Photo: The front side of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, located in Parkland, Florida. Credit: Wiki Commons.
Parkland, Florida. Almost six years after the deadliest high school shooting in the United States, a poignant and long-anticipated step towards healing is underway as the symbolic “time capsule” holding the community’s collective pain is being demolished.
On Friday morning, demolition crews began dismantling the three-story school building at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. This building, which witnessed unimaginable tragedy, is being carefully taken down, piece by piece.
The somber day was attended by parents and family members of the seventeen victims who lost their lives on that fateful Valentine’s Day in 2018. Their presence underscored the emotional weight of this moment, marking a new chapter in their journey of grief and remembrance.
Unlike some demolitions that are executed via dramatic implosions, the dismantling of this building will be a deliberate and prolonged process. Officials estimate that it will take at least a week, if not longer, to complete the careful deconstruction.
For many in the community, the desire to see the building removed has been strong for years. However, various legal and procedural hurdles have delayed the demolition. Initially, the building was preserved as a crime scene, critical for the investigation and subsequent trial of the shooter. Later, it was again preserved for a reenactment as part of a lawsuit against a deputy who was acquitted last year for not confronting the shooter during the attack.
The preservation of the building through these legal processes was necessary but painful, keeping a tangible reminder of the tragedy in place. With the conclusion of these legal proceedings, the way was finally cleared to begin the demolition.
This step towards removing the building is seen by many as a crucial move towards healing and closure. The demolition symbolizes not just the end of a physical structure, but a move towards the community’s emotional recovery. The meticulous process of taking down the building reflects the careful and respectful approach needed to address the collective trauma experienced by the Parkland community.
As the demolition progresses, it serves as a reminder of the resilience and strength of the Parkland community. It is a moment to honor the memories of those lost and to reaffirm the commitment to building a safer future.
TAGS: Parkland Shooting, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, School Safety, Gun Violence, Community Healing, Demolition, MSD Strong, Never Again, School Shooting, Florida, Crime Scene, Legal Delays
New York, N.Y. As a gay man and longtime survivor of HIV/AIDS, and someone deeply committed to amplifying voices that drive positive change, I have long admired Erik Bottcher‘s unwavering dedication to uplifting marginalized communities and fighting for social justice. From his early days as a grassroots organizer to his recent election to the New York City Council, Erik’s journey has been a testament to the power of perseverance, empathy, and an unwavering belief in equality.
I first noticed Erik during his tenure as the Chief of Staff for the New York City Council’s LGBTQ Caucus. Even then, his passion for advocating for the rights of the LGBTQ+ community was palpable. He approached every challenge with a strategic mindset, leveraging his deep understanding of the legislative process to effect meaningful change.
What struck me most, however, was Erik’s ability to connect with people from all walks of life. He possessed a rare gift for listening, truly hearing the concerns and experiences of those he served. This empathy, coupled with his sharp intellect and tireless work ethic, made him a formidable force in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality.
Erik’s commitment to social justice extended far beyond the LGBTQ+ community. As the former Chief of Staff for New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, he played a pivotal role in advancing progressive policies that addressed issues such as affordable housing, healthcare access, and environmental sustainability. His intersectional approach to advocacy recognized that true equality cannot be achieved until all marginalized groups are uplifted and empowered.
A Trailblazer in LGBTQ+ Representation
Erik’s election to the New York City Council in 2021 was a historic moment, making him one of the first openly gay men to represent the city’s West Side. But for Erik, this achievement was not merely a personal victory; it was a powerful symbol of the progress made by the LGBTQ+ community and a reminder of the work that still lies ahead.
In his role as a City Council member, Erik has continued to be a fierce advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, championing initiatives that promote inclusivity, combat discrimination, and provide essential resources to the community. His unwavering commitment to representation has inspired countless individuals, reminding them that their voices matter and that their identities should be celebrated, not suppressed.
A World Citizen Committed to Global Impact
While Erik’s impact has been profoundly felt in New York City, his vision for a more just and equitable world extends far beyond the boundaries of his district. As a global citizen, he has leveraged his platform to raise awareness about issues that transcend borders, such as the ongoing fight against HIV/AIDS and the promotion of human rights for all.
Through his work with organizations like GMHC (formerly Gay Men’s Health Crisis), Erik has been a tireless advocate for increased access to HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and support services. He understands that this pandemic has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, and his efforts have been instrumental in addressing the systemic barriers that perpetuate health disparities.
Moreover, Erik’s commitment to human rights has inspired him to use his voice to amplify the struggles of oppressed communities around the world. He has been a vocal supporter of LGBTQ+ rights movements globally, recognizing that the fight for equality is a shared battle that transcends borders and cultures.
A Legacy of Empowerment and Inspiration
As I reflect on Erik Bottcher’s remarkable journey, I am struck by the profound impact he has had on countless lives. Through his unwavering commitment to social justice, his ability to build bridges across diverse communities, and his unwavering belief in the power of representation, he has inspired a generation of changemakers to embrace their authentic selves and fight for a more equitable world.
Erik’s story is a testament to the transformative power of activism, perseverance, and a deep-rooted belief in the inherent dignity of all human beings. He has shown us that change is possible, that barriers can be broken, and that the voices of the marginalized can and must be amplified.
As Erik continues to shape the discourse on issues that matter most, I have no doubt that his legacy will endure, inspiring future generations of leaders to carry the torch of justice and equality forward. For in Erik Bottcher, we see not just a trailblazer and a world citizen, but a living embodiment of the values that make our world a better, more inclusive place for all.
Photo: Alexandria Villaseñor addresses U.N. Observance of International Women’s Day 2020, U.N. General Assembly Hall in New York. Credit: U.N. Women.
As a thought leader and global citizen, Alexandria Villaseñor embodies the resilience and determination necessary to confront the climate crisis head-on. We wholeheartedly support Alexandria for her unwavering commitment to environmental activism and her remarkable ability to inspire change on a global scale.
New York, N.Y. Driven by a profound sense of urgency and a deep concern for the future of our planet, Alexandria Villaseñor [Luce Index™ Score: pending] is on the move. Her journey into climate activism began at a young age.
