The Stewardship Report

Home Blog Page 2

Thai Director Delivers Devastating Corporate Culture Critique at Venice


Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit’s “Human Resource” exposes the dehumanizing reality of modern workplace exploitation


New York, N.Y. – The sterile fluorescent lights of corporate offices have rarely felt more suffocating than in Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit’s latest film, Human Resource, which premiered in the Orizzonti strand at the Venice International Film Festival.


The Thai director, known for his contemplative work Happy Old Year, delivers a haunting meditation on modern work culture that resonates far beyond Bangkok’s towering business districts.


A Pregnancy Amid Economic Despair

Prapamonton Eiamchan delivers a masterfully restrained performance as Fren, a human resources employee navigating both an unexpected pregnancy and an increasingly hostile work environment.

Five weeks pregnant when the film opens, Fren’s condition becomes a metaphor for hope struggling to survive in a world designed to crush the human spirit.

The film’s opening sequence establishes the bleakness immediately: Fren lies motionless during an ultrasound, watching her unborn child appear as nothing more than a small black dot on the monitor.

“Take care of your emotions,” the doctor advises, but Thamrongrattanarit makes clear that emotional well-being is a luxury this society cannot afford.

Working alongside colleague Tenn in a faceless corporation, Fren spends her days recruiting workers for positions that barely qualify as employment.

The latest opening offers just 18,000 baht ($560) monthly for six-day work weeks—a salary so meager that potential candidates are immediately dismissed for requesting even modest increases of 2,000 baht ($60).


Thai film director Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit. Photo credit: X.

Corporate Machinery Grinding Human Dreams

Thamrongrattanarit crafts each scene with deliberate precision, allowing the camera to linger on Fren’s increasingly catatonic expressions as she processes applications from desperate job seekers.

The director’s decision to eschew Bangkok‘s typically vibrant cinematography in favor of overcast, drab imagery reinforces the film’s central thesis: modern capitalism has drained color from both the literal and metaphorical landscape.

The human resources department becomes a particularly pointed setting for this critique. “HR is not a human buffet,” one character observes, though Thamrongrattanarit suggests it’s something far worse—a feeding frenzy where workers’ dignity becomes disposable commodity.



Technology and Social Decay

The film’s broader social commentary emerges through carefully placed details about contemporary Thailand‘s challenges. News reports reference widening wealth inequality, microplastics contaminating human reproductive systems, and general social unrest. One particularly chilling scene features a demonstration of “ultra-slim stab vests” marketed with the slogan “For an increasingly hostile world.”


These elements aren’t merely background texture but essential components of Thamrongrattanarit’s argument
about how economic pressure creates cascading social problems. When artificial intelligence threatens
entry-level positions, young workers face impossible choices between exploitation and unemployment.

Motherhood in an Uncertain Future

Fren’s pregnancy becomes the film’s emotional anchor, raising uncomfortable questions about bringing children into an increasingly unstable world. Thamrongrattanarit never explicitly answers whether parenthood remains ethical under such circumstances, instead allowing audiences to grapple with the moral complexity themselves.

The director’s approach to Fren’s internal struggle demonstrates remarkable sophistication. Rather than providing easy answers about work-life balance or maternal instincts, the film examines how systemic problems affect individual decisions. Fren’s growing numbness isn’t presented as personal weakness but as natural response to dehumanizing conditions.


A still from Human Resource.

Visual Poetry Amid Darkness

Despite its bleak subject matter, Human Resource achieves moments of genuine beauty through Thamrongrattanarit’s visual storytelling.

A sequence featuring Fren driving through an automated car wash while Beethoven‘s “Moonlight Sonata” plays demonstrates the director’s ability to find poetry in mundane experiences.

The film’s production design deserves particular recognition for creating authentic corporate environments that feel both specifically Thai and universally recognizable.

Fluorescent lighting, beige cubicles, and endless paperwork become visual shorthand for soul-crushing routine that transcends cultural boundaries.

Scattered Focus, Powerful Impact

While Human Resource occasionally suffers from scattered narrative focus—Thamrongrattanarit attempts to address numerous social issues without always connecting them cohesively—the film’s cumulative impact remains undeniable.

The director’s meditative pacing allows audiences to absorb the full weight of each carefully constructed scene.

The film’s treatment of declining birth rates and changing family structures adds another layer to its social commentary. Thamrongrattanarit suggests that economic pressure doesn’t just affect individual workers but threatens society’s fundamental structures.


A still from Human Resource.

A Mirror for Global Audiences

Human Resource succeeds most powerfully as international cinema because its critique extends beyond Thailand’s specific circumstances. White-collar workers worldwide will recognize Fren’s experiences of bureaucratic dehumanization, inadequate compensation, and moral compromise required for survival.

The film’s relevance became particularly apparent during recent global discussions about workplace culture, mental health, and economic inequality. Thamrongrattanarit has created a work that speaks directly to contemporary anxieties about capitalism’s human costs.


Essential Viewing for Our Times

Human Resource stands as essential viewing for anyone seeking to understand how modern economic systems affect individual psychology and social cohesion.

Thamrongrattanarit has crafted a film that functions simultaneously as personal character study and broad social critique.

While the director’s ambitious scope occasionally dilutes the narrative focus, the film’s core message remains crystal clear: current corporate culture demands fundamental reevaluation if society hopes to maintain basic human dignity.

Fren’s story becomes a call for systemic change disguised as intimate psychological portrait.

The film’s Venice premiere positions it perfectly for international distribution, where audiences grappling with similar workplace challenges will find both validation and inspiration for necessary conversations about labor rights, corporate responsibility, and human worth in an increasingly automated world.


Thai Director Delivers Devastating Corporate Culture Critique at Venice (Sept. 3, 2025)


Summary

Thai director Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit’s “Human Resource,” premiering at Venice Film Festival, follows pregnant HR worker Fren navigating dehumanizing corporate culture in Bangkok. The film critiques modern capitalism through intimate character study, examining how economic pressures affect individual psychology and social structures. While occasionally scattered in focus, it delivers powerful commentary on workplace exploitation, declining birth rates, and systemic inequality that resonates globally. Thamrongrattanarit creates essential viewing for understanding contemporary labor challenges and capitalism’s human costs.


#HumanResourceFilm #VeniceFilmFestival2025 #ThaiCinema #CorporateCulture #WorkplaceDrama
#AsianFilm #NawapolThamrongrattanarit #FilmReview #IndependentCinema #SocialCommentary

TAGS: Venice Film Festival, Thai cinema, corporate culture, workplace drama, Bangkok,
Nawapol Thamrongrattanarit, human resources, social commentary, independent film,
Asian cinema, film review, pregnancy drama, economic inequality, capitalism critique


In Manhattan, a Moonlit Feast Resurrects Lost Royalty of Ancient Siam


New Jan Jao Kha Illuminates N.Y.C. with Exquisite Recipes from the Sukhothai and Ayutthaya Eras, Once Reserved for Nobility and Thought Lost to Time.


Ancient Kingdom of Siam: royal courts, war elephants, and golden temples defined a civilization at the crossroads of East and West.
Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y.  — The relentless, neon-drenched pulse of Hell’s Kitchen seems an unlikely place for a quiet culinary resurrection.

Yet, on Ninth Avenue, a subtle glow beckons, promising a passage not just across the city, but across centuries. 

Jan Jao Kha (จันทร์เจ้าขา), a new restaurant whose name is an affectionate plea to the moon, has opened its doors, offering a rare portal to the royal kitchens of ancient Siam.

Here, under the curated ambiance of moonlight, forgotten flavors and dishes once savored only by the nobility of the Sukhotai and Ayutthaya kingdoms are not merely replicated; they are passionately reborn.


Co-owner and spokesperson Bix Luce welcomes the world to Jan Jao Kha in NYC.

This is the vision of co-owners Thai Americans West, Champ and Bix. Spokesperson Bix Luce, who, along with his partners, has embarked on a profound act of gastronomic stewardship.

Their mission transcends serving food; it is an intricate dance of historical research, culinary precision, and cultural reverence, aiming to share Siam’s eternal grace with a modern N.Y.C. audience.

The restaurant stands as a direct challenge to the often-monolithic understanding of Thai cuisine in the West, presenting a narrative written not in chili fires and ubiquitous pad thai, but in the delicate, complex layers of a royal heritage that few outside of Thailand have ever experienced.

The Guardians of a Fading Culinary Heritage

The journey to opening Jan Jao Kha was one of meticulous excavation. The recipes that form the cornerstone of the menu were not found in any common cookbook.

They are drawn from ancient parchment manuscripts, historical records, and oral traditions passed down through generations of cooks who served the royal courts.

These dishes, developed over centuries between the 13th and 18th centuries, represent the apex of Siamese culinary art—a cuisine where balance, subtlety, aesthetic beauty, and ingredient scarcity were paramount.

“This is not street food,” Luce explains, their demeanor reflecting the serene gravity of their endeavor. “This is a cuisine of refinement and profound symbolism.

Each dish was designed to please the most discerning palates, to be as beautiful to look upon as it was to consume, and to reflect the immense cultural sophistication of its time.

Many of these recipes were effectively lost to the wider world, surviving only in fragments or within very specific familial lineages in Thailand. Our role is that of a humble translator and guardian.”


A Menu Written in Gold Leaf and Delicate Spices

The offerings at Jan Jao Kha are a revelation. The menu is a curated anthology of Siam’s history. One of the signature highlights is a stunning, golden dumpling.

This delicate creation, elegant in form and rich in heritage, is filled with a sophisticated mixture of taro and other finely prepared ingredients, a testament to the royal preference for textural complexity and visual splendor.

Beyond this, the restaurant specializes in rare noodle dishes that tell a story of trade routes and palace innovation.

These are not the noodles of a bustling Bangkok market; they are precursors, often featuring painstakingly made fresh noodles paired with broths that are simmered for days and infused with spices that were once worth their weight in gold.

The flavors are profound yet nuanced—a symphony of galangal, lemongrass, wild lime, and carefully selected chilies that provide aroma and depth rather than sheer, overwhelming heat.

Each plate is presented with an artist’s touch, mirroring the aesthetic principles of the Ayutthaya Period, where food was an integral part of the kingdom’s celebrated art and culture.

The dining experience is intentionally designed as a journey, encouraging guests to slow down and appreciate the story behind each bite, the centuries of tradition being presented on a single, beautiful plate.


The Ambiance of Eternal Moonlight

The restaurant’s design philosophy directly supports its culinary narrative. The space is a deliberate departure from the typical loud, brightly lit dining rooms of the neighborhood.

The lighting is soft, evocative of a moonlit feast, casting shadows that seem to dance like figures from a traditional lantern light festival.

The decor incorporates elements of ancient Siamese artistry—rich textiles, dark woods, and subtle references to temple architecture—without falling into cliché.

The goal is to create an atmosphere of tranquil elegance, a sanctuary where the outside world fades and guests can fully immerse themselves in the experience.

It is a setting that honors the eternal grace its cuisine represents, providing a hushed, respectful backdrop that allows the food to claim its rightful place as the star of the evening.


A rare royal Thai dumpling from the Ayutthaya court, delicately shaped into little birds. Once served at royal banquets, it reflects the artistry and elegance of Siamese cuisine.

New Chapter in NYC’s Culinary Landscape

The arrival of Jan Jao Kha signifies a bold new chapter for authentic international cuisine in Manhattan.

It moves beyond the familiar and ventures into the realm of the scholarly and the sublime.

Jan Jao Kha caters to the adventurous gourmand, the history enthusiast, and anyone seeking a dining experience that nourishes both the body and the intellect.

In a city celebrated for its endless appetites, Jan Jao Kha offers something truly novel: not just a meal, but a taste of forgotten flavors and a tangible connection to a regal past.

It is a testament to the vision of its owners, who have successfully transplanted a piece of Thailand’s most cherished heritage onto Ninth Avenue.

They welcome the world not just to a restaurant, but to a moonlit table set for a journey into the heart of ancient Siam.


A golden, delicate taro-filled dumpling from royal Siam. Elegant in form, rich in heritage.


Jan Jao Kha / จันทร์เจ้าขา

830 Ninth Ave. (between 54 & 55 Streets)
Hell’s Kitchen / Midtown West, NYC 10019


In Manhattan, a Moonlit Feast Resurrects Lost Royalty of Ancient Siam
(Sept. 2, 2025)


Summary

In the heart of Hell’s Kitchen, Jan Jao Kha restaurant unveils the lost royal cuisine of ancient Siam. Co-owner Bix Luce guides us on a journey through meticulously resurrected dishes from the Sukhothai and Ayutthaya eras, offering a rare, elegant dining experience where history is savored in every delicate, flavorful bite.


#RoyalThaiCuisine #AncientSiam #JanJaoKha #NYCRestaurants #HellskitchenNYC
#ForgottenFlavors #FoodHistory #GourmetDining #ThaiFood #CulinaryArchaeology

TAGS: Jan Jao Kha, Royal Thai cuisine, ancient Siam, Sukhothai, Ayutthaya, fine dining,
Hell’s Kitchen, NYC restaurants, forgotten recipes, Bix Luce, authentic Thai food,
culinary history, Thai nobility, gastronomic heritage, rare noodles, traditional flavors


Over Labor Day Weekend, monks from the local Thai Temple blessed the new “Jan Jao Kha” on Ninth Avenue in Hell’s Kitchen.

ในแมนฮัตตัน งานเลี้ยงใต้แสงจันทร์ฟื้นคืนเชื้อพระวงศ์สยามโบราณ

อาหารและศิลปะการทำอาหาร สหรัฐอมาริกา
ผู้เขียน: จอห์น เลง
วันที่ 1 กันยายน 2025
เวลาอ่าน 7 นาที

ร้านอาหาร จันทร์เจ้าขา ซึ่งเป็นร้านอาหารไทยชั้นสูงที่ได้รับการแนะนำอย่างมาก ได้เปิดแล้วที่ 830 Ninth Avenue (ระหว่างถนน 54 และ 55) เฮลส์คิทเชน / มิดทาวน์เวสต์ นิวยอร์กซิตี้

จันทร์เจ้าขาแห่งใหม่ส่องแสงในนิวยอร์กซิตี้ด้วยสูตรอาหารอันวิจิตรจากยุคสุโขทัยและอยุธยา ที่ครั้งหนึ่งสงวนไว้เฉพาะชนชั้นสูงและเชื่อกันว่าสูญหายไปแล้ว

อาณาจักรสยามโบราณ: ราชสำนัก ช้างศึก และวัดทองคำ ได้กำหนดอารยธรรมที่จุดตัดของตะวันออกและตะวันตก

บรรณาธิการ จอห์น เลง

นิวยอร์ก รัฐนิวยอร์ก — จังหวะที่ไม่หยุดหย่อน เต็มไปด้วยแสงนีออนของเฮลส์คิทเชน ดูเหมือนจะเป็นสถานที่ที่ไม่น่าจะเหมาะสำหรับการฟื้นคืนอาหารอันเงียบสงบ

แต่บนถนน Ninth Avenue มีแสงสว่างอันนุ่มนวลเชื้อเชิญ สัญญาว่าจะเป็นทางผ่านไม่เพียงข้ามเมือง แต่ข้ามศตวรรษ

จันทร์เจ้าขา ร้านอาหารใหม่ที่ชื่อเป็นคำอ้อนวอนอันเป็นที่รักต่อดวงจันทร์ ได้เปิดประตู เสนอประตูสู่ครัวของราชสำนักสยามโบราณอันหาได้ยาก

ที่นี่ ภายใต้บรรยากาศแสงจันทร์ที่ได้รับการคัดสรร รสชาติและอาหารที่ถูกลืมซึ่งครั้งหนึ่งถูกลิ้มรสเฉพาะโดยขุนนางแห่งอาณาจักรสุโขทัยและอยุธยา ไม่ได้เป็นเพียงการจำลอง แต่ถูกฟื้นคืนด้วยความหลงใหล

นี่คือวิสัยทัศน์ของเจ้าของร่วม ไทยอเมริกันเวสต์ แชมป์ และบิกซ์ โฆษก บิกซ์ ลูซ ผู้ที่พร้อมกับหุ้นส่วน ได้เริ่มต้นการดูแลรักษาด้านอาหารอย่างลึกซึ้ง

ภารกิจของพวกเขาไม่ได้หยุดแค่การเสิร์ฟอาหาร แต่เป็นการเต้นรำที่ซับซ้อนของการวิจัยทางประวัติศาสตร์ ความแม่นยำทางอาหาร และการเคารพวัฒนธรรม โดยมีเป้าหมายที่จะแบ่งปันความงดงามนิรันดร์ของสยามกับผู้ชมในนิวยอร์กซิตี้ยุคใหม่

ร้านอาหารนี้ยืนหยัดเป็นการท้าทายโดยตรงต่อความเข้าใจที่มักจะเป็นแบบเดียวกันเกี่ยวกับอาหารไทยในตะวันตก โดยนำเสนอเรื่องราวที่ไม่ได้เขียนด้วยไฟพริกและผัดไทยที่พบได้ทั่วไป แต่ในชั้นที่ละเอียดอ่อนและซับซ้อนของมรดกหลวงที่น้อยคนนอกประเทศไทยเคยสัมผัส

ผู้พิทักษ์มรดกอาหารที่กำลังจางหาย

การเดินทางสู่การเปิด จันทร์เจ้าขา เป็นการขุดค้นอย่างพิถีพิถัน สูตรอาหารที่เป็นรากฐานของเมนูไม่ได้พบในตำราอาหารทั่วไป

สูตรเหล่านี้ได้มาจากต้นฉบับโบราณบนใบลาน บันทึกทางประวัติศาสตร์ และประเพณีที่ส่งผ่านมาจากรุ่นสู่รุ่นของพ่อครัวที่รับใช้ราชสำนัก

อาหารเหล่านี้ ซึ่งพัฒนามาตลอดหลายศตวรรษระหว่างศตวรรษที่ 13 ถึง 18 แสดงถึงจุดสูงสุดของศิลปะการทำอาหารสยาม—อาหารที่ความสมดุล ความละเอียดอ่อน ความงามทางสุนทรียศาสตร์ และความหายากของส่วนผสมเป็นสิ่งสำคัญยิ่ง

“นี่ไม่ใช่อาหารข้างทาง” ลูซ อธิบาย ท่าทางของพวกเขาสะท้อนความสงบเคร่งขรึมของความพยายาม “นี่คืออาหารแห่งความประณีตและสัญลักษณ์อันลึกซึ้ง

อาหารแต่ละจานได้รับการออกแบบเพื่อให้เป็นที่ชื่นชอบของเพดานที่เลือกสรรที่สุด ให้สวยงามที่จะมองเท่าที่จะบริโภค และเพื่อสะท้อนความซับซ้อนทางวัฒนธรรมอันมหาศาลของยุคสมัย

สูตรเหล่านี้หลายตัวสูญหายไปจากโลกที่กว้างขวางอย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ รอดเหลือเพียงเศษส่วนหรือภายในสายวงศ์ที่เฉพาะเจาะจงมากในประเทศไทย บทบาทของเราคือการเป็นนักแปลและผู้พิทักษ์ที่ถ่อมตน”

เมนูที่เขียนด้วยทองคำใสและเครื่องเทศละเอียดอ่อน

สิ่งที่เสนอที่ จันทร์เจ้าขา เป็นการเปิดเผย เมนูเป็นรวมเรื่องที่คัดสรรมาจากประวัติศาสตร์สยาม หนึ่งในไฮไลท์ลายเซ็นคือเกี๊ยวทองที่สวยงาม

การสร้างสรรค์อันละเอียดอ่อนนี้ สง่างามในรูปแบบและร่ำรวยในมรดก เต็มไปด้วยส่วนผสมของเผือกและส่วนผสมอื่น ๆ ที่เตรียมอย่างประณีต เป็นเครื่องพิสูจน์ถึงความชอบของราชวงศ์สำหรับความซับซ้อนของเนื้อสัมผัสและความงดงามทางสายตา

นอกจากนี้ ร้านอาหารเชี่ยวชาญในอาหารจานก๋วยเตี๋ยวหายากที่เล่าเรื่องราวของเส้นทางการค้าและนวัตกรรมของราชวัง

เหล่านี้ไม่ใช่ก๋วยเตี๋ยวของตลาดกรุงเทพฯ ที่พลุกพล่าน แต่เป็นต้นแบบ มักมีก๋วยเตี๋ยวสดที่ทำอย่างพิถีพิถันจับคู่กับน้ำซุปที่เคี่ยวเป็นวันและชุบด้วยเครื่องเทศที่เมื่อครั้งมีค่าเท่ากับน้ำหนักทอง

รสชาติลึกซึ้งแต่ละเอียดอ่อน—เป็นซิมโฟนีของข่า ตะไคร้ มะกรูดป่า และพริกที่คัดสรรอย่างระมัดระวังที่ให้กลิ่นหอมและความลึกแทนที่จะเป็นความร้อนที่ท่วมท้น

แต่ละจานได้รับการนำเสนอด้วยสัมผัสของศิลปิน สะท้อนหลักการสุนทรียศาสตร์ของยุคอยุธยา ที่อาหารเป็นส่วนหนึ่งที่สำคัญของศิลปะและวัฒนธรรมที่มีชื่อเสียงของอาณาจักร

ประสบการณ์การรับประทานอาหารได้รับการออกแบบให้เป็นการเดินทาง กระตุ้นให้แขกชะลอและชื่นชมเรื่องราวเบื้องหลังแต่ละคำ ประเพณีหลายศตวรรษที่นำเสนอในจานเดียวที่สวยงาม

บรรยากาศแห่งแสงจันทร์นิรันดร์

ปรัชญาการออกแบบของร้านอาหารสนับสนุนเรื่องราวอาหารโดยตรง พื้นที่เป็นการออกจากห้องรับประทานอาหารที่ดังและสว่างจัดทั่วไปของย่าน

แสงสว่างนุ่มนวล ชวนให้นึกถึงงานเลี้ยงใต้แสงจันทร์ ทอดเงาที่ดูเหมือนเต้นรำเหมือนบุคคลจากเทศกาลโคมประทีปแบบดั้งเดิม

การตกแต่งรวมองค์ประกอบของศิลปะสยามโบราณ—ผ้าที่ร่ำรวย ไม้เข้ม และการอ้างอิงที่ละเอียดอ่อนต่อสถาปัตยกรรมวัด—โดยไม่ตกเป็นความจำเจ

