 391. Right before the final breath of Parisian Dada, the group held two final performances in 1923.

Following these performances, the group gave into internal fighting. Many former Dada artists ceded to Surrealism, with Marcel Duchamp playing a crucial role in bridging the gap between Dadaism from Zürich and the proto-Surrealism movement in Paris. Swiss Dadaism saw Duchamp’s refusal to define art and the humor in his readymades as falling into Dada.

What Is DadaismDadaglobe solicitation form letter signed by Francis Picabia, Tristan Tzara, Georges Ribemont-Dessaignes, and Walter Serner, c. week of November 8, 1920; Francis Picabia, Tristan Tzara, Georges Ribemont-Dessaignes,and Walter Serner,, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 New York Dadaism During the war, many artists and writers found refuge in New York, as well as Zürich. In June of 1915, both Picabia and Duchamp arrived in New York. Soon after their arrival, these two artists met Man Ray, and the three began making moves in the New York Dada scene. Duchamp was a critical driver of New York Dada because he brought anti-art notions with him.

Man Ray, who was later associated with the Kinetic art movement, brought a mechanized twist to New York Dada. Duchamp began one of his most famous pieces in New York. This was The Large Glass or Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors (1915). This piece was a milestone in the growing anti-art trend of dramatizing the erotic with mechanized shapes.

1916 saw other artists joining Man Ray, Duchamp, and Picabia. These artists and writers include Mina Loy, Beatrice Wood, and Henri-Pierre Roche.

Louis and Walter Arensberg’s studio and the 291 Alfred Stieglitz gallery were the central hubs for New York anti-art Dada activity. From these hubs came many publications, including New York Dada, Rongwrong, and The Blind Man.

Through these publications and their art installations, New York Dadaist artists presented a challenge to artistic conventions, with slightly less bitterness and more humor than their European counterparts. Duchamp’s first experiments with readymades began during this period in New York. It was in 1917 that he first presented Fountain. He presented this readymade creation to the Society of Independent Artists.

The Parisian, New York, and Zürich Dadaist groups were tied together thanks to the traveling of Picabia. Between 1917 and 1924, Picabia was responsible for publishing the 391 Dada magazine, a publication stemming from the 291 magazine by Stieglitz. Despite his basis in New York, 391 was released in Barcelona before Zürich, Paris, and New York. Wherever Piciabia resided, fellow artists and writers contributed to 391. Although the periodical was primarily literary, Picabia became the most prominent contributor.

Dadaism Art MovementMarcel Duchamp, 1917, Fountain, photograph by Alfred Stieglitz at the 291 (Art Gallery) following the 1917 Society of Independent Artists exhibit, with entry tag visible. The backdrop is The Warriors by Marsden Hartley; Marcel Duchamp, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Styles, Concepts, and Trends in the Dada Movement Dadaism art presents us with difficulties in strictly defining its styles and trends. By definition, Dada aims to reject all possible labels and preconceived ideas. Many paradoxes and overlaps exist in Dada artworks. Dada works seek to make art more accessible and less institutional. In the same breath, Dada artists also aimed to leave enough mystery within each piece to allow for multiple interpretations.

Dada artists like Man Ray and Kurt Schwitters created abstracted works that highlight the metaphysical essence of the subject matter over the external aesthetic. Others Dada artists analyzed movement and form through representational depictions of scenes and people. Both of these methods fundamentally sought to deconstruct the norms of regular life in rebellious and challenging ways.

At the very basis of all Dada artwork is the intention of disrupting and rejecting all the trimmings of bourgeois society.

Regardless of Tzara’s insistence that Dada was not a statement, Dada artists became increasingly agitated by the political and social atmosphere and aimed to instill this same anger in their audiences. Several underlying concepts can be broadly applied to Dadaism, including assemblage, humor, irreverence, and chance.

Dadaism MovementPoster Kleine Dada Soirée (1922) by Theo van Doesburg; Theo van Doesburg, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 Assemblages and Readymade Art Duchamp was the first Dada artist to experiment with readymade artworks, but they soon became popular. Readymades are essentially an object that already exists and is presented as an artwork by a Dada artist. When an artist combined two readymades into a single work, it became an assemblage.

Bicycle Wheel by Duchamp is a perfect example of an assemblage. Other prominent assemblages and readymade artists include Man Ray, Ernst, and Hausmann. Readymades poked fun at art establishments and institutional ideas about creativity, a theme that would continue in many modernist art movements, including Pop Art.

The objects and their arrangement were typically guided by little more than chance. The introduction of chance or accident into the creative process was a conscious choice intended to challenge bourgeois ideas about artistic creativity. Although we have separated the Dadaist concepts of readymades and chance, it is a difficult separation. One of the most prominent features of readymades and assemblages is their apparent lack of sense. The bizarre nature of many of these artworks facilitated an easy merge with Surrealism.