At just 13, she became one of the leading voices of the youth climate movement, founding Earth Uprising, an organization dedicated to empowering young people to take action against climate change. Her leadership and advocacy have since galvanized a generation to demand immediate and significant action from world leaders.
One of Alexandria’s most notable actions was her weekly climate strike outside the United Nations headquarters in New York City, which she began in December 2018. Inspired by Greta Thunberg’s school strike for climate, Alexandria’s steadfast protests, regardless of weather conditions, drew international attention and underscored the critical nature of the climate emergency. Her dedication demonstrated the power of individual action and its potential to spark widespread change.
Alexandria’s influence extends beyond her activism on the streets.
She has become a powerful speaker and advocate, addressing global forums such as the United Nations Climate Action Summit and the World Economic Forum. Her articulate and passionate speeches resonate with audiences worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for systemic change to combat climate change and protect future generations.
As a global citizen, Alexandria’s work highlights the interconnectedness of the climate crisis and social justice issues.
She advocates for policies that not only address environmental degradation but also ensure equity and justice for marginalized communities disproportionately affected by climate change. Her holistic approach to activism is a testament to her understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of the challenges we face.
Supporting Alexandria Villaseñor meansstanding with a generation of young leaders who are fiercely committed to securing a livable planet for all. Her courage, vision, and relentless advocacy inspire hope and action in the fight against climate change. We are proud to support Alexandria Villaseñor and her tireless efforts to create a sustainable and just world.
Throughout his career, Jeremy Corbyn has been a vocal opponent of unjust wars and military interventions, advocating instead for diplomatic solutions and global cooperation. His leadership in the anti-war movement and his support for the rights of Palestinians and other oppressed peoples highlight his dedication to a just and peaceful world.
London, U.K. As a thought leader and global citizen, Jeremy Corbyn [Luce Index™ Score: pending] has consistently championed the causes of social justice, peace, and equality, making him a beacon of hope for progressive movements worldwide. We support Jeremy for his unwavering dedication to these principles and his tireless efforts to create a fairer, more compassionate world.
Jeremy’s political career spans several decades, during which he has remained a steadfast advocate for the marginalized and oppressed. As the Leader of the Labour Party in the U.K. from 2015 to 2020, he reinvigorated the party with bold policies aimed at addressing economic inequality, expanding public services, and protecting workers’ rights.His vision for a society that prioritizes the needs of the many over the interests of the few resonated deeply with millions of people.
One of Jeremy’s most significant contributions is his commitment to peace and international solidarity.
Jeremy’s focus on environmental sustainability is another reason we admire him. He has consistently called for transformative action to address the climate crisis, including investments in renewable energy, green jobs, and sustainable infrastructure. His Green Industrial Revolution plan was a cornerstone of his leadership, aiming to tackle climate change while creating a fairer economy.
In addition to his policy achievements, Jeremy’s personal integrity and humility have endeared him to supporters around the world.
Despite facing significant opposition and media scrutiny, he has remained committed to his principles, demonstrating the kind of leadership that prioritizes people over power. His ability to inspire and mobilize grassroots movements is a testament to his enduring impact on progressive politics.
Supporting Jeremy Corbyn means endorsing a vision of a world where everyone has the oppor
Washington, D.C. Once seemingly fading into obscurity, anti-Muslim hate groups in the United States have surged back into the spotlight in recent months, reinvigorated by the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
Many of these groups, such as Jihad Watch and ACT for America, emerged in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. and thrived on public fears of terrorism. But as those fears waned in recent years, so did the groups’ sway. Some disbanded, while others gravitated to other hot-button issues.
From a peak of 114 in 2017, their number dropped to a mere 34 last year, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit that tracks hate groups.
In early 2023, “Islamophobia was down to a slow trickle,” SPLC senior research analyst Caleb Kieffer said.
Then came the October 7 Hamas assault on Israel, which claimed about 1,200 lives and triggered a massive Israeli military response in Gaza.
Photo: Muslims praying\in Dubai. The congregation has spilled onto the road outside of the mosque. Credit: Levi Meir Clancy / Unsplash.
Anti-Muslim groups that had “opportunistically” seized on divisive issues, such as critical race theory and LGBTQ-inclusive policies, swung back into action.
“These anti-Muslim groups went right back to their core messaging,” Kieffer said in an interview with VOA. “They’ve been going hard on the rhetoric since October last year.”
Take ACT for America. Founded in 2007 by Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese American political activist and self-described “survivor of terrorism,” it grew into one of the country’s leading anti-Muslim organizations.
At its peak, the group had more than 50 active chapters, each counted as a separate hate group by the SPLC. But in recent years, most of those chapters either shut down or shifted into other areas, leaving ACT for America with just eight on SPLC’s most recent list.
According to the SPLC, ACT for America embraced a “nativist tone” before October 7, circulating, among other things, a petition calling to “Stop the Taxpayer Funded Border Invasion.”
After October 7, the group launched another petition more in line with its agenda and with a call by former U.S. President Donald Trump to stop admitting Palestinian refugees from Gaza.
Warning her followers about homegrown jihadi terror, Gabriel, a staunch Trump supporter, began peddling her bestselling anti-Muslim book, Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America, in exchange for a $25 donation.
In a video titled “Wake Up America” in October, she claimed, “Hamas has a large network of cells spreading all across America,” from Laurel, Maryland, to Tucson, Arizona.
Other groups that had also latched onto contentious issues similarly pivoted back to their core agenda.
Jihad Watch, a website run by prominent anti-Muslim figure Robert Spencer, published an article last October claiming, “We’re in a war between savages and civilization. Everything else is a detail.”
Eight days later, an affiliated political website called FrontPage Magazine ran a piece titled “It’s Islam, Stupid,” arguing that everything Hamas did “has been done by Muslims throughout history and is still being practiced today.”
FrontPage Magazine is published by the David Horowitz Freedom Center, another leading anti-Muslim group. Jihad Watch is a project of the center.
ACT for America, Jihad Watch and the David Horowitz Freedom Center are part of what experts describe as a well-funded, close-knit anti-Muslim industry, with each group playing a distinct role in the ecosystem.
With chapters across the country, Washington-based ACT for America provides the “grassroots muscle” to the movement, Kieffer said. The Center for Security Policy serves as its think tank, he said.