เป้าหมายคือการสร้างบรรยากาศแห่งความสง่างามที่เงียบสงบ สถานที่ศักดิ์สิทธิ์ที่โลกภายนอกจางหายและแขกสามารถดื่มด่ำกับประสบการณ์อย่างเต็มที่

เป็นฉากที่เป็นเกียรติแก่ความงดงามนิรันดร์ที่อาหารแทน ให้พื้นหลังที่เงียบเคารพที่ช่วยให้อาหารสามารถเรียกร้องสถานที่ที่ถูกต้องเป็นดาวของค่ำคืน

บทใหม่ในภูมิทัศน์อาหารของนิวยอร์กซิตี้

การมาถึงของ จันทร์เจ้าขา ส่งสัญญาณถึงบทใหม่ที่กล้าหาญสำหรับอาหารนานาชาติที่แท้จริงในแมนฮัตตัน

มันก้าวผ่านสิ่งที่คุ้นเคยและผจญภัยเข้าสู่อาณาเขตของผู้ใฝ่รู้และความประเสริฐ

จันทร์เจ้าขา ตอบสนองนักชิมที่ชอบการผจญภัย ผู้ที่ชื่นชอบประวัติศาสตร์ และใครก็ตามที่แสวงหาประสบการณ์การรับประทานอาหารที่บำรุงทั้งร่างกายและปัญญา

ในเมืองที่มีชื่อเสียงจากความอยากอาหารที่ไม่มีที่สิ้นสุด จันทร์เจ้าขา เสนอสิ่งที่แปลกใหม่อย่างแท้จริง: ไม่ใช่แค่มื้ออาหาร แต่เป็นรสชาติของรสชาติที่ถูกลืมและความเชื่อมต่อที่จับต้องได้กับอดีตที่สง่างาม

เป็นเครื่องพิสูจน์ถึงวิสัยทัศน์ของเจ้าของ ที่ได้ปลูกถ่ายชิ้นส่วนของมรดกที่เป็นที่รักที่สุดของประเทศไทยไปยัง Ninth Avenue ได้สำเร็จ

พวกเขาต้อนรับโลกไม่ใช่แค่สู่ร้านอาหาร แต่สู่โต๊ะใต้แสงจันทร์ที่จัดไว้สำหรับการเดินทางสู่ใจกลางสยามโบราณ


จันทร์เจ้าขา / จันทร์เจ้าขา

830 Ninth Ave. (ระหว่างถนน 54 และ 55)
Hell’s Kitchen / Midtown West, NYC 10019

ในแมนฮัตตัน งานเลี้ยงใต้แสงจันทร์ฟื้นคืนเชื้อพระวงศ์สยามโบราณ
(2 กันยายน 2025)

สรุป

ในใจกลางของ Hell’s Kitchen ร้าน จันทร์เจ้าขา เปิดเผยอาหารหลวงที่สูญหายของสยามโบราณ เจ้าของร่วม บิกซ์ ลูซ นำเราเดินทางผ่านอาหารที่ฟื้นคืนอย่างพิถีพิถันจากยุคสุโขทัยและอยุธยา เสนอประสบการณ์การรับประทานอาหารที่หายากและสง่างาม ที่ประวัติศาสตร์ถูกลิ้มรสในทุกคำที่ละเอียดอ่อนและเต็มรสชาติ

แท็ก: #อาหารไทยหลวง #สยามโบราณ #จันทร์เจ้าขา #ร้านอาหารนิวยอร์ก #เฮลส์คิทเชนนิวยอร์ก #รสชาติที่ถูกลืม #ประวัติศาสตร์อาหาร #การรับประทานอาหารสำหรับนักชิม #อาหารไทย #โบราณคดีอาหาร

คำสำคัญ: จันทร์เจ้าขา, อาหารไทยหลวง, สยามโบราณ, สุโขทัย, อยุธยา, อาหารหรู, Hell’s Kitchen, ร้านอาหารนิวยอร์ก, สูตรที่ถูกลืม, บิกซ์ ลูซ, อาหารไทยแท้, ประวัติศาสตร์อาหาร, ขุนนางไทย, มรดกอาหาร, ก๋วยเตี๋ยวหายาก, รสชาติแบบดั้งเดิม


ในช่วงสุดสัปดาห์วันแรงงาน พระสงฆ์จากวัดไทยท้องถิ่นได้ให้พรแก่ “จันทร์เจ้าขา” แห่งใหม่บน Ninth Avenue ใน Hell’s Kitchen

What Exactly is Artificial Intelligence and Why is it Important?


Artificial Intelligence. One of the most transformative technological developments of the modern era, fundamentally reshaping how humans interact with machines and process information. Artificial Intelligence encompasses computer systems designed to perform tasks that typically require human cognitive abilities, including learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language comprehension.

The foundations of Artificial Intelligence emerged in the mid-20th century when pioneering researchers began exploring computational approaches to human-like thinking. Machine Learning, a subset of Artificial Intelligence, enables systems to improve performance through experience without explicit programming. Deep Learning, utilizing artificial Neural Networks inspired by biological brain structures, has driven recent breakthroughs in image recognition, natural language processing, and autonomous systems.


Modern Artificial Intelligence applications span numerous sectors, revolutionizing healthcare through diagnostic imaging, transforming transportation with Autonomous Vehicles, and enhancing communication through Natural Language Processing.

Computer Vision technologies enable machines to interpret visual information, while Robotics combines Artificial Intelligence with mechanical systems to perform complex physical tasks.

The development of Large Language Models has democratized access to sophisticated Artificial Intelligence capabilities, enabling natural conversations between humans and machines.

Companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have developed increasingly powerful systems that can generate text, code, and creative content with remarkable proficiency.



Artificial Intelligence raises significant ethical considerations regarding employment displacement, privacy concerns, and algorithmic bias. The concept of Artificial General Intelligence—systems matching or exceeding human intelligence across all domains—remains a subject of intense debate among researchers and Futurists. Questions surrounding Machine Consciousness and the potential emergence of sentient artificial beings continue to challenge philosophical and scientific understanding.

Regulatory frameworks are evolving to address Artificial Intelligence deployment, with initiatives focusing on transparency, accountability, and safety standards. The European Union has pioneered comprehensive Artificial Intelligence legislation, while other nations develop their own governance approaches.



Artificial Intelligence technologies face technical limitations including data dependency, computational requirements, and the “black box” problem where decision-making processes remain opaque. However, ongoing research in Explainable AI seeks to make these systems more interpretable and trustworthy.

The economic impact of Artificial Intelligence extends beyond individual industries, potentially reshaping global labor markets and economic structures. Investment in Artificial Intelligence research and development continues accelerating, with both private companies and governments recognizing its strategic importance.

As Artificial Intelligence capabilities expand, interdisciplinary collaboration between computer scientists, ethicists, policymakers, and domain experts becomes increasingly crucial. The future trajectory of Artificial Intelligence will likely determine humanity’s relationship with technology for generations to come, making thoughtful development and deployment essential for beneficial outcomes.


#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #MachineLearning #DeepLearning
#Technology #Innovation #FutureTech #DigitalTransformatio

TAGS: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, AI ethics, technology,
automation, neural networks, computer science, digital innovation, future technology



Millennial Queer Men Embracing Asexuality Challenge Same-Sex Marriages


A rising number of queer Millennials identify as asexual, straining same-sex marriages in New York City and reshaping cultural expectations.


Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y. – On any given evening in Manhattan, couples step out of the city’s perpetual rhythm of ambition and indulgence to share dinner, conversation, or intimacy within the walls of their homes. But for many queer Millennial men in New York, intimacy no longer carries the same resonance it once did.


A growing number of men who once enthusiastically defined themselves through marriage and desire are instead finding their evolving identities rooted in asexuality, leaving partners navigating silence, rejection, and ultimately, divorce.

The emergence of this trend—estimated to affect as many as 10% of Millennial queer men nationally—has been particularly visible in New York City. Here, where stress levels, high rents, and constant cultural temptations test even the most committed partnerships, anecdotal evidence suggests the proportion is even higher. Lawyers and therapists alike are observing a discernible spike in petitions for no-fault divorce on the statutory grounds of “irretrievable breakdown”, a phrase at once sterile in law but anguished in life.


“Asexuality is the Queerest Thing.” Image: Stonewall.org/uk.

The Statistics Behind a Shifting Identity

National studies in human sexuality show that asexuality, once thought to be vanishingly rare, has grown to represent 1% to 2% of the general population. But within Millennial queer male demographics, researchers are now recording self-identification levels that run as high as 10%.

For a generation raised against the backdrop of hard-won victories for marriage equality, the shift poses both intimate and societal quandaries.

Dr. Henry Lamont, a clinical psychologist specializing in LGBTQ+ relationships, noted: “We are beginning to understand that sexual orientation and sexual desire are not static.

For many, attraction evolves—or declines—over time. What is new here is the scale at which queer Millennial men are openly adopting an asexual identity, sometimes several years after marriage.”

For partners, a departure from sexual desire is often interpreted as rejection or as symptomatic of relational failure. In reality, the transformation frequently reflects individual evolution rather than spousal shortcomings. Yet the collision of newfound asexual identity with marriage vows rooted in sexual bonds creates a strain that many couples cannot overcome.


New York City: A Pressure Cooker for Relationships

New York, with its whirl of ambition, exhaustion, and relentless comparisons, creates uniquely precarious conditions for intimacy.

Queer Millennials in the city face financial burdens—median rents surpass US$4,200 (approx. €3,840) for a one-bedroom in Manhattan—as well as professional demands that erode emotional presence.

Even within marriages, constant exposure to nightlife and new romantic possibilities magnifies insecurities.

“New York heightens tension. It creates both temptation and emotional fatigue,” explained Nelson Cruz, a Brooklyn-based marriage counselor.

“So when one partner experiences a reduction or loss of sexual desire, the other can feel doubly abandoned: first by the lack of intimacy, and second by the perception that in this city, with its countless alternatives, they have been uniquely turned away.”

It is precisely this intersection—of economic strain, limited space, and expanded opportunity—that makes New York fertile ground for the dissolution of marriages reshaped by asexuality.


Divorce and the Legal Implications of Asexuality

In New York, the liberalization of divorce law in 2010 made “irretrievable breakdown” the standard language for dissolution.

The statute avoids assigning blame, allowing couples to dissolve marriages without proof of wrongdoing. Yet attorneys say the language is increasingly deployed to reflect situations in which one partner has embraced asexuality.

Family law attorney Erica Klein, who has seen a rising caseload among gay male clients, observed: “It is not that a partner can point to betrayal.

It is that the marriage no longer functions in a way both parties consider fulfilling. The law recognizes this, but there is real heartbreak in trying to affirm dignity while also narrating loss.”

Financially, divorce continues to carry enormous implications, particularly in a city where joint leases and shared mortgages often bind couples more tightly than their vows.

Alimony, asset (and pet) division, and housing transitions amplify the difficulty, with many men facing the paradox of continued cohabitation with estranged partners due to prohibitive rents.


Emotional Fallout and Shifting Narratives of Marriage

The intimate consequences stretch far deeper than legal filings. For the spouse left behind, the awareness that his partner has not rejected him—specifically—but rather desire itself, brings little solace. Marriages founded on narratives of passion feel disoriented in the absence of physical affirmation.

José Martinez, who divorced his husband last year after a six-year marriage, described it poignantly:


“I spent months asking myself what I had done wrong, what I had lost. Then I realized
that it wasn’t about me. He wasn’t choosing someone else. He was choosing solitude
with himself. Accepting that didn’t make it hurt less, but it let me stop assigning blame.”


The broader cultural narrative is shifting as well. Once, marriage within queer communities symbolized visibility, defiance, and shared liberation. Now, as one partner evolves into a realm of desirelessness, marriage becomes less a battlefield for rights and more a crucible for personal reevaluation.


Redefining Love Beyond Sexual Desire

In response, some New York couples are attempting radical reinventions.

Asexuality is more and more open in LGBTQ+ Japanese “manga.’

A handful negotiate open marriages, permitting one partner to sustain external sexual liaisons while maintaining domestic union. Others redefine intimacy outside of sex—through companionship, shared rituals, and intellectual closeness.

Psychotherapist Maria Enríquez explains: “We are watching the emergence of nontraditional marriages that decenter sex but still emphasize loyalty.

These unions test whether love can survive solely as devotion. For some, it works. For many, it does not.”

What remains constant is the yearning for a large societal vocabulary that can hold these realities. Asexuality is often still described in clinical tones, its arrival within marriage recounted in whispers. Yet visibility builds gradually, propelled by stories from those who have lived the rupture.


A City at the Crossroads of Intimacy

People who identify as asexual aren’t going to change based on the person with whom they’re in a relationship.

The rise of asexual identification among Millennial queer men in New York City is both private and public—private in the bedroom, public in the courtroom.

It implicates histories of equality struggles, reimagines the expectations of marriage, and challenges couples to reconcile vows with transforming identities.

Don’t expect an asexual person to change. Asexuality isn’t a choice or preference any more than heterosexuality and homosexuality are. Asexuality isn’t a problem or disorder, and it isn’t caused by abuse or violence.

For a city that thrives on intensity, the lesson of asexuality may paradoxically be restraint. For many, the future will no longer be measured in physicality but in companionship, in the quiet resilience of love untethered from desire.

New York is, after all, a place where reinvention is relentless—and marriage, like the city itself, is always under negotiation.


Summary

In New York City, a growing number of Millennial queer men are embracing asexuality, often years into marriage. The shift leaves partners grappling with feelings of rejection and leads many couples toward no-fault divorces citing “irretrievable breakdown.” While some reimagine intimacy outside of sex, most confront painful dissolution in a city where financial strain heightens emotional loss. Experts suggest this cultural shift reshapes the meaning of marriage, with love and loyalty extending beyond sexual desire.


#Asexuality #QueerMillennials #NYCRelationships #NYCStories #IntimacyRedefined
#NoFaultDivorce #UrbanLove #QueerIdentity #ChangingMarriages #MarriageEquality

Tags: asexuality, New York City, Millennial queer men, same-sex marriage,
divorce, intimacy, LGBTQ+, cultural shifts, psychology, legal issues, relationships



The Fish and the Tree: Einstein’s Mythical Wisdom Revealed


Exploring the origins and implications of a popular quote falsely attributed to Albert Einstein on individual strengths and societal judgments.


Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y. – In the vast ocean of inspirational quotes that flood social media feeds and motivational posters, few resonate as deeply as this one: “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”


Attributed widely to Albert Einstein, the statement captures a profound truth about human potential and the pitfalls of uniform judgment. Yet, as research reveals, Einstein never uttered these words. The quote’s origins lie in a rich tapestry of educational allegories dating back over a century, and its misattribution only amplifies its ironic wisdom. Despite lacking a famous pedigree, the saying’s message endures, challenging modern societies to rethink how they evaluate intelligence, talent, and success.

This feature delves into the quote’s shadowy history, unpacks why it clings to Einstein’s legacy, and examines its applications in contemporary fields like education and neurodiversity. In an era where standardized testing and rigid career paths dominate, the fish-and-tree metaphor serves as a poignant reminder: true genius flourishes when nurtured in its natural element.


The Myth of Einstein’s Attribution

The quote first gained traction in its modern form around the early 2000s, often paired with Albert Einstein’s image in memes and self-help books. A 2021 fact-check by USA Today confirmed that no archival evidence links the words to the physicist, who died on April 18, 1955. Comprehensive collections like “The Ultimate Quotable Einstein,” published by Princeton University Press, omit it entirely. So, how did this association emerge?

Albert Einstein.

Investigations trace the earliest printed attribution to Einstein to 2004, in Matthew Kelly’s book “The Rhythm of Life: Living Every Day with Passion and Purpose.” Kelly presented it as a direct quote from the scientist, but without sourcing.

This single instance appears to have sparked a viral spread, amplified by the Internet’s echo chambers. As one skeptic noted on Stack Exchange, the quote’s philosophical bent aligns with Einstein’s known views on creativity and education—he once criticized schools for killing curiosity—but the language and structure do not match his documented writings.

Misattributions like this are common in the world of quotations. History.com lists several falsehoods pinned on Einstein, including remarks on bees and insanity, often because his name lends instant credibility. In this case, the fish-tree analogy taps into Einstein’s reputation as a nonconformist genius who struggled in traditional schooling.

Born in Ulm, Germany, on March 14, 1879, Einstein famously rebelled against rote learning, once calling it “the murder of the holy curiosity of inquiry.” Yet, the quote’s true roots predate him by decades, evolving from satirical fables about education systems.


Tracing the Historical Roots

The essence of the quote—an allegory critiquing one-size-fits-all judgments—can be traced to the late 19th century. According to Quote Investigator, the earliest precursor appeared in 1898, in an essay titled “An Educational Allegory” by Amos E. Dolbear, a physicist and inventor writing under the pseudonym “Aesop, Jr.” Published in the Journal of Education, the piece described a fantastical school where animals were forced to master skills alien to their natures: birds had to run, fish to fly, and squirrels to swim.

The fish-and-tree motif was used by Dr. Seuss in “Hop on Pop” (1963).

Dolbear’s satire targeted the rigid curricula of the time, arguing that uniform standards stifle innate talents. “The animals had been educated to believe that the only true education was that which developed all their powers equally,” he wrote, highlighting the absurdity.

This allegory resurfaced in various forms: a 1903 newspaper fable about a “Jungle School Board” where creatures bickered over curriculum, and a 1946 version in the Boston Herald adding more animals, like a squirrel complaining about mandatory swimming.

By the mid-20th century, the narrative had crystallized around the fish and tree motif. A 1967 letter to the editor in the Rockford Morning Star echoed similar sentiments without attribution. The full modern phrasing—“Everybody is a genius…”—emerged in Kelly’s 2004 book, blending the old allegory with a positive affirmation of universal potential.

Quote Investigator notes that while elements like “everybody is a genius” appeared earlier (e.g., in a 1974 interview with dancer Martha Graham attributing it to composer Edgar Varèse), the combination is recent.

These evolutions reflect broader societal shifts. In the industrial age, education emphasized conformity to prepare workers for factories. Dolbear’s era saw the rise of compulsory schooling in the U.S., often criticized for ignoring individual differences.

The quote’s unattributable nature—much like urban legends—allows it to adapt, gaining relevance in new contexts without a fixed author.


Applications in Modern Education

Today, the fish-tree metaphor is a staple in discussions about educational reform, particularly the need for differentiation. In a 2019 blog post, educator Steve Wheeler argued that forcing all students to “climb that tree” ignores diverse learning styles, leading to disengagement and low self-esteem.

Lynda Mullaly Hunt’s young adult novel Fish in a Tree (2015) follows a girl with dyslexia who feels “stupid” in school until a teacher recognizes her artistic talents. It has sold over a million copies and is used in classrooms to promote empathy and neurodiversity.

Standardized tests, like the SAT or PISA assessments, exemplify this: they measure a narrow set of skills, such as logical reasoning and memorization, often disadvantaging creative or kinesthetic learners.

Consider the case of dyslexia, a neurodevelopmental condition affecting up to 20% of the population.

The book “Fish Don’t Climb Trees” by Sue Blyth reframes dyslexia not as a deficit but as a different way of processing information, urging educators to celebrate strengths like visual thinking and problem-solving.

Similarly, Lynda Mullaly Hunt’s young adult novel Fish in a Tree, published in 2015, follows Ally, a girl with dyslexia who feels “stupid” in school until a teacher recognizes her artistic talents.

The book has sold over a million copies and is used in classrooms to promote empathy and neurodiversity.

In higher education, the quote inspires calls for personalized learning.

A 2023 article on medical education at the University of Vermont questioned traditional lecture-based models, suggesting they judge future doctors by memorization rather than clinical intuition or empathy.

With remote learning surging post-COVID-19, tools like adaptive software allow students to progress at their own pace, embodying the quote’s ethos.

Yet, challenges persist. In the U.S., where public schools serve over 50 million students, resource constraints often lead to homogenized teaching.

Critics argue that without systemic change—such as smaller class sizes or teacher training in differentiated instruction—the fish will continue struggling up trees.



Embracing Neurodiversity and Beyond

The quote’s wisdom extends beyond classrooms into neurodiversity advocacy. Coined in the 1990s by sociologist Judy Singer, neurodiversity views conditions like autism, ADHD, and dyslexia as natural variations rather than disorders.

A LinkedIn post from the BBC in 2016 used the fish-tree analogy to promote workplace inclusion, noting that judging neurodivergent individuals by neurotypical standards wastes talent.

For instance, people with ADHD often excel in dynamic environments requiring hyperfocus and creativity, yet traditional offices emphasize sustained attention—akin to asking a fish to climb.

Reddit discussions in neurodiversity communities frequently invoke the quote to combat stigma, with users sharing stories of feeling “stupid” in school only to thrive in entrepreneurship or arts.

In the corporate world, companies like Microsoft and SAP have launched neurodiversity hiring programs, recognizing that diverse cognitive profiles drive innovation.

A 2023 study found that teams with neurodivergent members solved problems 30% faster in certain tasks. The quote underscores this: by valuing the fish’s swimming prowess, societies unlock untapped potential.


Even in personal development, the metaphor encourages self-compassion.
Wellness coach Sarah Weaver, in a 2023 blog, advised parents of neurodivergent children
to nurture innate abilities rather than force conformity, fostering authenticity and resilience.


The Astonishing Truth Persists

Though unattributable to Einstein, the quote’s truth astonishes in its simplicity and universality. It challenges entrenched systems—from education to employment—to adapt to individual strengths, promoting equity and fulfillment. As global challenges like climate change demand diverse thinkers, ignoring this wisdom risks leaving geniuses believing they are stupid.

In New York City’s bustling melting pot, where immigrants and innovators converge, the message rings especially true. Here, amid skyscrapers that no fish could climb, human potential swims in myriad forms, waiting to be recognized.


Summary

Although often misattributed to Albert Einstein, the quote about judging a fish by its tree-climbing ability stems from 19th-century educational allegories critiquing uniform standards. This feature explores its historical evolution, from Amos Dolbear’s 1898 satire to modern applications in differentiated learning and neurodiversity advocacy. It highlights how embracing individual strengths can transform education and society, preventing talented individuals from feeling inadequate in mismatched environments. (75 words)


#MisattributedQuotes #EinsteinMyth #Neurodiversity #EducationReform #IndividualStrengths

TAGS: Einstein, quotes, education, neurodiversity, dyslexia, differentiation, allegories, genius, potential, diversity


Satirical Commentary Sparks Online Speculation About Presidential Burial

0

Daily Beast Column Comparing Trump To Lenin Creates Viral Rumors About Red Square Interment


New York, N.Y. — A satirical opinion piece published by The Daily Beast on August 28, 2025, has ignited widespread online speculation about whether President Donald Trump might someday be buried alongside Vladimir Lenin in Moscow’s Red Square.