Dadaism ArtBicycle Wheel (1913) by Marcel Duchamp; Daderot, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 Humor Despite their serious and often angry reactionary approach to bourgeois institutions and politics, Dada artists infused their works with a great deal of humor. Dada humor predominantly took the form of irony, as can be seen in their love for readymades. Readymades highlight Dada irony because they communicate a message about everything’s lack of intrinsic value.

Dada artists also received significant flexibility and freedom in their artistic expressions as a result of irony. They were able to embrace and celebrate the absurdity of the world around them without being drawn into institutional seriousness. The ironic infusion in many Dada artworks also keeps the artists from getting carried away with enthusiastic dreams of utopian worlds. The foundations of Dada’s artwork lay in their use of humor to say a resounding “yes” to everything being art and art being everything and nothing.

 Irreverence Irreverent is one of the most accurate ways to describe Dada. Whether it is a lack of respect and concern for art establishments, or mass-production, the government, or the bourgeoise, Dadaism is steeped in irreverence. Each Dada group had a slightly different focus for their lack of respect. The New York group focused their irreverence on the art world, with most of their works being inherently anti-art. The Berlin group centered around anti-government ideologies, and the Hannover group was surprisingly conservative.

Dada ArtistsFirst International Congress of Progressive Artists, Düsseldorf, 29-31 May 1922 (From left to right: unknown boy, Werner Graeff, Raoul Hausmann, Theo van Doesburg, Cornelis van Eesteren, Hans Richter, Nelly van Doesburg, unknown (De Pistoris?), El Lissitzky, Ruggero Vasari, Otto Freundlich (?), Hannah Höch, Franz Seiwert and Stanislav Kubicki); Netherlands Institute for Art History, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 Accident and Chance From Schwitters’ stunning compositions to Duchamp’s abstract assemblages, chance was a key concept in all Dada artwork. For Dada artists, embracing accident and random chance was a method for releasing creativity from rational control. Duchamp was welcoming of all accidents, like the crack in The Large Glass.

Schwitters was also a proponent of the use of chance in his works, gathering random pieces of debris from various locations. Alongside their lack of concern for preparatory work in the artistic process, and their love of slightly tarnished artworks, Dada artists’ fascination with chance underpins their lack of respect for institutional art methods.

 Different Modes in the Dada Art movement Dadaism was a very eclectic movement that explored a range of materials. Dada artists did not steer clear of using novel and unexpected materials in their works. Man Ray explored airbrush and photography techniques as a way of separating the artist’s hand from their work and introducing an element of chance, while Jean Arp experimented extensively with using random objects in collages.

Beyond typically artistic media, Dada artists also investigated performance art and literature. Hugo Ball, the artist responsible for the Dada Manifesto, experimented with liberating the written word from institutional conventions. Ball used syllables without sense to create Dadaism poetry. These nonsensical poems were often performed, bridging the gaps between different Dada media.

Dadaist Art“Belle Haleine: Eau de Voilette (Beautiful Breath: Veil Water)”. The label is a part of a photograph published on the cover of New York Dada, New York, April 1921 (cf. The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines: Volume III: Europe 1880 – 1940, p.177); Man Ray, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The Reception and Downfall of the Dada Art Movement As they intended, Dada stirred up a considerable amount of controversy. Dada attracted fervent fans and avid critics thanks to its overhauling of traditional artistic practices, passionate experimentation with new modes of expression, and their rebellion against all social institutions. Some saw Dadaism as a revolutionary step along the path of Avante-Garde art, while others found works like the readymades to be little more than objects from the garbage heap.

Into the early 1920s, whether positively or not, Dadaism gripped audiences. Unfortunately, the movement was destined to fall apart. Many Dada artists began to drift towards Surrealism, diving deeper into the philosophy of expressing the subconscious.

Other Dada artists, who entered the movement as a result of the First World War, found the growing power of Adolf Hitler to be too much to bear. Adolf Hitler struck a heavy blow to the Modern art world, rooting out all that he thought to be “degenerate.” Many Dada artists saw the destruction and mockery of their works and chose to move to the United States.

Although many of the first members of Dadaism began to scatter across the globe, Dadaism’s ideals continued to smolder. You can see the threads of Dada throughout many Modern art movements in the 20th century, most significantly in Pop Art.

Pop Art cultural commentaries surrounding capitalist culture and growing consumerism echo the ideals that first drew Dada artists together. Despite the brevity of the movement’s life, Dada remains a noted and significant part of 20th-century modern art, and it has been celebrated in retrospective exhibits throughout the world.

Famous Dada Artworks As the Dada artists would say, it is one thing to talk theoretically, but it is yet another to witness the soul of a movement in the pieces it produces. In this next section of the article, we discuss some of the most famous and influential pieces of Dada art.

 Francis Picabia: Ici, C’est Stieglitz (1915) Picabia was a heavily influential member of Dada at its inception, so it is only right that we begin by looking at one of his first Dada works. For Picabia, pushing against conventions and re-defining himself was enjoyable. Throughout his 45 year career, Picabia re-defined himself and his style many times. Early in his career, Picabia worked alongside Alfred Stieglitz, and this may have inspired this portrait.