The SPLC-designated groups appear on other hate lists. Several SPLC-branded groups contacted by VOA condemned their designation.
In a statement to VOA, a spokesperson for ACT for America rejected the “anti-Muslim” label, saying the organization has “always welcomed and included members of all faiths,” including Muslims, and hosted Muslim keynote speakers at its conferences.
ACT for America works “on a broad range of issues, none of which are anti-Muslim,” the spokesperson said. “As a matter of fact, since the defeat of ISIS and al-Qaida between 2018 and 2024, you didn’t hear a blurb from ACT for America about radical Islam.”
In response to a VOA query, Jihad Watch’s Spencer accused the SPLC of smearing and defaming “organizations that oppose its far-left political agenda by lumping them in with the likes of the KKK and neo-Nazis.”
In a brief interview with VOA, J. Michael Waller, a senior analyst for strategy at the Center for Security Policy, called the designation “slander,” saying it was tied to his group’s criticism of the Iranian government and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Kieffer defended the SPLC’s methodology, saying it only designates groups that “vilify” and “demonize” people because of their race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation or gender identity.
The SPLC defines anti-Muslim hate groups as organizations that “broadly defame Islam and traffic in conspiracy theories of Muslims being a subversive threat to the nation.”
Not every anti-Muslim hate group has stood the test of time. In recent years, dozens of ACT for America chapters have closed.
The ACT for America spokesperson said most of its member groups have “turned into digital chapters meeting via zoom or other technology platforms.”
Last year, an anti-refugee and anti-Muslim blog called Refugee Resettlement Watch became inactive and was dropped from SPLC’s list of hate groups.
Another well-known anti-Muslim group called Understanding the Threat announced last year it was shutting down. The group was operated by a former FBI agent known for spreading anti-Muslim conspiracy theories.
Other groups have rebranded. One former ACT for America chapter now operates as AlertAmerica.News, according to SPLC. Its focus ranges from “strengthening national security” to “fighting communism and American Marxism.”
Kieffer said while the group’s central focus may have shifted away from Islamophobia, it continues to invite well-known, anti-Muslim speakers to its events.
With the war in Gaza still raging, the resurgence in Islamophobia remains unabated, Kieffer said. But that’s likely to change in the run-up to the presidential election in November.
“I imagine that we’re going to slowly see a decline again as these groups start to push other issues,” he said.
Brian Levin, a criminologist and hate crime researcher, noted that anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years, even as the number of hate groups has dwindled.
That’s because hatred has found a new home in the mainstream, rendering niche groups such as Islamophobic outfits increasingly obsolete, he said.
“The bottom line is, the way we associate to express and amplify hatred has changed,” Levin said in an interview with VOA. “Up-and-coming bigots of all sorts will find an array of xenophobic bigotry and conspiracism within general mainstream platforms.”
Photo: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk. Credit: U.N. Photo/Violaine Martin.
“A stifling, claustrophobic environment, where life is a daily struggle devoid of hope.”
New York, N.Y. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered a bleak assessment of the situation in North Korea on Wednesday, a decade after an in-depth report shed light on severe and widespread abuses in the country.
“Today, the DPRK is a country sealed off from the world,” Volker Türk told a special briefing of the U.N. Security Council that North Korea’s ambassador did not attend. “A stifling, claustrophobic environment, where life is a daily struggle devoid of hope.”
DPRK is the abbreviation for North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Türk expressed concern about the regime’s tight control over the movements of its citizens, including the ability to leave the country. Most North Koreans cannot obtain the required government permission to leave, and those who attempt to escape face torture, labor camps or death if they fail.
Image: Proganda of North Korea. Credit: Mark Fahey / Wiki Commons.
“Leaving your own country is not a crime – on the contrary, it is a human right, recognized by international law,” he said by video from his office in Geneva.
He said repression of the freedom of expression has also worsened with the enforcement of laws forbidding people from consuming foreign media or culture, such as South Korean television dramas or K-pop music.
“Put simply, people in the DPRK are at risk of death for merely watching or sharing a foreign television series,” the human rights chief said.
He urged Pyongyang to halt the use of the death penalty throughout its legal system and move toward its complete abolition.
Perhaps even more worrying, is the situation of food security in North Korea.
“Every single person interviewed by my office has mentioned this in one form or another,” Türk said. “In the words of one: “It’s very easy to become fragile and malnourished because there is nothing to eat.”
WFP Reports 40% of North Koreans, nearly 11 million people, are undernourished.
The World Food Program says more than 40% of North Koreans, nearly 11 million people, are undernourished. Many suffer from chronic malnutrition because of a lack of essential nutrients, especially those living outside major cities. Children are particularly affected, with 18% suffering stunting and impaired development because of chronic malnutrition.
The high commissioner also expressed concern about Pyongyang’s use of forced labor, including overseas. He noted that workers they have interviewed described often performing work that is physically dangerous and they endured extreme levels of surveillance.
Western nations accuse North Korea of using these laborers’ wages to help fund their illicit nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs.
Türk said there have been some recent “positive signs” from North Korea in their engagement with the international human rights system, but he did not explain what that included.
Defector speaks
Gumhyok Kim, 33, grew up in privilege in North Korea. His family were Kim regime loyalists and so in 2010, he was able to leave the country and study in Beijing.
“At the age of 19, I saw a world for the first time that was different from everything I had learned,” he told the council. “In particular, the internet enabled me to learn about my country’s history and realize the horrific truth of North Korea that had been hidden from me.”
He said his feeling of loyalty to the Kim family that has ruled North Korea for three generations quickly turned to one of betrayal, and he began to connect with other North Korean students in Beijing to discuss the situation.
In the winter of 2011, the North Korean authorities discovered their activities, and he fled China to South Korea to avoid arrest.
“I survived and found freedom. But that freedom had come at a great cost,” he said. “It has already been 12 years since I defected, but I still have no contact with my family.”
He appealed directly to North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un, saying nuclear weapons and repression are not the way to maintain leadership.
“Allow North Koreans to live in freedom. Allow them their basic rights so they can live full and happy lives,” Kim said. “Turn away from the nuclear weapons threat and return your country to the family of nations so all North Korean people may lead prosperous lives.”