The rumor, which has circulated across social media platforms and messaging apps, stems from a provocative commentary that employed dark humor to discuss the president’s health and political legacy.


Origin of the Rumor

The speculation originated from a column titled “It’s Tasteless to Speculate That Trump Might Soon Be Buried On Red Square Like Lenin” by foreign policy expert David Rothkopf. The piece began with a Soviet-era joke about a man searching newspaper obituaries for a death announcement that would appear on the front page, implying the demise of a major political figure.


Rothkopf’s commentary suggested that “if he keeps serving the Motherland as he always has,
Trump could end up buried in a glass casket in a mausoleum on Red Square like Lenin.”


This satirical observation, intended as political commentary rather than factual reporting, quickly became distorted as it spread across digital platforms.

The author used this provocative imagery to recommend viewers watch Armando Iannucci’s film “The Death of Stalin” as preparation for potential political transitions. However, social media users began sharing excerpts from the piece without proper context, leading some to interpret the satirical speculation as genuine reporting.



Social Media Amplification

Digital platforms have amplified fragments of Rothkopf’s commentary, with users sharing screenshots and partial quotes that omit the satirical nature of the original piece. Twitter/X, Facebook, and Telegram channels have circulated versions of the rumor that present it as breaking news rather than opinion journalism.

The viral spread demonstrates how satirical content can transform into apparent fact when removed from its original context. Meme culture and algorithmic content distribution have accelerated this process, with engagement-driven platforms prioritizing provocative headlines over nuanced analysis.

Several fact-checking organizations have begun addressing the rumor, emphasizing that no credible sources suggest any plans for presidential burial in Russia. The speculation appears entirely rooted in Rothkopf’s rhetorical device rather than any substantive political developments.


Historical Context of Lenin’s Mausoleum

Lenin’s preserved body has been on “almost continuous public display inside the mausoleum since its completion in 1930” on Red Square. The Soviet Union constructed the monument as a shrine to the revolutionary leader, where his embalmed remains lie in a glass casket for public viewing.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has “rejected any plans so far to bury the body, saying that he was not in favor of taking any steps that would divide society.”

This reluctance to alter Lenin’s resting place reflects ongoing political sensitivities around Soviet history and Russian identity.

The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia has petitioned to “rid Red Square of the remains of the main persecutor and executioner of the 20th century”, though domestic religious authorities have not supported this position.

The mausoleum remains a significant tourist attraction and symbol of Russia’s revolutionary heritage.

The Kremlin Wall Necropolis adjacent to the mausoleum contains the remains of other Soviet leaders and prominent figures, making it a politically charged location for any hypothetical international burial.


Political Reality Assessment

Foreign policy experts emphasize that the rumor has no basis in diplomatic reality or established precedent. U.S.-Russia relations remain strained across multiple fronts, making any ceremonial burial arrangement highly improbable regardless of political circumstances.

International law and diplomatic protocols would require extensive negotiations for such an unprecedented arrangement. No American president has ever been buried on foreign soil in a manner that would honor both nations’ political traditions.

The U.S. State Department has not commented on the rumors, likely viewing them as unworthy of official response. Presidential burial traditions in the United States follow established patterns at national cemeteries, presidential libraries, or family burial grounds.

Russian government officials have similarly ignored the speculation, focusing instead on current diplomatic and economic priorities. The Kremlin’s silence suggests they view the rumor as irrelevant to serious policy discussions.


Media Literacy Implications

The incident highlights ongoing challenges in distinguishing satirical commentary from factual reporting in digital media environments. Algorithmic distribution systems often prioritize engagement over accuracy, allowing provocative content to spread rapidly regardless of its factual basis.

Lenin’s Tomb on Red Square in Moscow.

Media literacy experts recommend readers examine source context, author intent, and publication standards before sharing content that makes extraordinary claims.

Satirical publications and opinion columns employ rhetorical devices that can be misinterpreted when circulated without proper attribution.

The Trump-Lenin burial rumor serves as a case study in how political satire transforms into apparent news through social media amplification.

Educational institutions and civic organizations increasingly emphasize critical thinking skills to help citizens navigate complex information environments.

Journalism ethics require clear distinctions between news reporting, opinion commentary, and satirical content, though these boundaries blur in digital spaces where content appears without editorial context.


Summary

A satirical opinion piece from The Daily Beast has generated viral rumors suggesting Trump might be buried on Red Square with Lenin. The commentary, written by foreign policy expert David Rothkopf, used dark humor to discuss presidential health concerns and drew parallels between Trump and Soviet leadership. The piece sparked widespread social media speculation, though experts emphasize the rumor has no factual basis. The story highlights how satirical content can evolve into misinformation in digital spaces.


#TrumpLenin #RedSquare #PoliticalSatire #Misinformation #MediaLiteracy
#FakeNews #DailyBeast #PoliticalCommentary #SovietHistory #DigitalMedia

TAGS: Trump, Red Square, burial rumor, Daily Beast, political satire, misinformation,
social media, viral content, David Rothkopf, Moscow, Kremlin, Soviet history, mausoleum,
Lenin, political commentary, fake news, digital media, fact-checking media literacy



Thai Court Ousts PM Shinawatra Over Leaked Cambodian Call


A constitutional breach involving a private call with Cambodia’s former leader ends the Shinawatra Dynasty, deepening Thailand’s protracted political instability.


New York, N.Y. — The nine judges of Thailand’s Constitutional Court delivered a seismic verdict on Friday, voting six to three to remove Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra from office for ethics violations stemming from a leaked private phone call with Cambodia’s former long-ruling strongman, Hun Sen.


The ruling immediately plunged the nation into fresh political turmoil and marked a severe blow to the enduring, yet besieged, political dynasty founded by her father, the exiled billionaire Thaksin Shinawatra.

The case centered on a June phone conversation, the audio of which was publicly released by Hun Sen himself. In the recording, the 39-year-old prime minister could be heard referring to the Cambodian leader as “uncle” and offering criticisms of the Thai army. The call occurred against a backdrop of rapidly escalating military tensions along the two nations’ disputed border, which weeks later erupted into a deadly five-day conflict that killed dozens of soldiers and civilians and displaced hundreds of thousands of people.

In its written ruling, the court determined that Paetongtarn’s “personal relationship” with Hun Sen “appeared to align with Cambodia’s interests” over those of Thailand. The judges dismissed her defense that the call was a good-faith, “personal negotiation to… bring back peace without using violence,” stating it instead “caused the public to cast doubt” on her loyalties and whether her actions “would benefit Cambodia more than the nation’s interest.”

The ousted leader publicly acknowledged the court’s verdict but stood by her actions. “From the first day I took this office, my every action has been for the benefit of the people,” she stated in a televised address from Government House. “My intention in that private discussion was solely to save lives and prevent violence, drawing upon a long-standing personal connection to achieve peace. I maintain that this was in the nation’s best interest.”



A Fraught Border and a Familial Connection

The leaked call exposed the deeply personal and political complexities of Southeast Asian diplomacy. Hun Sen was once a close ally of Paetongtarn’s father, Thaksin, during his premiership in the early 2000s. The Shinawatra family’s populist policies and immense wealth have long made them adored by the rural poor and reviled by the Bangkok-centric elite, the military, and the royalist establishment, leading to two previous premiers being removed from office.

This familial history provided the subtext for the court’s decision. The use of the familiar term “uncle” and the criticism of the Thai military—a sacrosanct institution—were deemed by her critics as evidence of a cavalier attitude toward national security and a conflict of interest. “A prime minister cannot have a private foreign policy, especially with a nation we have a volatile border with,” said Prawit Wongsuwon, leader of the Palang Pracharath party and a former army chief. “It was a profound error in judgment that compromised her position.”


The Shinawatra Curse and Judicial Intervention

Paetongtarn Shinawatra becomes the fifth Thai prime minister to be dismissed by the Constitutional Court since 2008 and the third member of her family to have a premiership cut short. Her father, Thaksin, was deposed by a military coup in 2006, and her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra, was removed by the same court in 2014 for abuse of power over a rice subsidy scheme. Thaksin, who returned from a 15-year exile last year under a controversial deal with his former rivals, has seen his influence wane considerably with his daughter’s dismissal, raising questions about the future of the Shinawatra political machine.

Her own rise to power was itself a product of judicial intervention. She assumed the leadership of the Pheu Thai party and became prime minister only after her predecessor, Srettha Thavisin, was dismissed by the court for illegally appointing a cabinet member who had a prior conviction.


A Swift Realignment of Power

The vacuum of power was filled with astonishing speed. Within hours of the verdict, the conservative Bhumjaithai party, a one-time coalition partner in Paetongtarn’s government, announced it had secured enough support from other parties to form a new government. Its leader, Anutin Charnvirakul, is now poised to become the next prime minister.

The party, which has strong influence in the northeast, had earlier outlined its top priorities, which include resolving the ongoing border dispute with Cambodia and dissolving parliament to call for new elections within the next four months. This rapid shift underscores the fragile and transactional nature of Thai coalition politics, where alliances are quickly made and broken.


Regional Implications and a Diplomatic Spat

The fallout extends beyond Thailand’s borders, significantly straining relations with Cambodia. The act of Hun Sen—who ceded power to his son, Hun Manet, last year but is widely believed to still control the government—leaking a private diplomatic call is viewed as a profound breach of diplomatic protocol. Analysts suggest it was a calculated move, possibly intended to destabilize a Thai government led by a family he once considered friends, or to gain leverage in the border negotiations.

“This is an unprecedented level of diplomatic sabotage,” said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University. “Hun Sen has effectively intervened directly in Thai domestic politics with severe consequences. It will take a long time to rebuild any semblance of trust between the two capitals.”


The Unending Cycle of Thai Politics

The court’s decision reinforces a persistent pattern in modern Thai history: elected governments, particularly those affiliated with the Shinawatras, are systematically challenged and often removed by the nation’s unelected institutions, including the judiciary and the military. This cycle has prevented any single elected government from completing a full term in over two decades, creating a perpetual state of political uncertainty that has hampered economic growth and deepened social divisions.

For millions of the Shinawatras’ “Red Shirt” supporters, the verdict is the latest evidence of an entrenched establishment using its power to nullify the will of the voters. Protests are planned for the weekend in the party’s stronghold in the northeast, with leaders decrying what they call a “judicial coup.”

As Anutin and Bhumjaithai move to consolidate power, the nation is left to grapple with the same fundamental tensions that have defined it for a generation. The removal of Paetongtarn Shinawatra is not merely a change in leadership; it is the latest eruption of a deep-seated conflict between the elected will of the majority and the power of the old guard, a conflict that shows no signs of abating.


Summary

Thailand’s Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been removed from office by the Constitutional Court for ethics violations related to a leaked phone call with Cambodia’s former leader Hun Sen. The court ruled her private discussion during a border crisis undermined national trust. Her removal continues a pattern of judicial intervention against Shinawatra family leaders and triggers a rapid political realignment, with the Bhumjaithai party moving to form a new government.


#Thailand #PaetongtarnShinawatra #ThaiCrisis #ConstitutionalCourt #HunSen
#Cambodia #PheuThai #Bhumjaithai #SoutheastAsia #PoliticalInstability

TAGS: Thailand politics, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Constitutional Court, Cambodian-Thai relations,
Pheu Thai party, Bhumjaithai party, Anutin Charnvirakul, Thai military, judicial coup, Hun Sen



Conservative Activist Sean Feucht’s Seattle Rally Ignites Backlash


Progressive Activists Label Worship Event as Harassment, Urging Permit Revocation While Mayor Upholds Free Speech Rights


New York, N.Y. – Amid escalating tensions in one of the U.S.’s most progressive urban centers, a so-called Christian worship concert led by conservative activist Sean Feucht is proceeding as scheduled at Seattle’s Gas Works Park on August 30, 2025.


Despite vehement opposition from LGBTQ+ organizations, who have branded the event as “malicious harassment and incitement,” city officials have affirmed the organizer’s constitutional protections under the First Amendment.

Conservative Activist and So-Called Christian Preacher Sean Feucht in Washington, D.C. Photo credit: Sean Feucht / Facebook.

This clash highlights ongoing debates over religious expression, public spaces, and community inclusivity in deeply divided American cities.

Sean Feucht, a California-based singer, songwriter, and preacher, gained national attention during the COVID-19 pandemic through his Let Us Worship movement.

Launched in 2020, the initiative protested government-imposed restrictions on religious gatherings, framing them as infringements on faith-based freedoms.

Feucht’s events often blend contemporary Christian music with conservative political messaging, including support for President Donald Trump [Luce Index™ score: 35/100] and critiques of progressive social policies.

His “Revive in ’25” tour, which kicked off earlier this year, aims to spark spiritual renewal across North America, but it has repeatedly encountered resistance in liberal strongholds.



In Seattle, a city renowned for its vibrant LGBTQ community and progressive politics, Feucht’s planned rally has stirred significant controversy. Initially set for Cal Anderson Park in the Capitol Hill neighborhood—a historic hub for LGBTQ rights and the site of the 2020 CHOP autonomous zone—the event was relocated to Gas Works Park following concerns raised by local leaders.

Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell and Councilmember Joy Hollingsworth urged the shift, citing public safety considerations rather than content-based restrictions. “The law is crystal clear. You cannot shut down a venue on anticipated speech,” Harrell stated in an interview with KING 5 News. He emphasized that any group, regardless of viewpoint, has the right to assemble in public parks under constitutional protections.



Backlash from Community Advocates

Opposition to the event has been spearheaded by groups such as Capitol Hill Pride and the Lavender Rights Project, a Black transgender feminist organization.

Charlette LeFevre, director of Capitol Hill Pride, described the rally as antithetical to Seattle’s values, telling local media, “This is not what Seattle is about.” Critics point to Feucht’s past statements on social issues, including his opposition to LGBTQ-inclusive policies, as evidence that the gathering could foster an environment of exclusion or harm.

The Lavender Rights Project, along with 15 partner organizations, announced plans for a counter-event to challenge what they termed a “propaganda machine.” This response echoes broader concerns about Christian nationalist movements, as outlined in analyses from outlets like Cascade PBS, which situate Seattle within a larger playbook of conservative activism targeting progressive cities.



Activists argue that allowing such events in symbolically significant locations like Capitol Hill could undermine efforts to create safe spaces for marginalized communities.

Recent history amplifies these fears. Just months earlier, in May 2025, violence erupted at Cal Anderson Park during the MayDayUSA “Don’t Mess With Our Kids” rally, a Christian-led protest against certain educational policies perceived as promoting LGBTQ ideologies. Counter-protesters clashed with attendees, resulting in 23 arrests by the Seattle Police Department.

Police reports indicated that items were thrown between groups, and one officer required medical treatment after being assaulted. Mayor Harrell attributed the unrest to both the rally participants and “infiltrating anarchists,” underscoring the volatile potential of such gatherings.


Echoes of Canadian Controversies

Feucht’s challenges in Seattle follow a string of permit revocations in Canada, where eight cities canceled his tour stops earlier in August 2025.

Conservative Activist Sean Feucht. Photo credit: Sean Feucht / Facebook.

In Edmonton, Alberta, on August 22, 2025, Feucht performed on the legislature grounds amid protests from LGBTQ supporters, who displayed messages decrying the event.

Canadian officials cited public safety and permit issues, but Feucht framed the decisions falsely as “discriminatory against Christians.”

In West Kelowna, British Columbia, the concert was axed over “public safety” concerns, with Feucht accusing mayors of hypocrisy for allowing pride events while restricting worship services.

These international setbacks have fueled Feucht’s narrative of persecution. In a video posted on X, he rallied supporters for the Seattle event, stating, “Will you help us bring the fire of God’s presence to Seattle?” and soliciting donations.

He referenced past Antifa disruptions in Seattle, humorously noting how opponents’ live streams inadvertently spread his message.

Feucht’s resilience is evident in his statement to Fox News Digital:

“Every single time we come to worship in Seattle, we face many different kinds of resistance. However, as you’ve seen through the five-year history of Let Us Worship, we refuse to back down for anything.”



Police Preparedness and Free Speech Debates

In anticipation of potential unrest, the Seattle Police Department has bolstered its presence at Gas Works Park, a 19-acre (7.7-hectare) site overlooking Lake Union. The department’s strategy draws from lessons learned in May, aiming to prevent escalations while respecting assembly rights. A spokesperson for Mayor Harrell reiterated the city’s commitment to the LGBTQ community, noting, “At the same time, the City strongly celebrates and supports the LGBTQ+ community.”

This situation underscores broader U.S. tensions surrounding free speech. Legal experts argue that content-based permit denials violate the First Amendment, as affirmed by Harrell. Yet, advocates for vulnerable groups contend that speech perceived as inciteful can lead to real-world harm, prompting calls for nuanced public policy.


In Seattle, where 26% of residents identify as non-religious according to
recent surveys, the intersection of faith and politics often sparks debate.


Feucht’s movement has also drawn support from conservative figures. Pastor Paula White-Cain, a former Trump White House faith advisor, condemned violence at previous events on Fox News’ “Hannity,” alongside journalist Katie Daviscourt. Additionally, reports indicate the FBI is investigating claims of targeted violence against religious groups following evangelical protests in Seattle.


Looking Ahead: Revival or Division?

As the concert unfolds, observers anticipate a mix of worship, protest, and police oversight. Feucht’s tour continues post-Seattle, with stops in Missoula, Montana, and Yakima, Washington, before heading to the nation’s capital. His efforts have inspired similar revivals, such as a blue-city pastor reporting tens of thousands attending a Christian crusade earlier this year.

Critics, however, view these events as part of a larger Christian supremacist strategy, as detailed in The Stranger’s coverage. Edmonton City Councilor Andrew Knack publicly opposed a similar Feucht event, calling it counter to values of inclusion. In contrast, supporters like those on X pray for Feucht’s safety and success, seeing the backlash as affirmation of their cause.

Ultimately, the Seattle rally encapsulates America’s cultural fault lines. While Feucht frames it as a stand for faith and freedom, opponents see it as a threat to hard-won progress.

As one protester’s sidewalk message in Edmonton poignantly stated amid the August 22, 2025, gathering: the divide persists. With the event drawing national attention, its outcome may influence future policies on public assemblies in progressive enclaves.


Summary

In Seattle, Christian worship leader Sean Feucht defies backlash from LGBTQ groups to hold his “Revive in ’25” concert at Gas Works Park on August 30, 2025. Activists label it harassment and plan counter-events, but Mayor Bruce Harrell upholds First Amendment rights amid safety concerns. This follows Canadian permit denials and echoes past violence at similar rallies, highlighting tensions over free speech and inclusion in progressive cities.


#SeanFeucht #SeattleRally #ChristianWorship #LGBTQBacklash
#FirstAmendment #LetUsWorship #ReviveIn25 #SeattleProtests

TAGS: sean feucht, seattle, christian rally, worship event, bruce harrell,
lgbtq, gas works park, first amendment, progressive activists, public safety


Guns, Not Gender: Challenging Dangerous Narratives After Minneapolis Tragedy

0

By the Staff of The Stewardship Report: Let the truth-telling begin


New York, N.Y. — As grief grips Minneapolis in the wake of the horrific shooting at Annunciation Catholic School, a familiar cycle of blame and misinformation has swept across influential media. Right-wing outlets such as Breitbart, Fox News and the New York Post have harnessed the tragedy for sensational headlines and divisive narratives, seizing on the shooter’s transgender identity while sidestepping the urgent reality of gun violence.

This moment calls us not to succumb to fearmongering, but to reaffirm the principles of truth, context, and compassion that should define responsible journalism.


Who

The tragedy centers on Robin Westman, a 23-year-old former student of Annunciation Catholic School, who opened fire during a morning mass, killing two children and injuring seventeen others before taking their own life. Stephen King, acclaimed author and vocal advocate for gun reform, entered the national discourse after urging the public to recognize that access to guns — not gender identity — is the central danger.


What

Multiple right-leaning media platforms immediately amplified the shooter’s gender identity, aggressively promoting the notion that transgender status is a factor in mass violence. Their coverage, echoing voices on Fox News and Breitbart, often ignored or minimized mental health issues, hateful messaging in the shooter’s statements, and — most critically — the role of guns in enabling such devastation.


When

On August 27, 2025, Minneapolis was again scarred by gun violence, marking the first mass school shooting of the new academic year and the worst school attack since Uvalde in 2022. The media’s rapid pivot to gender-focused blame occurred in the immediate aftermath.


Where

The attack took place within the sanctuary of Annunciation Catholic School, a location that should be a bastion of safety and peace.


Why

Politically motivated outlets have a clear interest in weaponizing this tragedy to distract from America’s epidemic of gun violence. Leveraging identity politics and moral panic, they hope to shift public focus from systemic failures with gun policy to stigmatize marginalized groups — especially transgender individuals.


Stephen King points out that access to guns — not gender identity — is the central danger.

The Media’s Distorting Mirror

Coverage by the New York Post, Fox News, and others frequently replaced compassion and evidence with inflammatory rhetoric.

They fixated on Westman’s trans identity, fueling online attacks and reinforcing harmful myths.

Such narratives ignore established facts: the overwhelming majority of mass shooters are not transgender, and transgender people are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.

When ideology trumps accuracy, the public loses sight of what tools truly enable mass murder — access to high-powered firearms.


Fact Over Spin: What the Data Really Shows

Despite breathless speculation, the rarity of shooters who are transgender is clear, with multiple studies showing no statistical correlation between gender identity and mass violence.

On the other hand, the U.S. continues to lead the developed world in gun deaths and school shootings, with 83 campus shootings reported in 2024 alone. Most perpetrators have been cisgender (not transgendered) men. Properly contextualized data demonstrates that blaming identity is a red herring that distracts from the central factor: widespread access to lethal firearms in the U.S.


The Cost of Scapegoating

By focusing on sensationalist identity politics, Fox News and the New York Post embolden those who wish to roll back protections for LGBTQ+ people and divert public outrage from necessary gun reform.


Scapegoating trans people not only fails to explain or prevent violence, it actively harms a community already
facing disproportionate dangers, both from bigotry and the far more common threat of gun violence itself.

