The Stewardship Report

Home Blog Page 35

Chinese Officials Urge U.S. Universities to Protect Student Rights

China Calls on U.S. to End “Discriminatory” Policies Targeting Chinese Students;
290,000 Chinese enrolled in U.S. institutions – nearly 25% of international scholars

Beijing — The Chinese government has called on U.S. authorities to stop targeting Chinese students with “discriminatory and restrictive measures” after a U.S. congressman demanded six universities disclose details about their Chinese scholars, citing national security concerns. The appeal, issued Thursday by Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, underscores growing friction over educational exchanges amid strained bilateral relations.

US lawmakers are proposing a bill to ban mainland Chinese from studying science and technology at American universities. Photo: Xinhua.

Background of the Dispute

The controversy follows reports that a U.S. House representative, whose name was not specified in Chinese state media, sent letters to six American universities earlier this month requesting information on Chinese students and researchers.

The lawmaker allegedly raised concerns about potential intellectual property theft and unauthorized technology transfers, reflecting longstanding U.S. anxieties about Chinese espionage. While the institutions involved remain unnamed, the move aligns with recent U.S. efforts to tighten oversight on academic collaborations with China, particularly in STEM fields.

Chinese students graduate, University of Southern California. Photo credit: USC/D. Sprague.

China’s Response: stigmatizing students, undermining decades of cooperation

At a routine press briefing, Mao Ning condemned the inquiry as an abuse of national security rhetoric, warning that such actions risk stigmatizing Chinese students and undermining decades of educational cooperation.

“We urge the U.S. side to cease overstretching the concept of national security,” she stated, emphasizing that Chinese students’ contributions to American innovation and campus diversity should not be overshadowed by “groundless suspicions.”

Mao highlighted that approximately 290,000 Chinese students enrolled in U.S. institutions in 2023, constituting nearly 25% of all international scholars—a demographic critical to sustaining tuition revenues amid declining domestic enrollment.

“These students are not security threats,” she asserted. “They are bridges fostering mutual understanding and drivers of scientific progress.

Economic Stakes: Chinese students contribute $11 billion annually to U.S.

Chinese students contribute an estimated $11.5 billion annually to the U.S. economy through tuition and living expenses, according to the Institute of International Education. Universities, particularly those reliant on international tuition fees, have repeatedly opposed blanket restrictions, arguing they harm academic freedom and institutional competitiveness.

Mao echoed these sentiments, noting that Sino-American educational partnerships have historically propelled advancements in technology, medicine, and engineering. “Cooperation benefits both nations,” she said, pointing to collaborative research on climate change and public health as evidence of shared gains.

Broader Geopolitical Tensions

The dispute occurs against a backdrop of escalating U.S.-China rivalry, with Washington increasingly framing Beijing as a strategic competitor.

Under the Biden administration, the U.S. has maintained Trump-era policies restricting visas for students linked to Chinese military-affiliated universities, while Congress debates further measures to limit technology leaks.

China, meanwhile, has accused the U.S. of “paranoia” and hypocrisy, noting that thousands of American students study in China without similar scrutiny. Analysts suggest the latest clash could further deter Chinese scholars from choosing U.S. institutions, potentially redirecting talent to competitors like Canada, Australia, or Europe.

Calls for Dialogue

Mao urged Washington to “approach educational exchanges objectively and fairly,” stressing that fostering cross-cultural ties aligns with global demands for collaboration on transnational challenges. However, U.S. officials have yet to publicly respond to China’s remarks.

Looking Ahead

The outcome of this dispute may hinge on whether U.S. universities comply with the congressional requests—and how lawmakers utilize the data. While some institutions may resist to protect student privacy, others could face political pressure to demonstrate compliance with security protocols.

For now, Chinese state media has framed the issue as a test of America’s commitment to open academia. As Mao concluded: “Discrimination erodes trust. Cooperation is the only path forward.”


Implications for Bilateral Relations

Educational exchanges have long been a stabilizing force in U.S.-China relations, but their politicization risks severing a vital people-to-people bond,” state Jim Luce of the J. Luce Foundation of Luce Family Charities.

“As debates over national security versus academic freedom intensify, the world is watching to see whether these two powers can reconcile competing priorities—or if international higher education becomes another sad casualty of President Trump‘s deepening Cold War-style divide,” he adds


Chinese Officials Urge U.S. Universities to Protect Student Rights (March 21, 2025)


#USChinaEducationTensions #ProtectChineseStudents #AcademicCooperation #XinhuaReport #USNationalSecurity

Tags: Xinhua News Agency, U.S.-China Relations, International Education, National Security, Chinese Students Abroad, Academic Discrimination, Higher Education Policy

Netflix Unveils ‘The Residence’: A Whodunit Set in the White House


New York, N.Y. — Netflix has expanded its repertoire of original content with the release of “The Residence,” a murder mystery series set against the backdrop of the White House. Premiering on March 20, 2025, the show offers viewers a blend of suspense, drama, and subtle humor.

Plot Overview

“The Residence” transports audiences into the intricate world of the White House staff, where a state dinner culminates in the murder of Chief Usher A.B. Wynter, portrayed by Giancarlo Esposito. With 157 potential suspects among the residence’s personnel, the narrative centers on Detective Cordelia Cupp, played by Uzo Aduba, as she navigates the complexities of the investigation.

The series delves into the personal and professional lives of the staff, revealing hidden secrets and motives that keep viewers guessing until the end.  

Cast and Characters

The ensemble cast brings depth to the series, with notable performances including:
    •    Uzo Aduba as Detective Cordelia Cupp: An eccentric investigator renowned for solving complex cases.
    •    Giancarlo Esposito as A.B. Wynter: The esteemed Chief Usher whose untimely death sparks the central mystery.
    •    Randall Park as FBI Agent Edwin Park: Cupp’s partner, providing a balance of wit and seriousness.
    •    Susan Kelechi Watson as Jasmine Haney: A senior staff member with intricate ties to the residence’s operations.
    •    Ken Marino as Brian Castillo: A charismatic staffer with a penchant for bending rules.

Additionally, the series features appearances by Jane Curtin, Jason Lee, and Kylie Minogue, who plays herself, adding a touch of real-world glamour to the storyline.

Production Insights

Giancarlo Esposito as A. B. Wynter. Character Profile: The White House’s former chief usher. He dies at the beginning of the series. A.B. opens up about his experiences as
an orphan during flashback sequences. Esposito appeared in Do the Right Thing (1989), 
The Usual Suspects (1995), Breaking Bad (2009-11), and The Jungle Book (2016).

Developed by Shondaland’s Paul William Davies, known for his work on “Scandal” and “For the People,” “The Residence” is inspired by Kate Andersen Brower’s book, “The Residence: Inside the Private World of the White House.”

The series offers a fictional narrative that provides a unique perspective on the lives of those working behind the scenes in one of the world’s most iconic buildings.

The production team undertook the ambitious task of recreating the White House interiors. Filming took place at Raleigh Studios in Los Angeles, where approximately 150,000 pounds of flooring and 200 doors were utilized to construct the sets.

Handmade wallpapers, including a replica of the 18th-century bear wallpaper from the Diplomatic Reception Room, were crafted to enhance authenticity. Notably, 95% of the scenes were filmed on these meticulously designed sets, with minimal reliance on visual effects.  

Critical Reception

Upon its release, “The Residence” garnered generally favorable reviews. Rotten Tomatoes reported an 81% approval rating, with critics praising Aduba’s portrayal of Detective Cupp as bringing a “welcome level of sophistication” to the series. Metacritic assigned a score of 66 out of 100, indicating positive feedback from the critic community.  

Viewer Engagement

Early audience reactions have been positive, with many viewers expressing enthusiasm for the show’s unique setting and intricate plot. The combination of a high-stakes environment and a classic whodunit format has resonated with subscribers, positioning “The Residence” as a potential standout in Netflix’s 2025 lineup.

Future Prospects

While Netflix has yet to announce a second season, creator Paul William Davies has expressed interest in continuing the narrative. In an interview, Davies mentioned having ideas for future seasons, potentially exploring new mysteries that Detective Cupp and Agent Park could tackle, possibly even beyond the confines of the White House.  

“The Residence” offers a fresh take on the murder mystery genre by situating it within the iconic halls of the White House. With strong performances, detailed production design, and an engaging storyline, the series stands as a testament to Netflix’s commitment to delivering diverse and compelling content to its global audience.

Netflix Unveils ‘The Residence’: A Whodunit Set in the White House (March 20, 2025)


#TheResidenceNetflix, #WhiteHouseMystery,
#UzoAduba, #Shondaland, #NetflixOriginals

Tags: The Residence, Uzo Aduba, Shondaland, Murder Mystery, Streaming Series,
White House, Paul William Davies, Giancarlo Esposito, Randall Park

Orphans International El Salvador & The Dueñas Family Legacy


New York, N.Y. — In 2002, Jim Luce, the visionary behind Orphans International Worldwide (OIW), initiated talks with Salvadoran business magnates Alejandro Dueñas and Miguel F. Dueñas to establish Orphans International El Salvador. The proposed initiative aimed to deliver a comprehensive care model for orphaned and abandoned children, prioritizing education, healthcare, psychological support, and community reintegration.

El Salvador’s civil war had devastated social structures, leaving an estimated 75,000 dead and displacing over a million people. By 2002, the country grappled with a legacy of poverty (40% of the population below the poverty line), gang violence, and a high rate of child abandonment. Gangs such as MS-13 and Barrio 18 territories led to great domestic instability.

Systemic Gaps: El Salvador’s reliance on small-scale NGOs underscores a lack of state-led solutions. Government initiatives, like president Bukele’s gang crackdowns, reduce street violence but do little for systemic orphan care, leaving NGOs as critical lifelines.

Luce remembers the trip vividly: “It was an eye-opening adventure, surrounded even in the family compound with armed guards. The family told me the once a year the military opened a road to the sea for the family to enjoy a day at the beach, but other than that, the family remained secluded in their compound for safety.”

Orphans International El Salvador never fully launched

The “global family care” philosophy of Orphans International sought to move beyond traditional orphanages, fostering small, family-like units led by local stakeholders. The Dueñas brothers, with their business acumen and social standing, were ideal partners to anchor this vision in El Salvador’s unique cultural and economic landscape.

However, Orphans International El Salvador never fully launched as a distinct entity due to cultural and regulatory challenges to its ties to the American organization and the project was subsumed into charity work of the local Catholic diocese which the Dueñas family supported. This collaboration underscored the family’s openness to philanthropy, even if their role had remained exploratory.

El Salvador’s child welfare ecosystem today reflects a blend of local and international efforts, addressing systemic challenges like gang recruitment, malnutrition, and educational deficits. Orphans International continued to be active in countries like Haiti and Indonesia.

The Dueñas family is historically significant in El Salvador, known for their involvement in the coffee industry during the 19th century and later diversifying into real estate, construction, and retail. They are part of the country’s elite, often mentioned among the richest families, with properties like Casa Dueñas, now La Casa de las Academias, reflecting their cultural impact.

The Dueñas Family: Business Legacy and Social Impact

In the 19th Century, the Dueñas family emerged as a pillar of El Salvador’s “14 Families” (las catorce), an oligarchy that dominated the coffee trade from the 1870s onward. Coffee accounted for 90% of exports by 1900, cementing their wealth.

Their El Espino estate, sprawling about 2,000 acres (over 800 hectares) near San Salvador, epitomized their dominance until the 1980 agrarian reform redistributed it to 500+ peasant families under President José Napoleón Duarte’s decree. 800 hectares is two-and-a-half times as big as Central Park.

The coffee boom created a legacy of inequality which enriched elites but left indigenous and peasant communities landless, fueling tensions that erupted in the 1932 La Matanza massacre and, later, the civil war (1980–1992).

Francisco Dueñas Díaz had served as president of El Salvador intermittently between 1851–1871. He was a conservative stalwart, he oversaw road construction and legal reforms but prioritized elite interests. His ousting in 1871 marked a shift toward liberal governance, though the Dueñas clan retained economic clout.

Dueñas Hermanos Ltda.The Dueñas Brothers — then formed as a modern business empire. A second-generation leader, Miguel Dueñas helped steered Dueñas Hermanos y Compañia and Roberto Dueñas Limitada into diversified sectors. Miguel F. Dueñas had graduated from Georgetown University in 1966.

Cement became the family’s fortune. They secured contracts with firms like Holcim for infrastructure projects, including San Salvador’s metro expansion in the 2020s.