Stieglitz gave Picabia his first solo exhibition, but Picabia later criticized his former friend, as we can see in this portrait. The portrait features a bellows camera, intended to represent the gallerist, a brake lever, and gear shift, and a large “IDEAL” in Gothic font. The broken camera and neutral gear shift are thought to paint Stieglitz as being beyond his prime, a concept strengthened by the outdated gothic font.

This drawing is one of a series of mechanical imagery and portraiture. It is intriguing to note that while the imagery is mechanical, these drawings are not a celebration of progress or modernity. Instead, they provide a new subject matter, one that contrasts the institutionally accepted symbolism of the past.

Dada Art MagazineOther mechanical drawings by Francis Picabia, including Canter, Portrait d’une Jeune Fille Américaine dans l’État de Nudité, and J’ai Vu (1915); Francis Picabia, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Hugo Ball: Sound Poem Karawane (1916) Hugo Ball is perhaps the most celebrated Dada artist, and he was responsible for writing the 1916 Dada Manifesto. The majority of Ball’s work was literary, and much took on the genre of poetry. In the same year that he penned the Manifesto, Ball performed this piece of Dadaism poetry. Here are the opening lines of Karawane:

“jolifanto bambla o falli bambla großiga m’pfa habla horem”

Clearly, the poem does not make sense in our language, or probably any language, and it continues along the same lines. Although the poem appears to be little more than incoherent, nonsensical ramblings, Ball is offering a deep consideration of literature. The concept behind sound poetry was to remove everything from poetry but the vocalization of the human voice. By doing so, Ball demonstrates that you are still able to experience a rhythm and emotion through the poem, despite the lack of what we would call traditional meaning.

Some historians believe that the nonsensical nature of this sound poem was intended to represent the failings of rational discussion in the ability of European leaders to solve their problems. Ball was equating the failings of discussions that eventually led to the First World War to the biblical narrative, The Tower of Babel. During the performance, Ball wore a strange costume. This costume allowed him to distance himself even further from his surroundings and audience, making the poem appear even stranger.

Dadaism PoetryHugo Ball performing his poem, Karawane in the Cabaret Voltaire, Zurich in 1916; Unknown authorUnknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 Marcel Duchamp: Fountain (1917) Of all Duchamp’s readymade pieces, this is probably the most well-known. The choice to use a urinal and name it Fountain was a challenge even to Duchamp’s fellow artists. As with most of his readymades, he manipulated the urinal very little before display, simply turning it upside down and adding a fictitious signature.

 A urinal is the farthest object away from what we socially understand as art. By removing it from its natural environment and placing it in a fine art context, Duchamp prompts us to question the fundamental definitions of art and the role of the artist in its creation.

The name Fountain is a humorous reference to the famous Baroque and Renaissance fountains and the purpose of a urinal. This piece is an icon of Dadaism, thanks to its ground-breaking deviation from tradition. Irreverence towards institutional production and design values fills every inch of this piece, and it has had an enormous influence on later 20th-century artists like Damien Hirst, Robert Rauschenberg, and Jeff Koons.

Contentious Modernist ArtFountain (1917) by Marcel Duchamp; Marcel Duchamp, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Hannah Höch: Cut with a Kitchen Knife Dada Through the Last Weimar Beer Belly Cultural Epoch of Germany (1919) Known for her photomontage and collage compositions, Höch was a member of the Club Dada. Using clippings from magazines and newspapers, alongside her own craft and sewing designs for the Ullstein Press, Höch unashamedly criticized German culture. Her literal slicing up and reassembly of German cultural imagery into emotional, disjointed, and vivid depictions of modern life made her an integral member of German Dadaism.

The long-winded title of this piece is a reference to the sexism, corruption, and consumerist decadence of the culture in pre-war Germany. This collage is more political and much larger than many of her montages. Höch uses fragmentation in this anti-art work to shed light on the contradictions inherent in Weimer politics. The juxtaposed images of artists, radicals, intellectuals, establishment people, and entertainers highlight these polarities.

 We can see many familiar faces in this fragmented photomontage, including Kathe Kollwitz, Lenin, Marx, and Pola Negri. The European map indicates which countries afford women the vote, suggesting or pushing for Germany to allow the newly enfranchised women to cut through the “beer belly” of male-dominated culture.

Höch breaks the boundaries between the spheres of public and domestic life and ties in commercial products, crafts, and modern art.

 Marcel Duchamp: LHOOQ (1919) What we may consider vandalism today, Dada artists saw as anti-art creations. This work by Duchamp is a perfect example of the irreverence of Dada towards traditional and classical art. On a postcard of the 1517 Mona Lisa painting, Duchamp drew a mustache and goatee. The label on the postcard, LHOOQ, letters that if pronounced by a French speaker, would sound like “she has a hot ass,” in French, of course.

 As was his style and intention, Duchamp managed to offend almost everyone with this piece. At the same time, he provokes us to ask questions about the overall artistic cannon, the values of traditional art, and the role of the artist in creativity. The Mona Lisa had been stolen around 1911 and had only just been brought back to the Louvre when Duchamp created this piece.