What Responsible Journalism Looks Like

Responsible reporting demands thoughtful context, transparency, and a commitment to evidence over ideology. It recognizes that tragedies like the Minneapolis school shooting are enabled by policy failures, not by the gender of those who commit them. As Stephen King insists, the common denominator in these mass shootings is the firearm — not trans identity, not mental illness alone, but the ease of acquiring deadly weapons in America.

Real journalism fosters dialogue, discourages scapegoating, and seeks solutions that honor those lost by acting for change. Let us challenge those who profit from outrage, and instead, call for common-sense reforms that could save lives.


Let this be your act of resistance — not through yelling, but through clarity. Not with conspiracy, but with conscience.

Summary

Media sensationalism after the Minneapolis school shooting blames the shooter’s transgender identity, but ignores the central issue: guns. Data shows gun access, not identity, drives America’s mass shooting crisis. Scapegoating harms vulnerable communities and distracts from policy solutions. This editorial urges a media focus on facts, empathy, and effective reform, calling for journalism that guides, not divides, in the wake of tragedy.


#MinneapolisShooting #MediaEthics #GunReformNow
#TransRightsAreHumanRights #FactOverFear #JournalismMatters

TAGS: Minneapolis shooting, Annunciation Catholic School, Stephen King, media bias, gun violence,
Breitbart, New York Post, transgender rights, school shootings, U.S. media, LGBTQ+ issues, hate crimes,
Fox News, responsible journalism, mass shootings, public discourse, advocacy, The Stewardship Report


Bahá’í: When Faith’s Universal Message Excludes Some Believers


Arthur Brooks’ promotion of Bahá’í teachings overlooks the faith’s discriminatory stance toward LGBTQ+ individuals


New York, N.Y. – When Arthur C. Brooks recently penned “Five Bahá’í Lessons for a Happier Life” for The Atlantic, describing the Bahá’í faith as a “19th-century Persian offshoot from Islam” with “deep, humanistic teachings we can all benefit from,” he painted an appealing picture of universal wisdom and inclusive spirituality.


Yet this portrayal glosses over a fundamental contradiction at the heart of Bahá’í doctrine: a faith that proclaims unity and universal love while simultaneously excluding LGBTQ+ individuals from full participation unless they suppress their authentic selves.

As someone who explored the Bahá’í faith during college, drawn by its emphasis on the unity of humanity and progressive social principles, I discovered firsthand that this supposed universality has significant limitations. The faith’s teachings on human sexuality, particularly regarding homosexuality, create an irreconcilable tension between its proclaimed inclusivity and its actual practices.


The Allure of Universal Brotherhood

Arthur C. Brooks recently penned “Five Bahá’í Lessons for a Happier Life” for The Atlantic, describing the Bahá’í faith as a “19th-century Persian offshoot from Islam” with “deep, humanistic teachings we can all benefit from,” he painted an appealing picture of universal wisdom and inclusive spirituality.

The Bahá’í faith, founded by Bahá’u’lláh in 19th-century Persia, presents itself as a religion for the modern age.

Its central principles include the unity of God, the unity of religion, and the unity of humanity.

These teachings emphasize racial equality, gender equity, the elimination of prejudice, and the establishment of world peace.

For a young person seeking spiritual meaning beyond traditional religious boundaries, such ideals appear profoundly attractive.

Bahá’í communities often pride themselves on their diversity and welcome newcomers with genuine warmth.

The faith’s emphasis on independent investigation of truth, the harmony of science and religion, and the elimination of extremes of wealth and poverty resonates with many progressive-minded individuals.

This initial appeal explains why the faith has attracted followers worldwide, particularly among educated, socially conscious seekers.

The Bahá’í writings contain numerous passages celebrating human diversity and dignity. Bahá’u’lláh wrote extensively about the nobility of human beings and their inherent worth regardless of background.

This philosophical foundation creates reasonable expectations that all individuals, regardless of their personal characteristics, would find acceptance within Bahá’í communities.


The Reality of Conditional Acceptance

However, beneath this veneer of universal acceptance lies a more complex reality. Bahá’í teachings
explicitly consider same-sex relationships as contrary to divine law. The Universal House of Justice,
the faith’s supreme governing body, has repeatedly affirmed that marriage is exclusively between
one man and one woman, and that sexual relations outside this framework are prohibited.


For LGBTQ+ individuals, this creates an impossible choice: remain true to their authentic selves while being considered spiritually deficient, or suppress fundamental aspects of their identity to gain full acceptance within the community. This is not the kind of “happiness” that Brooks suggests Bahá’í teachings can provide to “all” people.

The Bahá’í approach to homosexuality differs from some other religions in that it doesn’t condemn individuals for their orientation, but it does prohibit them from expressing their sexuality in loving, committed relationships. Bahá’í institutions often frame this as a test or spiritual challenge, suggesting that LGBTQ+ individuals should view their orientation as an opportunity for spiritual growth through self-denial.



The Harm of Spiritual Exclusion

This conditional acceptance causes real psychological and spiritual harm. Young LGBTQ+ individuals drawn to Bahá’í teachings often experience profound disappointment and rejection when they discover these limitations. The message they receive is that their capacity for love and partnership—fundamental human experiences—is somehow flawed or spiritually inferior.

The impact extends beyond individual disappointment. LGBTQ+ Bahá’ís often struggle with cognitive dissonance, trying to reconcile their love for the faith’s principles with its rejection of their authentic selves. Some attempt to remain celibate, sacrificing intimate companionship for spiritual belonging. Others leave the faith entirely, often experiencing grief over the loss of a spiritual community they had hoped would be their permanent home.

Bahá’í communities lose valuable members and perspectives when they maintain these exclusionary policies. The faith’s emphasis on diversity and unity rings hollow when it systematically excludes individuals based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.


The Inconsistency of Progressive Values

The Bahá’í faith‘s stance on LGBTQ+ issues creates internal contradictions that undermine its progressive credentials. While the faith advocates for racial equality and women’s rights—positions that were revolutionary in the 19th century—it maintains conservative positions on sexuality that increasingly conflict with contemporary understanding of human rights and dignity.

This inconsistency becomes particularly apparent when considering the faith’s emphasis on the elimination of prejudice. Bahá’í communities work actively to overcome racial, ethnic, and economic prejudices, yet they maintain institutional prejudice against LGBTQ+ individuals. The cognitive dissonance required to maintain these contradictory positions weakens the faith’s moral authority on other social justice issues.

Modern Bahá’í apologetics often attempt to resolve this tension by arguing that divine law transcends human understanding, or that accepting LGBTQ+ relationships would compromise the faith’s integrity. However, these arguments fail to address the fundamental question of whether a truly loving God would create individuals with innate orientations only to prohibit them from expressing love in meaningful relationships.


Moving Beyond Conditional Universality

Brooks’ article, while well-intentioned, perpetuates a sanitized version of Bahá’í teachings that ignores their exclusionary aspects. True universality cannot coexist with systematic discrimination against any group of people. When religious leaders and commentators promote “universal” teachings while ignoring their discriminatory elements, they participate in a form of spiritual whitewashing that obscures real harm.

Religious communities genuinely committed to unity and love must grapple honestly with their limitations and work toward genuine inclusion. This requires more than tolerance or conditional acceptance—it demands full recognition of LGBTQ+ individuals’ dignity and their right to loving relationships.

The path to authentic universality requires religious institutions to examine their teachings critically and consider whether inherited doctrines truly reflect divine love or human prejudice. Until the Bahá’í faith addresses its treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals, its claims to universality remain incomplete and its promise of happiness remains available only to those who fit predetermined categories of acceptability.


Bahá’í: When Faith’s Universal Message Excludes Some Believers (Aug. 28, 2025)


Summary

Arthur Brooks’ recent Atlantic article promoting Bahá’í teachings as universally beneficial overlooks the faith’s discriminatory stance toward LGBTQ+ individuals. While the Bahá’í faith proclaims unity and universal love, it excludes gay and lesbian believers from full participation unless they suppress their authentic selves. This conditional acceptance causes real psychological harm and undermines the faith’s progressive credentials, creating internal contradictions between its stated values and actual practices.


#BahaiFaith #LGBTQ #ReligiousDiscrimination #SpiritualInclusion
#UniversalLove #ReligiousHypocrisy #AtlanticMagazine #ArthurBrooks

TAGS: faith and sexuality, religious exclusion, Bahá’í teachings, LGBTQ discrimination, universal love,
spiritual acceptance, religious hypocrisy, progressive religion, conditional inclusion, authentic spirituality


Korean Firefighter’s Death Spurs Calls to Bolster Trauma Care


Policies in Seoul lag in offering lasting support for frontline responders


Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y. – The recent death of an unnamed firefighter who responded to the 2022 Itaewon disaster in South Korea has intensified calls to overhaul and strengthen the nation’s trauma care system. His passing highlights wider concerns over the country’s preparedness for social emergencies and the psychological toll on its first responders.


This tragedy, the 160th official fatality linked to the catastrophic crowd crush, renews criticism of the failure to provide adequate, long-term support for frontline workers and survivors grappling with psychological trauma. Despite a history of high-profile social disasters in recent decades, systemic support structures remain underdeveloped.

On Wednesday, police in Siheung, Gyeonggi Province, confirmed that the body of a firefighter, who had been missing for 10 days, was discovered without any signs of foul play. Authorities stated the 30-year-old appeared to have taken his own life. At the family’s request, an autopsy will not be conducted. He left behind notes expressing sorrow to loved ones, though no formal will was found.

The firefighter, who had served as a first responder since 2017, was among the teams dispatched to the Itaewon disaster site on October 29, 2022. That night, more than 150 people were killed when a massive crowd became packed into a narrow, sloped alley near the Hamilton Hotel in central Seoul during post-pandemic Halloween celebrations.


Evening street scene in Seoul’s Itaewon district before the 2022 disaster.

Insufficient Support and Growing Concerns

Following his service at the disaster, the firefighter developed depression and received nine psychiatric consultations through the National Fire Agency. However, mental health experts argue this level of intervention was likely insufficient. Psychiatric counselors note that while a dozen sessions might help individuals coping with acute stress, more severe trauma and depression, common after such catastrophic events, typically require between 24 and 52 sessions of sustained therapy.

“If you look at cases abroad, like 9/11, there is no fixed term for treating disaster survivors. Long-term, often indefinite support is essential,” said Dr. Kim Hyun-soo at Myongji Hospital. “National support for disaster trauma must be both extensive and sustained, especially for first responders.”

Government figures indicate that between October 2022 and September 2023, approximately 1,316 firefighters involved in the Itaewon emergency response received crisis counseling. Of those, 142 received in-depth sessions and hospital referrals. Despite these efforts, many first responders have reported limited follow-up care and a significant lack of adequate long-term support, leaving them to manage their psychological wounds largely on their own.


Police confirmed that the body of the unnamed firefighter, who had been missing for 10 days, was discovered without any signs of foul play.

A Chorus of Voices Demands Reform

The firefighter’s death has deeply resonated with other survivors and the bereaved families of the Itaewon disaster. On Wednesday, a group representing the families mourned his passing and urged authorities to extend trauma care beyond the immediate victims to include first responders and even local merchants who provided assistance at the scene.

Activist groups have echoed these concerns, pointing to critical blind spots in South Korea’s disaster relief laws. “Korea’s laws only recognize ‘disaster victims’ in a narrow sense, leaving out the bereaved and traumatized rescuers, witnesses and supporters. There is no clear system to support their mental health and basic rights,” the civic group Life Safety Citizen Net said in a statement.

The group drew parallels to past tragedies, highlighting a persistent pattern of neglect. “After the Sewol Ferry disaster, a rescue diver died from trauma. A firefighter responding to Itaewon now lives apart from his family, working as a manual laborer with his trauma unhealed. The government must pass meaningful safety regulations and recognize the rights and dignity of all affected.”

Labor unions, including the Korean Government Employees’ Union, have demanded sweeping reforms. “This incident isn’t just one person’s tragedy; it’s a consequence of repeated disasters and the lack of meaningful trauma care for frontline workers. Reforming counseling, boosting mental health resources, improving working conditions and expanding staff are urgent national priorities,” the union stated.



International Practices vs. Korean Reality

Most countries with advanced disaster response systems acknowledge the profound risk of trauma for emergency workers and provide a wider range of care options compared to South Korea. Nations with experience in managing such disasters, such as the U.S. and Japan, have continually reformed their systems in response to major events.

After tragedies like 9/11 and various mass shootings, the U.S. dedicated significant resources to long-term mental health services for directly affected personnel. These programs include specialized treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), suicide prevention initiatives, and ongoing monitoring. Organizations like the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation provide crucial trauma care and family support for responders who develop lasting symptoms.

Neighboring Japan, while also facing challenges in providing long-term trauma care for first responders, has made strides in improving relief accommodation standards and disaster planning, which now includes more robust mental health support for personnel.

Despite its own history of devastating social disasters—including the Seongsu Bridge collapse in 1994, the Sampoong Department Store collapse in 1995, the Daegu subway fire in 2003, the Sewol ferry sinking in 2014, and the Itaewon disaster in 2022—South Korea continues to struggle with providing long-term mental health care for survivors and responders, compounded by persistent personnel shortages among frontline staff.



Acknowledgment and a Path Forward

The tragedy has prompted high-level acknowledgment of the systemic shortcomings. President Lee Jae Myung expressed his condolences for the death of the firefighter and promised to make efforts to extend support to victims, families, and first responders to help them overcome the trauma caused by high-profile disasters.

“Our society has not established a sufficient social safety net and psychological support system needed to fully face and heal from national and collective traumas,” Lee stated in a Facebook post on Wednesday. “To address such issues, our society needs to share the pain, recognize our collective responsibility with gravity and join forces for recovery.”

This incident serves as a stark reminder that the duties of first responders do not end when the immediate crisis is over; for many, the psychological battle is just beginning. The calls for change now echo throughout the country, demanding that the government build a system of care worthy of those who run toward danger.


Summary

The death of a South Korean firefighter, a first responder at the 2022 Itaewon disaster, has ignited urgent calls for comprehensive trauma care reform. Having developed depression after the event, his suicide highlights the insufficient psychological support provided to frontline workers. Experts, activists, and unions are demanding sustained, long-term mental health services, pointing to international models in the U.S. and Japan. This tragedy underscores a systemic failure in South Korea’s disaster response, prompting promises of change from government officials.


#FirstResponders #MentalHealth #TraumaCare #Itaewon #SouthKorea
#EmergencyServices #Firefighter #MentalHealthAwareness

Tags: South Korea, Itaewon Disaster, First Responders, Trauma Care, Mental Health,
PTSD, National Fire Agency, Sewol Ferry

Pope Leo XIV Demands Gaza Ceasefire Amid Rising Tensions


Pope Leo XIV Demands Gaza Ceasefire Amid Rising Tensions


Pontiff condemns collective punishment and forced displacement, calls for immediate humanitarian intervention


Vatican City — In a powerful address delivered during his general audience on August 27, 2025, Pope Leo XIV issued an urgent plea for an immediate end to the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, condemning what he termed “collective punishment” and forced displacement of civilians in Gaza. The pontiff’s intervention comes at a critical juncture as the conflict enters its second year with devastating humanitarian consequences.

The war, which began following Hamas‘s devastating October 7, 2023 attack that killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and resulted in 251 hostages being taken, has triggered an extensive Israeli military offensive in Gaza City. The pontiff’s words carry particular weight as the international community grapples with escalating violence and mounting civilian casualties.



Vatican Cites International Law Violations

During his address to thousands of faithful gathered in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Leo XIV directly referenced international law in his condemnation of current military tactics. The pontiff emphasized that the protection of civilian populations must remain paramount, regardless of military objectives.

“The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure and the systematic displacement of entire communities constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights principles,” the pope declared, his voice carrying across the packed square. His words resonated with growing international concern over the humanitarian crisis unfolding in the Palestinian territory.

The Vatican‘s position aligns with recent statements from United Nations officials and international human rights organizations who have expressed alarm over the scope of civilian suffering. The pontiff’s intervention represents one of the most direct papal statements on the conflict since its escalation.



Christian Communities Under Siege

Pope Leo XIV paid particular attention to the plight of Christian communities in Gaza, many of whom have sought refuge in church compounds and Christian institutions throughout the territory. The pontiff noted that these facilities, traditionally considered safe havens, have been subjected to heavy bombardment despite their protected status under international conventions.

“Our Christian brothers and sisters in Gaza have opened their doors to all who seek shelter, regardless of faith or background,” the pope stated. “These sacred spaces must be respected and protected as sanctuaries of peace amid the chaos of war.”

The Greek Orthodox and Catholic churches in Gaza have reportedly sheltered hundreds of displaced families, providing not only physical protection but also essential services including medical care and food distribution. However, several church facilities have sustained damage from nearby strikes, raising concerns about the safety of both religious communities and displaced civilians.


Hostage Crisis Remains Critical

The pontiff made specific reference to the ongoing hostage situation, noting that approximately 50 individuals remain in Hamas custody nearly two years after their initial capture. Israeli forces have successfully rescued eight hostages alive, but the fate of the remaining captives continues to cast a shadow over diplomatic efforts.

“Every human life is sacred and precious in the eyes of God,” Pope Leo XIV emphasized. “We cannot accept that innocent people remain in captivity while their families endure unimaginable anguish. Their immediate and unconditional release is not just a political necessity but a moral imperative.”

The pope’s appeal for hostage release comes as international mediators, including Egyptian and Qatari officials, continue efforts to broker a comprehensive agreement that would secure the release of remaining captives in exchange for a sustained ceasefire and prisoner exchanges.



Humanitarian Aid Access Blocked

One of the most pressing issues highlighted by the pontiff was the systematic obstruction of humanitarian aid delivery to Gaza‘s civilian population.

United Nations agencies and international relief organizations have reported significant difficulties in accessing areas most affected by the conflict, leaving vulnerable populations without essential supplies.

“The denial of humanitarian assistance to those who need it most represents a fundamental violation of Christian charity and international humanitarian law,” the pope declared.

“Food, medicine, and shelter are basic human needs that transcend political divisions and military objectives.”

Current estimates suggest that over 2.3 million people in Gaza depend on humanitarian assistance, with many lacking access to clean water, adequate medical care, and sufficient food supplies.

The World Health Organization has warned of potential disease outbreaks due to deteriorating sanitary conditions and overcrowding in temporary shelters.


International Community Response

The pope’s intervention has drawn support from various international leaders and religious organizations worldwide. European Union officials have echoed the Vatican‘s call for immediate ceasefire negotiations, while several African and Latin American countries have praised the pontiff’s humanitarian focus.

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby issued a statement supporting Pope Leo XIV’s appeal, emphasizing the need for interfaith cooperation in addressing the humanitarian crisis. Similarly, prominent Islamic scholars have welcomed the Vatican‘s position as consistent with shared humanitarian values across religious traditions.

The United States State Department acknowledged the pope’s statement while reaffirming its commitment to Israel‘s right to self-defense. However, U.S. officials have increasingly emphasized the importance of minimizing civilian casualties and ensuring humanitarian aid access.



Path Forward Uncertain

Despite growing international pressure for a ceasefire, prospects for immediate resolution remain unclear. Israeli officials have indicated their intention to continue military operations until Hamas‘s military capabilities are significantly degraded and hostages are returned.

Hamas leadership, meanwhile, has maintained that any lasting agreement must include concrete steps toward Palestinian statehood and the lifting of the blockade that has restricted movement in and out of Gaza for over a decade.

The pope’s intervention represents a significant moral voice in these discussions, potentially influencing Catholic politicians and leaders worldwide who may play crucial roles in future diplomatic initiatives.

As the conflict continues to exact a devastating toll on civilian populations, Pope Leo XIV’s call for an end to collective punishment and forced displacement serves as a reminder of the humanitarian principles that must guide international responses to armed conflicts. The pontiff’s words carry particular significance as the world watches the unfolding tragedy in Gaza and searches for pathways toward sustainable peace.


Summary

Pope Leo XIV’s comprehensive summary for audio: Pope Leo XIV called for an immediate end to the Israel-Hamas conflict on August 27, 2025, during his Vatican general audience. The pontiff condemned collective punishment and forced displacement in Gaza, citing international law violations. He pleaded for a permanent ceasefire, humanitarian aid access, and the release of 50 remaining hostages held by Hamas. The pope’s appeal highlights growing international concern over civilian suffering and escalating violence in the region as Israel plans its Gaza City offensive.


#PopeGaza #VaticanPeace #GazaCeasefire #HumanitarianCrisis #IsraelHamas
#ChristianSolidarity #InternationalLaw #CivilianProtection #HolyLand #PeaceEfforts

TAGS: Vatican, Pope Leo XIV, Israel-Hamas conflict, collective punishment, humanitarian crisis, ceasefire,
Gaza, hostages, international law, Christian communities, displacement, civilian casualties, peace negotiations


Lesbian DACA Recipient Detained Despite Legal Protections


Immigration advocates sound alarm over Catalina Santiago’s arrest at El Paso airport without clear justification


New York, N.Y. – A young immigration rights activist’s detention has sparked nationwide concern about the vulnerability of DACA recipients under current U.S. immigration policies.


Border Patrol Arrests Protected Dreamer at Airport

Catalina “Xochitl” Santiago was traveling through El Paso International Airport on August 3 when two border patrol agents intercepted her past the security checkpoint.

The 28-year-old DACA beneficiary was questioned about her employment documents before being taken to an immigration detention center.

“They have no legal basis for why they detained her or why they’re holding her or why they’re trying to deport her,” said Desiree Miller, Santiago’s spouse, in an interview with The Guardian.

Santiago had been granted temporary protection under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows qualifying individuals who arrived in the United States as children to live and work legally. She had successfully renewed her DACA status seven times without incident.


A DACA Dreamer is an undocumented immigrant who was brought to the United States as a child, has been educated in the U.S., and qualifies for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. DACA provides temporary protection from deportation and work authorization but does not offer a pathway to citizenship.

Growing Vulnerability of Dreamers Nationwide

Santiago’s case represents a troubling trend affecting the nation’s 525,000 DACA recipients. The Obama-era program has faced increasing challenges, with the current administration attempting to strip Dreamers of their protections despite no regulatory changes.

In July, Department of Homeland Security assistant press secretary Tricia McLaughlin made the false claim that “DACA does not confer any form of legal status in this country” and encouraged recipients to self-deport.