The Dueñas family moved in real estate where the developed high-end properties like the Torre Futura, a commercial hub in the capital’s Zona Rosa district, moved into retail managing franchises such as Subway and Wendy’s, capitalizing on Central America’s growing middle class.

Then, they leveraged the family’s local strength with U.S. education to forge ties with multinational corporations, enhancing the family’s regional influence.

Post-Land Reform Adaptation

After losing agricultural dominance in 1980, the family pivoted to urban industries, aligning with El Salvador’s shift toward manufacturing and services (e.g., maquiladoras and tourism). By 2025, their portfolio reflected resilience amid political upheavals, including Nayib Bukele’s populist reforms.

Philanthropy and Ambiguity

Unlike their peers such as the Cristiani family, the Dueñas clan maintains a subdued charitable profile. Their wealth supports private giving—schools, churches, or hospitals—but lacks the transparency of formal foundations. The redistribution of their El Espino catalyzed rural cooperatives, indirectly advancing welfare policies the family once opposed.

Current Status and Legacy

Today, the Dueñas family remains a quiet force in El Salvador’s elite circles. Younger Dueñas members—often educated abroad—engage in fintech startups, renewable energy, and regional NGOs, signaling a modernized legacy. Their influence persists despite Bukele’s anti-oligarchy rhetoric, suggesting both adaptability and discreet political alliances.

The Dueñas family’s tentative 2002 foray into child welfare reflects a broader trend among Latin American oligarchs—balancing historical privilege with modern social responsibility. Their limited follow-through highlights the tension between profit and altruism. There remain systemic gaps: El Salvador’s reliance on small-scale NGOs underscores a lack of state-led solutions. The absence of a robust Orphans International El Salvador points to missed opportunities for scalable impact.

Historical Echoes

The Dueñas legacy mirrors El Salvador’s trajectory—from feudal coffee barons to urban capitalists—raising questions about whether their wealth redistribution (voluntary or forced) can bridge the nation’s enduring divides.

The family’s shift to urban industries (cement, real estate) bolstered San Salvador’s growth but neglected rural investment. This mirrors national trends: urban GDP per capita rose 15% since 2010, while rural areas lag, with 50% of residents in poverty (2023 data). Their legacy thus reinforces, rather than mitigates, the divide. The question remains: how has the Dueñas family’s post-land reform strategy impacted the urban-rural divide?

Elite Philanthropy: The Dueñas family’s tentative 2002 foray into child welfare reflects a broader trend among Latin American oligarchs—balancing historical privilege with modern social responsibility. Their limited follow-through highlights the tension between profit and altruism.

The Dueñas family is historically significant in El Salvador, known for their involvement in the coffee industry during the 19th century and later diversifying into real estate, construction, and retail. They are part of the country’s elite, often mentioned among the richest families, with properties like Casa Dueñas, now La Casa de las Academias, reflecting their cultural impact.

Orphans International El Salvador & The Dueñas Family Legacy (March 20, 2025)


#OrphansInternational, #DueñasFamily, #ElSalvador, #ChildWelfare, #Philanthropy, #SocialImpact, #Legacy, #History, #BusinessInfluence, #UrbanRuralDivide, #ElitePhilanthropy

Tags: Orphans International El Salvador, Dueñas Family, Jim Luce, Philanthropy, Child Welfare, El Salvador History, Business Legacy, Social Impact, Urban-Rural Divide, Elite Families

The Global Chef – Goat Meat Light Fufu Soup (Togo)


New York, N.Y. — Our friends at #Savourous have share this menu and video for one of our all-time favorites – goat and fufu!

Goat Meat Light Fufu Soup (Cuisine Togolaise).

She writes, “One of my favorite soup to go with the fabulous Togolese pounded yam fufu. Any meat will work perfect for this soup, but today I just opted for goat meat… What I like about this pot is how versatile it is. The same pot can be use as a slow cooker —On a stove top including induction —- And in the oven! So now you know why I love this baby so much! Back to my fufu soup recipe, all you need is:

  • Goat meat
  • Ginger Onion
  • Akpi seed or Djassang (optional)
  • Bouillon, salt
  • Hot pepper
  • Cloves
  • Black pepper
  • Fresh tomato and onion
  • Water (you can use boiled yam water if making yam fufu at the same time otherwise water is good)

Our friends at #Savourous have share this menu and video for one of our all-time favorites – goat and fufu!

Pepper soup, goat meat pepper soup

Ingredients

  • 3-5 pounds of cubed goat meat
  • About 8 cups of water (or boiled yam water)
  • 5 Tablespoons of ginger paste
  • 5 Tablespoons of onion paste
  • About 10 cloves
  • about 6 Akpi seeds or Djassang (optional)
  • 1 Big fresh crushed tomato
  • 1/2 medium onion sliced
  • 2 Tablespoons of black pepper
  • 4 Tablespoons of bouillon powder (or to taste)
  • 4 habanero peppers (less if hot pepper heat is an issue)

Goat meat pepper soup with fufu

Instructions

  1. In the 4 quart 360 cookware pot, add the clean cubed goat meat.
  2. Place the pot on the slow cooker base and turn it to high setting.
  3. Add ginger paste, onion paste, cloves and the optional akpi seeds.
  4. Cover and let it cook for 30 mins to 45 mins (depends on how soft you want the meat).
  5. Open the lid, add your water, then remove the pot from the slow cooker base and place it on stove top at high heat.
  6. Add the crushed tomato, sliced onion and hot pepper.
  7. Let it boil for about 3 mins then taste the soup. If you feel it need salt or bouillon, add a little of those to your taste.
  8. Let it boil for another 5 minutes, add black pepper and mix well.
  9. Remove and serve as is or over fufu.

Goat meat pepper soup with fufu

This Togolese goat meat fufu soup is very light and similar to Nigerian style pepper soup. It goes so well with fufu or as is, perfect during cold days. You can make it vegan by using mushrooms as meat.


Global Chef for The Stewardship Report

African Traditional Religion | Odinani Explained by Chimdi Nobim


New York, N.Y. — Chimdi Nobim has written a wonderful introduction to Odinani, the ancestral spiritual science of the Igbo people of Nigeria. He writes:

What is Odinani?

“Odinani is the ancestral spiritual science of the Igbo people of Nigeria.”

“Literally translated it means “It is in the Earth/land,” referencing the traditional Igbo belief that Ani/Ala the Earth Mother Goddess is central to our very existence and to progress in all endeavors.

Odinani/Odinala should not be confused with Omenani/Omenala, which are the social elements (customs and traditions) of Igbo people, although there are obvious links between the two, as spirituality is often the basis for all other cultural elements.”

Symbol of Ala, the Earth Mother, among the Eda Igbo, present-day Abia or Ebonyi State. P. A. Talbot, c. 1920s.
Symbol of Ala, the Earth Mother, among the Eda Igbo, present-day Abia or Ebonyi State. P. A. Talbot, c. 1920s. Photo courtesy Chimdi Nobim.

What are the basic tenets of Odinani?

Chimdi Nobim writes, “In Odinani it is believed that everyone is a spiritual being (mmuo) born into a physical body (mmadu) to accomplish a destiny on Earth, or to acquire experience.

At the center of our being is Chi, the divine spark that is our true self and that guides us from within, and is our link to the Supreme Being And Source of All Life known as Chineke, which has a masculine part called Chi Ukwu (Great Soul) and a feminine part called Eke.

While Chi Ukwu is the source/collective of all Chi, Eke is Creation herself and sustains and nurtures all life within the universes contained in her Cosmic Womb. The Earth, Ani/Ala, is therefore an extension of the Divine Mother Eke.”

Playing with Time and Memory. A series of four acrylic on canvas paintings, each 101x101cm, by Chuu Krydz Ikwuemesi, 2020. Image courtesy Chimdi Nobim.
Masquerades from different cultural regions of the Igbo area photographed
by G. I. Jones in the 1930s. Photo courtesy Chimdi Nobim.

Nobim continues, “The Divine Mother extends herself into forces of nature that regulate life as we know it, and these forces are personalized as deities (called Agbara, Alushi or Arushi depending on dialect).

Some common examples of these deities are:

Ihejioku/Ifejioku – deity of Agriculture
Omumu – deity of fertility
Ekwensu – deity of warfare
Amadioha – deity of justice
Onwa – deity of the moon
Anyanwu – deity of the sun
Nnemmiri/Oshimmiri/Idemili – deity of the waters
Arobinagu – deity of herbs
Agwu – deity of wisdom, knowledge and divination

This list is in no way conclusive as the number and functions of deities vary from community to community. Practitioners of Odinani invoke these deities on matters considered to be under their respective jurisdictions.

Reincarnation is a central belief of Odinani, as it is asserted that a person incarnates repeatedly, usually within a family, until certain tasks are successfully accomplished. Once accomplished, the individual takes his place amongst other ascended ancestors to guide and watch over descendants, provided said descendants are receptive to their guidance.

When a person incarnates, his previous incarnation is called onyeuwa, and it’s believed that the onyeuwa can be accessed and invoked to assist the individual in achieving the task that brought him/her back.

In Odinani it is also believed that humans are not alone in this world, neither is this world the only one. Surrounding us are subtle realms not accessible to our physical senses, which are populated by sentient beings.

Okoroshi masquerade.

Actually many of us on Earth as humans today lived in those worlds before our birth into this one, and we have friends and families there.

These beings are called mmuo in Igbo, also known as fairies/jinns/elementals/wee folk in other languages.

As we are all children of the Divine Mother whose worlds interface, our primordial ancestors established relationships with these spirit beings, much like treaties are established between nations, for mutually beneficial cohabitation.

Just like treaties are inherited by successive governments and people of a nation, so also do we inherit these covenants made with other worlds from our ancestors.

Some of these spirits serve as guardians for clans and communities, and in return we are expected to honor or repay them in several ways which depend on the initial ancestral agreement.”

Is worship part of Odinani?

Nobim writes, “In worship one is expected to give of oneself to another being on the assumption that this being has a right to demand it of us, no questions asked.

Also in worship one is expected to beg or grovel before another in hopes that the latter will answer our requests based on their own whim.

However, in Odinani, we seek only to align with our true nature, Chi, and be receptive to its guidance.

We do not believe Chineke our Supreme Being or any other force requires worship, how do you give anything to The One that is the Source of Everything? We also do not believe that Chineke is a vain and insecure entity that needs to be placated, cajoled or flattered.

While a casual onlooker might conclude that we “worship” the deities subordinate to the Supreme Being, as well as spirits we interact with, we do not. We relate with deities and other spirits on a transactional and not devotional level.

Life is balance, we give to receive, we provide value in order to get value, and this is true for all relationships where needs must be met. This is the essence of sacrifices and offerings in Odinani, which will be covered in more detail later. The offerings and sacrifices provide energies with which our spirit allies are equipped and compensated for their work, they are not materials for worship.”


U.N. Staff Member Killed in Central Gaza Blast, Five Others Injured


Editor’s Note: As of today, media reports at least 49,547 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza
since the beginning of the conflict, with approximately 112,719 Palestinians injured.


“This was not an accident.” – U.N. Spokesperson

New York, N.Y. — At least one U.N. staffer has been killed and at least five others injured – several very severely – following an explosion at two U.N. guesthouses in Deir al Balah in the central Gaza Strip on Wednesday.

The U.N. is verifying and confirming the details, including the circumstances that led up to the incident at the compound,, but it was not due to “any action” that was being taken by U.N. personnel to remove “unexploded ordinance”, the head of the UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS) said during a press conference in Brussels.

According to media reports, the Israeli military – which has resumed deadly strikes in the Gaza Strip, killing hundreds since Monday – has denied attacking the compound.

These premises were well known by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and they were ‘deconflicted’,” said, UNOPS chief Jorge Moreira da Silva, explaining that “everyone knew who was working inside the premises – it was U.N. personnel, UNOPS personnel.”

No accident

“This was not an accident, this was an incident,” he told journalists, adding that additional information is being collected.

What we do know is that an explosive ordnance was dropped or fired at the infrastructure and detonated inside the building,” he said, adding it was unclear if it had been due to air-drop weapons, artillery or rocket fire.

Mr. da Silva stressed that attacks against humanitarian premises are a breach of international law.  

“U.N. personnel and its premises must be protected by all sides. The civilian population relies on the UN for lifesaving assistance, they are an essential lifeline at the time of utter tragedy and devastation,” he said.

Previous attacks

The incident took place at around 11:30 AM local time on Wednesday. It followed strikes on Tuesday that resulted in some damage, and “a near miss” on Monday, Mr. da Silva said.