Popular Dada ArtA derivative work of Duchamp’s LHOOQ (1919), depicting the Mona Lisa with a moustache for “Movember”; Mona_Lisa.jpg: Leonardo da Vinciderivative work: Perhelion, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Raoul Hausmann: The Spirit of our Time (1920) This mechanical head assemblage is certainly Hausmann’s most famous work from the Dada period. Historians believe that the work represents the disillusionment that Hausmann felt towards the inability of the German government to make changes for the betterment of the nation. The sculpture consists of a wooden hat maker’s dummy with various objects attached to it, including a tape measure, a jewelry box, a ruler, brass camera knobs, a typewriter wheel, an old purse, and a leaking telescopic beaker.

The use of the wooden head echoes Hausmann’s attitude towards the typical person in a corrupt society who had only the capacity of what chance stuck to the outside of their head. The brain of these people, according to Haussmann, remains empty. Hausmann criticizes the inability for subtlety or critical thinking, representing these citizens as narrow-minded dummies with blind automation.

 Max Ernst: Chinese Nightingale (1920) Many of the pieces we have looked at so far have been quite political. In contrast, Max Ernst’s photomontages tend to be more poetic than the works of other German Dada artists. Rather than crafting a political message into his work, Ernst created images by randomly juxtaposing images. Ernst created Dada art by associating various elements that were completely alien in daily life to find the spark of poetry in their sudden and unexpected interactions.

In 1919 and 1920, Ernst created a variety of collages combining illustrations of human limbs, war machinery, and other objects. These collages emerged as bizarre, hybrid creatures which joined the fear of weaponry and death with lyrical titles and other innocuous elements. Many believe that these collages provided Ernst with catharsis following an injury caused by a recoiling gun in the war.

In this composition, Ernst uses the fan and arms of a Chinese dancer to represent the headdress and limbs of a strange creature whose body is a British bomb. Just above the side bracket of the bomb, Ernst has added an eye, creating an odd and unsettling bird-like creature. Using a sense of whimsy, Ernst is able to defuse the fear we associate with bombs, while still maintaining its other, more political associations.

Dada ArtistA photograph of Max Ernst in 1968; Unknown authorUnknown author, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Kurt Schwitters: Merz picture 46A. The Skittle Picture (1921) In this assemblage, Schwitters combines both three- and two-dimensional objects. The strange word “merz” at the beginning of this piece’s title is a nonsensical term that Schwitters used to describe his art method and many of his individual pieces. Apparently, Schwitters separated the term from “commerz.” Schwitters described his term as the fragments left by the turmoil of war that he used to compose new things.

His Merz pictures are often described as psychological collages. Schwitters would use small fragments of trash, including chess pieces, string, or ticket stubs, to create new and beautiful compositions. Much of Schwitters’ work is far less political, hostile, and dogmatic than other Dada works. EFor Schwitters, the focus was on using unique and non traditional materials.

Dada Art CollageAnother of Schwitters’ Merz drawings, Merzzeichnung 47 (1920); Kurt Schwitters, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 Man Ray: Rayograph (1922) Man Ray was part of the American branch of Dadaism. Although he was American, he spent many years working in France, where he developed his rayographs. These rayographs were experiments with photography, where Ray would place objects onto sensitized paper and expose them to light sources. The shadowy imprint left behind by these objects brings them away from their original context, purpose, and meaning.

 Ray reflected the Dada values of nonsensical artwork in his rayographs which have a ghostly appearance and tend to be composed of unrelated and strange objects. The Dada fascination with chance is also reflected in many of these works. Ray’s works liberate photography from the grips of institutional tradition, while other Dada artists liberated sculpture, literature, and painting. In Ray’s hands, photography was no longer a direct mirror of reality but a tool to create unique and strange images.

In fact, the very existence of the rayograph is due to chance. Ray was waiting for an image to appear in his darkroom after he had forgotten to expose it. While waiting, he placed various objects on top of the photo paper. These rayographs were the purest form of Dada creativity, according to Tzara. Like-minded Dada artists loved Ray’s work, and while he was not responsible for inventing the photogram, his works are undoubtedly the most well-known.

 What is Dada? Art Movements & Styles

Of all the Modernist and Avant-Garde art movements of the 20th century, there are none more bizarre and stimulating than the Dada movement. The artworks may seem confrontational and irreverent, and that is the point. Although the Dada movement lasted only a few years, it changed the course of 20th-century modern art and raised very necessary questions about society, consumerism, art, and politics.

VOA: Four Scenarios for Securing Peace in Ukraine


Washington, D.C. — U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing for a peaceful resolution to Russia’s now three-year full-scale war in Ukraine. VOA examined several approaches floated by think tanks recently aimed at achieving a lasting peace to the war.

Maximum pressure strategy

A plan by the Center for European Policy Analysis, or CEPA, titled “How to Win: A Seven-Point Plan for Sustainable Peace in Ukraine,” calls for “a maximum pressure strategy to bring Russia to the negotiating table in good faith.”