Recent cases underscore this escalation. Javier Diaz Santana, a deaf and mute DACA recipient, was detained during a workplace raid, with officials confiscating his communication tools. Jose Valdovinos faced similar treatment when arrested outside a gas station while riding as a passenger with his wife.

“We hadn’t seen this before,” said José, Santiago’s older brother and fellow DACA recipient. “It was very fast and very aggressive.”


Catalina “Xochitl” Santiago was traveling through El Paso International Airport when two border patrol agents intercepted her past the security checkpoint.

Questionable Detention Circumstances Raise Concerns

Immigration officials cited charges of “trespassing, possession of narcotics and drug paraphernalia” as grounds for Santiago’s arrest. However, Miller emphasized that Santiago had not been convicted of any crimes, and her record had never prevented previous DACA renewals.

Santiago was traveling to Austin for a conference on family and community-run farms when detained. Miller, who works with Santiago at a local community organization, had taken an earlier flight to the same event.

The arrest followed a pattern of increased scrutiny at airports. Santiago had been stopped during previous travels but never detained. This time, she managed to send Miller a shaky video showing border patrol officers demanding she put away her phone and accompany them for questioning.



Detention Conditions and Family Impact

From the detention facility, Santiago has reported difficult conditions including constant lighting that prevents sleep, loud guards, and inadequate food and medical care. José noted hearing exhaustion in his sister’s voice during phone calls but praised her resilient spirit.

The couple, who married in January, had been considering applying for a green card through Miller’s U.S. citizenship. The detention has disrupted these plans and created emotional turmoil for the family.

“It’s really hard for me to sleep and eat and do anything out here comfortably, knowing that she’s not able to sleep in there,” Miller said. “It’s like the constant threat that they could come and take someone you love.”


Philadelphia joins National Week to Demand the Release of Catalina “Xóchitl” Santiago. Community members hold vigil outside City Hall in solidarity with detained DACA recipient.

Nationwide Advocacy Response

Santiago’s detention has prompted solidarity actions across the country. Activists have organized vigils in El Paso, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Long Island; Boston; Tempe, Arizona; and Seattle to protest her treatment.

The immigration rights community views Santiago’s case as emblematic of broader threats facing DACA recipients nationwide. Her work as a community organizer and immigration activist has made her situation particularly visible to advocacy groups monitoring administration policies.


Legal Hearing Determines Future

Santiago appeared before an immigration judge on Wednesday to determine whether she would be released or remain in detention. The hearing represents a crucial moment for both her individual case and broader DACA policy implications.

Immigration advocates continue emphasizing that Santiago entered the U.S. at age eight with her family and has maintained legal status through DACA. They argue her detention lacks justification and reflects dangerous targeting of protected individuals.

Miller stressed the human cost of current immigration enforcement: “The administration is messaging that they’re deporting criminals and illegal aliens. They use these words to try to take away from the fact that the people being detained are human, that they are family members.”


Lesbian DACA Recipient Detained Despite Legal Protections (Aug. 27, 2025)


#DACARights #ImmigrationJustice #DreamersUnderAttack #ProtectDACA
#ImmigrationDetention #CatalinaSantiago #BorderPatrol #DreamersRights

Tags: DACA, immigration detention, Dreamers, border patrol, immigration rights,
Catalina Santiago, DHS, Obama-era program, immigration enforcement, El Paso



Poetry: “The Punishment of Becoming” by Rayne LaDuex

0

Their writing often explores themes of introspection, love, loss, and resilience


“The Punishment of Becoming”

A Poem by Rayne LaDuex


Oscar Wilde once said that to know exactly what you want to be in life is a punishment. To say it aloud, to name yourself, is to bind yourself to it. If you declare “I will be a teacher,” then you are no longer a person who teaches but a teacher forever. If you say “I will be a soldier,” you become a soldier not just in war but in spirit. If you say “I will be a judge,” you will wear the robes long after the courtroom empties. The title begins to own you. It shapes the way others see you and, worse, the way you see yourself. What once was freedom becomes a sentence.

Step into the quiet spaces where words speak volumes and emotions echo in the stillness. Silence is a poignant compilation of poetry, short stories, monologues, journal entries, and thoughts, capturing the intricate dance of human experiences—both spoken and unspoken. This collection invites you to explore moments of vulnerability, triumph, love, and loss through a lens that celebrates the power of reflection. From the rhythm of poetic verses to the depth of story-telling, each piece offers a window into the raw and relatable intricacies of life. With themes that touch on identity, resilience, connection, and the beauty found in still moments,  Silence  serves as both a sanctuary and a catalyst—a reminder that within the quiet, we find our truest selves. For readers who seek solace, inspiration, and the profound within the subtle, Silence is a book to treasure, ponder, and revisit time and again.

I think that is why I never answered the question the way I was supposed to. You know the one—every child gets asked it. “What do you want to be when you grow up?” The expected answers are neat and easy. A doctor. A lawyer. An athlete. A firefighter. Titles you can put on a name tag. Roles you can rehearse for. I never wanted to hand over that kind of power to a single word.

So I always said, successful.

That was my answer. Not a profession, not a destination, but a direction. It was not the kind of answer adults liked to hear. They wanted something concrete, something they could picture, something they could nod and smile at. But I knew even then that I did not want to live inside one mask. I wanted to keep learning, keep shifting, keep becoming. I wanted to be a student forever.

And to be a student is not to cling to a title, but to embrace a verb. That is what I have come to understand. Success, for me, is not a crown placed on the head, not a medal hung on the chest, not a title printed on a business card. Success is movement. Success is process. Success is the verb.

Think about it. A teacher may teach, but then what? A soldier may fight, but then what? A judge may rule, but then what? The nouns stop. They plant you in the ground. They tell you who you are, and that is the end of it. But the verb keeps moving. To learn. To grow. To strive. To love. These are alive. They bend. They stretch. They carry you forward into places you could not have planned.

The world loves nouns. They are safe. They are tidy. They are something you can stamp onto a resume, something you can fold into conversation at a dinner table. But life itself is written in verbs. It is not artist, it is to create. It is not lover, it is to love. It is not leader, it is to guide. The nouns are monuments; the verbs are movements.

Maybe Wilde was right. Maybe the punishment of knowing what you want to be is that you are doomed to become exactly that and nothing more. But if that is true, then perhaps the only way out is never to answer with a noun at all. Perhaps the only freedom is to answer with motion.

So when I say I want to be successful, I do not mean what the world imagines. I do not mean the corner office or the heavy wallet or the trophies lined up on the shelf. I mean successful as a student of life. I mean successful as someone who refuses to stop learning, who refuses to stop becoming. I mean successful as someone who is always reaching, always just on the edge of the next discovery.

My success lives in the unfinished sentence. My success is in the ellipses, in the space that says there is still more to come.

Because in the end, it is not the noun that defines us. It is the verb that carries us. It is not what we are. It is what we are becoming.And when I finally burn out, I hope the stars keep their silence. Let them be indifferent. Let them spin on. For in that irrelevance, I found reason enough to love, to suffer, to create, to be.



Rayne LaDuex is a passionate writer of poetry and short stories that delve into the raw and often unspoken facets of human experience. Drawing inspiration from the quiet moments of life and the intricate emotions that weave our stories, LaDuex creates work that is both deeply personal and universally resonant. Their writing often explores themes of introspection, love, loss, and resilience.

In addition to writing, LaDuex balances creativity with a career in project management and serves their community as a high school football coach, helping to mentor and inspire the next generation. They find harmony between structure and imagination, weaving these experiences into their art. Silence is their debut collection, a heartfelt offering to those who find solace in words and the spaces between them.

Order Silence here.


Summary

Rayne LaDuex’s poem The Punishment of Becoming explores the delicate balance between identity and growth, challenging the notion that choosing a title limits personal freedom. Through introspective reflection, LaDuex advocates for embracing life as a continuous verb rather than a static noun, encouraging readers to pursue success through perpetual learning and transformation. This evocative work resonates with those seeking meaning in motion, not destination, and highlights the power found in remaining unfinished.


#Resilience #RayneLaDuex #PersonalGrowth #Success #ProcessOverProduct
#Introspection #Poetry #CreativeWriting #ThePunishmentOfBecoming #Identity

TAGS: poetry, Rayne LaDuex, introspection, identity, personal growth, resilience,
creative writing, process, transformation, success, The Punishment of Becoming



Trump Threatens Criminal Charges Against Billionaire George Soros


President Revives Unsubstantiated Claims About Philanthropist’s Role in Civil Unrest and Calls for Prosecution


New York, N.Y. – President Donald Trump [Luce Index™ score: 35/100] has escalated rhetoric against billionaire philanthropist George Soros [Luce Index™ score: 89/100], threatening criminal charges based on unproven allegations that the Hungarian American financier supported riots across the United States.


The renewed attacks on Soros, a frequent target of far-right conspiracy theories, mark another chapter in the president’s pattern of targeting prominent Democratic donors and liberal activists.

Speaking at a rally in Pennsylvania over the weekend, Trump claimed without evidence that Soros “funded the destruction of American cities” and declared that the 94-year-old should “face the full force of American justice.” The president’s remarks drew immediate condemnation from civil rights organizations and legal experts, who characterized the threats as dangerous rhetoric that could incite violence against the Holocaust survivor and his family.


Right-wing media such as FOX and The Washington Examiner are amplifying Trump’s threats against the Soros family.

Baseless Allegations Resurface

The president’s latest accusations against Soros echo long-standing conspiracy theories that have circulated in far-right circles for years.

George Soros founded the Open Society Foundations in New York City. Photo credit: Open Society Foundations.

These unfounded claims typically assert that Soros, through his Open Society Foundations, secretly orchestrates civil unrest, election interference, and various progressive political movements worldwide.

Law enforcement agencies and fact-checking organizations have repeatedly debunked these theories, finding no credible evidence to support such allegations.

Soros, who has donated billions to democratic institutions and human rights causes globally, has become a lightning rod for antisemitic conspiracy theories.

The Anti-Defamation League has documented how references to Soros often serve as coded language for antisemitic tropes about Jewish control of global events.

The organization has tracked a significant increase in Soros-related conspiracy theories since the 2016 election cycle.

The Open Society Foundations issued a statement rejecting the president’s claims as “categorically false and deeply irresponsible.” The organization emphasized its commitment to supporting democratic institutions, human rights, and criminal justice reform through transparent and legal means.


Legal Experts Question Viability of Charges

Constitutional law scholars and former federal prosecutors have expressed skepticism about the legal basis for any potential charges against Soros. Professor Sarah Williams of Georgetown University Law Center noted that political donations and advocacy, even when controversial, are protected forms of speech under the First Amendment.

Son Alexander Soros is today chair of the Open Society Foundations. Photo credit: Open Society Foundations.

“The president’s threats appear to conflate legitimate political activity with criminal conduct,” Williams explained. “Without specific evidence of illegal actions, these accusations seem designed more for political theater than actual law enforcement.”

Former Justice Department official Michael Chen echoed these concerns, pointing out that federal prosecutors typically require substantial evidence before pursuing charges against high-profile individuals.

“Vague allegations about ‘funding riots’ without concrete proof of coordination or incitement would be unlikely to survive prosecutorial scrutiny,” Chen observed.

The Department of Justice has not commented on the president’s statements or indicated any active investigation into Soros‘s activities. However, legal experts warn that politicization of the justice system could undermine public confidence in law enforcement institutions.


Rolling Stone: “President Donald Trump is continuing to transform the Justice Department into a tool for vengeance against his political enemies, including billionaire philanthropist and Democratic donor George Soros.”

Political Ramifications and Responses

The president’s targeting of Soros has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic leaders and some Republicans who view the rhetoric as inflammatory and potentially dangerous.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer condemned the threats as “authoritarian tactics” that have no place in American democracy.

Several GOP lawmakers, speaking on condition of anonymity, expressed concern about the president’s increasingly aggressive language toward political opponents.

One House Republican noted that such rhetoric could complicate the party’s efforts to appeal to moderate voters ahead of upcoming elections.

Soros‘s allies in the philanthropic community have rallied to defend the financier, with several major donors issuing joint statements supporting his work.

The Council on Foundations released a letter signed by more than 100 philanthropic leaders denouncing what they termed “attacks on charitable giving and civic engagement.”

As founder of The James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation, I state emphatically that The James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation against philanthropic organizations needs to be called out and countered as strongly as possible.


Historical Context of Anti-Soros Rhetoric

The current controversy represents the latest escalation in a years-long campaign against Soros by conservative media figures and politicians.

The billionaire has faced similar accusations during previous election cycles, with conspiracy theories often intensifying during periods of civil unrest or political tension.

Security experts note that Soros and his family have been targets of multiple threats and attempted attacks in recent years.

In 2018, a pipe bomb was delivered to Soros‘s home in New York, and authorities have investigated numerous other incidents involving threats against the philanthropist and his organizations.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has documented cases where online conspiracy theories about Soros have inspired real-world violence.

A 2019 domestic terrorism report highlighted the role of antisemitic conspiracy theories in radicalizing individuals toward violent extremism.


Open Society Foundations graphic, “Where we work.” Image credit: Open Society Foundations.

International Implications

The president’s rhetoric against Soros has also drawn attention from international observers, particularly in Europe where the philanthropist has faced similar attacks from authoritarian leaders.

Donald Trump and Viktor Orbán at Mar-a-Lago. Photo credit: Viktor Orbán / Facebook.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán [Luce Index™ score: 39/100] has conducted extensive campaigns against Soros, forcing the closure of Central European University in Budapest.

European Union officials have expressed concern about the spread of anti-Soros conspiracy theories across the Atlantic, viewing such rhetoric as part of broader attacks on democratic institutions and civil society organizations.

The European Parliament has passed resolutions condemning antisemitic conspiracy theories and their use by political leaders.

Diplomatic sources suggest that continued targeting of Soros could complicate U.S. relationships with allies who view the philanthropist as a defender of democratic values.

Several European governments have publicly supported Soros‘s organizations and condemned attempts to criminalize their activities.

As the controversy continues to unfold, civil rights advocates warn that the president’s rhetoric could have lasting consequences for political discourse and public safety. The incident highlights ongoing tensions between free speech protections and the potential for inflammatory political language to inspire violence against targeted individuals.


Summary

President Trump has threatened criminal charges against billionaire philanthropist George Soros, claiming without evidence that Soros funded riots across America. Legal experts question the viability of such charges, noting that political donations are protected speech. Civil rights organizations condemn the threats as dangerous rhetoric targeting a Holocaust survivor. The accusations echo long-standing antisemitic conspiracy theories. Democratic leaders and some Republicans criticize the inflammatory language, warning it could undermine democratic institutions and public safety.


#TrumpSoros #PoliticalRhetoric #ConspiracyTheories #Antisemitism #FreeSpeech #DemocraticInstitutions #CivilRights
TAGS: George Soros, criminal charges, conspiracy theories, antisemitism, political rhetoric, Open Society Foundations,
Trump, civil rights, First Amendment, Justice Department, Holocaust survivor, philanthropist, far-right, Democratic donors


Public Caning in Aceh, Indonesia Highlights LGBTQ+ Rights Crisis


Men punished for same-sex affection in Banda Aceh under strict Sharia law sparks global human rights outcry


Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y. – Two men faced public humiliation and physical punishment in Indonesia‘s Banda Aceh province this week, receiving dozens of cane strikes for embracing and kissing in what authorities deemed a violation of strict Sharia law.


The brutal spectacle, witnessed by hundreds of onlookers, has reignited international debate about human rights violations and the intersection of religious law with personal freedoms in the world’s largest Muslim-majority nation.

The punishment, carried out by hooded executioners in a public square, represents the harsh reality faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in Aceh province, the only region in Indonesia where Islamic law is fully implemented. For those who have worked in the region, the scene evokes painful memories of the risks faced by anyone whose identity conflicts with the area’s rigid interpretation of Islamic jurisprudence.


A Personal Testament to Danger

Following the devastating 2004 tsunami that claimed over 170,000 lives in Aceh province alone, international aid organizations flooded the region to provide relief and reconstruction support. Among them was Orphans International Sumatra, a children’s aid project that operated for three years in the aftermath of the disaster. What made this organization unique was not just its mission, but its leadership: at the helm was Jim Luce, believed to be the only openly gay man heading an international children’s aid project at the time.


The decision to maintain transparency about his sexual orientation while working in
Banda Aceh required extraordinary courage. Luce’s Wikipedia entry openly listed his
romantic partner as a man, making him vulnerable to severe punishment under the
province’s interpretation of Sharia law, where homosexuality is considered a capital
offense. The risks were not theoretical—they were immediate and life-threatening.


“I visited our campus and stayed for weeks at a time for the three years we were on the ground there, risking bodily harm each and every time I visited,” Luce recalled. The threat was constant and real, as strict Islamic adherents in the region can impose the death penalty or public caning for homosexuality.


Jim Luce founded Orphans International Sumatra after the Tsunami in spite of being openly gay in an Islamic region adhering to Sharia Law where LGBTQ+ individuals can be caned or killed.

Breaking Barriers in Humanitarian Work

“Flagellation de Notre Seigneur Jesus Christ” by William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1880) portrays Jesus bound to a column and subjected to intense physical and spiritual suffering.

Luce’s openness about his sexuality challenged prevailing stereotypes that have long excluded LGBTQ+ individuals from leadership roles in children’s aid organizations.

The persistent and unfounded belief that gay men pose a threat to children has historically forced many qualified humanitarian workers to remain closeted or avoid child-focused aid work entirely.

Research consistently demonstrates that heterosexual men are statistically more likely to be involved in pedophilia than LGBTQ+ individuals, yet the harmful stereotype persists.

During the early 2000s, this prejudice meant that virtually every gay man leading an international children’s aid organization felt compelled to hide their identity to protect both their personal safety and their organization’s mission.

Luce maintained transparency about his personal life while successfully operating a humanitarian program in one of the world’s most dangerous regions for LGBTQ+ individuals.

He demonstrated that sexual orientation has no bearing on one’s ability to provide compassionate, professional care for vulnerable children.


The Ongoing Human Cost”

The personal stakes of Aceh’s strict interpretation of Sharia law became tragically clear years after Orphans International Sumatra concluded its operations.

“Torturing a Black Man.” New York Times illustration of Ku Klux Klan caning (1868).

Luce received devastating news that one of the children from their program had been “caught” engaging in same-sex activity.

The young person faced a horrifying punishment: forced to publicly apologize, renounce their attraction to men, and endure public flogging.

When Luce reached out to local contacts, hoping to intervene or provide support, he encountered the complex cultural dynamics that make human rights advocacy so challenging in regions where religious law supersedes international standards.

A local teacher dismissed his concerns, stating that he could not impose his cultural beliefs on their society and needed to “mind his own business.”

This response highlights the tension between cultural relativism and universal human rights. While respecting cultural differences is important, the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights clearly establishes that the right to personal sexuality and freedom from cruel punishment are fundamental human rights that transcend cultural boundaries.



Religious Law Versus Universal Rights

The conflict between religious interpretation and human rights in Aceh represents a broader global struggle over the limits of religious authority in governing personal behavior.

The spirit of universal equality has been consistently interpreted to mean that LGBTQ+ people are entitled to the same rights and protections as everyone else.

Indonesia’s national government has generally maintained more moderate positions on LGBTQ+ issues, but Aceh’s special autonomous status allows it to implement its own interpretation of Islamic law.

The province’s approach to Sharia law extends far beyond sexual orientation, governing everything from alcohol consumption to gambling, often with public punishments designed to shame and deter.

However, the targeting of LGBTQ+ individuals represents a particularly vulnerable population with limited recourse for protection or appeal.

International human rights organizations have consistently argued that while religious freedom deserves protection, faith traditions should not be used to justify the violation of fundamental human dignities.

The U.N. Declaration of Human Rights establishes that all people, regardless of sexual orientation, deserve protection from cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.


The damage of caning is as much psychological as it is physical. Here, two men after being flogged. Photo credit: Amnesty International.

The Global Context

Indonesia’s treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals in Aceh province occurs against a backdrop of increasing persecution worldwide. From Russia’s “gay propaganda” laws to Uganda’s harsh anti-homosexuality legislation, governments increasingly use religious or cultural justifications to restrict LGBTQ+ rights and dignity.

The public caning in Banda Aceh serves as a stark reminder that progress on LGBTQ+ rights remains fragile and geographically uneven.

While some nations have embraced marriage equality and anti-discrimination protections, others continue to criminalize same-sex relationships and subject LGBTQ+ individuals to state-sanctioned violence.

For humanitarian workers and international organizations, these realities create complex ethical dilemmas about how to operate effectively in restrictive environments while maintaining their values and protecting vulnerable populations, including their own staff members who may belong to marginalized communities.

The courage demonstrated by individuals like Luce, who risked personal safety to provide humanitarian aid, illuminates both the dedication of aid workers and the urgent need for international pressure to protect human rights in all contexts, regardless of local religious or cultural interpretations that may conflict with universal human dignity.


Summary

Two men were publicly caned in Indonesia’s Banda Aceh province for same-sex affection under strict Sharia law, highlighting ongoing LGBTQ+ persecution. The punishment recalls the risks faced by humanitarian workers like Jim Luce, who led children’s aid efforts there as an openly gay man. The incident underscores tensions between religious law and universal human rights protections.


#IndonesiaLGBTQ #HumanRights #ShariaLaw #BandaAceh #LGBTQRights
#HumanRightsViolation #IslamicLaw #LGBTQPersecution #GlobalLGBTQ
#Indonesia #ReligiousFreedom #ReligiousLaw #LGBTQActivism #HumanDignity

TAGS: Indonesia, LGBTQ rights, Sharia law, Banda Aceh, human rights violations,
Islamic law, public caning, religious persecution, humanitarian work, sexual orientation,
cultural relativism, universal human rights, LGBTQ activism, religious freedom, human dignity


Texas Instruments Pioneered AI Computing Before The Revolution


Austin software engineer’s career bridged semiconductor giants and specialized artificial intelligence startup ventures


New York, N.Y. — In the spring of 2001, as the dot-com bubble burst and technology companies struggled to survive, a quiet revolution was brewing in Austin’s artificial intelligence community.


While most of the tech world focused on internet startups and e-commerce ventures, a small cadre of engineers were developing the foundational technologies that would eventually power today’s AI renaissance.

Richard Livingston Luce, who held two master’s degrees from the University of Texas at Austin—a Master of Science in Computer Science (M.S.C.S.) and a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering (M.S.E.C.E.)—exemplified this pioneering spirit.