The U.N. buildings are situated in an “isolated area” in Dier al Balah.

UNOPS Executive Director Jorge Moreira da Silva (right) speaking to the press in the Belgian capital, Brussels.
UNOPS Executive Director Jorge Moreira da Silva (right) speaking to the press in the Belgian capital, Brussels. Photo Credit: U.N. Brussels/Jorge Varas Mardones.

Evacuating the injured

As investigations continue into the incident, the “top priority” is the evacuation of injured staff members, Mr. da Silva said.

“We have stayed and delivered for the people in Gaza in the last year and a half. This was not the first time a first colleague from UNOPS lost their life,” he added, noting that a staffer who drove aid trucks was killed around a year ago in the line of duty.

It is very difficult to operate in Gaza… we have been challenged by the fact that international humanitarian law has not been respected,” he said.

UNOPS teams in Gaza have been carrying out critical humanitarian work, supporting hundreds of thousands of civilians severely affected by the conflict. Their efforts include delivering essential supplies such as fuel and assisting in demining and explosive removal.

Additionally, the agency manages the so-called U.N. 2720 Mechanism for Gaza, which was mandated by the Security Council to accelerate humanitarian aid into the enclave.

UN chief condemns attacks

Secretary-General António Guterres reaffirmed that all parties to the conflict have a legal obligation to protect UN premises, which must remain absolutely inviolable.

In a statement issued by his spokesperson, the UN chief strongly condemned the attacks and called for a full investigation.

Today’s deadly strike brings the number of U.N. colleagues killed in Gaza since 7 October 2023 to at least 280,” the statement noted.

Mr. Guterres emphasized that all military operations must respect and prioritize civilian protection.

The Secretary-General stresses the need for the ceasefire to be respected to bring an end to the suffering of the people. Humanitarian aid must reach all people in need. The hostages must be released immediately and unconditionally,” said the statement.


Toxic Inheritance: Inside Murky Wealth, Memorabilia of Far-Right Patriarch


Le Pen’s Last Laugh: How Repudiated Leader’s
Wealth and Ideology Reshape the Far Right


Paris — A Le Monde investigation into Jean-Marie Le Pen’s estate reveals a trove of fascist memorabilia, gold bars, and a lavish manor in Paris. The far-right co-founder, once ostracized by his party, is now posthumously celebrated as a ideological martyr. Questions swirl about the origins of his wealth, with experts alleging ties to opaque networks. As France’s far right reclaims his legacy, critics warn of resurgent extremism fueled by mythologizing his divisive persona.

Behind the iron gates of a sprawling manor house in an affluent Paris suburb, the late Jean-Marie Le Pen left more than a political legacy. The co-founder of France’s far-right Front National (FN), who died in January at 96, amassed a fortune shrouded in mystery: gold bars, fascist artifacts, and property whose origins are now under scrutiny.

A Palace of Extremism

Le Pen’s Rueil-Malmaison manor, valued at €7.3 million, serves as a macabre museum to his decades-long career. Investigators discovered rooms filled with Third Reich memorabilia, including a signed copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Italian fascist medals, and portraits of Nazi collaborators.

Historian Dr. Élise Durant, who reviewed the inventory, called it “a shrine to Europe’s darkest chapters.” Equally jarring were 47 gold bars—worth €2.8 million—stashed in a concealed vault. Financial crimes unit head Marc Lambert confirmed an inquiry into their provenance, citing gaps in Le Pen’s declared income.

From Pariah to Martyr

Le Pen’s death marked a stark reversal in his political standing. Once expelled in 2015 by his daughter Marine Le Pen for anti-Semitic remarks, he was eulogized at a March 1 FN rally as a “visionary.” Marine, who rebranded FN as the National Rally (RN) to sanitize its image, now invokes his rhetoric ahead of 2027 elections. “They called him a monster, but history proved him right,” she told supporters in Calais. Analysts say rehabilitating Le Pen Sr. galvanizes RN’s base amid rising anti-immigrant sentiment.

The Money Trail

Le Pen’s wealth—estimated at €12 million—puzzles experts. While he inherited property, legal records show sudden asset spikes in the 1980s-90s, coinciding with FN’s ties to dictatorships. Investigators probe links to gold smuggled from apartheid South Africa and loans from Syria’s late dictator Hafez al-Assad. “His finances were a black box,” said journalist Anne-Sophie Mercier, author of The Le Pen Empire. “Some ‘gifts’ came from oligarchs and far-right groups laundering money through FN.”

A Legacy Reclaimed

The rehabilitation of Le Pen’s image underscores the far right’s ideological pivot. Once deemed toxic for Holocaust trivialization and racist diatribes, his xenophobic slogans now feature in RN campaigns. At his manor, admirers gather to view his relics, reframed as “cultural heritage.” Far-right blogger François Dubois argues, “He wasn’t hateful—he was honest.” But anti-fascist groups warn the glorification risks mainstreaming extremism. “This isn’t nostalgia—it’s a blueprint,” said SOS Racisme’s president, Dominique Sopo.

Marine’s Dilemma

Marine Le Pen faces backlash from RN moderates for embracing her father’s legacy. Privately, aides admit the strategy risks alienating centrist voters. Yet, with Eric Zemmour’s rival Reconquête! party poaching RN’s hardliners, experts say she has little choice. “The far right is in an arms race of radicalism,” said Sciences Po professor Jean-Yves Camus. “Marine needs her father’s ghost to survive.”

Jean-Marie Le Pen’s heirs now battle over more than money. As RN weaponizes his ideology and relics, France confronts a resurgent specter of extremism—one fueled by gold, grievance, and the enduring allure of a man who turned bigotry into a brand. In death, as in life, Le Pen’s divisive shadow looms large.


#LePenLegacy #FarRightFortune #FascistMemorabilia
#GoldenInheritance #ExtremistEstate #LePenSecrets

Tags: Jean-Marie Le Pen, Front National, National Rally, far-right politics, France, fascist memorabilia, political inheritance, Rueil-Malmaison, Marine Le Pen, gold smuggling, French extremism

Trump Targets Georgetown Student for Deportation Over Alleged Ties


Badar Khan Suri’s Arrest Sparks Debate Over Immigration and Free Speech

Washington, D.C. — On March 17, 2025, U.S. federal immigration authorities arrested Dr. Badar Khan Suri, a Georgetown University postdoctoral fellow and Indian national, outside his apartment in Arlington, Virginia.

The Trump administration is now seeking to deport Suri, alleging he has ties to Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, and has been spreading its propaganda online. The case has sparked debate over immigration policy, free speech, and national security as the administration ramps up efforts to remove individuals it deems threats to U.S. foreign policy.

Suri, who entered the U.S. on a valid student visa, is a researcher at Georgetown University’s Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. His work focuses on peacebuilding in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to the university.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claims Suri has been “actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism on social media,” according to Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokesperson. She further alleged that Suri has “close connections to a known or suspected terrorist, who is a senior advisor to Hamas.”

On March 15, Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined Suri’s presence in the U.S. rendered him ‘deportable‘ under a rarely used provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allows expulsion if an individual’s activities are seen as detrimental to U.S. foreign policy.

Suri’s attorney, Hassan Ahmad, has challenged the detention, filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court in Virginia to determine its legality. The petition asserts that the government has provided no specific evidence or details to substantiate its claims against Suri.

“The government has offered no evidence that he committed a crime,” Ahmad told MSNBC, emphasizing that Suri has no criminal record.

The legal filing also suggests that Suri may be targeted due to his wife, Mapheze Saleh, a U.S. citizen of Palestinian descent who has written for Al Jazeera and worked with Gaza’s foreign ministry. The couple believes their views on U.S.-Israel policy have drawn scrutiny.

Georgetown University has expressed support for Suri, stating it is unaware of any illegal activity on his part.

Dr. Khan Suri is an Indian national who was duly granted a visa to enter the United States to continue his doctoral research,” a university spokesperson said. The institution underscored its commitment to “free and open inquiry, deliberation, and debate,” even on controversial topics. However, it has not received an official explanation for his arrest.

The DHS has not publicly identified the alleged terrorist connection or provided specific examples of Suri’s supposed propaganda. Suri is currently detained at the Alexandria Staging Facility in Louisiana, awaiting an immigration hearing. His case mirrors that of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and green card holder facing deportation under the same legal provision for leading pro-Palestinian protests. Khalil’s detention has been challenged in court, with a judge recently ordering his transfer to New Jersey for further proceedings.

The Trump administration’s actions come amid a broader push to deport foreign nationals involved in pro-Palestinian activities following Hamas’ October 2023 attack on Israel. Critics, including civil liberties groups, argue that such moves infringe on free speech and target political dissent. The administration, however, maintains that these measures are necessary to protect national security. “No one has a right to a student visa,” Rubio has said, defending the deportations.

Suri’s arrest has raised questions about the balance between security and academic freedom. Some observers note that the lack of transparency in the allegations could set a precedent for broader crackdowns on campus activism. Others argue that ties to a group like Hamas, if proven, justify swift action. For now, the case remains in legal limbo, with Suri’s fate hinging on the outcome of his court challenge.

As of March 20, 2025, the story continues to unfold, drawing attention to the Trump administration’s immigration priorities two months into its term. Whether Suri’s deportation proceeds may depend on the evidence—or lack thereof—presented by the government in the coming weeks.


#BadarKhanSuri #GeorgetownUniversity #TrumpDeportation
#HamasTies #ImmigrationPolicy #FreeSpeech


Tags: MSNBC, Georgetown University, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump Administration, Hamas

Palestinian Activist’s Legal Fight Moves to N.J. Amid Controversy

Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil is a legal U.S. resident


New York, N.Y. — In a significant development for the closely watched case of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a federal judge has ruled that his deportation proceedings should be heard in New Jersey, rather than New York or Louisiana.

Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York made the decision on Wednesday, describing Khalil’s case as “exceptional” and warranting careful judicial review. The ruling comes as a setback to the Trump administration, which had sought to have the case dismissed in New York or transferred to Louisiana.


International students admitted to U.S. universities are issued an I-20 (F-1 Students) visa.

Khalil, a 30-year-old Columbia University graduate student and legal U.S. resident, was arrested by federal immigration agents on March 8 near his campus residence. He was initially held at a detention center in New Jersey before being transferred to a facility in Jena, Louisiana.

The activist’s detention is linked to his prominent role in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Columbia University last year. The Trump administration has alleged, without providing evidence, that Khalil has ties to Hamas and is sympathetic to terrorism


Khalil’s legal team vehemently denies these claims,
arguing that his arrest violates his First and Fifth Amendment rights.


Mahmoud Khalil is being held in a U.S. detention center in Jena, Louisiana.

In his ruling, Judge Furman maintained his previous order preventing Khalil’s deportation, stating that it will remain in effect unless a district court judge in New Jersey decides otherwise. The judge emphasized the need for careful consideration of the constitutional issues at stake.

Dr. Noor Abdalla, Khalil’s wife who is eight months pregnant with their first child, called the ruling a “first step” in a statement released by the American Civil Liberties Union. “His unlawful and unjust detention cannot stand. We will not stop fighting until he is home with me,” she said.

The case has drawn significant attention as it is seen as part of a broader crackdown promised by President Donald Trump against student protesters accused of “un-American activity.” 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has cited a rarely-used statute giving him broad authority to deport individuals posing “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.


As the legal battle continues, Khalil remains in detention in Louisiana, where he is scheduled to appear before an immigration judge on March 27. 

His lawyers argue that the government’s actions amount to “blatant repression of student activism and political expression.”

The case’s transfer to New Jersey represents a compromise between the positions of Khalil’s legal team, who sought to keep the case in New York, and the government, which pushed for Louisiana. 

It sets the stage for what promises to be a closely watched legal battle with significant implications for free speech and immigration rights in the United States.

Palestinian Activist’s Legal Fight Moves to N.J. Amid Controversy (March 18, 2025)


Tags: Mahmoud Khalil, deportation, immigration detention, pro-Palestinian protests, Columbia University, Trump administration, free speech, human rights, Jesse Furman, ACLU


#MahmoudKhalil #FreeSpeech #PalestinianRights
#ImmigrationJustice #ColumbiaUniversity #NewJerseyCourt

Harrison Ford, Helen Mirren Lead “1923” to New Heights

0

“1923” Season 2 Breaks Records on Paramount+

Los Angeles, CA — On February 23, 2025, Paramount+ launched the second season of “1923,” a prequel to the hit series “Yellowstone,” drawing significant attention from fans and critics alike.