It proposes that the U.S. and its allies:

  • “Should provide immediate materiel support to Ukraine without caveats, aiming to wear down Russia’s military and thereby improve Ukraine’s negotiating position.”
  • “Should increase sanctions on Russian financial institutions and energy sector entities, release frozen Russian assets to support Ukrainian defense and reconstruction and enact secondary sanctions to intensify economic pressure not only on Russia but also on the authoritarian regimes of China, Iran, and North Korea.”

CEPA says that “Ukraine and Europe” must be included in any peace talks with Russia, that the U.S. should support “a European-led coalition of the willing” to enforce any “ceasefire line with an international force,” and that “European allies must make consistent and as rapid as possible progress toward Ukraine’s accession to the European Union.”One of the report’s authors, Catherine Sendak, CEPA’s director for transatlantic defense and security, told VOA’s Ukrainian service that the United States should enter talks with Russia only having “equipped Ukraine with the strongest possible means” and using its toughest “diplomatic tools.”

She added that the issue of Ukraine’s possible membership in NATO should not be included in talks with Russia. “To discuss that with a non-NATO member … I don’t believe it is advantageous to any negotiation,” Sendak said, noting that it would give Russia “veto power, if you will, over … choosing members to join the alliance or not.”

Negotiating tactics

Josh Rudolph, a German Marshall Fund senior fellow and head of its Transatlantic Democracy Working Group, worked on Russian and Ukrainian policy at the National Security Council during the first Trump administration.

Last month, he offered policy recommendations to the current Trump administration on ending the Ukraine conflict.

Among them:

  • “Approach [Russian President Vladimir] Putin from a position of strength. Whereas Putin looked tough and capable at the outset of Trump’s first term, his blunder in Ukraine has left him diminished. … As the dominant partner in this relationship, Trump, not Putin, can set negotiating terms.”
  • “Know when to walk away. A critical moment in the negotiations will come when Putin refuses to make major concessions. Trump must be prepared to walk away.”
  • “Combine sanctions with lower oil and gas prices. The best way to make Putin to see that pressing on in Ukraine would spell disaster for his rule is to pressure Russia financially. … Harnessing his warmer relationship with Saudi Arabia than [former President Joe] Biden enjoyed, Trump should flood the fossil fuel market, which would make the sanctions sustainable, starve Russia’s war machine, and generate political stability risks in Moscow.”

Rudolph also recommended arming Ukraine “to the hilt”; giving it “all $300 billion of Russia’s frozen assets”; making Europe “pay more for weapons” and provide 100,000 troops as “peacekeepers”; enabling “American companies to rebuild Ukraine”; and inviting Ukraine to join NATO should Putin refuse to accept “reasonable” peace deal terms.

Rudolph told VOA that Trump could convince those in the U.S. now skeptical of continuing to arm Ukraine that doing so as part of a peace deal would benefit American workers.

“[H]e tells them, OK, now we’ve got a good deal, it’s secured by rare earth [minerals], it has ended the war, and in order to hold it together, we’re going to need to provide a continued stream of good old American-made weapons, which by the way, create all of these American jobs and facilities and factories across red states.”

Touting economic benefits

In a report titled “Dollars and Sense: America’s Interest in a Ukrainian Victory,” Elaine McCusker, Frederick W. Kagan and Richard Sims of the American Enterprise Institute looked at the cost of ending support for Ukraine, concluding that this would lead to Ukraine’s defeat and Russia’s advance farther into Europe, forcing the U.S. to surge its presence in Europe.

Among the report’s conclusions:

  • “Supporting Ukraine to victory against Russia is in the best interest of the United States.”
  • “A world in which Russia prevails would be more dangerous and more expensive for America — requiring an estimated increase of $808 billion in defense spending over five years.”
  • “Alternatively, an increased and accelerated multinational commitment to Ukraine and the conclusion of the war in the near term would result in a vibrant and free Ukraine with a newly modernized and battle-tested military and a thriving industrial base, which would help stabilize Europe.”

In an interview with VOA, Frederick Kagan said a Russian victory in Ukraine would be a victory for Iran, China and North Korea, encouraging adventurism in their respective regions, and allow Russia to rebuild its army by obtaining additional human and material resources within Ukraine.

A Russian takeover of Ukraine would send a wave of refugees into Europe, further destabilizing the continent, Kagan said.

“They’ve committed atrocities on the Ukrainian population in the areas they occupy. I would expect that would get worse the further west the Russians move and the more they move into the hardest traditional anti-Russian, pro-Western areas of western Ukraine. The horrors will be unspeakable,” he predicted.

He said surged assistance to Ukraine would turn it into a bulwark for European peace and security — a country with a battle-tested army and rapidly developing military industry — thereby allowing the U.S. to focus on other regions.

Middle road approach

The Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025 Presidential Transition Project” includes policy recommendations concerning the Russia-Ukraine war.