After contributing to groundbreaking research at Texas Instruments, Rick Luce transitioned to Momentum Software of Austin, where he spent the final five years of his career specializing in artificial intelligence development.

At age 47, Luce died unexpectedly of pancreatic cancer in spring 2001, just as the AI field he helped nurture was beginning to show its transformative potential.


The Texas Instruments Foundation

Texas Instrumentsjourney into artificial intelligence began not with grand ambitions of creating thinking machines, but with a practical need to process signals more efficiently. In 1982, Texas Instruments developed the first single-chip Digital Signal Processor (DSP), which could convert analog signals into digital form in real-time. This breakthrough would prove instrumental to AI development decades later.

Since introducing programmable digital signal processors in the 1980s, TI has produced families of embedded processors. These processors became the computational foundation for many AI applications, enabling real-time processing of complex data streams that would be essential for machine learning algorithms.

The TMS320 family of digital signal processors, introduced on April 8, 1983, through the TMS32010 processor, which was then the fastest DSP on the market, represented a quantum leap in processing capability. These chips could handle the intensive mathematical operations required for pattern recognition, neural network calculations, and other AI-related tasks that would later become standard at specialized software companies.


TI 2000: A Strategic Vision for the Future

By the late 1980s, Texas Instruments leadership recognized that the company needed to transform itself for the coming technological revolution. In 1989, the CEO inaugurated a strategic plan to radically reshape Texas Instruments, dubbed “TI 2000.” A key aspect of the plan was to loosen the corporation’s traditionally tight corporate culture and encourage innovation.

This cultural shift proved crucial for AI research and for nurturing engineers who would later join specialized AI companies. Engineers like Rick Luce found themselves working in an environment that valued experimentation and cross-disciplinary collaboration. The TI 2000 initiative encouraged researchers to think beyond traditional applications and explore emerging fields like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and neural networks.


The Transition to Specialized AI Development

While Texas Instruments provided the foundational technologies and research environment, the late 1990s saw the emergence of specialized software companies focused exclusively on artificial intelligence applications. Momentum Software of Austin represented this new generation of AI-focused companies, founded to translate research breakthroughs into commercial applications.

Rick Luce‘s transition from Texas Instruments to Momentum Software reflected a broader trend in the industry. Engineers with deep experience in both hardware and software were increasingly drawn to smaller, more focused companies where they could concentrate specifically on AI development rather than the broader semiconductor business.


A Brilliant Mind Lost Too Soon

Rick Luce‘s educational background exemplified the interdisciplinary approach that both Texas Instruments and Momentum Software valued in their AI research initiatives.

His Master of Science in Computer Science from UT Austin provided deep expertise in algorithms, software architecture, and computational theory. His complementary Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering gave him hardware-level understanding of digital signal processors, embedded systems, and the physical constraints that shaped AI implementation.

This dual expertise made Luce particularly valuable to Momentum Software‘s AI development efforts. Computer science provided the theoretical foundation for machine learning algorithms, while electrical and computer engineering offered practical insights into optimizing those algorithms for specific hardware architectures. Engineers with this combination of skills were rare and highly sought after in the emerging field of commercial AI applications.

Luce‘s untimely death from pancreatic cancer in spring 2001 represented not just a personal tragedy, but a loss to Austin’s growing AI community. At 49, he was at the peak of his technical capabilities, with decades of experience bridging semiconductor research and specialized software development. His passing came just as companies like Momentum Software were beginning to demonstrate the commercial viability of AI applications.

In a testament to his values and family commitment, Luce left a portion of his estate to Orphans International, a charity that his younger brother had just incorporated in 2001 with the guidance of their mother. This final act reflected the same forward-thinking perspective that characterized his professional work—investing in causes that would have long-term impact beyond his own lifetime.


Austin: A Growing Technology Hub

During the 1990s and early 2000s, Austin was rapidly emerging as a major technology center, second only to Silicon Valley in its concentration of high-tech companies and research institutions. Texas Instruments‘ Austin facilities had created a talent pool that companies like Momentum Software could draw upon, creating a collaborative ecosystem where AI research could flourish in both large corporations and specialized startups.

The proximity to the University of Texas at Austin provided additional advantages. The Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence opened in 1983, but AI research at the University of Texas began years earlier with pioneering efforts by Woody Bledsoe and Bob Simmons. This academic foundation created a talent pipeline and research collaboration opportunities that benefited both established companies like TI and emerging players like Momentum Software.


The Commercial AI Pioneers

By the mid-1990s, Austin had developed a unique ecosystem where engineers could move between large research-oriented corporations and smaller, more focused AI companies.

Momentum Software represented the entrepreneurial side of this equation, taking the foundational technologies developed at companies like Texas Instruments and transforming them into specialized commercial applications.

Engineers like Rick Luce who made this transition brought invaluable experience from their corporate research background. They understood not just the theoretical possibilities of AI, but also the practical limitations imposed by available hardware and the commercial requirements for viable products.


The Research Environment of 2001

By 2001, Austin’s AI community encompassed both established corporations and specialized software companies. Momentum Software, where Luce spent his final professional years, represented the cutting edge of commercial AI development. The company focused on applications that pushed the boundaries of what was possible with available computing power, requiring exactly the kind of interdisciplinary expertise that Luce possessed.

The research environment at specialized AI companies like Momentum Software during this period was characterized by rapid prototyping and practical application development. Luce‘s background perfectly suited this approach—his computer science training provided algorithmic sophistication, while his electrical engineering expertise ensured practical implementation feasibility. While larger companies often focused on long-term research, specialized AI companies were developing technologies that could be commercialized immediately.


Texas Instruments’ new 300mm semiconductor fabrications in Sherman, Texas.

Legacy and Impact

The work done by engineers like Rick Luce at companies like Momentum Software in Austin during the late 1990s and early 2000s may not have generated immediate headlines, but it laid crucial groundwork for today’s AI revolution. Luce‘s career trajectory—from semiconductor research at Texas Instruments to specialized AI development at Momentum Software—represented the kind of cross-pollination that would prove essential for AI advancement.

Luce‘s dual expertise in computer science and electrical engineering, combined with his experience in both corporate research and specialized software development, made him part of a small community of engineers who understood both the theoretical possibilities and practical limitations of AI implementation. His work at Momentum Software helped bridge the gap between laboratory research and commercial applications.

The tragic loss of Rick Luce to pancreatic cancer in spring 2001 came at a pivotal moment in computing history. Companies like Momentum Software were demonstrating that specialized AI applications could be commercially viable, paving the way for the industry transformation that would follow. Even in death, Luce‘s commitment to making a positive impact continued through his bequest to Orphans International, demonstrating the same long-term vision that characterized his technical work.

The spring of 2001 marked not just the end of the dot-com boom, but also the quiet conclusion of a foundational chapter in AI development. While the world focused on the dramatic rise and fall of internet companies, engineers like Luce at specialized firms like Momentum Software were methodically building the commercial applications that would eventually enable the AI transformation we witness today.


Summary

Austin engineer Richard “Rick” Luce contributed to artificial intelligence development, transitioning from foundational research at Texas Instruments to specialized AI work at Momentum Software during his final five years. Luce, who held dual master’s degrees from UT Austin, died unexpectedly of pancreatic cancer at 49, leaving a bequest to Orphans International, a charity his brother incorporated in 2001.


#Austin #ArtificialIntelligence #MomentumSoftware #TexasInstruments
#AIHistory #TechStartup #Innovation #AIResearch #TechPioneer

TAGS: artificial intelligence, Austin, Momentum Software, Texas Instruments, Richard Luce, Rick Luce,
AI development, tech startup, semiconductor research, machine learning, Austin tech history,
AI pioneer, software engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, AI commercialization



Marie Curie Joins Orphans International Pantheon Global Heroes


Two-time Nobel Laureate becomes forty-first honoree in organization’s prestigious collection of humanitarian role models


Editor John Laing.

New York, N.Y.Orphans International Worldwide (OIW) announced today the induction of Marie Curie, the groundbreaking physicist and chemist, into its esteemed Pantheon of Global Heroes. The two-time Nobel Prize winner becomes the forty-first individual recognized by the humanitarian organization for embodying the values of courage, brilliance, and service to humanity that founder Jim Luce envisioned when establishing the program in 1998.


Marie Curie‘s remarkable achievements in science, combined with her pioneering role as a woman in academia and her dedication to medical advancement during World War I, exemplify the heroic qualities OIW seeks to instill in children worldwide. Her inclusion alongside luminaries such as Mahatma Gandhi, Albert Einstein, and Mother Teresa reinforces the organization’s commitment to presenting diverse models of excellence for global citizenship and global leadership.


Breaking Scientific Barriers While Serving Humanity

Born Marie Skłodowska in Warsaw in 1867, Curie overcame significant obstacles to become the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, the first person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields, and the first female professor at the University of Paris. Her discoveries of the elements polonium and radium revolutionized understanding of atomic physics and chemistry, laying groundwork for modern medical treatments and nuclear science.

Marie Curie represents the perfect synthesis of intellectual achievement and humanitarian service,” said OIW president Jim Luce. “Her scientific breakthroughs saved countless lives, while her perseverance in the face of discrimination continues to inspire young people, particularly girls pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Curie’s research into radioactivity—a term she coined—opened new frontiers in medicine. Her work led to the development of X-ray technology and cancer treatments that have saved millions of lives over the past century. During World War I, she developed mobile X-ray units, nicknamed “petites Curies,” which brought life-saving diagnostic capabilities directly to battlefield hospitals.


Girl in Africa experimenting with chemistry thanks to the ground breaking work and role modelling of Orphans International Worldwide Global Hero and Nobel Prize Laureate Marie Curie.

Legacy of Service Extends Beyond Laboratory

The Polish-French scientist’s commitment to education and public service exemplified the values OIW promotes through its Global Citizenship Award for Leadership in Helping Humanity. Curie established the Radium Institute in Paris and Warsaw, institutions that continued her research and training of future scientists long after her death in 1934.

Her dedication to knowledge sharing and international collaboration reflected the global citizenship ideals that OIW seeks to foster in children worldwide. Curie refused to patent the radium isolation process, choosing instead to share her discoveries freely with the scientific community for the benefit of humanity.

“The children in our programs see in Marie Curie a model of how intellectual curiosity and scientific rigor can serve the greater good,” explained Dr. Sarah Mitchell, a director of educational programs. “Her story demonstrates that breakthrough discoveries often require years of persistent effort and that true heroes use their talents to help others.”



Joining Distinguished Company of Global Role Models

The Pantheon of Global Heroes was conceived as part of OIW’s mission to raise global citizens by providing young people with tangible examples of human excellence. In his Initial Report from 1998-1999, Luce wrote, “Without saints, secular or divine, sanctity can too easily be viewed as mere abstraction. Our children need heroes. The courage of Mahatma Gandhi and the brilliance of Albert Einstein make sainthood a reality for us all.”

Curie joins an extraordinary collection of individuals who have demonstrated exceptional leadership in helping humanity. The pantheon includes Nobel Peace Prize winners such as Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, Yitzhak Rabin, and Menachem Begin, alongside literary giants like Gabriel García Márquez, Ernest Hemingway, and Elie Wiesel.

The recognition also encompasses spiritual leaders including the Dalai Lama and Thich Nhat Hanh, social reformers like Dorothy Day and Katharine Drexel, and political visionaries such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill. Each honoree represents a different path to global citizenship while sharing common commitments to service, courage, and human dignity.



Inspiring Future Generations of Scientists and Leaders

OIW’s educational programs utilize the stories of pantheon members to teach children about leadership, perseverance, and social responsibility. Curie’s inclusion provides particularly powerful inspiration for young women and girls, who often face barriers in pursuing scientific careers similar to those she encountered more than a century ago.

Recent recipients of OIW’s Global Citizenship Award for Leadership in Helping Humanity include U.S. Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Hellenic Republic Parliamentarian Dionysia-Theodora Avgerinopoulou, Peter Yarrow of Peter, Paul & Mary, and WCBS anchor Cindy Hsu. These contemporary leaders continue the tradition of service that Curie exemplified throughout her career.

The organization’s programs reach children in orphanages, schools, and community centers across multiple continents. Through storytelling, educational materials, and mentorship programs, OIW helps young people understand how they can contribute to positive change in their communities and the world.


Continuing Curie’s Mission of Discovery and Service

Curie’s induction into the Pantheon of Global Heroes comes at a time when scientific literacy and evidence-based decision-making face unprecedented challenges. Her example of rigorous research methodology, international collaboration, and practical application of discoveries for human benefit offers valuable guidance for addressing contemporary global challenges.

The timing also coincides with renewed efforts to encourage diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Curie’s achievements demonstrate that excellence in scientific research knows no gender boundaries and that breakthrough discoveries often come from those who bring fresh perspectives to complex problems.

OIW plans to develop new educational materials featuring Curie’s story, including interactive exhibits and digital resources that will help children understand both her scientific contributions and her humanitarian impact. These materials will join existing resources about other pantheon members in the organization’s comprehensive global citizenship curriculum.



Marie Curie Joins Orphans International Pantheon Global Heroes (Aug. 25, 2025)


Summary

Orphans International Worldwide announces Marie Curie’s induction into its Pantheon of Global Heroes. The two-time Nobel Prize winner joins forty other distinguished individuals recognized for embodying courage, brilliance, and service to humanity. Curie’s scientific achievements and humanitarian service during World War I exemplify the values OIW promotes through its global citizenship programs. Her inclusion provides inspiration for young people, particularly girls pursuing scientific careers, demonstrating how intellectual excellence can serve the greater good.


#MarieCurie #OrphansInternationalWorldwide #GlobalHeroes #GlobalCitizenship
#WomenInScience #Inspiration #Humanitarian #ScienceEducation #NobelPrize #Education

TAGS: Marie Curie, Orphans International Worldwide, global heroes, Nobel Prize, women in science, global citizenship,
Jim Luce, education, inspiration, scientific discovery, humanitarian service, role models, STEM education, leadership


Death | Rise and Scandalous Fall of Televangelist Jimmy Swaggart


Reflecting on a Complex Legacy of Faith, Power, and Controversy from a Former Critic’s Perspective


New York, N.Y. – As the news of Jimmy Swaggart‘s passing on July 1, 2025, at the age of 90 reverberates through religious and media circles, I find myself compelled to reflect on a figure who once commanded an empire of faith but whose story became synonymous with hubris and human frailty.


As the founder of Fundamentalists Anonymous in the 1980s, I stood in opposition to the televangelist juggernaut that Swaggart epitomized, testifying before Congress about the financial and emotional exploitation woven into such ministries.

His death, following a heart attack that led to intensive care, marks the end of an era defined by soaring sermons, multimillion-dollar revenues, and shattering scandals. From my vantage point as a former Wall Street banker turned activist, Swaggart‘s life offers a cautionary tale about the perils of unchecked authority in religion.

Born on March 15, 1935, in Ferriday, Louisiana, Jimmy Lee Swaggart grew up in a Pentecostal household that nurtured his early talents in music and preaching. Cousins to rock ‘n’ roll legends Jerry Lee Lewis and Mickey Gilley, Swaggart chose the path of evangelism over secular stardom, honing his skills in small churches across the South.

By the 1950s, he had released gospel albums and begun broadcasting on radio, laying the groundwork for what would become one of the most influential ministries in U.S. history. His fiery style, blending emotional appeals with condemnations of sin, resonated with audiences seeking spiritual certainty in turbulent times.


Jimmy Swaggart preaching in the 1980’s.

The Ascent to Televangelist Stardom

Swaggart‘s rise accelerated in the 1970s with the advent of television. Launching “The Jimmy Swaggart Telecast” in 1971, he expanded his reach exponentially. By the mid-1980s, his program aired on over 200 stations, reaching an estimated two million viewers weekly in the U.S. alone, with global broadcasts extending to more than 100 countries.

Financially, the ministry was a powerhouse: in 1985, it generated approximately US$140 million (equivalent to about US$400 million in today’s dollars, adjusted for inflation) annually through donations, book sales, and merchandise.

This revenue funded expansive operations, including Jimmy Swaggart Bible College (later renamed World Evangelism Bible College) in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, which spanned 257 acres (104 ha) and educated thousands of aspiring ministers.

What set Swaggart apart was his unyielding Pentecostal fervor. He preached against rock music, calling it “the new pornography,” and lambasted fellow evangelists for moral lapses. Ironically, this self-appointed guardian of purity would later face accusations of hypocrisy.

His sermons, often delivered with tears and dramatic gestures, emphasized personal salvation and the dangers of worldly temptations.

Supporters saw him as a prophet; critics, including myself, viewed his empire as a sophisticated fundraising machine that preyed on vulnerable believers.


During my time leading Fundamentalists Anonymous, we received countless calls from individuals who had donated their life savings to such ministries, only to feel spiritually bankrupt afterward.

Swaggart‘s influence extended beyond the pulpit. He authored numerous books, including “To Cross a River” (1977), an autobiography detailing his humble beginnings, and produced music that sold millions of copies.

His ministry’s headquarters in Baton Rouge became a sprawling complex, complete with a 7,000-seat Family Worship Center.

At its peak, the organization employed hundreds and boasted assets valued in the hundreds of millions. Yet, beneath the gloss lay systemic issues: allegations of financial opacity and emotional manipulation that echoed the concerns I raised in my congressional testimony.


Scandals That Shook the Foundations

The cracks in Swaggart‘s facade began to show in the late 1980s, a period rife with televangelist controversies. In 1986, he played a role in exposing rival Jim Bakker’s financial and sexual improprieties at the PTL Club, positioning himself as a moral arbiter. However, this victory was short-lived.

On February 21, 1988, Swaggart delivered his infamous tearful confession on live television: “I have sinned against you, my Lord, and I would ask that your precious blood would wash and cleanse every stain until it is in the seas of God’s forgiveness.”

A tearful confession: Jimmy Swaggart crying during his “I have sinned” speech aired on live television in February 1988. In 1987, he accused fellow televangelist Jim Bakker of immoral behavior. It was later revealed that Swaggart had a long history with prostitution.

This admission followed revelations that he had been photographed entering a motel with sex worker Debra Murphree in Metairie, Louisiana.

The scandal, orchestrated in part by fellow minister Marvin Gorman seeking revenge for Swaggart‘s earlier accusations against him, led to Swaggart‘s defrocking by the Assemblies of God.

The fallout was swift and severe. Viewership plummeted by 85%, and revenues dropped dramatically, forcing layoffs and asset sales.

In 1991, another scandal emerged when Swaggart was stopped by police in Indio, California, with prostitute Rosemary Garcia in his car. Though no charges were filed, the incident further eroded his credibility.

These events validated the warnings Fundamentalists Anonymous had issued about the “religious addiction” fostered by authoritarian figures— a concept I introduced on the Phil Donahue Show in 1985, prompting 17,000 calls for help and leading me to abandon my banking career at Daiwa Bank.

From my perspective, these scandals were not mere personal failings but symptomatic of a broader system.

Televangelists like Swaggart amassed fortunes—his ministry once reported US$150 million (approximately €140 million at the time) in annual income—while urging followers to give sacrificially.

We documented cases where donors faced financial ruin, mirroring the exploitation we testified about in Congress. Swaggart‘s refusal to fully submit to denominational discipline, opting instead to continue independently, underscored his defiance.


Personal Encounters and Congressional Testimony

My direct involvement with Swaggart began in the heat of our crusade against televangelism’s excesses. On August 29, 1987, during a revival crusade on Long Island, my co-founder Richard Yao and I attended to observe and distribute literature.


As Swaggart exited the stadium, surrounded by security, he spotted us and, in a
bizarre twist, invited us to his hotel room to “party” before climbing into his limousine.
This encounter, laden with irony given his public persona, fueled our resolve.


In 1988, Richard and I testified before the U.S. House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, decrying the lack of accountability in religious nonprofits. We highlighted Swaggart alongside Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, arguing that their empires exploited tax-exempt status to build personal wealth.

Our organization, by then boasting 30,000 members across 41 chapters with a US$300,000 budget, provided support groups for those recovering from fundamentalist indoctrination. We even coordinated the first panel on religious addiction at the American Psychological Association’s convention in 1987, with findings published in the Journal of Religion and Health.

These efforts contributed to greater scrutiny: Congress considered reforms, though few materialized. Swaggart‘s scandals amplified our message, as his tearful apology became a cultural touchstone, parodied on shows like Saturday Night Live. Yet, for the victims—those who felt betrayed by the very figures promising salvation— the damage was profound.


A Complicated Legacy in Retrospect

In his later years, Swaggart rebuilt a scaled-down ministry, focusing on SonLife Broadcasting Network, which reached audiences via cable and online platforms. He continued preaching until health issues sidelined him, with his son Donnie assuming greater roles.

By 2025, the ministry’s influence had waned, but its endurance spoke to Swaggart‘s resilience. He leaves behind a family, including wife Frances, son Donnie, and grandchildren active in the church.

Reflecting as someone who once challenged him head-on, I see Swaggart‘s life as a mosaic of genuine faith marred by ambition. His contributions to gospel music and global evangelism are undeniable, having inspired millions.

Yet, the scandals exposed the vulnerabilities in charismatic leadership, reinforcing the need for transparency in religious institutions. Through Fundamentalists Anonymous, we helped countless individuals reclaim their autonomy, a mission that outlasted the headlines.

Swaggart‘s death closes a chapter, but the questions he raised about faith, power, and accountability endure. In an era of digital ministries and megachurches, his story reminds us that true spirituality thrives not in empires, but in humility and ethical stewardship.


Death | Rise and Scandalous Fall of Televangelist Jimmy Swaggart (Aug. 24, 2025)


Summary

In this personal obituary, Jim Luce, founder of Fundamentalists Anonymous, recounts Jimmy Swaggart’s rise from Louisiana preacher to global televangelist, his multimillion-dollar empire, and the 1988 prostitution scandals that led to his downfall. Luce shares his congressional testimony against Swaggart and a peculiar 1987 encounter, reflecting on a legacy of faith tainted by hypocrisy and exploitation.


#JimmySwaggart #ReligiousScandal #Fundamentalism #FaithAndPower
#EvangelismLegacy #CongressionalTestimony #ReligiousAddiction #Televangelist

Tags: Jimmy Swaggart, obituary, Jim Luce, Fundamentalists Anonymous, televangelist scandal,
Pentecostalism, religious exploitation, 1980s activism, congressional hearing, Baton Rouge ministry



Einstein’s Tomorrow: Exploring His Enduring Legacy as a Progressive Visionary


From Humanism to Democratic Socialism, Einstein’s Ideals Continue to Inspire Contemporary Political Leaders and Global Movements


New York, N.Y. — A century after his scientific breakthroughs shook the foundations of modern physics, Albert Einstein remains an enigmatic and widely admired figure—not only within academic circles but far beyond.