The series, which stars Harrison Ford as Jacob Dutton and Helen Mirren as Cara Dutton, explores the Dutton family’s struggles in the early 20th century, set against the backdrop of prohibition, drought, and economic hardship in Montana. The premiere episode marked a record-breaking debut for Paramount+, pulling in 5.4 million global viewers, a 146% increase over the first season’s debut in December 2022.

“1923” Season 2 picks up where the first left off, following the Duttons as they face mounting threats to their ranch.

Main antagonists Donald Whitfield (Timothy Dalton) and Banner Creighton (Jerome Flynn) continue their scheme to seize the Dutton land, while Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar) and his captivating British wife Alexandra (Julia Schlaepfer) journey separately toward Montana.

The season promises a blend of historical drama and Western action, with episode 5, titled “Only Gunshots to Guide Us,” set to release on March 23, hinting at escalating conflict.



Paramount Global reports that Season 2 viewership is outpacing Season 1 by 56%, with the premiere alone reaching 17 million viewers worldwide within its first month.

New episodes drop every Sunday at midnight ET, exclusively on Paramount+, reinforcing the platform’s strategy of staggered releases to maintain engagement. The eight-episode season, consistent with its predecessor and fellow spinoff “1883,” is slated to conclude in mid-April, wrapping up the story arc originally billed as a limited series.


“1923” blends star power with intricate storytelling.

Created by Taylor Sheridan, known for expanding the “Yellowstone” universe, “1923” blends star power with intricate storytelling. Alongside Ford and Mirren, the ensemble cast includes Darren Mann, Brian Geraghty, Aminah Nieves, and Jennifer Carpenter, who joined in Season 2.

Sheridan’s signature style—rooted in historical accuracy and character-driven narratives—continues to resonate, as evidenced by the show’s dominance on Paramount+ charts since its return.

The series delves into themes of land ownership and survival, reflecting the Dutton family’s legacy a century before “Yellowstone.”

It also explores parallel narratives, such as Teonna Rainwater’s (Aminah Nieves) fight against cultural erasure, which may intersect with the Dutton storyline in later episodes.

Critics have praised the slow-build tension, though some note the lack of Season 1’s frequent shootouts, suggesting Sheridan is saving major action for the finale.

Paramount+ has capitalized on the “Yellowstone” franchise’s popularity, with “1923” joining “1883” and other Sheridan projects like “Tulsa King” and “Landman” on the platform. In the U.K., Canada, and Australia, the series streams exclusively on Paramount+, while “Yellowstone” itself remains on Peacock in the U.S.

The network premiere of Season 2 aired on Paramount Network on March 16, broadening its reach beyond streaming.

Fan reactions on social media highlight excitement for Ford and Mirren’s performances, though some express impatience with the pacing.

Posts on X reflect a mix of anticipation for Spencer’s return to the ranch and speculation about potential crossovers, such as Teonna meeting the Duttons.

As of March 22, 2025, “1923” has aired four episodes, with the latest, “Journey the Rivers of Iron,” released on March 16.

The remaining four episodes will unfold weekly, building toward what cast members have called a definitive conclusion. While Paramount+ has not confirmed a Season 3, the show’s success suggests the “Yellowstone” universe will continue to expand, with projects like “The Madison” and “1944” in development.

For now, “1923” stands as a cornerstone of Paramount+’s original programming, blending prestige talent with a loyal fanbase. Whether it delivers the explosive payoff fans expect remains to be seen, but its early numbers affirm its place in the streaming landscape.

Harrison Ford, Helen Mirren Lead “1923” to New Heights (March 18, 2025)


#WesternDrama #ParamountPlus #YellowstonePrequel
#1923Series #HarrisonFord #HelenMirren #TaylorSheridan

Tags: Paramount+, 1923, Yellowstone, Season 2, Harrison Ford,
Helen Mirren, Taylor Sheridan, Western, streaming, television

Unified Opposition: Black Leaders Inspire Diverse Resistance


Racial Justice Champions Inspire Inclusive Fight Against Trump

Washington, D.C. — As Donald Trump’s presidency unfolds in 2025, a powerful coalition of Black leaders has emerged as the backbone of opposition, championing racial justice, social equity, and inclusivity.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY).

Figures like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senator Cory Booker, Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Jasmine Crockett, and progressive commentators Touré and Joy Reid, alongside Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), are driving a movement rooted in addressing systemic racism and uplifting marginalized communities.

And they are younger – average age 50.

The average age of Trump and his key appointments is 68. Reid was born in 1968 (57), Booker in 1969 (56), Jeffries in 1970 (55), Touré in 1971 (54), Pressley in 1974 (51), Crockett in 1981 (44), AOC in 1989 (36). Their average age is 50. And, of course, Pete Buttigieg is only 43 years old.

[The average age of Joe, Bernie, Nancy, Chuck, and Elizabeth, by the way, is 80.]

U.S. Senator Cory Booker (NJ).

“How can I help?”

Their collective resistance to Trump’s agenda offers a compelling call to action—not just for Black Americans, but for allies across all identities, including a gay white man such as myself, asking, “How can I help?”

This opposition, largely led by straight Black voices, reflects a deep commitment to dismantling inequities that Trump’s policies—like his rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives—threaten to exacerbate.

Representative Ayanna Pressley (MA).

Jeffries, the first Black House party leader, has been a strategic force, empowering Black women in Congress like Crockett and Pressley to lead with boldness.

Booker, known for bipartisan collaboration, pairs his social justice advocacy with economic reform, appealing to a broad coalition. Meanwhile, Reid and Touré amplify these issues on airwaves and social media, framing Trump’s actions as assaults on progress.

Pressley, a vocal advocate for racial and economic justice, has condemned Trump’s rhetoric as “reckless” and “divisive,” particularly after he blamed DEI for tragedies like the December 2024 plane crash at Reagan National Airport.

Crockett, a rising star from Texas, has called out Trump’s incompetence, likening his leadership to “a real-life bad episode of The Apprentice.”

Progressive commentators Touré .

AOC, while not Black, aligns closely with this group’s progressive vision, pushing for systemic change and defending immigrants—another target of Trump’s policies.

Together, they form a united front, emphasizing that the fight against Trump is about protecting all marginalized communities, not just one group.

For a gay white man looking to contribute, their leadership offers a blueprint for allyship.

Representative Jasmine Crockett (TX).

Jeffries’ strategic inclusivity—seen in his support for freshmen Democrats like Crockett—shows that effective resistance thrives on diverse voices working together. “This is a time that requires leadership, compassion, and decency,” Jeffries said recently, signaling an openness to allies who share these values.

Booker’s bipartisan approach suggests that building bridges across identities can amplify the movement’s reach, while Pressley’s call to “actively pursue anti-racist policies” invites personal reflection and action from those outside the Black community.

So, how can an older, gay white man like me be of help?

First, by listening and amplifying these leaders’ messages. Reid’s platform on MSNBC, for instance, offers a nightly masterclass in connecting race, politics, and equity—issues that intersect with the LGBTQ+ struggle against discrimination. Sharing her insights, or Touré’s sharp cultural critiques, on social media can extend their reach to new audiences.

Second, by showing up where it counts: Crockett and Pressley have joined protests against Trump’s mass firings and deportations, spaces where physical presence as an ally can signal solidarity.

Education is another key step.

AOC’s push for a path to citizenship and Pressley’s anti-racism legislation—like the Anti-Racism in Public Health Act—highlight policies that benefit multiple marginalized groups, including queer communities of color.

Understanding these intersections equips allies to advocate more effectively, whether through voting, lobbying, or community organizing. donating to grassroots efforts, like the “State of the People” livestream backed by Crockett and other Congressional Black Caucus members, provides tangible support to counter Trump’s narrative.

The beauty of this opposition lies in its inclusivity. While predominantly Black and straight, its leaders don’t gatekeep the fight. “We don’t need queer voices that don’t want to be queer voices,” Pressley once said, a sentiment that implicitly welcomes authentic allyship from all quarters.

For a gay white man, this means bringing his own lived experience—perhaps the sting of exclusion or the joy of hard-won rights—to the table, enriching the movement without overshadowing its core voices.

As Trump’s administration tests America’s resolve, this coalition’s strength offers hope. Their progressive views on racial justice and equity aren’t just opposition; they’re a vision for a better future.

For allies, the invitation is clear: join the resistance, not as a savior, but as a partner. By amplifying, educating, and showing up, a gay white man can help turn this Black-led momentum into a broader triumph for all.

Unified Opposition: Black Leaders Inspire Diverse Resistance (March 17, 2025)


#BlackLedResistance, #TrumpOpposition, #RacialJustice,
#SocialEquity, #AllyshipMatters, #InclusivityInAction

Tags: CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, TheGrio, Politico

In America Now, More Millionaires than Users of Food Stamps

0

Equality Isn’t Enough:
America Needs Equity to Truly Level the Playing Field

New York, N.Y. — The image of three people watching a baseball game from behind a fence — each standing on a different number of boxes — explains the difference between “equality” and “equity” better than any words.

It’s simple: equality gives everyone the same box, but equity gives each person what they need to see over the fence. The adult may need no box, the teenager one, and the toddler two.

This visual demonstrates why equality alone is not enough — and why equity is crucial to a just society.

In America, we pride ourselves on the belief that everyone should have equal opportunities.

The phrase “all men are created equal” echoes through our national conscience. But the reality is far from equal.

If two people start a race — one with a head start and one weighed down by centuries of systemic barriers — equal treatment doesn’t create a fair competition.

Equity addresses those barriers, ensuring everyone has what they need to succeed.

It’s time for America to confront this truth head-on, especially when it comes to institutional or structural racism and the generational poverty it fuels.

Consider this: about 22 million households rely on SNAP benefits — what used to be called food stamps — to put meals on the table. Meanwhile, roughly 24 million American households have more than a million dollars in assets.

This is not a coincidence.

Wealth begets wealth. Families who have assets — homes, investments, savings — pass those down to their children. This is called “generational wealth.”

Families denied those opportunities through redlining, discriminatory hiring, and unequal education systems pass down nothing but struggle.

The racial wealth gap is staggering.

According to the Federal Reserve, the median white family holds ten times the wealth of the median Black family.

This is the cumulative result of centuries of enslavement, segregation, and systemic exclusion from economic opportunities — from the Homestead Act to the GI Bill.

So, what do we do about it?

The Middle Class shrinks while the Upper and Lower Classes expand.

First, we need to stop pretending that equality alone will fix things. We must embrace equity — crafting policies that account for historical injustice and present-day disparities.

That includes targeted investments in education, healthcare, and housing in underserved communities. It also means rethinking taxation and social safety nets to redistribute wealth more fairly.

But equity isn’t just about government policy — it’s about moral responsibility. America owes a debt to those it has systematically disadvantaged. That’s why the conversation must include reparations.

Critics dismiss the idea as radical or impractical, but reparations are about restoring stolen opportunities — from land to labor to the right to build wealth.

Germany paid reparations to Holocaust survivors.

The U.S. compensated Japanese Americans interned during World War II. Why should the descendants of enslaved African Americans — who built this nation’s economy without compensation — be denied the same recognition and restitution?

Equity means acknowledging that some communities need two boxes, not one, to see over the fence.

It means recognizing that generational wealth has been reserved for a privileged few while others have been deliberately left behind. And it means finally having the courage to do something about it.

As a society, we must ask ourselves: Do we want to be a nation that offers everyone the same box — knowing that many will still be left behind — or a nation that ensures everyone gets what they need to thrive?

The answer should be obvious. It’s time for America to embrace equity, tackle systemic racism, and consider reparations — not as an act of charity, but as a long-overdue step toward justice.

It’s time to level the playing field for all.

In America Now, More Millionaires than People on ‘Food Stamps’ (March 17, 2025)


Note: Jim Luce is the president of Luce Family Charities which includes the
J. Luce Foundation, Orphans International, and The Stewardship Report.


#EquityNotEquality #SocialJustice #ReparationsNow #WealthInequality #ProgressiveLeadership #LevelThePlayingField #JimLuce #LuceFamilyCharities

Tags: Jim Luce, J. Luce Foundation, Orphans International, The Stewardship Report, social justice, equity vs equality, wealth inequality, SNAP benefits, reparations, progressive leadership

Equity vs Equality: Unpacking the Pillars of Social Justice


Their approaches diverge sharply, sparking critical debates among policymakers, educators, activists

New York, N.Y. — In an era where terms like “equity” and “equality” dominate social justice discourse, it is vital to recognize their distinct meanings—and fewer grasp the real-world implications of conflating them. While both concepts aim to foster fairness, their approaches diverge sharply, sparking critical debates among policymakers, educators, and activists.