Kim and his South Korean-born wife chronicle their married life on YouTube, where they show what life is like in Seoul. He said he is now a father to a 1-year-old, and he hopes one day to take his son to a changed North Korea.
Council inaction
The U.N. Security Council is divided over the situation in North Korea. The last time its 15 members agreed on sanctions for the regime’s nuclear and ballistic missile activity was in 2017. Since then, the geopolitical landscape has changed, the council has become more fractured, and action on the North Korean file has become more difficult.
Both China and Russia objected to Wednesday’s human rights briefing, saying such issues do not belong in the Security Council. Russia called for a procedural vote, but lost, as only China joined it in voting against holding the meeting and 12 council members supported it. Mozambique abstained. There are no vetoes in procedural votes.
U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield.
“The efforts by both Russia and China to block this meeting today is another effort to support the DPRK, and is also emboldening their actions,” U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said.
Venezuela’s envoy made a statement to reporters outside the council during the meeting on behalf of the “Group of Friends in Defense of Charter of the United Nations,” rejecting the convening of a human rights-specific council meeting. The group of 18 like-minded countries includes Russia, China, North Korea, Belarus, Iran, Cuba and Syria.
The council meeting was requested by the United States and Britain, along with Japan and South Korea, who both currently hold non-permanent council seats.
“The DPRK nuclear and human rights issues are like two sides of the same coin, and thus, need to be addressed comprehensively,” South Korean Ambassador JoonKook Hwang said.
He urged the council to regularly address the human rights situation. Until last August, the last time the council discussed North Korea’s human rights situation also was in 2017.
A 2014 Commission of Inquiry report found that North Korea’s rights violations had risen to the level of crimes against humanity. The panel said the regime had used “extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions and other sexual violence, persecution on political, religious, racial and gender grounds, the forcible transfer of populations, the enforced disappearance of persons and the inhumane act of knowingly causing prolonged starvation.”
The J. Luce Foundation, publisher of The Stewardship Report, focuses on supporting Young Global Leadership. Below is a listing of thought leaders and global citizens representing Generations X, Y and Z.
Generation Z (iGen): Born 1997-2010
May 18, 2005: Alexandria Villaseñor (Latina American climate activist and founder of Earth Uprising)
Feb. 19, 2004: Millie Bobby Brown (British actress known for science-fiction–horror TV series Stranger Things)
Jan. 3, 2003: Greta Thunberg (Swedish environmental activist)
Jan. 31, 2003: Hannah Alper (Jewish Canadian youth activist focused on the environment)
May 19, 2003: “JoJo” Siwa (American singer, dancer, and influential LGBTQ+ youth icon first appeared on television with her mother)
Nov. 8, 2000: Roy Wang (Wang Yuan)(Chinese singer-songwriter, television host and actor; UNICEF ambassador since 2018)
Oct. 31, 2000: Willow Smith (American singer)
Oct. 6, 2000: Jazz Jennings (American transgender YouTube personality, television personality, and LGBT rights activist)
April 12, 2000: David Hogg (American gun control activist; survivor of Stoneman Douglas High School shooting)
Dec. 31, 1999: Hunter Schafer (American transgender model and LGBTQ+ activist)
Nov. 11, 1999: X González (Cuban-American activist, advocate for gun control; survivor of Stoneman Douglas High School shooting)
April 12, 1999: Muzoon Almellehan (Syrian refugee empowering global youth through education)
July 24, 1998: Bindi Sue Irwin (Australian television personality, conservationist, and zookeeper)
June 16, 1998: Eugenie Carys de Silva (Sri Lankan-British-American child prodigy who graduated from Harvard at 13)
July 12, 1997: Malala Yousafzai (Pakistani activist who survived Taliban acid attack)
Generation Y (Millennials): Born 1981-1996
Frieda Pinto (b. 1984)
Jan. 18, 1996: Alexandra Scott (American pediatric cancer patient who raised millions for research)
From Student Activist to President: Gabriel Boric’s Journey to Transform Chile
New York, N.Y. — As a young, progressive leader, Gabriel Boric embodies the hopes and aspirations of a new generation yearning for change in Chile. His journey from student activist to the nation’s president at just 36 years old is nothing short of remarkable.
I admire Boric’s unwavering commitment to social justice, feminism, and environmental protection – values that resonate deeply with me as a global citizen. His cabinet, comprising a majority of women in key positions, is a powerful statement on gender equality and inclusivity.Boric’s determination to dismantle Chile’s neoliberal economic model and build a more equitable society is a bold and necessary step towards addressing the country’s stark inequalities.
Gabriel Boric giving his victory speech at 2021 Chile Presidential Election. Gabriel Boric campaign via Wikipedia.
What truly sets Boric apart is his ability to bridge divides and unite diverse voices under a shared vision of progress.
From his pivotal role in negotiating the 2019 constitutional referendum to his outreach to moderate voters during the election campaign, he has demonstrated a rare talent for consensus-building. His condemnation of authoritarianism in Latin America and ties with progressive leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Lula da Silva underscore his commitment to democratic values and global cooperation.
As a young leader with a deep connection to the arts and literature, Boric represents a refreshing departure from traditional politics. His tattoos inspired by the landscapes of his hometown and his refusal to wear ties symbolize a break from convention and a desire to connect with the people he serves. With his progressive agenda, inclusive approach, and authentic leadership style, Boric has the potential to be a transformative figure not just for Chile, but for the entire region and the world.
TAGS: Gabriel Boric, Millennial President, Santiago, Millennial Leader, Young Global Leader, Chile, Social Justice, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Lula da Silva, Progressive leader, La Moneda
A view of the U.N. Security Council as members vote in favour of the draft resolution on the situation in Gaza. U.N. Photo/Eskinder Debebe.
The U.N. Security Council on Monday adopted a resolution aimed at reaching a comprehensive ceasefire deal in three phases to end the war in Gaza, with US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield telling members “today, we voted for peace.”
New York, N.Y. The United States-drafted text calls for Hamas to accept a ceasefire proposal announced on 31 May by President Joe Biden that has already been accepted by Israel.
Adopted by a large majority with 14 votes in favour and Russia abstaining – choosing not to exercise its veto power – the resolution also urges both parties to fully implement the terms of the proposal “without delay and without condition.”