It noted that the American conservative movement is split over Ukraine — one side supports Kyiv, the other favors walking away — and offered a middle road.

Among Project 2025’s recommendations:

  • “With respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives.”
  • “Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. The conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations.”
  • “The next conservative president has a generational opportunity to bring resolution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century.”

James Carafano, a national security expert at The Heritage Foundation who is responsible for its defense and foreign policy team, told VOA that it is in the U.S. interest to have a free and independent Ukraine that can defend itself.

“For the practical matter is, the United Europe can defend itself, and the United States can defend Europe if Ukraine’s occupied by Russia. Now, having said that, are we … way, way better off with the Russians on the other side of Ukraine? And the answer is ‘absolutely.’”


Men, Women Experience Near Daily Floggings in Afghanistan


ISLAMABAD — Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities publicly flogged six individuals on Tuesday after convicting them of offenses such as adultery, sodomy and eloping.

The Supreme Court of the de facto Afghan rulers announced that the punishments were carried out in southeastern Khost and northern Faryab provinces and that the individuals received 39 lashes each, along with varying prison sentences of up to 18 months.

Since the beginning of February, at least 61 Afghans, including nine women, have been flogged in sports stadiums packed with ordinary citizens and Taliban officials from the judiciary and administration, according to data from the top court.

The individuals were accused of adultery, eloping, sodomy and robbery, with many of them also receiving prison sentences ranging from several months to six years.

The United Nations and human rights organizations have condemned corporal punishment in Afghanistan as a violation of international law, urging the Taliban to immediately cease the practice.

Despite global outcry, hundreds of Afghan men and women have faced public flogging, and several have been executed under the Taliban’s interpretation of retributive justice, known as qisas.

Last week, reclusive Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada defended his governance, including the criminal justice system, saying they were rooted in divine commands.

“The esteemed supreme leader stated that every decree he issues is based on consultation with scholars and derived from the Quran and Hadith [sayings of Islam’s Prophet Muhammad] and represents commands of Allah,” a government spokesman quoted Akhundzada as telling a gathering in Kandahar.

Akhundzada, who is based in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar, has issued numerous decrees in accordance with his stringent interpretation of Islamic law and principles, resulting in restrictions on freedom of speech and female access to education and employment in the country.

The Taliban leader has banned girls’ education beyond the sixth grade and blocked many women from public and private sector employment. Afghan women cannot travel by road or air without a chaperon and cannot visit public places such as parks, gyms or beauty salons.

The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan emphasized again on X Tuesday that restrictions on women “are causing long-term damage” in the impoverished, war-torn country.

The chief prosecutor of the Hague-based International Criminal Court last month announced he was seeking arrest warrants for Akhundzada and the Taliban chief justice, holding them “criminally responsible for persecuting Afghan girls and women.”

The Taliban dismissed the warrants as “devoid of just legal basis, duplicitous in nature and politically motivated.”

No country has recognized the Taliban as the legitimate governing authority of the country, primarily due to the harsh treatment of Afghan women.


#HumanRights #Afghanistan #Taliban #WomensRights #Justice #Flogging #HumanRightsViolations #StopTheViolence #WarCrimes #Freedom #Equality #SaveAfghanWomen #InternationalLaw #EndCorporalPunishment #UN #ICC #JusticeForAfghanistan #NoToTorture

@UNHumanRights, @amnesty, @hrw, @IntlCrimCourt, @UN, @UN_Women, @Refugees, @voanews, @guardian, @AJEnglish, @BBCWorld, @CNN, @hrc, @StateDept, @EU_Commission, @UNICEF, @WomenDeliver, @ICR


Men, Women Experience Near Daily Floggings in Afghanistan (Feb. 19, 2025)

Multilateralism: What is it, and Why does it Matter?


New York, N.Y. Multilateralism is a term frequently used at the United Nations, but it’s not a concept that is only relevant to the corridors and conference rooms where international diplomacy takes place.

Beyond the U.N., it affects people’s daily lives in many ways. It helps reduce conflicts, grow our economies, and allows us to travel safely around the world. It’s also crucial for tackling big global problems like climate change and unregulated artificial intelligence.

What does “multilateral” actually mean?  

Originally, “multilateral” was a geometry term meaning “many-sided.”

Now, it describes international politics and diplomacy, where many countries with different views and goals work together.

The United Nations system is the principal multilateral forum where countries come together to solve global problems. They hold conferences, summits, and meetings to address important issues.

 The world comes together to debate issues at the UN General Assembly in New York.
The world comes together to debate issues at the UN General Assembly in New York. UN Photo/Loey Felipe.

Cooperation, Compromise, and Coordination  

In international affairs, countries work together (cooperation), make deals (compromise), and organize their efforts (coordination) to solve problems that one country alone couldn’t handle.

These three “Cs” help build trust and settle disputes peacefully.

Making the modern world possible  

Imagine if every country developed its own system for phone calls, airlines, shipping or mail developed nationally – and did not coordinate with others. Global travel, communication, and trade would be a mess. Thanks to multilateralism, we have international systems that make these things possible.