Defining the Divide

“The image of people standing on boxes illustrates he concept of “equality” and “equity” better than any words. Of course, human beings should have equal treatment. But, as we see with the image, equality is not always enough. The adult does not need a box, the youth only one, but the toddler two. This evens the playing field. In America, we must level the field for all as well,” states Jim Luce of Luce Family Charities (J. Luce Foundation, Orphans International, etc.).

“This opens the door to dealing with institutional racism and, further, reparations. That generational wealth has been dneied those with nothing, creating a society of ‘have’s’ and ‘have not’s.’ About 22 million households that receive SNAP benefits — ‘food stamps’ — in the our country, while there are here are approximately 24 million ‘millionaire’ households – families with more than one million dollars in assets,” says Luce.

Social equality advocates for uniform treatment, providing identical resources and opportunities to all individuals. Imagine a food bank distributing the same meal box to every family. While well-intentioned, this approach overlooks varying needs—such as dietary restrictions or family size—potentially leaving some hungry. Equality’s strength lies in its simplicity, but critics argue it risks perpetuating disparities by ignoring systemic barriers like racism, poverty, or disability.

Social equity, however, prioritizes fairness over uniformity. It acknowledges historical disadvantages and adjusts support to bridge gaps. Using the same analogy, an equity-focused food bank might offer larger portions to families in food deserts or culturally specific items for immigrant communities. “Equity isn’t about handouts; it’s about repairing generational cracks in the system,” explains Dr. Lena Torres, a sociologist at Columbia University.

Key Differences in Practice

  1. Approach: Equality’s “one-size-fits-all” model contrasts with equity’s tailored solutions. For instance, equal funding for all schools ignores under-resourced districts needing extra investment.
  2. Resource Allocation: Equity directs resources based on need, such as prioritizing healthcare access in marginalized communities.
  3. Outcomes: Equality measures success by equal access, while equity seeks equal results, like closing racial wealth gaps.
  4. Systemic Recognition: Equity explicitly addresses entrenched inequalities, whereas equality often operates under the assumption of a “level playing field.”

Why the Confusion Matters

Misunderstanding these terms can derail policy. A 2024 U.S. education bill initially framed as “equitable” faced backlash when it proposed equal tech funding for all schools, neglecting rural areas with outdated infrastructure. “Politicians use ‘equity’ as a buzzword without committing to targeted action,” argues Marc Thompson of the Equity Now Initiative.

Conversely, equity-focused programs are sometimes mislabeled as “unfair.” California’s 2023 Affordable Housing Act, which allocated units based on income and disability status, faced lawsuits alleging “reverse discrimination.” Such clashes reveal a societal tension between immediate fairness and perceived favoritism.

The Case for Coexistence

Experts stress that equity and equality are complementary. Equality lays the groundwork for basic rights, while equity addresses deeper imbalances. For example, universal healthcare (equality) ensures access, but equity might prioritize maternal health programs in regions with high mortality rates.

“Equality is the floor; equity builds the stairs,” says UN Human Rights Officer Priya Mehta. “Without both, marginalized groups hit glass ceilings.”

Real-World Applications

  • Education: Schools in low-income neighborhoods receiving extra funding (equity) versus standardized per-student budgets (equality).
  • Workplace: Gender-neutral parental leave (equality) versus extended leave for single parents (equity).
  • Philanthropy: Grants awarded equally to all applicants versus prioritized funding for minority-led nonprofits.

Looking Ahead

As governments and organizations increasingly adopt equity frameworks, backlash persists. Critics argue that equity’s focus on identity-based solutions risks division, while proponents counter that colorblind equality sustains inequity. The challenge lies in balancing individuality with collectivism—a debate unlikely to resolve soon.

What remains clear is that precision in language shapes progress. As Torres notes, “Calling for ‘equality’ when you mean ‘equity’ is like prescribing aspirin for a broken leg. Both matter, but only one heals the root issue.”

In the pursuit of justice, understanding these distinctions aren’t semantics—it’s strategy.

Who Knew? Social Equity and Social Equality are Different (March 17, 2025)


#EquityVsEquality #SocialJusticeNow #FairnessMatters
#SystemicChange #EqualOutcomes #JusticeInAction #HumanRights

Tags: Social Equity, Social Equality, Human Rights, Philanthropy, Systemic Inequality, Public Policy, Social Justice, Resource Allocation

Shockingly, The Voice of America Silenced by Donald Trump

0

The move has raised concerns about the future of U.S. efforts to promote accurate news and democratic values in areas saturated by foreign propaganda

Washington, D.C. — Voice of America (VOA) and its affiliated networks are facing significant cutbacks following President Donald Trump‘s recent executive order.

On March 15, 2025, VOA Director Michael Abramowitz announced that he and nearly all of the organization’s 1,300 staff members were placed on administrative leave. This action came just one day after Trump signed an order to drastically reduce the functions of VOA’s parent agency, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

The impact of these cuts has been immediate and far-reaching.

Several VOA local-language radio stations have ceased news broadcasts, resorting to playing music instead. Top editors have been instructed to halt their work, leading to expectations that VOA’s global news coverage will soon come to a standstill.

USAGM oversees not only VOA but also other networks such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia. These organizations have also been affected, with their contracts being terminated. The cuts extend to funding for these networks, which provide news to regions including Eastern Europe, Russia, Ukraine, China, and North Korea.

Supporters of the Trump administration argue that these broadcasters are outdated and inefficient. However, critics warn that dismantling these networks could allow countries like China to dominate international airwaves, potentially harming American interests abroad.

The move has raised concerns about the future of U.S. efforts to promote accurate news and democratic values in areas saturated by foreign propaganda. For decades, both Republican and Democratic leaders have supported these initiatives.

As a result of these actions, VOA employees have been barred from accessing their Washington, D.C. headquarters, and freelancers and contract workers have also been prevented from working due to lack of funds. This situation marks the first time in VOA’s 83-year history that it has been effectively silenced.


Federal Court Halts Trump’s Alien Enemies Act Deportation Order


Its application in this case is unprecedented and unconstitutional since the U.S. is not at war nor facing an invasion by a foreign government

New York, N.Y. – On Saturday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg temporarily halted President Donald Trump’s efforts to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelan migrants accused of being affiliated with the Tren de Aragua gang. The administration invoked the centuries-old wartime statute earlier in the day, claiming the gang posed a national security threat akin to an invasion. This marked the first use of the law since World War II.

The Alien Enemies Act grants presidents sweeping powers during wartime or foreign invasions to detain and deport noncitizens deemed threats to national security. However, legal experts and immigrant rights groups argue its application in this case is unprecedented and unconstitutional since the U.S. is not at war nor facing an invasion by a foreign government.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg.

The lawsuit was filed by five Venezuelan men held in immigration detention facilities in Texas and New York. Represented by attorneys from the ACLU and Democracy Forward, the plaintiffs challenged Trump’s proclamation as unlawful and lacking justification under the act’s criteria. Judge Boasberg agreed with their arguments, issuing a temporary restraining order that blocks deportations for 14 days.

During a hastily convened hearing on Saturday evening, Judge Boasberg broadened his ruling to cover all noncitizens in U.S. custody subject to Trump’s proclamation. He ordered planes already carrying deportees to Central America to return to the United States immediately. “Particularly given the plaintiffs’ information, unrebutted by the government, that flights are actively departing and planning to depart, I do not believe that I’m able to wait any longer,” Boasberg stated.

President Trump’s proclamation identified Tren de Aragua as a transnational criminal organization engaging in activities such as extortion, kidnapping, and contract killings. He argued that their actions constituted “irregular warfare” against the United States and justified invoking wartime powers for expedited deportations. Critics contend this interpretation stretches the law’s intent beyond its historical use during conflicts like World War II.

Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign defended the administration’s approach during court proceedings, citing past Supreme Court rulings that upheld presidential authority under the Alien Enemies Act. However, Judge Boasberg questioned whether labeling a criminal gang as equivalent to a foreign government met the statute’s requirements.

Legal analysts predict this case will escalate quickly to higher courts, potentially reaching the Supreme Court due to its implications for executive power and immigration policy. The Justice Department has already filed an appeal against Boasberg’s ruling.

Advocates for immigrant rights celebrated Saturday’s decision as a victory for due process protections under U.S. law. Lee Gelernt of the ACLU criticized Trump’s proclamation as “unlawful,” stating it represents an overreach of wartime authority during peacetime.

The temporary restraining order expires in 14 days, with further hearings scheduled next week to determine whether Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act can proceed legally. This high-stakes legal battle underscores ongoing tensions between immigration enforcement and constitutional safeguards in modern America.


#ImmigrationLaw #AlienEnemiesAct #TrumpDeportation
#LegalVictory #HumanRights

Tags: Judge James Boasberg, Alien Enemies Act, Venezuelan migrants, Tren de Aragua gang, Trump administration, ACLU, Democracy Forward

“X” Marks the Ethical Dilemma: Should We Still Use Musk’s Platform?

0

Is It Ethical to Continue Using “X”?
The Progressive Case for Leaving — or Staying

New York, N.Y. — When Elon Musk rebranded Twitter as “X” in 2023, the shift seemed symbolic of more than just a name change. It marked a dramatic transformation in how the platform operates — from its content moderation policies to its role in public discourse.

Since then, the site has become a breeding ground for misinformation, hate speech, and unchecked extremism. For many progressives, this raises an uncomfortable question: is it still ethical to stay on “X”?

The Platform’s Transformation

Under Musk’s leadership, “X” has undergone sweeping changes. He slashed content moderation teams, reinstated previously banned accounts (including those of far-right figures), and loosened restrictions on what can be posted. Verified users — now anyone willing to pay for the blue check — often receive priority visibility, regardless of the content’s accuracy or intent.

The result? A platform where misinformation flourishes and engagement rewards the most inflammatory voices. Studies have shown a spike in hate speech and conspiracy theories since Musk’s takeover, leaving users to navigate a minefield of harmful content.

For progressives who once saw Twitter as a tool for activism, community-building, and holding power to account, “X” now represents a moral quandary: does continuing to use the platform enable its worst tendencies?

The Ethical Dilemma

On one hand, staying on “X” allows progressive voices to push back against harmful narratives. Grassroots activists, journalists, and everyday users can still reach broad audiences, challenge misinformation, and promote progressive causes. Abandoning the platform entirely could mean ceding that space to bad actors — leaving it as an unchecked echo chamber for extremism.

Some argue that boycotting “X” sends a clearer, more powerful message. High-profile users, like author Stephen King and actor Jack Black, have criticized Musk’s changes and signaled their unwillingness to engage with the platform. Others have followed suit, migrating to alternatives like Mastodon, Bluesky, and Threads.

The key ethical question boils down to this: does staying on “X” make you complicit in its harmful practices, or does it empower you to fight back from within?

Who Profits from Your Presence?

A crucial factor in this debate is the financial side of “X.” Musk has shifted the platform’s revenue model to rely more heavily on subscriptions and advertising. Users who stay — particularly those who engage frequently or pay for verification — contribute to the platform’s profitability and credibility, even unintentionally.

The more engagement “X” attracts, the more appealing it becomes to advertisers and investors. This creates an uncomfortable reality for those who oppose Musk’s vision: their presence fuels the very system they oppose.

However, some argue that quitting entirely isn’t the only ethical response. Many users now treat “X” less as a social platform and more as a battleground — amplifying progressive voices while refusing to give Musk a dime. They advocate using the platform without contributing to its financial success, such as avoiding paid features and reporting harmful content.

Alternatives on the Rise

For those considering leaving “X,” a growing number of alternative platforms offer refuge. Mastodon, a decentralized platform, has attracted users seeking a more community-driven experience. Bluesky — initially funded by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey — has gained traction as an invite-only, more open version of the original Twitter experience. Meta’s Threads, though tied to Instagram, offers a familiar microblogging feel with stricter content moderation.

Still, none have yet reached the scale and influence of “X.” For many of us progressives, the reality is that “X” remains the place where public conversations happen — from breaking news to political organizing. The ethical conflict remains: is visibility worth the cost?

The Personal Choice

Ultimately, the decision to stay or leave “X” is a deeply personal one. For progressives, the answer hinges on balancing impact with integrity:

. •    Staying may help counter harmful content and keep progressive ideas visible, but it indirectly supports Musk’s platform.
    •    Leaving sends a clear ethical statement and denies “X” user engagement — but risks losing an influential public space.