Russia’s Permanent Representative told the Council after the vote there was a lack of clarity over what exactly Israel had signed up to in the resolution, leaving too many questions unanswered for Moscow to offer its support.
‘Durable end’ to the war in sight
President Biden described the deal as “not just a ceasefire that would inevitably be fragile and temporary” but one that would provide a “durable end to the war”.
He added that the terms of the deal had been transmitted by Qatar to the leadership of Hamas.
Signaling a hopeful shift in diplomacy, the US-led initiative brought both Israel and the Palestinian mission on board, avoiding the vetoes from permanent members – including the US itself – which have stalled action on several of the resolutions which have failed to pass since the 7 October terror attacks and kidnappings began the cycle of violence.
Three-phase approach
The motion envisages a three phase approach to ensure a lasting and comprehensive end to the fighting.
Phase one includes an “immediate, full, and complete ceasefire with the release of hostages including women, the elderly and the wounded, the return of the remains of some hostages who have been killed, and the exchange of Palestinian prisoners”.
It calls for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from “populated areas” of Gaza, the return of Palestinians to their homes and neighbourhoods throughout the enclave, including in the north, as well as the safe and effective distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale.
Permanent end to hostilities
Phase two would see a permanent end to hostilities “in exchange for the release of all other hostages still in Gaza, and a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza”.
In phase three, “a major multi-year reconstruction plan for Gaza” would begin and the remains of any deceased hostages still in the Strip would be returned to Israel.
The Council also underlined the proposal’s provision that if negotiations take longer than six weeks for phase one, the ceasefire will continue as long as negotiations continue.
No territorial change
In the resolution, the Security Councilrejects any attempt at demographic or territorial change in the Gaza Strip, including any actions that reduce the territory of the enclave.
The text also reiterates the Council’s “unwavering commitment” to the vision of the two-State solution where two democratic States, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace within secure and recognized borders consistent with international law and relevant UN resolutions.
“In this regard stresses the importance of unifying the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority,” the resolution added.
Hamas must accept deal: US
The fighting could stop today if Hamas agrees to the deal now endorsed by the Security Council, said US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield.
United States Representative. UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe.
Hamas should now see clearly that the international community is united, “united behind a deal that will save lives and help Palestinian civilians in Gaza start to rebuild and heal. United behind a deal that will reunite hostages with their families after eight months in captivity.”
Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield said there was now an opportunity to chart a new course and the US will help ensure that Israel lives up to its obligations, “assuming that Hamas accepts the deal.”
Today is the fourth Security Council resolution making clear that the only way to end the cycle of violence “is through a political settlement”, she added.
Algeria: ‘Palestinian lives matter’
Algerian Ambassador Amar Bendjama said that his compatriots “deeply feel” the suffering of Palestinians and with their own history of struggle against colonial occupation, “fully understand and support” the Palestinian people’s legitimate and just demands.
“As a free and dignified people, the Palestinians will never accept living under occupation. They will never abdicate their fight for liberation,” he said.
Stressing that Algeria’s sole guiding principle has been to save Palestinian lives, he said that his country cannot remain silent in the face of collective punishment against Palestinian people.
“Palestinian lives matter,” he stressed.
He said Algeria voted in favour of the draft because it represents a step towards an immediate and lasting ceasefire. “This text is not perfect, but it offers a glimmer of hope to the Palestinians as the alternative is continued killing and suffering…We voted for this text to give diplomacy a chance”, he added.
“It is time to halt the killing.”
Permanent ceasefire is key: China
China’s Ambassador Fu Cong said they have voted in favour of the resolution but there needs to be a permanent ceasefire which has been at the core of the international community’s concerns.
Ending the bombardment and offensive is also the most pressing need for civilians under fire in Gaza.
He stressed that all Security Council resolutions are binding, and today’s must be no different.
All resolutions have to be implemented in an efficient and constructive way, he added.
Russia: No clarity to ‘so-called deal’
Russian Ambassador and Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia said his country had abstained due to several outstanding concerns.
U.N. Photo/Eskinder Debebe.
“From the very outset of the military escalation, we have consistently and unwaveringly advocated for the imperative for a permanent ceasefire regime, including in order to release the hostages and remedy the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip,” he said.
“We have a whole of host of questions about the American draft resolution, whereby the Council welcomes some deal – the ultimate outlines of which are not known to anyone perhaps except the mediators,” he said.
Although the resolution calls on Hamas to accept the “so called deal” there is no clarity on the official agreement of Israel “as it is written in the resolution.”
Noting the public statements of Israeli leaders indicating that the war would continue until Hamas is completely defeated, he asked “what specifically has Israel agreed to?”
The parameters of this “deal” are “vague” and the Council should not be signing up to it, he added.
Israel: War aims unchanged
The Representative of Israel Reut Shapir Ben Naftaly said her country’s goals have been “very clear” since the first few days following 7 October: “To bring all our hostages back home and to dismantle Hamas’ capabilities…and ensure that Gaza does not pose a threat to Israel in the future”.
U.N. Photo/Evan Schneider.
“As we have echoed several times in this very chamber, once these goals are met, the war will end,” she added, noting that 120 hostages remain in captivity and that Hamas continues firing rockets at Israeli towns and cities.
She called for more pressure on Hamas, stating that although three resolutions have been adopted by the Security Council calling for hostages to be released, none have been freed as a result.
“The pressure on the terrorists should have begun long ago but it is still not too late, it must begin now,” she added.
“We will continue until all of the hostages are returned and until Hamas’ military and governing capabilities are dismantled,” she said.
“Israel will not engage in meaningless and endless negotiations which can be exploited by Hamas as a means to stall for time,” she added.
Photo: Muhammad Yunus, Nobel Peace Prize winner, addresses the crowd at the Houston World Affair’s Council on January 14th 2008.
No competitive politics left in Bangladesh, says Dr. Yunus
New York, N.Y. Ruma Paul of Reuters interviewed Bangladeshi Nobel Peace Prize winner Dr. Muhammad Yunus [Luce Index™ rank: 99] this week in Dr. Yunus’ office in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Reuters quotes Yunus, a thought leader and global citizen, as saying that Bangladesh has turned into a “one-party state” as the ruling party stamps out political competition.
Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus is a pioneer of the global microcredit movement whom I interviewed at a Clinton Global Initiative conference (link).
An election in January won Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina a fourth straight term, but it was boycotted by the main opposition party, whose top leaders were either jailed or in exile ahead of the poll.
The author with one of his heroes, Professor Muhammad Yunus, founder of the Grameen Bank. Credit: Rahim B. Kanani (www.rahimkanani.com).
The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), the opposition party, promotes religious freedom and tolerance as a component of Bangladeshi nationalism. Many founding leaders of the party were non-Muslims. The party has soundly rejected theocracy as the governing system for Bangladesh.
Yunus, who helped lift millions from poverty by providing tiny loans of sums less than $100 to the rural poor, angered Hasina with a 2007 plan to set up a political party to be called “Citizens’ Power.”
The 2006 Nobel laureate accused Hasina’s ruling Awami League party of being involved in rampant corruption, saying Bangladesh lacked a genuine political opposition.
“Bangladesh doesn’t have any politics left,” Yunus, 83, said last week in his office in Dhaka, the capital. “There’s only one party which is active and occupies everything, does everything, gets to the elections in their way.” He added, “They get their people elected in many different forms—proper candidates, dummy candidates, independent candidates—but all from the same party.”
Yunus, an economist who won the Nobel for his work on microcredit, was forced out of Grameen Bank in 2011 by Hasina’s government, which said he had stayed on past the legal retirement age of 60.
Muhammad Yunus was educated at Dhaka University and was awarded a Fulbright scholarship to study economics at Vanderbilt University. In 1972 he became head of the economics department at Chittagong University.
Hasina, 76, is the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the founding father of the South Asian nation killed in an army coup in 1975, along with most of his family. She first became prime minister in 1996.
As Bangladesh’s longest-serving prime minister,Hasina has been credited with turning around the economy, though critics have also accused her of human rights violations and suppression of dissent.
Letter received from Dr. Muhammad Yunis.
The U.S. State Department said January’s elections were not free and fair while the British government’s foreign office also condemned acts of “intimidation and violence.”
At the time, the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) denounced the exercise as a “sham” election, calling for its cancellation, Hasina’s resignation, and the formation of a non-party neutral government to hold a fresh one.
Just before the election, a court in Bangladesh had sentenced Yunus to six months in prison for violations of labor law, which he denied.
Although he is not in prison after securing bail in that case, Yunus faces more than 100 cases regarding the violations and graft accusations, which he dismissed as “very flimsy, made-up stories.“
It seems as if there truly are no competitive politics left in Bangladesh, as Yunus believes. And that the government wishes to silence Yunus for this thought. However, Bangladeshi Nobel Peace Prize winner Dr. Muhammad Yunus is a thought leader and global citizen who we can believe in.
The state of Utah orders the removal of 13 books from public school classrooms and libraries… In Orwell’s seminal work 1984, the dangers of a totalitarian society where “Big Brother” watches and controls every aspect of life serve as a chilling warning. While Orwell’s vision was a dystopian future, the parallels to today’s landscape are striking.
[draft]
New York, N.Y. — In today’s increasingly interconnected world, the need for young global leaders to champion the cause of freedom has never been more pressing. As our foundation, committed to nurturing the next generation of leaders, observes, the greatest threat to global leadership is not merely the complexity of the issues we face, but the insidious rise of censorship and authoritarianism that stifles the very essence of what leadership should be—freedom of thought, expression, and action.
Photo: Hitler Youth (Hitlerjugend) members burn books, 1938. Credit: World History Archive / Alamy Stock Photo.
The Rise of Authoritarianism and Censorship
The concept of censorship and authoritarianismis not new. History has shown time and again that the most repressive regimes often begin with the silencing of dissent.
In George Orwell‘s seminal work 1984, the dangers of a totalitarian society where “Big Brother“ watches and controls every aspect of life serve as a chilling warning. While Orwell’s vision was a dystopian future, the parallels to today’s global landscape are striking.
Across the globe, we see governments tightening their grip on information, restricting the media, and using advanced technology to surveil and control their populations.
From China’s Great Firewall to Russia’s crackdown on independent journalism, authoritarianism is rearing its head in new and sophisticated ways. Even in democratic societies, we witness alarming trends where misinformation is weaponized, and dissenting voices are marginalized.
One of the most recent and alarming examples of this trend is the decision by the state of Utah to order the removal of 13 books from public school classrooms and libraries. This decision, made in accordance with a new state law passed earlier this year, has sparked outrage and concern among library associations, free speech groups, and advocates nationwide. These books, deemed inappropriate by the state, include works that have long been regarded as important literary contributions, essential for fostering critical thinking and understanding among students.
This act of censorship is not just a localized issue; it reflects a broader, disturbing trend where the suppression of ideas is becoming more prevalent in places where freedom of expression should be most protected. The removal of these books undercuts the very foundation of education, which is to expose students to diverse viewpoints and encourage them to engage with challenging ideas.
The Role of Young Global Leaders
It is against this backdrop that the role of young global leaders becomes critically important. Young leaders are not only the future but also the present, challenging the status quo and advocating for a world where freedom and human rights are protected. Our foundation supports these leaders, providing them with the tools and platforms they need to make their voices heard on the global stage.
Young global leaders represent a diverse spectrum of ideas and experiences, unified by a common goal: to create a world where freedom is not just an aspiration but a reality. They understand that leadership is not about power or control, but about empowering others and fostering an environment where diverse perspectives can flourish.
However, this vision is under threat. The rise of censorship and authoritarianism, exemplified by actions like Utah’s book ban, is not just a challenge to political systems; it is a direct assault on the values that young leaders stand for. The suppression of ideas, the erosion of civil liberties, and the encroachment on individual freedoms all serve to undermine the potential of these leaders and the societies they seek to improve.
The United States as a Beacon of Freedom
The U.S., with its deep-rooted commitment to freedom and democracy, has historically served as a beacon of hope for those living under authoritarian regimes. The Founding Fathers envisioned a nation where freedom of speech, press, and assembly would be protected as fundamental rights. These principles are enshrined in the Constitution and have been the bedrock of American society.