The fact that we have global standards for a range of our daily activities from health to postal systems to travel is down to multilateralism, and the creation of a series of multilateral organizations, many of which were established in the 19th Century, and have now become part of the U.N. System.

Two multilateral organizations that pre-date the UN are:

International Telecommunications Union (ITU): Started in 1865 to standardize telegraph networks. Now, it helps with governance for radio frequencies, satellites, and the internet.

International Labour Organization (ILO): Founded in 1919 to promote workers’ rights, encourage decent employment opportunities, enhance social protection and strengthen dialogue on work-related issues.

Multilateralism enables international coordination across sectors, including communication.
Multilateralism enables international coordination across sectors, including communication. © Unsplash/Brunno Tozzo.

Making multilateral policies  

Since 1945, the UN has helped countries work together and create important agreements.

The central policy-making arm of the Organization is the General Assembly, a unique forum for multilateral discussions of international issues.

Each of the 193 Member States of the United Nations has an equal vote, no matter the size of their economy, population, or military might: Monaco’s vote carries the same weight as China’s.

Achievements of the U.N.  

Another feature of multilateralism is standard-setting. The General Assembly has this normative role and has created many international laws and treaties on disarmament, human rights, and environmental protection.

One of its greatest accomplishments is the drafting and adoption of the groundbreaking Universal Declaration of Human Rights which paved the way for a comprehensive body of human rights law.  

Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, it was proclaimed by the General Assembly in 1948.

It set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and has inspired the constitutions of many newly independent States and new democracies.

Young children read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights at a playground. (Archive)
Young children read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights at a playground. (Archive) UN Photo.

The Cold War  

During the Cold War (late 1940s to early 1990s), the UN played a key role in peacekeeping and arms control.

Despite the threat of nuclear war, a third world war was avoided partly because of the U.N. providing a platform for discussion and decision-making.

The U.N. today  

Some 80 years later, the United Nations is still the world’s primary multilateral organization, harmonizing and coordinating international action in fields ranging from peacekeeping to economic development to trade.

Millions of lives have been saved thanks to the humanitarian assistance provided and coordinated by the United Nations, bringing food, health and shelter to conflict and disaster zones.

The multilateral framework has expanded beyond countries to include representatives of civil society, youth and business, among others.

UN staff support a polio vaccination campaign in Gaza.
U.N. staff support a polio vaccination campaign in Gaza. © UNRWA

What’s next?

Member States often struggle to cope effectively with today’s global threats and challenges, from devastating civil wars and cross-border conflicts to growing economic inequality between and within countries, and the existential threats of unregulated artificial intelligence and climate change.

To make sure that the UN remains fit for purpose as the world’s pre-eminent forum for multilateralism in the decades to come, in 2020 Member States invited the Secretary-General, António Guterres, to develop a vision for stronger global governance, for present and future generations.

Policy reforms in areas from peacekeeping to the international financial architecture, education and youth engagement in policymaking were encapsulated in Our Common Agenda, which covered recommendations for an upgraded U.N. which in turn fed into the landmark Pact for the Future, which was adopted by world leaders at the Summit for the Future meeting at the United Nations in New York in September 2024.

Call to action by the U.N. chief

In his first year as Secretary-General, António Guterres said having laws and conventions are not enough.

He urged: “We need stronger commitment to a rules-based order, with the United Nations at its center, with the different institutions and treaties that bring the Charter to life.”

He called for networked multilateralism – with other international and regional organizations – and an inclusive multilateralism that would withstand the tests and threats of today and tomorrow.


Multilateralism: What is it, and Why does it Matter? (Feb. 19, 2025)

Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes Skyrocket in U.K., Report Finds

London – A new report reveals a disturbing surge in Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hate crimes across the United Kingdom.

The nonprofit ‘Tell MAMA‘ has issued “The New Norm of Anti-Muslim Hate” that documents over 6,000 verified incidents in 2024, the highest number in the organization’s 12-year history.

This represents a shocking 165% increase compared to 2022.

The report details a wide range of hostile acts, from life-threatening attacks and incitement to violence to verbal abuse, harassment, and discrimination.

These incidents occurred in various locations, including places of worship, public spaces, schools, workplaces, and private homes, demonstrating that no environment is immune.

Specific events, like the Southport murders, the U.K. General Elections, and the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, triggered significant spikes in reported cases.

While these events contributed to the increase, the report highlights a persistent undercurrent of prejudice fueled by online misinformation, inflammatory rhetoric, conspiracy theories, and sensationalist media narratives. It emphasizes the profound impact these incidents have on individuals and communities, causing trauma, fear, and marginalization.

The report calls for a comprehensive, society-wide approach to combating Islamophobia. Recommendations include educational campaigns to challenge stereotypes, policy changes to address systemic issues, and community engagement to promote equality and inclusion.


#Islamophobia, #HateCrime, #TellMAMA, #UK, #Equality, #SocialJustice

What is Social Justice; How is the U.N. Helping Make it a Reality?