Perhaps the real ethical challenge isn’t whether to stay or go, but how to ensure whatever choice you make supports progressive values in the long run. Whether that means fighting from within or building better spaces elsewhere, the goal remains the same: to create a digital world that amplifies truth, compassion, and justice — not hate.

So, the question remains: is it time to walk away from “X”? Or can we progressives still reclaim the platform from the inside?

“X” Marks the Ethical Dilemma: Should We Still Use Musk’s Platform? (March 15, 2025)


#Ethics #SocialMedia #ElonMusk #Twitter #X #TechEthics #DigitalResponsibility #BoycottX #SocialMediaReform

Tags: Elon Musk, Twitter, X, social media, ethics, technology, online platforms, digital responsibility, tech industry, free speech, misinformation

From Moscow to Manhattan: Tracing Trump’s Russian Ties

1987 Moscow: The Beginning of Trump’s Russia Connection?

New York, N.Y. In the summer of 1987, a 41-year-old Donald Trump — then a rising New York real estate developer — visited Moscow, hosted by the Soviet Ambassador. On the surface, it seemed like just another business trip. But former KGB officials, including ex-Soviet spy Yuri Shvets, later claimed this visit was no ordinary venture. Instead, they suggest it was part of a broader Soviet strategy to cultivate Trump as a potential political asset — a claim that continues to provoke debate decades later.

The Moscow Visit: A Turning Point?

Trump’s 1987 trip came at a time when the Soviet Union, under Mikhail Gorbachev’s leadership, was shifting its approach to the West. Seeking to undermine U.S. influence globally, Soviet intelligence operatives reportedly sought Western figures who could help sow division — particularly those with ambition, ego, and influence.

According to Shvets, Trump fit the profile. He was wealthy, politically curious, and — perhaps most importantly — flattered by the high-level attention. The Soviets, he claims, believed Trump could be nudged into promoting policies that aligned with their interests.

When Trump returned to New York, his behavior seemed to shift. Just two months later, he spent nearly $100,000 on full-page ads in major U.S. newspapers — including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Boston Globe. The ads criticized America’s foreign alliances, urging the U.S. to stop defending Japan, Saudi Arabia, and Western Europe and let those nations “pay their own way.”

For a man with no political experience at the time, the move was baffling — and strikingly aligned with Soviet interests. The ads mirrored long-standing Kremlin narratives aimed at weakening Western alliances like NATO.

Follow the Money: Trump’s Russian Ties Deepen

Fast forward to the 2000s, and Trump’s business dealings took an increasingly international turn — with a noticeable pattern of Russian connections.

The Trump Organization sold numerous luxury properties to anonymous shell companies, many of which were later linked to Russian oligarchs. While legal, such transactions raise questions about who was behind the purchases and why they were made.

In 2008, one deal stood out: Trump sold his lavish Palm Beach estate, Maison de L’Amitié, to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million — nearly double its market value. Rybolovlev never lived in the mansion and later demolished it. The sale raised eyebrows among financial analysts, some of whom speculated the inflated price could have been a covert financial favor or backchannel transaction.

During a real estate conference that same year, Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., even remarked: “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets… we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”

Coincidence or Pattern?

While no definitive proof has emerged that Trump knowingly worked with Russian intelligence, the series of events — from the 1987 Moscow trip to later business deals — leaves a trail of unanswered questions. The timeline suggests more than a random collection of coincidences:

•    1987: Trump invited to Moscow by the Soviet Ambassador, reportedly cultivated by Soviet intelligence.
    •    1987: Trump returns to the U.S. and publishes ads urging a pullback from foreign alliances — echoing Soviet interests.
    •    2000s: Trump sells properties to anonymous shell companies, some traced back to Russian oligarchs.
    •    2008: Trump sells his Palm Beach mansion to a Russian billionaire for nearly double its value.

Whether this pattern points to a deliberate strategy or a series of fortuitous business moves remains a subject of intense speculation.

Donald Trump surrounded by women on the TV show “The Apprentice.”

The Bigger Picture

Decades after his first Moscow trip, Trump’s presidency was marked by an unusual affinity for Russian leadership, particularly Vladimir Putin. He repeatedly questioned the value of NATO, criticized America’s European allies, and cast doubt on Russian election interference — positions that eerily echoed the ideas he first published in his 1987 newspaper ads.

Was Trump’s Moscow visit a pivotal moment in shaping his worldview? Was he an unwitting player in a larger geopolitical game — or a man whose personal ambitions simply aligned with the Kremlin’s goals?

The truth may never be fully known. But one thing is clear: the echoes of that 1987 trip still resonate in today’s political landscape.

For those looking to connect the dots, one mantra remains: follow the money.

Former KGB officials, including Yuri Shvets, claim this visit was part of a Soviet strategy to cultivate Trump as a potential asset. Just two months after returning to New York, Trump paid nearly $100,000 for full-page ads in major newspapers, urging the U.S. to abandon its allies and let them fend for themselves. Sound familiar?

Fast forward to the 2000s:

🔍 The Trump Organization sold numerous properties to anonymous shell companies—many linked to Russian oligarchs.
🔍 In 2008, Trump sold his Palm Beach estate, Maison de L’Amitié, to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million—nearly double its market value.

Coincidence? Or a pattern?


Tags: Donald Trump, Moscow, 1987, Soviet Union, KGB, Yuri Shvets, Russian oligarchs, Dmitry Rybolovlev, real estate, politics, Cold War, U.S. foreign policy

#Trump #MoscowTrip #ColdWar #Politics #Russia #Geopolitics #InvestigativeJournalism #DonaldTrump #KGB

A Dozen Tails of Love and Chaos: Life with Our 12 Rescue Dogs


From Pandemonium to Peace:
A Couple’s Journey with 12 Canine Companions

New York, N.Y. — It surprises some people to learn that my partner and I have 12 dogs. Shih Tzu or Shih Tzu-Havanese mixes. Of course, I never imagined our life would revolve around rescued dogs, each with a story etched into their soulful eyes.

Max naps in our living room to classical music.

My partner, Bix, and I live in a New York City apartment that hums with the chaos and love of our unconventional furry family. It’s a life of constant motion—laundry spinning, carpets steaming, and a symphony of barks greeting us at the door.

Yet, amid the pandemonium, there’s a peace that settles over us, a rhythm we’ve learned to dance to with our twelve canine companions.

Our life revolves around our furry family,
a mix of rescues with complex needs

Our days are shaped by their needs. Five of our boys wear diapers due to urinary incontinence, a condition that demands round-the-clock care. We’re up early, changing pads, washing soiled linens, and wielding the steam cleaner like it’s an extension of our hands.

It’s messy, relentless work, but it’s worth it. These dogs—discarded by others for their imperfections—deserve dignity. I look into their trusting eyes and know we’re giving them that, one clean diaper at a time.

Coming home is an event. The moment the front door opens, “puppy-monium” erupts—a tornado of barks and furiously wagging tails. Bix laughs, calling it “a tornado of love,” and he’s right.

It’s overwhelming for about sixty seconds until they settle, reassured we’re back where we belong.

The UPS guy, a regular witness to this chaos, grins and says we’re running a canine hotel. He’s not wrong. Even meal prep is a logistical feat—bowls stretch across the kitchen, dining room, and living room, each tailored to specific dietary needs. It’s a circus, but it’s our circus.

Grooming is another beast entirely

Bix and our boys in the kitchen.

Every six weeks, each dog needs professional ear cleaning, gland expression, and nail trims—a $500 monthly expense that dwarfs my own haircut costs.

I’ve set up a grooming station at home to manage half the sessions myself, brushing out tangles and trimming where I can. But the pros handle the delicate stuff.

Twelve dogs, twelve appointments—it’s a logistical puzzle, but their wagging tails and freshly fluffed fur make it a triumph.

They are always within ten feet of me, whether I’m writing in my office, cooking in the kitchen, or taking a shower. Many people ask me how we can have so many dogs in a New York City apartment.

Well, even if we lived in a mansion, they would always be within ten feet of me… Six of them sleep on the bed with us. It’s rather comforting to be touching all six and my partner as I sleep.

They are extremely intuitive. They know when you’re upset, they know when you’re sad. Their emotional intelligence often stuns us. One guy, blind in one eye, bit my finger by accident the other day.

He followed me into the bathroom as I bandage my finger. Head bowed, nuzzling my bandaged hand with his one good eye, he looked devastated. Dogs know. Of course, I forgave him.

Intuition and Heartbreak

Life with twelve dogs isn’t all cuddles and loyalty. We have had our loses, and it hurts. A diabetic rescue, Mushu, passed away despite round-the-clock care. Another, Rogi, succumbed to kidney disease. Another, who arrived with distemper, had to be put to sleep.

Walking the gang along the Roosevelt Island Promenade under the 59th Street Bridge.

The hardest goodbye was Remi, a dog with unexplained aggression linked to a neurological disorder. He bit me so badly I needed hospitalization.

We tried for another year after that, but he was unable to learn acceptable behavior through positive reinforcement, desensitization, and counter-conditioning techniques now matter how hard we tried.

The vet explained his brain was irreparably damaged. We held him as he crossed that so-called rainbow bridge. He wasn’t a bad dog—just a broken one. And we never stopped loving him.

The Price of Compassion

Financially, the commitment can be staggering. Grooming costs exceed $500 monthly, and specialized diets, medications, and diapers add thousands annually.

Yet, whatever. These dogs were discarded. Who else would take a senior with incontinence or a ‘problem’ dog?” We just try to give them a soft landing.

A Balancing Act

Despite the challenges, we find joy in small victories. Teaching a formerly abused mix to trust again or watching an old dog learn a new trick fuels our resolve. They’re survivors. Every tail wag feels like a middle finger to whatever they endured before.

But it can be hard. We rarely travel together because we cannot find a pet sitter who can deal with so many dogs at the same time – especially given their special needs.

You can’t just ‘clock out’ with this many dogs. It’s exhausting, but quitting isn’t an option. They’re family.

Bix and Jim Luce, Clover and Yap Yap returning form the groomers by subway.

Lessons from the Pack

For us, our dogs have redefined love. Their presence has also taught us patience. When six dogs follow you into the bathroom, we learn to laugh instead of scream.

Perhaps our story will inspire others to consider adopting overlooked pets—seniors, special-needs animals, or those labeled “difficult.” Perfect dogs don’t exist. But every one of them deserves a chance to be loved, even if it’s messy. And, truly, each is perfect in his own way.

It’s late at night as I finish this piece. Our home is quiet. Our dogs are curled into a collective heap under my desk, their breathing syncing into a contented rhythm.

I survey the scene: a laundry pile of diapers, a few wee pads, and a oriental carpet that’s seen better days. This may be chaos, but it our chaos. And we wouldn’t trade it for the world.


#DogLoversUnite #RescueDogLife #FurryFamilyChaos #IncontinenceCare
#PackOf12 #PetParentingExtreme #UnconditionalLove #DogGroomingPro
#Rescue Dogs, #ShihTzu, #NYCPets, #AnimalWelfare

Tags: Animal rescue, pet care, dog behavior, urinary incontinence in pets, pet grooming, multi-dog households, emotional bonds with pets, senior dog care, veterinary challenges, dog rehabilitation

Love, Loss, and International Borders: Green Card Holder’s Dilemma


Dear Dr. Sami,


I recently received my green card as part of my journey to become a U.S. citizen after marrying my American husband. I’m gay, and we’ve built a life together here that means everything to me. But now I’m facing a heartbreaking dilemma. My mother recently passed away in Indonesia, and I feel a deep need to attend her funeral and settle her estate. It’s a responsibility I can’t ignore, yet I’m terrified that if I leave the U.S., I might be denied reentry. The thought of losing my husband, my home, and the career I’ve worked so hard for is overwhelming. Should I risk going to Indonesia, or stay here and let this go unresolved?

Balancing Act

Dear Balancing Act,

I am so sorry for your loss. Losing a parent is heartbreaking enough, but to have that grief compounded by immigration fears makes it all the more overwhelming. You’re standing at a painful crossroads—between honoring your mother and protecting the life you’ve built with your husband.

First, let’s address the legal concerns.

As a green card holder, you have the right to travel internationally, but there are risks. If you stay outside the U.S. for too long or if immigration authorities question your intent to remain a permanent resident, you could face complications upon reentry. To minimize these risks, take the following steps:

    1. Consult an Immigration Attorney – Before making any decisions, speak with a lawyer who specializes in immigration law. They can review your case and help ensure your return is as smooth as possible.