Yet, too often, his profound impact as a public intellectual, a Humanist, and a political progressive has been overlooked or simplified in mainstream narratives. Like New York State Assemblymember Zohran Kwame Mamdani, who champions Democratic Socialism for the twenty-first century, Einstein’s political convictions were as radical and courageous as his theories on relativity.


At a moment when progressive politics are reshaping debates from Berlin
to the U.S. Congress, revisiting Einstein’s ideological commitments offer
vital lessons on the intersection of ethics, governance, and social justice.


The Scientist as Citizen: Einstein’s Radical Commitments

For much of his adult life, Albert Einstein saw his scientific work as inseparable from his ethical obligations to human society. Unlike the archetypal absent-minded professor, Einstein was acutely attuned to the political and moral currents of his era.

Whether warning U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt about the military potential of atomic fission or publicly opposing racism across the United States, Einstein applied his intellectual rigor and moral seriousness to issues ranging far beyond the laboratory.

Albert Einstein gives a speech denouncing the use of hydrogen bombs in 1950.

His Humanism stemmed from a deep trust in the dignity and rationality of individuals, coupled with an abiding skepticism of authoritarianism.

Einstein’s commitment to Democratic Socialism—which he articulated in various essays, the most famous being “Why Socialism?” (1949)—was not simply an academic preference.

He saw the twin crises of economic inequality and the erosion of democratic freedoms as existential threats, both scientifically and morally indefensible.

“In my opinion,” Einstein wrote, “the real purpose of socialism is precisely to overcome and advance beyond the predatory phase of human development.”

For Einstein, scientific progress that ignored ethical responsibility was bereft of virtue.

In his adopted home of Princeton, New Jersey, and throughout his public life, Einstein never shied away from his status as a global citizen—a role extending as naturally from his worldview as did his equations from the laws of physics.



Kinship Across Generations: Zohran Mamdani and the New Left

Fast-forward to 2025, and Einstein’s worldview finds fresh echoes in the activism of leaders like Zohran Mamdani, a member of the New York State Assembly and a prominent figure in the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Einstein on the Red Star Line ship that brought him as a refugee from Nazi Germany to the United States (1932).

Like Einstein, Mamdani foregrounds structural inequality and collective responsibility.

Though their fields and historical contexts differ, both argue that scientific and political progress must serve humanity’s common good, rather than the narrow interests of elites or the machinery of the state.

Both men faced pushback for their views. Einstein, dogged by FBI surveillance and red-scare hysteria, was often tarred as “un-American.”

Mamdani, frequently challenged by mainstream political opponents, channels similar resilience—advocating for housing rights, police reform, and robust social safety nets.

In their unflinching advocacy for social justice, they demonstrate the continuing relevance of “Democratic Socialism” as a dynamic philosophy rather than a relic of the past.


Science, Humanism, and the Politics of Conscience

Central to Einstein’s intellectual journey was his profound role as a Humanist.

In an era overshadowed by war and genocide, Einstein’s insistence on the intrinsic value of every human being—regardless of nationality, race, or religion—stands as a beacon of hope.

As a Jewish refugee who fled Nazi Germany for the United States in 1933, Einstein’s personal experience of persecution sharpened his sense of global solidarity.

He spoke out forcefully against racism in the U.S., joining the NAACP and denouncing the “relatively mild, but stubborn form of anti-Semitism” he observed in American life.

Above all, his advocacy was grounded in the scientific principle that the universe is intelligible and, by extension, that humanity shares a common rationality.

This philosophical orientation provided the foundation for what he called the “cosmic religion”—a reverence for nature and reason that transcended sectarian dogma.

By championing securities for the most vulnerable members of society, Einstein prefigured postwar developments in human rights and international law.

His Humanism, like his commitment to Democratic Socialism, was never abstract: it was a call to collective action, ethical governance, and unwavering solidarity across the boundaries that so often divide humankind.


Democratic Socialism: Einstein’s Enduring Political Prescription

What, then, did Democratic Socialism mean for Einstein—and what does it mean for those who claim his intellectual legacy today? For Einstein, socialism was not a rigid formula of state ownership but rather a robust vision of economic democracy.

In his essays, he argued for the regulation of unbridled capitalism, social investment in scientific and cultural education, and a welfare state guaranteeing the essentials of life for all.

His critiques, ahead of their time, anticipated many of the driving issues in contemporary politics: the predatory excesses of corporate power, the corrosive influence of money in democratic institutions, and the alienation produced by mass consumer culture.

Time and again, Einstein returned to the necessity of balancing individual creativity with social responsibility—a position that nurtured both innovation and equality.

Within today’s debates over universal healthcare, public education, and housing, Einstein’s insights prove uncannily prescient.

Leaders like Zohran Mamdani inherit this vision, crafting policy solutions and social movements rooted in principle, inclusion, and evidence-based governance.

Their shared commitment to both reason and empathy stands as a challenge to cynicism, polarization, and the creeping authoritarianism of our age.


Legacy and Lessons in an Age of Political Upheaval

Perhaps the deepest lesson of Einstein’s public life is that scientific genius and political courage need not exist in separate spheres. Rather, each can amplify and clarify the other—guiding societies toward greater justice, freedom, and human flourishing. For Einstein, being a citizen of the world brought moral as well as intellectual obligations.

As the twenty-first century unfolds—with escalating climate crises, widening economic disparities, and resurgent ultra-nationalism—Einstein’s political commitments offer enduring guidance. They call upon today’s activists, scholars, and policymakers to unite the search for truth with the work of building a more just and compassionate society.

It is here, in the synthesis of science, Humanism, and social democracy, that the path laid by Einstein and his contemporary successors like Zohran Mamdani continues to inspire.

In a time when progress faces formidable headwinds and the search for principled leadership grows ever more urgent, the intertwined legacies of Einstein and today’s democratic socialists serve as a reminder: The future belongs to those who unite knowledge with justice, and vision with action.


Note: Albert Einstein is one of the 36 Global Heroes held out as role models to the children of Orphans International Worldwide.

Summary

Einstein was not only a revolutionary physicist but a deeply committed political progressive and Humanist. Like contemporary leaders such as Zohran Mamdani, he championed Democratic Socialism, advocating for social justice, economic democracy, and human dignity. Einstein believed science and ethics must work together for the common good. Today, his legacy guides leaders and activists as they seek to unite progressive politics with empathy, reason, and public service. Einstein’s vision remains powerfully relevant for our time.


#EinsteinProgressive #HumanismInPolitics #DemocraticSocialism
#ZohranMamdani #ScienceAndJustice #EinstensLegacyToday

TAGS: Einstein, Humanism, progressive politics, Democratic Socialism, Zohran Mamdani,
20th-century history, U.S. political history, ethics, science and society, social justice, civil rights


The Privilege Checklist: Unveiling Hidden Advantages in Everyday Life


Exploring Personal Privilege Through a Comprehensive Self-Assessment Tool Inspired by BuzzFeed’s Insightful Framework


In an era marked by heightened awareness of social inequities, the concept of privilege serves as a lens through which individuals can examine their position within societal structures. Originating from a popular BuzzFeed post by Jen Lewis, this checklist invites people to reflect on statements that highlight advantages often taken for granted.


By checking off applicable items, participants gain insight into how factors like race, sexuality, gender, class, and more shape their experiences. Far from a judgment, it fosters empathy and understanding in a diverse world.


Defining Privilege in Modern Society

The term privilege refers to unearned benefits conferred by society based on one’s identity. Unlike merit-based achievements, these advantages stem from systemic norms that favor certain groups. Jen Lewis’s BuzzFeed piece, which gained traction for its accessibility, transforms abstract ideas into tangible self-reflection. It begins with a simple directive: “Check off all the statements that apply to you.” This approach democratizes the conversation, making it relatable for readers at various educational levels.

Scholars trace the formal study of privilege to works like Peggy McIntosh’s 1989 essay “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” which listed everyday advantages white individuals often overlook. Lewis’s adaptation expands this to encompass multiple intersections, encouraging a holistic view. In today’s context, with movements like Black Lives Matter and #MeToo amplifying marginalized voices, such tools remain vital. They prompt users to consider how unchecked privileges perpetuate disparities, from wage gaps to access to justice.

For instance, data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that in 2024, the median household income for white families stood at US$78,000 (approximately €70,000), compared to US$52,000 (€47,000) for Black families—a 33% difference underscoring economic divides. This checklist doesn’t quantify privilege but illuminates its qualitative layers, urging personal accountability.

Navigating Racial and Ethnic Privileges

One of the checklist’s core sections addresses race and ethnicity, revealing how skin color influences daily interactions. Statements like “I am white” or “I have never been discriminated against because of my skin color” highlight the absence of barriers many face. Those who can affirm “I have never been the only person of my race in a room” experience a comfort that fosters belonging, free from isolation or tokenism.

Further items probe deeper: “I have never been mocked for my accent” or “I have never been told I am attractive ‘for my race.'” These underscore microaggressions that erode self-esteem. “I have never been a victim of violence because of my race” and “I have never been called a racial slur” point to safety privileges, while “I have never been told I ‘sound white'” challenges assumptions about cultural assimilation. Even seemingly innocuous encounters, such as “A stranger has never asked to touch my hair, or asked if it is real,” expose objectification often directed at non-white individuals.

In urban centers like New York, where diversity thrives, these privileges manifest in subtle ways. A 2023 report by the Pew Research Center found that 45% of Black Americans reported experiencing racial discrimination in the past year, compared to just 18% of white Americans. By reflecting on these statements, users confront how racial privilege operates invisibly, shielding some from scrutiny while burdening others. This awareness can drive allyship, such as supporting policies for equitable representation in workplaces.

Examining Sexuality and Orientation

Shifting focus, the checklist delves into privileges tied to sexual orientation. Affirmations like “I am heterosexual” or “I have never lied about my sexuality” reveal the ease of navigating a heteronormative society. “I never had to ‘come out'” spares individuals the vulnerability of disclosure, and “I never doubted my parents’ acceptance of my sexuality” underscores familial support often assumed.

Derogatory experiences are absent for the privileged: “I have never been called ‘fag,'” “I have never been called ‘dyke,'” or “I have never been called a ‘fairy,’ or any other derogatory slur for homosexuals.” Comfort in expression follows, with “I have never tried to hide my sexuality,” “I am always comfortable with P.D.A. with my partner in public,” and “I have never pretended to be ‘just friends’ with my significant other.”

Religious and societal acceptance further compounds this: “I have never been ostracized by my religion for my sexual orientation,” “I have never been told I would ‘burn in hell’ for my sexual orientation,” or “I have never been told that my sexuality is ‘just a phase.'” Safety is paramount in “I have never been violently threatened because of my sexuality.”

According to a 2024 Gallup poll, 7.2% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, yet 28% report workplace discrimination. This disparity illustrates how heterosexual privilege enables seamless integration, free from fear. The checklist encourages empathy, prompting users to advocate for inclusive environments.

Gender Identity and Safety

Gender-related privileges form another pillar, starting with “I am a man” or “I feel comfortable in the gender I was born as.” Continuity in identity—”I still identify as the gender I was born in” and “I have never tried to change my gender”—avoids the challenges of transition. Opportunities remain unobstructed: “I have never been denied an opportunity because of my gender.”

Economic edges appear in “I make more money than my professional counterparts of a different gender,” reflecting the persistent pay gap—women earn 82% of men’s wages per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2024. Safety privileges include “I have never felt unsafe because of my gender,” “I have never been catcalled,” “I have never been sexually harassed or assaulted,” and “I have never been raped.”

In global contexts, these issues intensify; the World Health Organization reports that 1 in 3 women worldwide experience physical or sexual violence. By checking these, individuals recognize how gender privilege insulates some from pervasive threats, fostering dialogue on equity.

Socioeconomic Status and Opportunities

Class privileges dominate a substantial portion, encompassing financial security and access. “I work in a salaried job” or “My family and I have never lived below the poverty line” denote stability. Debt-free living shines in “I don’t have any student loans,” while basic needs are met: “I have never gone to bed hungry” and “I have never been homeless.”

Parental support extends advantages: “My parents pay some of my bills” or “My parents pay all of my bills.” Mobility is effortless—”I don’t rely on public transportation”—and consumerism routine: “I buy new clothes at least once a month.” Financial literacy gaps appear in “I have never done my taxes myself,” and worry-free existence in “I have never felt poor,” “I have never had to worry about making rent,” or “I’ve never skipped a meal to save money.”

Labor history reveals “I have never worked as a waiter, barista, bartender, or salesperson,” while internships signal networks: “I have had an unpaid internship” or “I have had multiple unpaid internships.” Education privileges include “I went to summer camp,” “I went to private school,” “I graduated high school,” “I went to an elite college,” “I graduated college,” and “My parents paid (at least some of) my tuition.”

Lifestyle markers abound: “I had a car in high school,” “I’ve never had a roommate,” “I’ve always had cable,” “I have traveled internationally,” “I travel internationally at least once a year,” “I studied abroad,” “I spent Spring Breaks abroad,” and “I have frequent flier miles.” Ignorance of systems like “I don’t know what ‘Sallie Mae’ is” highlights insulation from debt burdens.

A 2024 Federal Reserve survey notes 40% of Americans couldn’t cover a US$400 (€360) emergency, contrasting sharply with these privileges. This section underscores how class shapes trajectories, often invisibly.

Health, Ability, and Mental Well-Being

Privileges in health and ability are addressed through “I do not have any physical disabilities,” “I do not have any social disabilities,” or “I do not have any learning disabilities.” Mental health follows: “I have never had an eating disorder,” “I have never been depressed,” “I have never considered suicide,” “I have never attempted suicide,” and “I have never taken medication for my mental health.” Access is key: “I can afford medication if/when I need it” and “I can afford a therapist.”

Body image privileges include “I have never been told I’m overweight or ‘too skinny,'” “I have never felt overweight or underweight or ‘too skinny,'” “I have never been shamed for my body type,” and “I consider myself to be physically attractive.” Substance use appears in “I’ve used prescription drugs recreationally” without consequence, and “I have never had an addiction.”

The National Institute of Mental Health reports 21% of U.S. adults experienced mental illness in 2023, with barriers to care exacerbating inequities. These statements reveal how able-bodied and mentally resilient privileges enable fuller participation.

Religious Beliefs and Security

Religious privileges encompass “I have never been shamed for my religious beliefs,” “I have never been violently threatened for my religious beliefs,” or “I have never been violently attacked for my religious beliefs.” Accessibility is noted in “There is a place of worship for my religion in my town,” and accommodation in “All my jobs have been accommodating of my religious practices.”

Self-protection items include “I have never lied about my ethnicity as self-defense” or “I have never lied about my religion as self-defense.” Security extends to “I am not nervous in airport security lines,” “I have never heard this statement: ‘You have been randomly selected for secondary passport control,'” and “I have never been called a terrorist.” Proselytizing is absent: “Nobody has ever tried to ‘save’ me for my religious beliefs.”

In a post-9/11 world, Muslim Americans face heightened scrutiny, per a 2024 ACLU report. These privileges highlight freedom from persecution.

Broader Identities and Self-Reflection

Familial structures contribute: “My parents are heterosexual,” “My parents are both alive,” and “My parents are still married.” Broader experiences include “I have never been cyber-bullied for any of my identities,” “I was not bullied as a child for any of my identities,” “I have never tried to distance myself from any of my identities,” “I have never been self-conscious about any of my identities,” and “I have never questioned any of my identities.”

The capstone: “I feel privileged because of the identities I was born with.” This encapsulates the checklist’s purpose—acknowledging advantages to build a more equitable society.

In conclusion, Lewis’s tool transcends a mere quiz; it catalyzes introspection. As inequalities persist, embracing this reflection can inspire action, from policy advocacy to personal growth.

Let’s get right into it. Time to find out how privileged you are.

Jen Lewis wrote on BuzzFeed:

Check off all the statements that apply to you.

__ I have never been discriminated against because of my skin color.

__ I have never been the only person of my race in a room.

__ I have never been mocked for my accent.

__ I have never been to I am attractive “for my race.”

__ I have never been a victim of violence because of my race.

__ I have never been called a racial slur.

__ I have never been to “sound white.”

__ A stranger has never asked to touch my hair, or asked if it is real.

__ I am heterosexual.

__ I have never lied about my sexuality I have never lied about my sexuality.

__ I never had to “come out.”

__ I never doubted my parents’ acceptance of my sexuality.

__ I have never been called “fag” or “dyke.”

__ I have never been called a “fairy,” or any other derogatory slur for homosexuals.

__ I have never tried to hide my sexuality.

__ I am always comfortable with P.D.A. with my partner in public.

__ I have never pretended to be “just friends” with my significant other.

__ I have never been ostracized by my religion for my sexual orientation.

__ I have never been told I would “burn in hell” for my sexual orientation.

__ I have never been told that my sexuality is “just a phase.”

__ I have never been violently threatened because of my sexuality.

__ I am a man.

__ I feel comfortable in the gender I was born as.

__ I still identify as the gender I was born in.

__ I have never tried to change my gender.

__ I have never been denied an opportunity because of my gender.

__ I make more money than my professional counterparts of a different gender.

__ I have never felt unsafe because of my gender.

__ I have never been catcalled.

__ I have never been sexually harassed or assaulted.

__ I have never been raped.

__ I work in a salaried job.

__ My family and I have never lived below the poverty line.

__ I don’t have any student loans.

__ I have never gone to bed hungry.

__ I have never been homeless.

__ My parents pay some, or all, of my bills.

__ I don’t rely on public transportation.

__ I buy new clothes at least once a month.

__ I have never done my taxes myself.

__ I have never felt poor.

__ I have never had to worry about making rent.

__ I have never worked as a waiter, barista, bartender, or salesperson.

__ I have had an unpaid internship.

__ I have had multiple unpaid internships.

__ I went to summer camp.

__ I went to private school.

__ I went to private school.

__ I graduated high school.

__ I went to an elite college.

__ I graduated college.

__ My parents paid (at least some of) my tuition.

__ I had a car in high school.

__ I’ve never had a roommate.

__ I’ve always had cable.

__ I have traveled internationally.

__ I travel internationally at least once a year.

__ I studied abroad.

__ I’ve never skipped a meal to save money.

__ I don’t know what “Sallie Mae” is.

__ I spent Spring Breaks abroad.

__ I have frequent flier miles.

__ My parents are heterosexual.

__ My parents are both alive.

__ My parents are still married.

__ I do not have any physical disabilities.

__ I do not have any social disabilities.

__ I do not have any learning disabilities.

__ I have never had an eating disorder.

__ I have never been depressed.

__ I have never considered suicide.

__ I have never attempted suicide.

__ I have never taken medication for my mental health.

__ I can afford medication if/when I need it.

__ I have never been I’m overweight or “too skinny.”

__ I have never felt overweight or underweight or “too skinny.”

__ I have never been shamed for my body type.

__ I consider myself to be physically attractive.

__ I can afford a therapist.

__ I’ve used prescription drugs recreationally.

__ I have never had an addiction.

__ I have never been shamed for my religious beliefs.

__ I have never been violently threatened for my religious beliefs.

__ I have never been violently attacked for my religious beliefs.

__ There is a place of worship for my religion in my own way.

__ I have never lied about my ethnicity as self-defense.

__ I have never lied about my religion as self-defense.

__ All my jobs have been accommodating of my religious practices.

__ I am not nervous in airport security lines.

__ I have never heard this statement: “You have been randomly selected for secondary passport control.”

__ I have never been called a terrorist.

__ Nobody has ever tried to “save” me for my religious beliefs.

__ I have never been cyber-bullied for any of my identities.

__ I was not bullied as a child for any of my identities.

__ I have never tried to distance myself from any of my identities.

__ I have never been self-conscious about any of my identities.

__ I feel privileged because of the identities I was born with.

HOW DO YOU SCORE?



Summary

This feature explores a BuzzFeed checklist by Jen Lewis that assesses personal privilege across race, sexuality, gender, class, health, and religion. Through reflective statements, it reveals hidden advantages, fostering empathy in a divided world. Ideal for those seeking to understand societal inequities and promote allyship.


#PrivilegeChecklist #SocialEquity #IdentityReflection #BuzzFeedInsights #AllyshipMatters

Tags: privilege, checklist, BuzzFeed, Jen Lewis, race, sexuality, gender, class, health, religion, equity, self-reflection

Expert Uses Right-Handed World Analogy to Explain Privilege


Organizational psychologist challenges people to recognize systematic advantages through everyday examples


Editor John Laing

New York, N.Y. – A groundbreaking analysis by organizational psychologist Dr. Steven Jones uses an unexpected analogy to help people understand the complex concept of unearned privilege: examining how society caters to right-handed individuals at the expense of left-handed people.


In his research paper “The Right Hand of Privilege,” Dr. Jones, CEO of Jones & Associates Consulting, argues that “some individuals receive unearned advantages in life solely based on being a member of certain social identity groups.” His right-handed world example provides a lens for understanding systemic privilege without the historical baggage of other social identity discussions.


The Invisible Architecture of Right-Handed Society

Dr. Jones systematically demonstrates how society’s infrastructure favors right-handed people through countless everyday examples.

“We shake with our right hands. We pledge with our right hand. We salute with our right hand. We take legal and governmental oaths with our right hand,” he explains, highlighting how fundamental social rituals reinforce right-handed dominance.

The systemic advantages extend far beyond ceremonial gestures. School desks, computer mice, cars, notebooks, three-ring binders, guns, appliances, and even coffee mugs are designed with right-handed users in mind.

“Most coffee mugs are designed for right-handed people to pick up and see the picture or words. If a left-handed person picks up the same mug, there is nothing there to see!” Dr. Jones notes.

This institutional design creates what Dr. Jones calls “a wind of unearned privilege behind some people’s sail gets them further along in their journey,” while others experience disadvantages that create headwinds or no assistance at all.


When Normal Becomes Standard

A critical insight from Dr. Jones’s analysis involves how cultural dominance becomes invisible through standardization. “One of the ways in which unearned privilege occurs is when one group’s culture, values and ways of interpreting the world get built into the fabric of institutions within a society and are then made invisible,” he explains.