New York, N.Y. — In recent years, the term “social justice” has become a significant part of public discourse, often invoked in discussions about equality, human rights, and societal reforms. But what exactly does social justice mean, and why is it so important?

The United Nations supports the principle in multiple ways, from addressing economic inequality to access to education, healthcare, and the protection of human rights, with the aim of creating a world where everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

Social justice is for everyone, which is why the UN pays attention to the needs of particularly marginalized and vulnerable communities, such as refugees, indigenous peoples and those living with disabilities.

Social justice encompasses a wide range of issues which are highlighted as part of World Day of Social Justice marked annually on 20 February.

Equity, solidarity, human rights

The UN definition of social justice is “an underlying principle for peaceful and prosperous coexistence within and among nations.” This can be interpreted as a world in which societies are based on the principles of equality and solidarity, understand and value human rights, and recognize the dignity of every human being.

The five key principles of social justice are often defined as:

  • the recognition that different people have different needs and circumstances (equity),
  • ensuring that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to succeed (access),
  • enabling all individuals to play in role in the political, economic and social life of the communities (participation),
  • protecting the human rights of all individuals (rights) and
  • valuing and respecting differences between people, such as race, gender, and sexual orientation (diversity).

Social justice is a cornerstone of the United Nations’ mission to promote peace, security, and human rights worldwide and is enshrined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, an international blueprint for peace and prosperity.

The Agenda is broken down into 17 ambitious Goals, which are due to be achieved in the next five years. Some progress has been made, particularly on the reduction of extreme poverty, and improved access to essential health services, but overall they are not on track.

However, the Goals have been useful in providing UN Member States with clear, objective targets designed to improve the lives of their citizens.

The Sustainable Development Goals form the bedrock of social justice.
The Sustainable Development Goals form the bedrock of social justice. U.N. News/Daniel Dickinson.

Promoting decent work

One of the primary ways the UN supports social justice is through the promotion of decent work and economic opportunities.

The International Labour Organization (ILO), a specialized UN agency, plays a crucial role in this area. The ILO‘s Decent Work Agenda focuses on creating jobs, guaranteeing rights at work, extending social protection, and promoting social dialogue.

By advocating for fair wages, safe working conditions, and the elimination of forced labour and child labour, the ILO helps ensure that workers worldwide are treated with dignity and respect.

A banana grower harvests his crop in Manicaland, Zimbabwe.
A banana grower harvests his crop in Manicaland, Zimbabwe. © ILO/Shaun Chitsiga.

The promotion of decent work is one of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 AgendaGoal 8 (SDG 8) calls for the promotion of inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all.

Advancing gender equality

Gender equality is another critical aspect of social justice that the UN actively promotes. It is a fundamental human right and is critical to a healthy society.

UN Women, the United Nations entity dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women, works to eliminate discrimination against women and girls, empower women, and achieve gender equality, through initiatives such as the HeForShe campaign and the Spotlight Initiative.

A community activist in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique provides information on preventing child marriage and gender-based violence.
A community activist in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique provides information on preventing child marriage and gender-based violence. © UNFPA/Mbuto Machil

SDG 5 calls for the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls: UN-backed commitments have seen declines in some problem areas, such as child marriage and female genital mutilation (FGM), but many women and girls continue to face barriers to their economic and social empowerment.

Ensuring access to education

Despite some recent progress in the percentage of students attaining a basic education, an estimated 300 million children and young people will still lack basic numeracy and literacy skills by 2030.

Students in Chhattisgarh, India, attend a robotics class.
Students in Chhattisgarh, India, attend a robotics class. © UNICEF.

Education is a powerful tool for reducing inequalities, reaching gender equality and achieving social justice, and the UN is committed to reaching SDG 4, which focuses on ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all.

The UN also supports educational and training programmes aim to build tolerance, understanding, and resilience among young people, helping them become advocates for social justice.

Protecting human rights

The protection of human rights is at the heart of the UN’s mission, and one of its greatest accomplishments is the drafting and adoption of the groundbreaking Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which paved the way for a comprehensive body of human rights law.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) works to promote and protect the human rights of all people, monitoring and reporting human rights violations, providing technical assistance to governments, and supporting the work of human rights defenders.

The work of the OHCHR is crucial in ensuring that individuals can live free from discrimination, violence, and oppression.

The SDGs focus on eliminating poverty and providing people with opportunities to prosper.
The SDGs focus on eliminating poverty and providing people with opportunities to prosper. © WHO/Anna Kari.

World Day of Social Justice: A just transition

  • Since 2008 World Day of Social Justice has been celebrated annually on 20 February, following a declaration by the General Assembly.
  • The Day was created as a reminder of the need to build a fairer and more equitable world, and to combat unemployment, social exclusion and poverty.
  • This year’s theme is “Strengthening a just transition for a sustainable future,” acknowledging the need to ensure that the move towards low-carbon economies benefits everyone, especially the most vulnerable.
  • The International Labour Organization (ILO) is marking the occasion with a series of events held in major cities around the world.