    2. Carry Strong Documentation – If you decide to travel, bring proof of your ties to the U.S., including your marriage certificate, employment records, lease/mortgage, and tax filings. These documents reinforce your commitment to living here.

    3. Limit Your Time Away – Short trips (ideally under six months) are less likely to raise concerns. If necessary, explore whether estate matters can be handled remotely or through legal representation in Indonesia.

    4. Consider a Reentry Permit – If you anticipate needing more time abroad, applying for a reentry permit before you leave may provide additional security.

Now, for the emotional side.

Grief doesn’t always wait for immigration logistics to fall into place, and the idea of not being present for your mother’s funeral is a heavy burden. If the risk of leaving feels too high, find ways to honor her memory from afar. Hold a ceremony with loved ones here, contribute to a cause she cared about, or engage in a personal ritual that connects you to her.

This is an agonizing choice, but you are not alone. Your husband, your chosen family, and your community can help you navigate this moment. Prioritize both your heart and your future—you deserve to grieve and to keep the life you’ve worked so hard to build.

With compassion,
Dr. Sami Milan


#GreenCard #ImmigrationConcerns #LGBTQRights #FamilyDuty #HomeAndHeartParentingAdvice #LGBTQConversations #FamilySupport #UnderstandingYourChild #NavigatingRelationships #SummerPlans #DrSamiMilan



03/15/25: Love, Loss, and International Borders: A Green Card Holder’s Dilemma
02/15/25: Carrying the Weight of Silence: Time to Tell My Mother the Truth?
01/15/25: Friend, Boyfriend? Navigating Sensitive Areas with Your Adult Child
12/15/24: Love Without Borders: Facing Family Reaction to Interfaith Romance
11/15/24: How to Keep Family Safe Without Hurting Mother-in-Law’s Feelings
10/15/24: Balancing Compassion, Practicality: Sponsoring Family Member in Need
09/15/24: Dating, Health, Honesty: Should I Share STD Status with My Partner?
08/15/24: Breaking the Cycle: Take Control of Drinking to Save Your Marriage

At NATO Meeting: Trump Vows, Again, to Annex Greenland


U.S. President Questions Denmark’s Historical Claim to Greenland

Washington, D.C. — During a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Thursday, President Donald Trump expressed confidence that the United States would annex Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.

Trump described Greenland as essential for U.S. national security and suggested NATO could play a role in facilitating the acquisition. “I think it will happen,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, underscoring his belief that the Arctic island is crucial for international security.

Trump also questioned Denmark’s historical claim to Greenland, stating, “Denmark is very far away from Greenland… A boat landed there 200 years ago or something. They say they have rights to it—I don’t know if that’s true.” He added that the United States already has a military presence on the island and hinted at increasing troop deployments.

NATO Secretary General Distances Himself

Mark Rutte responded cautiously to Trump’s remarks, emphasizing that discussions about Greenland were outside NATO’s purview. While acknowledging the strategic importance of the Arctic region amid growing Chinese and Russian influence, Rutte made clear he did not want NATO involved in Trump’s annexation plans.

Greenland and Denmark Push Back

Greenland’s leaders swiftly rejected Trump’s statements. On Friday, all five political parties in Greenland’s parliament issued a rare joint declaration condemning Trump’s comments as “unacceptable.” The statement emphasized that Greenland belongs to its people and reaffirmed their commitment to self-determination.

Outgoing Prime Minister Múte Egede described Trump’s approach as “completely unacceptable,” while Jens Frederik Nielsen, leader of the pro-business Demokraatit party that recently won Greenland’s parliamentary elections, echoed similar sentiments. Nielsen called for unity among Greenlandic leaders to resist external pressure.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen also dismissed Trump’s remarks, reiterating that Greenland is not for sale and emphasizing Denmark’s commitment to respecting Greenlanders’ autonomy.

Political Context in Greenland

Greenland recently held parliamentary elections, with the center-right Demokraatit party emerging victorious over Egede’s Inuit Ataqatigiit party. The Demokraatit party advocates for gradual independence from Denmark but has no intention of aligning with Washington. Despite political shifts within Greenland, all major parties remain unified in opposing U.S. annexation.

Greenland has a population of approximately 56,000 and operates as a self-governing territory under Denmark’s kingdom. While Denmark retains authority over foreign and defense policy, Greenland achieved home rule in 1979 and gained further autonomy in 2009, including the right to hold referendums on independence.

Strategic Importance of Greenland

As climate change opens new shipping routes in the Arctic and reveals extensive mineral resources, Greenland has gained global strategic significance. The U.S. already maintains a military base at Thule Air Base on the island, which plays a critical role in missile defense systems and Arctic surveillance.

Trump has repeatedly cited national security concerns as justification for acquiring Greenland, claiming it is vital to counter threats from Russia and China. However, his rhetoric has sparked widespread criticism both internationally and within Greenland itself.

Public Reaction and Protests

Trump’s remarks have fueled protests across Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, where hundreds gathered outside the U.S. consulate to oppose his annexation plans. Protesters carried signs demanding respect for Greenlandic sovereignty and rejecting external interference.

A January poll revealed that 85% of Greenlanders oppose becoming part of the United States—a sentiment echoed by political leaders across party lines.

Trump’s renewed push for annexing Greenland has heightened tensions between Washington, Copenhagen, and Nuuk while drawing criticism from NATO allies wary of escalating geopolitical disputes in the Arctic region. As Greenland continues its path toward greater independence from Denmark, its leaders remain steadfast in rejecting any attempts at U.S. control.


#GreenlandSovereignty #TrumpAnnexation #ArcticPolitics
#NATO #InternationalSecurity #GreenlandIndependence

Tags: Donald Trump, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Annexation Plans, Greenland Politics, Danish Sovereignty, Arctic Strategy

Rubio Ousts South African Ambassador Over Trump Criticism

Donald Trump’s friend Elon Musk was born in Pretoria, South Africa in 1971. He remains a South African citizen, as well as a Canadian citizen – and a U.S. citizen in 2002.

The U.S. has expelled South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool in a
dramatic escalation of diplomatic tensions between the two countries

Washington, D.C. — The U.S. has expelled South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio labeling him a “race-baiting politician” who “hates America and Trump.”

This rare diplomatic move escalates tensions between the nations after the Trump administration cut aid to South Africa and criticized its land expropriation policies. Rasool’s remarks accusing Trump of promoting white supremacy further fueled the fallout.

South Africa called the expulsion “regrettable” but reaffirmed its commitment to U.S. relations.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the decision late Friday on X (formerly Twitter), declaring Rasool “persona non grata” and accusing him of being a “race-baiting politician” who harbors animosity toward America and President Donald Trump.

Rubio’s statement marks a rare move in international diplomacy and reflects the deteriorating relationship between Washington and Pretoria under Trump’s second term. The expulsion follows Rasool’s public criticism of Trump, whom he accused of leading a global white supremacist movement during a recent webinar.

Rubio responded sharply, stating that Rasool’s comments left “nothing to discuss” and that his presence in the U.S. was unwelcome.

The diplomatic fallout comes amid broader tensions over South Africa’s domestic policies and international stances.

Earlier this year, Trump froze financial aid to South Africa, citing its controversial land expropriation law aimed at addressing racial disparities in land ownership. The law has been criticized by Trump and allies like Elon Musk as targeting white Afrikaner farmers unfairly—a claim South Africa denies.

Rasool’s vocal support for South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has also drawn ire from Washington. The ambassador has been described as one of Pretoria’s most ardent pro-Palestinian voices, further straining ties with the US, a staunch ally of Israel.

In response to the expulsion, South Africa’s presidency issued a statement calling the decision “regrettable” and urging diplomatic decorum. It emphasized that South Africa remains committed to fostering a mutually beneficial relationship with the United States despite current challenges.

This incident underscores the deepening rift between the two nations. Former US Ambassador to South Africa Patrick Gaspard described relations as being at their “lowest point,” highlighting the urgent need for repair amid significant geopolitical stakes. Meanwhile, critics argue that Trump’s administration is leveraging racial tensions for political gain domestically and abroad.

As tensions rise, this expulsion signals a precarious moment in US-South Africa relations, with potential repercussions for broader international diplomacy.


#USSouthAfricaRelations, #DiplomaticCrisis,
#TrumpAdministration, #EbrahimRasool, #PersonaNonGrata

Tags: South Africa, United States, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ebrahim Rasool, Diplomacy, International Relations, Land Expropriation, Race Relations

The Digital Veil: How Iran Uses Apps to Police Women’s Attire

0

Big Brother in the Sky: Iran’s Drone-Powered Hijab Enforcement

New York, N.Y. — In a startling development, the United Nations has reported that Iran is employing advanced surveillance technology, including drones and mobile applications, to enforce its mandatory hijab laws. This intensified crackdown on women’s dress code violations marks a significant escalation in the Islamic Republic‘s efforts to maintain strict control over its citizens’ appearance and behavior.

State-Sponsored Vigilantism and Digital Surveillance

The U.N.’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran has uncovered a pattern of “state-sponsored vigilantism” that utilizes digital surveillance to punish women who defy the country’s mandatory hijab laws. 

This comprehensive digital monitoring framework is being used to stifle opposition, with a particular focus on women who choose not to comply with the strict dress code.

Drone Surveillance

Iranian authorities are deploying drones to monitor women’s adherence to hijab laws in public areas, particularly in Tehran and southern regions of the country. These aerial surveillance devices provide a bird’s-eye view of public spaces, allowing officials to identify and target individuals who are not complying with the dress code.

Facial Recognition Technology

In addition to drones, the government has implemented facial recognition systems to keep tabs on female students. For instance, such technology has been installed at the entrance of Tehran’s Amirkabir University. This invasive measure allows authorities to identify and potentially punish students who do not adhere to the hijab requirements.

Mobile Applications

One of the key elements in this technological crackdown is the government-backed Nazer app. This application enables both police and “vetted” members of the public to report alleged violations by women in vehicles, including those in ambulances, mass transit, and taxis. The app allows users to upload the vehicle’s license plate, location, and time of the alleged violation, triggering real-time alerts to the police and warnings to vehicle owners.

Iranian military officers at the starting ceremony of two days of military drills to showcase and test drones hitting air, ground and sea targets. [Courtesy of the Iranian government]

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The consequences for women who challenge these laws or protest against them can be severe. Punishments range from arrests and vehicle seizures to physical assault and even sexual violence while in custody. This harsh treatment has created an atmosphere of fear and oppression, with many women feeling constantly monitored and exposed.

Ongoing Protests and Resistance

Despite the threat of violent arrests and imprisonment, protests against the mandatory hijab laws continue. These demonstrations were initially sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman who died in custody in 2022 after being detained by the morality police. Witnesses claimed that Amini was severely beaten during her detention, although authorities dismissed claims of mistreatment and attributed her death to “sudden heart failure.”

International Concern and Human Rights Implications

The U..N report highlights the systematic discrimination faced by women and girls in Iran, both in law and in practice. This discrimination permeates all aspects of their lives, particularly with respect to the enforcement of the mandatory hijab. The international community has expressed concern over these human rights violations and the increasing use of technology to enforce restrictive laws.

As Iran continues to tighten its grip on women’s freedoms through technological means, the struggle for personal autonomy and human rights in the country intensifies. The use of drones, facial recognition, and citizen-reporting apps represents a new frontier in state control, raising important questions about privacy, individual liberty, and the role of technology in enforcing social norms.

The Digital Veil: How Iran Uses Apps to Police Women’s Attire (March 15, 2025)


#IranHijabLaws #TechSurveillance #WomensRightsIran #UNReport

Tags: Iran, Hijab Laws, Surveillance Technology, Women’s Rights, United Nations, Drones, Facial Recognition, Mobile Apps, Human Rights, Protests


High-Speed Rails: How Asia, Europe, North America Stack Up


New York, N.Y. — Rail networks have long been a pillar of transportation infrastructure worldwide. From high-speed trains racing across countries to regional networks connecting cities, rail systems define how people travel efficiently. When comparing China, Europe, North America, and Japan, key differences emerge in speed, coverage, technology, and cultural approach. Let’s explore how these regions stack up — and where they diverge.


Train at the platform of Tengzhou East Railroad Station.