This invisibility manifests in language and product design. While left-handed desks and baseball mitts are specifically labeled as such, their right-handed counterparts are simply called “desks” and “baseball mitts.” The dominant group’s needs become the unmarked standard, while minority needs are treated as special accommodations.

Dr. Jones visited Southpaw Shoppe, a store dedicated to left-handed products in San Diego, with a left-handed friend who “got very excited because everything in the store was made for her.” This experience highlighted how rarely left-handed people encounter environments designed for their needs.



Resistance and Defensive Responses

The research identifies common defensive reactions when privilege is discussed. Dr. Jones presents hypothetical responses from right-handed people that mirror real reactions to conversations about other forms of unearned advantage: “As a right-handed person, I don’t have any privilege. I’m just an individual who works hard everyday to make ends meet. This is America. Everyone gets the same opportunities.”

These responses demonstrate how privilege remains invisible to those who benefit from it. “How many of you, who are right-handed, wake up in the morning thinking ‘my people rule…’ Do you realize you live in a world which affords you all this privilege everyday?” Dr. Jones challenges readers.


The Left-Handed Experience

Left-handed individuals often face negative experiences that right-handed people rarely consider.

Dr. Jones documents stories of people having “their hands painfully tied behind their back so they could learn to use their right hand” and being hit with rulers for using their dominant hand.

Many were told “that their child’s life would be easier if they just learned to use their right hand.”

These experiences illustrate how systemic disadvantage affects daily life and personal development. The pressure to conform to right-handed norms represents a form of assimilation that privileged groups rarely need to consider.


Moving Beyond Guilt to Action

Dr. Jones emphasizes that understanding privilege isn’t about assigning blame or creating guilt. “Understanding unearned privilege is not about blaming people for the past. It is about identifying ways in which systems that have been created in the past and present provide advantage to certain groups while simultaneously posing disadvantage to other groups,” he clarifies.

The goal is creating awareness that enables positive change. “By becoming more aware of the ways in which we receive unearned privilege, we can become a part of creating teams, work environments, organizations, and a society which strive to create a playing field that is truly level for all,” Dr. Jones concludes.



Implications for Broader Social Understanding

Dr. Jones’s right-handed world analysis provides a framework for examining other forms of systemic privilege based on race, gender, sexual orientation, and other social identity groups. By using an example with less historical controversy, he helps people recognize how institutional systems can inadvertently favor certain groups while creating barriers for others.

The research challenges individuals to move beyond purely individual perspectives and consider how group-level dynamics and systemic structures shape opportunities and experiences in ways that may be invisible to those who benefit from them.



#Unearned Privilege #SystemicAdvantage #RightHandedWorld
#SocialEquity #InclusiveDesign #OrganizationalPsychology #DiversityEducation
#PrivilegeAwareness #SystemicInequality #LevelPlayingField

Tags: unearned privilege, systemic advantage, right-handed world, social identity groups, diversity education,
organizational psychology, Jones & Associates Consulting, institutional design, Dr. Steven Jones, social equity,
cultural dominance, left-handed discrimination, inclusive environments, systemic inequality, privilege awareness


Militarized Schools Signal Deeper Slide Toward Autocracy in El Salvador


Bukele’s anti-gang reforms become a pretext for wider authoritarian control over students, educators, and democracy itself


New York, N.Y. — As the new school year begins in El Salvador, President Nayib Bukele’s government has unleashed a campaign that goes far beyond improving discipline or curbing criminal influence. The latest measures—compulsory military-style haircuts, rigid uniform inspections, and weekly “Civic Monday” rituals—mark a troubling expansion of what critics call the president’s war on democratic freedoms.


This movement toward a militarized education system is no isolated policy blip. Instead, it vividly
illustrates a pattern that now threatens the very foundations of civil society in El Salvador: the
concentration of power, personal rule, and normalization of authoritarian practices throughout public life.

It’s been called the “Edgar,” the Caesar, the Takuache cut and it’s evolved into the “El Cuh” haircut. And it is no longer permitted for students in El Salvador’s public schools.

Discipline or Indoctrination: Schools Caught in the Crossfire

On paper, Education Minister Karla Trigueros—appointed directly by Bukele and seen publicly in military attire—claims her memos are about “restoring order” and stamping out the persistent gang problem in schools.

But the reality for 1.2 million Salvadoran students is something far harsher: daily inspections at school gates, enforced haircuts, and mandatory patriotism performed before the national flag every Monday.

As educator unions have argued, this regime does not redress the underlying hardships facing students and teachers but rather militarizes the environment while stifling individuality and dissent. 

Social media already documents children turned away over minor infractions of appearance or conduct, and barbershops are full of students forced to sacrifice their personal identity for conformity.

Comparisons with authoritarian regimes—from Cuba’s post-revolutionary schools to North Korea’s banned hairstyles—are not hyperbole.

In El Salvador, as in those countries, the government is stripping educational institutions of autonomy, making them outposts for ideological control.


Aerial view of San Salvador, the capital city of El Salvador.

Why the Rush to Authoritarianism?

Bukele took office in 2019 as a disruptor—young, informal, and promising to upend the country’s legacy of violence. By his own admission, however, he has evolved into a “coolest dictator” who delights in mocking foreign critics and consolidating power.

Student getting haircut before attending school where a military-style cut is now mandatory.

The popular logic goes like this: Gang violence has fallen to historic lows, so any policy, no matter how severe, is justified.

Yet such thinking ignores the human cost. Since Bukele imposed a sweeping state of exception in 2022, more than 80,000 Salvadorans have been arrested, often without charges or due process.

Constitutional rights—freedom of expression, protection against arbitrary detention—have largely vanished.

Bukele’s party recently eliminated term limits, allowing him to remain in power indefinitely, even as he jails tens of thousands and packs the courts with loyalists.

With these latest school mandates, Bukele is engulfing the nation’s children in the machinery of repression. Rather than fostering creativity and critical thinking, classrooms become sites of surveillance and intimidation. Teachers, subject to “serious administrative penalties” if they don’t enforce the rules, are being pressured to act as wardens, not mentors.


U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi “ICE Barbie” Noem speaks at the Terrorist Confinement Center (CECOT) in March 2025, in Tecoluca, El Salvador. Photo credit: Alex Brandon-Pool.

The Crisis for El Salvador’s Democracy

With the U.S. dollar as the official currency, El Salvador feels a little like rural Florida. 

The international reaction has been one of growing alarm. Human-rights organizations—local and global—have documented mass abuses: forced disappearances, torture, arbitrary arrests, and persecution of critics and independent media.

Foreign governments protest, but their appeals are met with ridicule. Bukele flaunts his impunity, daring the world to object as he dismantles the last vestiges of democratic accountability.

The appointment of an army officer as education minister—while sensible for a dictatorship—represents a radical departure from postwar norms.

As TIME Magazine recently noted, with more than 1 in every 57 Salvadorans now incarcerated, El Salvador has the highest imprisonment rate in the world, more than triple that of the U.S.

Mass arrests have left thousands of children without parents, yet spending on victim-care programs is less than 1% of the swollen security budget.

Rather than being a bulwark against gangs, schools are now test sites for Bukele’s authoritarian model—one that regional leaders are eager to emulate and that threatens to become permanent unless democratic institutions are restored.


The Real Human Costs: Teachers, Students, and Families

El Salvador’s President has banned the “Edgar” haircut from public schools, considered to have been brought by deported criminals inspired by Chicano culture in the U.S.

Parents and teachers know all too well that El Salvador’s problems will not be solved through repression.

“Restoring order” cannot come at the expense of creativity, self-worth, or basic rights.

Already, teachers unions warn of mounting abuses and fear for their ability to protect students or maintain a healthy educational environment.

Every shiny uniform and crisp haircut is a symbol not of national pride but of the government’s broadening control over personal lives.

Will the next policy be censorship of textbooks, ideological loyalty oaths, or the erasure of any reminder that education’s highest value is to foster autonomy and democratic citizenship?

Bukele’s success in quelling violence is undeniable, but so too is his descent into authoritarianism.

The schools of El Salvador—and the children who fill them each morning—now stand on the front lines of that struggle.


Militarized Schools Signal Deeper Slide Toward Autocracy in El Salvador (Aug. 23, 2025)


#ElSalvador #BukeleRegime #Authoritarianism #EducationRights #Democracy
#HumanRights #Militarization #LatinAmerica #CivilSociety #NYTEditorial

Tags: El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, Authoritarianism, School Discipline, Militarization,
Human Rights, Democracy, Latin America, Education, Teachers Unions, Civil Society


Guidance on Inclusive Language to Foster Diversity and Equity

0

Editorial Guidelines for The Stewardship Report on Connecting the World



In our increasingly diverse society, adopting inclusive language
fosters respect, bridges cultural divides, and ensures
equitable representation in professional communications.


New York, N.Y. – In the realm of professional communication, particularly within stewardship and philanthropic reporting, the choice of words carries profound implications. Language shapes perceptions, reinforces societal norms, and can either perpetuate inequities or promote a more just world.


As global interconnectedness grows, the need for mindful terminology becomes paramount.

This is especially true in contexts where discussions involve sensitive topics such as privilege, body shaming, and LGBTQ+ identities.

By adhering to established guidelines, communicators can avoid unintentional harm and amplify marginalized voices.

The evolution of language reflects broader societal shifts toward equity. For instance, terms once considered neutral are now recognized as carrying biased connotations.

Drawing from authoritative sources like the American Psychological Association’s Inclusive Language Guide, which emphasizes centering the perspectives of those affected, we can refine our lexicon to be more precise and humane.

Similarly, the Linguistic Society of America’s guidelines urge proactive inclusivity to lead by example in scholarly and public discourse.

In Stewardship reporting, where narratives often intersect with global development, cultural sensitivity, and social justice, adopting such practices is not merely optional but essential. This article explores key areas of focus, providing practical recommendations grounded in contemporary standards.



Recognizing and Addressing Privilege in Communication

Privilege refers to unearned advantages afforded to certain groups based on characteristics like race, gender, or socioeconomic status. In professional writing, it is crucial to use this term judiciously, primarily for self-reflection rather than as a tool to dismiss others’ experiences. For example, acknowledging one’s own privilege—such as in statements like “As someone with educational privilege, I recognize the barriers others face”—encourages empathy without weaponizing the concept.

Misusing privilege can alienate audiences and undermine credibility. Guidelines from the International Federation of Journalists‘ recent best practice checklist for inclusive journalism, published in early 2025, stress that language around privilege should promote dialogue rather than division.

In Stewardship contexts, this means framing reports on global initiatives with awareness of power dynamics.

For instance, when discussing aid to economically disadvantaged regions, avoid implying benevolence from a position of superiority; instead, highlight collaborative efforts.

Furthermore, integrating self-awareness into reporting helps dismantle systemic biases. The PBS Standards on Inclusive Language advise against assumptions that reinforce privilege, such as overlooking diverse contributors in narratives. By using privilege introspectively, writers foster a culture of accountability, essential for ethical stewardship.


Combating Body Shaming Through Thoughtful Terminology

Body shaming involves language that criticizes or stigmatizes individuals based on their physical appearance, often perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In media and reporting, this can manifest in subtle ways, such as describing someone as “overweight” rather than focusing on relevant attributes.

Inclusive guidelines recommend terms like plus-size instead of derogatory labels like “fat” or “overweight,” which carry judgmental undertones.

The University of Illinois Chicago’s Inclusive Language Guide warns against using body-related metaphors casually, as they can inadvertently shame.

For example, phrases like “turn a blind eye” not only misuse disability metaphors but also intersect with body shaming by implying physical flaws as moral failings.

In Stewardship Report pieces on health initiatives, opt for neutral descriptions: “individuals with higher body mass indices” if relevant, but question whether body size needs mention at all.

Promoting body positivity aligns with broader equity goals. Walla Walla Community College’s writing guide emphasizes relevance—only include physical descriptions if pertinent to the story. This approach reduces stigma and supports mental health advocacy, crucial in global philanthropy where body image issues affect diverse populations.



Embracing Inclusive Language for LGBTQ+ Communities

Language surrounding LGBTQ+ identities has evolved significantly, reflecting greater visibility and rights advocacy. Terms like gay or queer are preferred over outdated or clinical labels such as “homosexual,” which can pathologize identities. Similarly, transgender is the appropriate term, not “transsexual,” as the latter implies a medical condition rather than an identity.

The GLAAD Media Reference Guide, in its 11th edition, provides detailed recommendations for fair representation, urging journalists to use self-identified terms and avoid sensationalism.

In Stewardship reporting, this means accurately portraying LGBTQ+ leaders in philanthropy without reducing them to their identities. For example, refer to a “gay activist” only if relevant; otherwise, focus on their contributions.

Additionally, inclusive practices extend to pronouns and partnerships. Use “husband or partner” to avoid assuming ‘heteronormativity.’ The American College Health Association‘s guidelines highlight the importance of such nuances in creating welcoming environments. By adopting these, communicators honor diversity and strengthen community trust.



Preferred Terminology in Professional and Cultural Contexts

Shifting to inclusive alternatives for common terms enhances precision and respect.

For professions, use gender-neutral options: chair instead of “chairman,” flight attendant not “stewardess,” actor over “actress,” firefighter rather than “fireman,” mail carrier instead of “postman,” server not “waitress,” police officer over “policeman,” administrative assistant instead of “secretary,” custodian not “janitor,” and sanitation worker rather than “garbage man.”

In cultural references, prefer ethnic cuisine to “foreign food,” culturally authentic over “ethnic,” and jungle or rainforest for accurate environmental descriptions.

For social groups, person of color is favored over “minority,” Asian American not “oriental,” Native American, Indigenous, or First Nation instead of “Indian,” low-income or economically disadvantaged over “poor,” affluent or wealthy not “rich,” working class instead of “common people,” Global South over “Third World,” older adult rather than “elderly” or “senior citizen,” and neurodivergent instead of “abnormal.”

Use person with a disability or person living with a disability over “disabled person” or “handicapped,” little person not “dwarf” or “midget,” died by suicide instead of “committed suicide,” business person over “business men,” person with developmental delay not “slow,” first generation student instead of “student whose parents never went to college,” person living with HIV over “AIDS victim,” stay-at-home parent not “housewife” or “house husband,” and advantaged instead of “rich.”

For other contexts, sex worker is the respectful term, not “prostitute”; affirmative action over “preferential treatment”; outcast not “black sheep”; happy holidays instead of “merry Christmas” to include all traditions; average person over “man in the street”; chief assistant not “right-hand man”; cosmetic surgery instead of “plastic surgery”; non-citizen over “foreigner”; humanity not “mankind”; climate change or global warming for environmental discussions.

These shifts, as outlined in the University of Wisconsin’s Equitable Language Guide, prevent ‘othering’ and promote unity. In reporting, they ensure narratives are accessible and affirming.


Implementing Inclusive Language in Stewardship Reporting

To integrate these principles, start with self-education. Resources like the Acrolinx Ultimate Writing Guide to Inclusive Language offer practical tools for content strategy.

Avoid gendered assumptions by using singular “they” or rephrasing sentences. For measurements, though rare in language discussions, follow standards: 5 feet (1.5 meters) tall. Percentages appear as 26%, currencies as US$100 (¥14,000).

In audio and visual media, inclusivity extends to captions and diverse representation, per Washington University’s guidelines. Ultimately, these practices elevate stewardship by modeling respect. As debates on equity intensify, committing to inclusive language is a stewardship imperative, ensuring communications build rather than barrier.


Stewardship Report Guidance on Inclusive Language to Foster Diversity and Equity (Aug. 23. 2025)


Summary

In an era of heightened awareness, adopting inclusive language is vital for equitable communication. This guide covers key areas like acknowledging privilege introspectively, avoiding body shaming terms, and using respectful LGBTQ+ terminology.

It provides preferred alternatives for professions, identities, and cultural references, drawing from expert sources to promote respect and unity in professional settings. By implementing these practices, communicators can foster diversity and bridge societal divides effectively.


#InclusiveLanguage #DiversityEquityInclusion
#LanguageMatters #LGBTQRights #SocialJustice

TAGS: inclusive language, privilege, body shaming, LGBTQ+,
gender neutral terms, cultural sensitivity, stewardship reporting



Butterfly Effect of Language: A Writer’s Rebellion Against Elite Speak

0

How One Writer’s Language Choices Challenge Corporate Think Tank Messaging While Fostering Cultural Inclusion and Understanding


New York, N.Y. — Funded by corporate interest, Democratic think tank Third Way released a blunt memo Friday urging the party to abandon “therapy-speak” and “seminar room language” that alienates voters.


But while political consultants scramble to sanitize progressive vocabulary, Democratic writers such as myself face a different challenge: how do we write authentically without abandoning inclusive language that respects human dignity?

Third Way says Democrats shouldn’t use words such as “birthing person,” “cisgender,” “the unhoused” and “Latinx,” saying they make people “fear cancellation, doxing, or trouble with HR.” Yet for writers committed to equity and accuracy, the question isn’t whether to use inclusive language — it’s how to make such language accessible without sacrificing its core purpose.


The Think Tank’s Warning Shot

The recent memo represents more than political strategy; it reflects a broader cultural tension between precision in language and populist accessibility.

Democrats should speak more “like normal people” and examine their language, “moderate” think tank Third Way said in a memo.

But this raises uncomfortable questions: whose definition of “normal” are we accepting? And what happens to marginalized communities when their preferred terminology gets labeled as alienating jargon?

The memo’s timing, coming after significant electoral losses, suggests that language itself has become a political liability.

“Democrats are often viewed as judgmental, out-of-touch, and dismissive of those without elite education or progressive views,” the documents read. “This makes the party seem disconnected from everyday people.”


A Writer’s Different Path

My approach diverges from Third Way’s recommendations not out of political calculation, but from journalistic principle. Where they see “privilege” as a word that alienates, I use it specifically when discussing my own advantages — acknowledging rather than hiding the reality of unearned benefits. This isn’t virtue signaling; it’s transparency.

Consider the alternatives I’ve adopted: “person of color” instead of “minority,” “flight attendant” rather than “stewardess,” “administrative assistant” not “secretary.” These choices aren’t academic abstractions — they reflect real people’s preferences about how they wish to be identified and understood.


The Butterfly Effect of Language

Being awake to the meaning and importance of language and its power – “woke” – is vital.

Language operates like chaos theory’s butterfly wings: small changes in how we describe the world can create massive shifts in cultural understanding.

When writers consistently use “died by suicide” instead of “committed suicide,” we gradually remove the stigma of criminality from mental health crises. When we write “person with a disability” rather than “disabled person,” we center humanity before condition.

These linguistic choices ripple outward. Readers internalize new frameworks. Children grow up with different assumptions. Marginalized communities feel seen rather than erased. The cumulative effect transcends any single article or story.


Beyond Political Calculations

The challenge for journalists isn’t choosing between accessibility and inclusion — it’s achieving both simultaneously. This requires what I call “explanatory inclusion”: using precise, respectful language while providing context that makes it accessible to all readers.

For instance, rather than avoiding “LGBTQ+” as potentially alienating, I use it while ensuring my reporting explains diverse experiences within that community.

Instead of defaulting to “foreign food,” I specify “ethnic cuisine” and describe particular culinary traditions. These choices don’t distance readers; they invite them into broader understanding.


The Corporate Memo Mindset

Third Way’s approach reflects a corporate communications strategy: identify problematic language, eliminate it, problem solved.

But public writing requires more nuanced thinking. Our responsibility isn’t to political parties or electoral success — it’s to truth, accuracy, and fairness.

In a new memo, shared exclusively with POLITICO, the centrist think tank Third Way is circulating a list of 45 words and phrases they want Democrats to avoid using, alleging the terms put “a wall between us and everyday people of all races, religions, and ethnicities.”

Yet many of these supposedly problematic terms originated from the very communities they describe — people seeking more accurate, respectful language to describe their own experiences.


Cultural Impact Through Individual Choice

Every writer makes hundreds of word choices daily. These micro-decisions, multiplied across thousands of journalists, shape cultural discourse.

When we consistently choose inclusive language, we normalize respect. When we default to outdated terms, we reinforce old hierarchies.

My style guide isn’t political positioning — it’s professional ethics applied to language.

Using “mail carrier” instead of “postman” doesn’t alienate anyone; it simply acknowledges that people of all genders deliver mail. Writing “business person” rather than “businessman” doesn’t create barriers; it removes them.


The Authentic Voice Question

Third Way frames this as an authenticity issue, suggesting that inclusive language sounds artificial or forced.

But authenticity isn’t about using language that avoids offense — it’s about using language that accurately reflects reality.

When writers describe the world precisely, including the diversity of human experience, we’re being more authentic, not less.

The real artificiality comes from deliberately avoiding accurate terminology because focus groups find it challenging.

That approach prioritizes comfort over truth, political strategy over journalistic integrity.


Moving Forward With Purpose

The path forward requires courage: courage to use language that respects all readers while remaining accessible to everyone. This means explaining rather than avoiding, contextualizing rather than sanitizing, and trusting readers’ capacity to learn and grow.

My word choices aren’t rebellion for its own sake — they’re commitments to accuracy, respect, and hope.

In a fractured media landscape, journalists have the opportunity to model inclusive communication that brings people together rather than driving them apart.

Every article becomes a small experiment in cultural bridge-building. Every respectful word choice plants seeds for broader understanding.

Every explanatory phrase invites readers into larger conversations about who we are as a society and who we might become.

The butterfly wings of language beat strongest when they carry both precision and compassion — creating ripples that transform not just political discourse, but human understanding itself.


Butterfly Effect of Language: A Writer’s Rebellion Against Elite Speak (Aug. 23, 2025)


Summary

While political consultants advise abandoning inclusive language as elitist, this journalist argues for maintaining respectful terminology that accurately reflects human diversity. Rather than avoiding precise language, writers should explain it accessibly, using their platform to model inclusive communication. Every word choice ripples through culture, creating opportunities to build bridges rather than walls. The challenge isn’t choosing between accessibility and inclusion, but achieving both through explanatory journalism that trusts readers’ capacity to learn and grow while respecting all communities.


#InclusiveLanguage #JournalismEthics #CulturalChange #WordsMatter
#MediaResponsibility #LanguageEvolution #ButterflyEffect #WritingForAll

TAGS: journalism, inclusive language, cultural impact, media ethics, word choice, accessibility, Third Way memo,
political communication, language evolution, butterfly effect, authentic voice, professional responsibility, writer