Yet, even in the U.S., these freedoms cannot be taken for granted. The rise of polarized politics, the spread of misinformation, and increasing distrust in institutions pose significant challenges to the preservation of these rights. If America is to continue its role as a global leader in freedom and democracy, it must confront these issues head-on and reaffirm its commitment to the principles upon which it was founded.
The recent actions in Utah serve as a stark reminder that the battle for freedom is far from over. The decision to ban books from schools—a place where freedom of thought and expression should be most encouraged—echoes the very practices that authoritarian regimes use to control their populations. It is a direct affront to the values of freedom and democracy that America is supposed to uphold.
The Danger of a “1984” Reality
The dangers of a world slipping into a “1984” reality are all too real. A society where censorship is normalized and authoritarianism is accepted is one where creativity, innovation, and progress are stifled. Such a world is antithetical to the vision of a free and open society that young global leaders are striving to build.
The lessons of 1984 remind us of the consequences of complacency. In the novel, the Party’s control over truth and reality is absolute, leading to a society devoid of individual thought or freedom. The manipulation of language, the rewriting of history, and the constant surveillance serve to keep the population in check, ensuring that no one dares to challenge the status quo.
This dystopian vision is not just a work of fiction; it is a warning. It is a reminder that the fight for freedom is ongoing and that the forces of censorship and authoritarianism must be actively resisted. The decision in Utah is but one example of how easily freedoms can be eroded if we do not remain vigilant.
A Call to Action
As we navigate these challenging times, our foundation remains committed to supporting young global leaders who are at the forefront of the fight for freedom. These leaders understand that true leadership is about more than just governance; it is about safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all individuals, ensuring that every voice can be heard.
The fight against censorship and authoritarianism is not an easy one, but it is necessary. We cannot allow the world to slip into the darkness of “1984.” Instead, we must strive to live in a free United States of America, as intended by our founders. This is not just a political stance; it is a moral imperative.
Our foundation calls on all who believe in freedom to support the next generation of leaders, to stand up against censorship in all its forms, and to resist the rise of authoritarianism. The future of global leadership depends on it, and so does the future of our world.
The vision of a free and open society is one that must be actively pursued and defended. The rise of censorship and authoritarianism poses a grave threat to this vision, but it is not insurmountable. With the support of young global leaders and a collective commitment to the principles of freedom, we can ensure that Orwell’s nightmare remains a cautionary tale, not a reality.
The recent developments in Utah are a stark reminder of the fragility of our freedoms and the need for constant vigilance. Together, we must continue the fight for a world where freedom is not just a dream, but a lived experience for all.
New York, N.Y. In these unprecedented times, Israel finds itself at a critical juncture, necessitating decisive and principled leadership. Benny Gantz has emerged as a figure of integrity and dedication, embodying the qualities Israel needs to navigate its complex political landscape.
His recent resignation from Benjamin Netanyahu’s war cabinet, amid the prime minister’s controversial celebration of a rare hostage rescue operation in Gaza that resulted in significant casualties, underscores Gantz’s commitment to principled governance.
Gantz’s extensive military background and unwavering commitment to national security equip him with a level-headed and pragmatic approach. His experience is crucial for fostering unity in a deeply divided nation.
Contrasting starkly with Netanyahu, an authoritarian hawk reminiscent of Ariel Sharon, Gantz offers a vision that could avert the perpetual cycle of conflict that threatens to engulf the Middle East for the next two centuries.
Drawing Parallels with Yitzhak Rabin
Portrait of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of Israel, 1994. Photo: Yaakov Saar.
Benny Gantz and the late, great Yitzhak Rabin [Luce Index™ rank: 98] share several notable similarities and differences in their leadership and contributions to Israel:
Military Background: Both Rabin and Gantz served as Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), their military experiences underpinning a strong commitment to national security.
Dedication to Peace:Rabin was instrumental in the Oslo Accords, seeking peace with the Palestinians. Gantz, too, has shown openness to dialogue and negotiation, despite operating in a more complex and divided political landscape.
Leadership in Crisis:Rabin led Israel through significant turmoil, including the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War and during the peace process. Similarly, Gantz has navigated Israel through political instability and security threats, demonstrating calm and pragmatic leadership.
Rabin’s assassination tragically cut short his efforts toward peace, cementing his legacy as a martyr for peace. Gantz’s ongoing political career continues to shape his legacy as he works within a highly polarized environment to achieve stability and unity.
Both leaders exemplify profound dedication to Israel’s security and prosperity, each navigating their unique challenges and leaving distinct marks on the nation’s history.
In these times of division and uncertainty, Gantz’s leadership could foster a more cohesive and resilient Israel. By embracing Gantz, Israel may yet realize a future defined by unity, security, and lasting peace.
Jim Luce is an author and commentator on global leadership and development.
We add Benny Gantz to the pantheon of progressive leaders around the world we support including Claudia Sheinbaumof Mexico, Lai “William” Ching-te of Taiwan, Raul Gandhi of India, and Pita “Tim” Limjaroenrat in Thailand.
Ganesha Home for Once-Called “Untouchable” Children – How Can Kids be Untouchable?
Bihar, India. Ganesha House, a project of Orphans International Worldwide and the J. Luce Foundation India, will have five bedrooms, five bathrooms, a large living area, dining room and kitchen, as well as a full flat roof for laundry and games. It is being built upon the Lotus Free School, a project of the Japanese, and funded by generous donors in Atlanta. Lotus School is sister school to the Luce School at Saraswati Centre, also outside Bodhgaya. Ganesha, the elephant-man, is appropriately the patron saint of New Beginnings. Opening is set for Fall 2024.
[metaslider id=”10628″]
We congratulate Dip Agrawal and the full team of the J. Luce Foundation, Saraswati Centre and Lotus School staff for their contribution to making this incredible dream a reality.
Photo: Israel Defense Forces paratroopers brigade operate within the Gaza Strip by Israel Defense Forces.
U.N. Security Council Urged to Convene Amid Mass Casualties in Gaza
New York, N.Y. The Israeli assault on the Nuseirat camp has claimed the lives of hundreds and left numerous others wounded.
President Abbas is engaged in intensive communications with relevant Arab and international parties to convene this urgent session of the UN Security Council,” a statement posted to X by the Palestinian permanent observer mission to the U.N. said.