China: The Modern Giant

China has revolutionized its rail infrastructure in just over two decades. The country’s high-speed rail (HSR) network now exceeds 42,000 kilometers (26,000 miles) — more than the rest of the world combined. Trains regularly hit speeds of 350 km/h (217 mph), connecting major cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou in record times.

The Chinese government heavily subsidizes the system, investing trillions of yuan to support economic growth, urbanization, and carbon reduction efforts. A notable example is the Beijing-Shanghai route — a 1,318 km (819 mi) journey that takes just 4.5 hours by train, compared to 2.5 hours by plane (plus airport wait times).

However, China’s rapid development comes with challenges. The system carries massive debt, and some lines in less populated regions operate at a loss. Still, the network remains a symbol of China’s global infrastructure ambition, including projects like the Belt and Road Initiative that extend its rail expertise internationally.


France’s new generation of TGV trains.

Europe: A Tapestry of Rail Networks

Europe boasts an extensive, interconnected rail system, with high-speed lines crisscrossing countries like France, Germany, Spain, and Italy. While no single country rivals China’s scale, Europe’s strength lies in its diversity and cross-border integration.

The French TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse) reaches 320 km/h (199 mph), linking Paris to major hubs like Lyon and Marseille. Germany’s ICE trains prioritize comfort and reliability, while Spain’s AVE network is among the fastest, connecting Madrid to Barcelona in 2.5 hours.

The European Union has prioritized rail as a greener alternative to short-haul flights, though the continent faces hurdles in harmonizing different national systems, track gauges, and ticketing platforms. Unlike China’s state-controlled approach, Europe relies on a mix of public and private operators, resulting in varied pricing and service quality.


A northbound Amtrak Acela Express passing through Old Saybrook, Connecticut in 2011. Photo credit: Wikipedia.

North America: Lagging Behind

North America’s rail landscape stands in sharp contrast. The United States — despite having a vast geography similar to China — lacks high-speed rail on a comparable scale. Amtrak’s Acela Express, running between Boston, New York, and Washington, D.C., reaches 240 km/h (150 mph) but averages much lower speeds due to shared tracks with slower freight trains.

High Speed Rail Canada – Train à grande vitesse au Canada.

High-speed rail projects, like California’s ambitious but delayed bullet train, face funding, land acquisition, and political resistance. Meanwhile, Canada has limited intercity rail services, with VIA Rail’s Corridor service between Toronto, Montreal, and Ottawa offering moderate speeds but no high-speed connections.

One exception is Mexico’s development of the Maya Train — designed to boost tourism and economic development in the country’s southeast — though it’s more regional than high-speed in nature.

North America’s rail infrastructure remains heavily freight-focused, with passenger services struggling to gain momentum amid car culture, airline dominance, and sprawling urban development.


Bullet train at Fukuoka railway station, Japan, East Asia. Photo credit: Wikipedia.

Japan: The Pioneer

Japan remains the gold standard in high-speed rail technology. Its Shinkansen (“bullet train”) debuted in 1964, reshaping global perceptions of rail travel. Today, the network covers 3,000 kilometers (1,864 miles), with trains reaching 320 km/h (199 mph) — though newer models, like the maglev under development, aim for speeds over 600 km/h (373 mph).

The Shinkansen is renowned for its punctuality — delays average less than a minute per year — and safety, with zero passenger fatalities in its 60-year history. The trains prioritize efficiency, comfort, and reliability, reflecting Japan’s dedication to precision engineering.

However, Japan’s high-speed rail primarily serves densely populated areas, leaving rural regions dependent on slower, local trains. Additionally, operating costs remain high, and tickets are more expensive than in China or Europe.


Key Takeaways: Efficiency vs. Accessibility

. •    China leads in scale and speed, with an expansive network that supports economic growth but faces high debt.
    •    Europe prioritizes cross-border connectivity and sustainability, balancing public and private operators.
    •    North America lags, with fragmented services and few high-speed options, hindered by geography and politics.
    •    Japan remains the technological and safety leader, though its network is more compact and premium-priced.

Each region reflects its unique priorities — whether speed, accessibility, or innovation — shaping the future of global rail travel.

High-Speed Rails: How Asia, Europe, North America Stack Up (March 15, 2025)


#ChinaInfrastructure #EuropeanRail #NorthAmericaTransit
#JapanRail #GlobalTransport #SustainableTravel #HighSpeedRail

Tags: China, Europe, North America, Japan, rail system, high-speed rail, transportation, infrastructure, public transit, bullet trains

Welcome to New Axis of Trump: Diplomacy for the Devoted


A Masterclass in Diplomatic Self-Sabotage

New York, N.Y. –– Let’s give a round of applause to Secretary of State Marco Rubio for his bold vision of diplomacy: loyalty oaths to Donald Trump. In a move that screams “diplomatic genius,” Rubio declared South Africa’s ambassador persona non grata because—brace yourselves—the ambassador dared to criticize Trump.

Apparently, in the new world order, expressing disdain for the former president is tantamount to treason against America itself.

Rubio’s latest masterpiece raises an intriguing question: what happens if we apply this standard globally? Spoiler alert—Washington would look like a ghost town. By my calculations, 120 countries would lose their diplomatic representation in the U.S., leaving only about 30 embassies standing. And what a distinguished group that would be! Russia would lead the charge, followed by paragons of democracy like North Korea, Belarus, and Eritrea. Truly, a coalition to inspire confidence.


The Survivors’ Club: Trump’s Inner Circle

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the countries that would remain in Washington under Rubio’s loyalty test. Among them are such luminaries as:

  • Russia: Because nothing says “Make America Great Again” like cozying up to Vladimir Putin.
  • North Korea: Kim Jong-un did write those “beautiful letters” after all.
  • Saudi Arabia: Where human rights violations are just another Tuesday.
  • Eritrea: A nation so free it has been dubbed the “North Korea of Africa.”

Yes, these are the nations Rubio envisions as America’s closest allies in his new diplomatic utopia. Forget NATO and the European Union; we’re building alliances with autocrats now.


The Departed: Allies Who Dared to Criticize

Meanwhile, traditional allies like Germany, France, and the U.K. would be shown the door for their unflattering assessments of Trump. Let’s not forget their unforgivable sins:

  • Germany: President Frank-Walter Steinmeier once called Trump “a danger” due to his unpredictability.
  • France: Former President François Hollande said Trump’s rhetoric “makes your stomach turn.”
  • United Kingdom: Even David Cameron couldn’t hold back, labeling Trump’s comments “divisive” and “unhelpful.”

These are countries that have stood by the U.S. through wars and crises—but alas, they failed the ultimate test of swearing fealty to Trump.


Collateral Damage: Global Institutions

Rubio’s policy wouldn’t just alienate individual nations; it would also sever ties with global institutions that have dared to cross Trump:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO): Remember when Trump pulled out during a global pandemic? That move surely won him no friends among countries prioritizing public health.
  • Paris Climate Agreement Signatories: On day one of his presidency, Trump withdrew from this pact because who needs clean air or water anyway?

By alienating these groups, Rubio ensures that America stands alone—not as a leader but as an outcast.


The Irony of “America First”

Rubio’s strategy is a perfect reflection of Trump’s “America First” doctrine—except it seems more like “America Alone.” Traditional allies are dismissed as nuisances while authoritarian regimes are embraced with open arms. This isn’t diplomacy; it’s a high school popularity contest where only sycophants get invited to sit at the cool kids’ table.

And let’s not overlook how this impacts America domestically. Shuttering embassies means fewer opportunities for cultural exchange, trade negotiations, and international cooperation on issues like terrorism and climate change. But hey, who needs all that when you’ve got Twitter posts declaring your enemies persona non grata?


A Warning from History

History is littered with examples of leaders who prioritized loyalty over competence or collaboration—and it never ends well. Rubio might want to brush up on his history books before he isolates America further on the global stage.

In conclusion, Rubio’s approach is less about diplomacy and more about enforcing ideological purity tests on behalf of Donald Trump. If this continues, Washington might as well replace its embassies with statues of Trump himself—gold-plated and larger than life, naturally.

Welcome to the New Axis of Trump: Diplomacy for the Devoted (March 15, 2025)


#RubioDiplomacyFail #AmericaAlone #TrumpLoyaltyTest
#GlobalIsolation #PersonaNonGrata

Tags: Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Diplomacy, Persona Non Grata Policy, U.S.-South Africa Relations, Global Politics

Grisly Discovery: Cartel ‘Extermination Camp’ Unearthed in Mexico


Izaguirre Ranch: A Chilling Glimpse into Cartel Brutality

Mexico City — In a chilling revelation that has sent shockwaves through Mexico and beyond, a volunteer search group has uncovered what appears to be a cartel “extermination camp” at the Izaguirre Ranch in Jalisco. The discovery, made in early March 2025, has brought to light the horrifying extent of cartel violence in the region and raised urgent questions about the fate of thousands of missing persons in Mexico. Official figures indicate that more than 110,000 people are currently missing in the country.

This photo released by the Jalisco State Attorney General’s Office shows investigators inspecting the Izaguirre Ranch where skeletal remains were discovered in the municipality of Teuchitlan, Mexico, Tuesday, March 11, 2025. Photo credit: Jalisco State Attorney General’s Office.

The Warrior Searchers of Jalisco, a group dedicated to finding disappeared individuals, made the grim discovery after receiving an anonymous tip. Upon entering the ranch, located approximately 60 kilometers west of Guadalajara, they found a scene that defied their worst nightmares.

At the heart of the discovery were three underground cremation ovens, containing incinerated skeletal remains hidden beneath layers of earth and brick slabs. The searchers also uncovered a vast array of personal belongings, including over 200 pairs of shoes, hundreds of articles of clothing, backpacks, identification documents, and even children’s toys.

Indira Navarro, a representative of the Warrior Searchers, described the site as a “forced recruitment and extermination center.” She explained that while the existence of such facilities was an “open secret,” this was the first time they had encountered one firsthand.

The Jalisco Attorney General’s Office revealed that the ranch had initially been discovered in September 2024 during a Mexican National Guard operation.

At that time, authorities arrested ten individuals, rescued two kidnapping victims, and found one deceased person. However, they failed to detect the hidden remains and crematoriums, which were concealed using methods previously unknown to law enforcement.

The discovery has sparked outrage and demands for a thorough, independent investigation. A coalition of human rights organizations and families of the missing has raised concerns about potential collusion between local officials and criminal groups. They argue that it is “inconceivable” that such a large-scale operation could have functioned without some level of official knowledge or involvement.

Mexico’s Attorney General, Alejandro Gertz Manero, echoed these concerns, stating that it was “implausible” for local authorities to have been unaware of the site’s existence. The federal government has since taken charge of the investigation, with forensic teams working tirelessly to process the evidence and identify the remains.

The Izaguirre Ranch is believed to have served as a hub for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), one of Mexico’s most powerful and violent criminal organizations. Activists suggest that the site was used not only for disposing of victims’ remains but also for the forced recruitment and training of cartel operatives.

This gruesome discovery is just the latest in a series of similar findings across Mexico in recent years.

In 2011, authorities uncovered mass graves containing 193 bodies in Tamaulipas. In 2017, investigators determined that a jail in Piedras Negras had been used by the Zetas cartel as a base for disposing of victims. More recently, in Tamaulipas, authorities have identified at least 15 “extermination sites,” with one location yielding over 1,100 pounds of human bones.

The scale of these discoveries underscores the ongoing crisis of disappearances in Mexico. Official figures indicate that more than 110,000 people are currently missing in the country, with many families left in a state of perpetual uncertainty and grief.

Rosario Magaña, whose son Carlos disappeared in 2017 at the age of 19, expressed the frustration felt by many families of the missing. “I still feel hopeless, as it has been eight years and I remain in the same predicament,” she said, highlighting the slow pace of investigations and the lack of progress in many cases.

As forensic teams continue their work at the Izaguirre Ranch, questions linger about the true extent of the atrocities committed there and the identities of the victims. The discovery has reignited calls for more robust action against cartel violence and increased support for the families of the disappeared.

The uncovering of this “extermination camp” serves as a grim reminder of the human cost of Mexico’s ongoing drug war and the urgent need for effective strategies to combat organized crime and protect vulnerable populations.

As the investigation unfolds, many hope that it will not only bring closure to grieving families but also lead to meaningful changes in how Mexico addresses the intertwined issues of drug trafficking, corruption, and human rights abuses.


#MexicoExtermination #CartelViolence
#MissingPersons #JaliscoDiscovery #HumanRights

Tags: Mexico, Jalisco, Cartel Violence, Missing Persons, Human Rights, Criminal Investigation, Drug War