EU Diplomat Condemns Gaza ‘Bloodbath’ Following Israeli Rescue Operation
Israeli attacks in central Gaza killed scores of Palestinians, many of them civilians, on Saturday amid a special forces operation to free four hostages held there, with the death toll sparking international outrage.
At least 274 Palestinians were killed and 698 wounded in Israeli strikes on the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza, Gaza’s health ministry said on Sunday. The Israeli military said its forces came under heavy fire during the daytime operation.
The EU’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, called it a “massacre,” while the U.N.’s aid chief described in graphic detail scenes of “shredded bodies on the ground.”
As the teams take the field, the roar of the sold-out crowd of 34,000 spectators will reverberate through the stadium, creating an electrifying atmosphere that only a clash of this magnitude can generate. The players, carrying the weight of a billion dreams on their shoulders, will undoubtedly feel the intensity of the moment, knowing that their every move will be scrutinized by millions of ardent fans across the globe.
New York, N.Y. The cricketing world is holding its breath as the two South Asian giants, India and Pakistan, prepare to reignite their fierce rivalry on the hallowed turf of the Nassau County International Cricket Stadium in Long Island, New York. This blockbuster clash, scheduled for Sunday, is expected to captivate a staggering audience of nearly half a billion viewers, a testament to the sport’s unparalleled popularity and the intensity of this age-old rivalry.
A Rivalry Bigger than War
The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is often described as “bigger than war,” a phrase that encapsulates the passion, fervor, and sheer magnitude of this sporting spectacle. For these two nations, cricket transcends mere athletic competition; it is a battleground where national pride, historical tensions, and cultural identities collide in a high-stakes drama that leaves fans on the edge of their seats.
As the teams take the field, the roar of the sold-out crowd of 34,000 spectators will reverberate through the stadium, creating an electrifying atmosphere that only a clash of this magnitude can generate. The players, carrying the weight of a billion dreams on their shoulders, will undoubtedly feel the intensity of the moment, knowing that their every move will be scrutinized by millions of ardent fans across the globe.
A Clash of Titans
Both India and Pakistan boast formidable cricketing pedigrees, with a rich history of producing some of the game’s greatest talents. The Indian team, led by the charismatic Virat Kohli, is a force to be reckoned with, boasting a star-studded lineup of world-class batsmen and a potent bowling attack. On the other hand, Pakistan, captained by the dynamic Babar Azam, is known for its unpredictability and ability to produce match-winning performances on any given day.
As the two teams lock horns, the world will witness not only a battle of skill and strategy but also a clash of contrasting styles and philosophies. India’s methodical approach will be pitted against Pakistan’s flair and audacity, setting the stage for an enthralling contest that promises to keep spectators on the edge of their seats.
A Unifying Force
Beyond the fierce rivalry and intense competition, this match also serves as a powerful symbol of unity and diplomacy. Cricket has long been a bridge between the two nations, transcending political tensions and fostering a spirit of camaraderie and sportsmanship. As the players from both sides shake hands and embrace each other, they remind us that sports have the power to bring people together, even in the face of deep-rooted conflicts.
As the world eagerly awaits this epic encounter, one thing is certain: the India-Pakistan cricket rivalry will once again captivate the hearts and minds of millions, solidifying its status as a phenomenon that is truly “bigger than war.”
The parade serves as a powerful expression of Puerto Rican pride, honoring the contributions of Puerto Ricans to the fabric of American society.
New York, N.Y. — The Puerto Rican Day Parade, a vibrant celebration of Puerto Rican culture and heritage, takes to the streets of New York City this afternoon. This iconic event, held annually on the second Sunday of June, is a testament to the city’s role as a hub for the Puerto Rican diaspora.
A Cherished Tradition
The parade traces its roots back to 1958, when it was established to replace the former Hispanic Day Parade, marking a shift towards culturally specific expressions. Over the decades, it has grown into one of the largest parades in the United States, attracting millions of spectators annually. Unlike other ethnic parades, the Puerto Rican Day Parade holds the distinction of being the only Latino heritage parade to march along the iconic Fifth Avenue.
Celebrating Puerto Rican Pride
The parade serves as a powerful expression of Puerto Rican pride, honoring the contributions of Puerto Ricans to the fabric of American society. It showcases the rich cultural heritage, vibrant music, and traditional dances of the Puerto Rican community. Celebrities, politicians, and community leaders participate, lending their voices to this celebration of identity and resilience.
New York’s Puerto Rican Diaspora
New York City has long been a hub for the Puerto Rican diaspora, with a massive influx of Puerto Rican migrants in the 1950s. The parade emerged as a way for this growing community to assert its presence and celebrate its culture in the face of challenges like police abuse and institutional indifference. Today, the parade remains a powerful symbol of unity and pride for the city’s Puerto Rican population.
A Cultural Extravaganza
While the parade has faced criticism for its commercialization and corporate sponsorships, efforts are underway to reclaim its cultural roots. Smaller, neighborhood-based events like the Sunset Park Puerto Rican Day Parade offer more community-oriented alternatives. Nonetheless, the National Puerto Rican Day Parade remains a cherished tradition, a vibrant tapestry woven from the threads of Puerto Rican history, culture, and resilience.
With Women Physicians, the clinic specialized in Tsunami traumas caused by exposure to floodwaters and subsequent diseases
New York, N.Y. The International Refugee Committee outfitted our first health clinic, on the campus of Orphans International Sumatera, after the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. The building had once housed a provincial health clinic that had shuttered a decade before, and young doctors from Jakarta journeyed to Banda Aceh to help in the disaster relief efforts, many volunteering in our clinic.
Mark Your Calendar for Sunday, June 30: Reflect. Empower. Unite.
Photo: Betzy Arosemena / Unsplash.
New York, N.Y. The NYC Pride March, the iconic pride parade in New York City, will take place on Sunday, June 30, 2024. It will begin at 11am from 25th Street and Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. Some key details about the 2024 NYC Pride March:
It marks the 54th annual Pride March in NYC, commemorating the Stonewall Uprising of 1969.
The theme for 2024 is “Reflect. Empower. Unite.”
The parade will kick off at 11am from 25th Street and 5th Avenue, proceeding along the traditional route.
It is the highlight event of NYC Pride Week, which runs from June 22-30 with various festivals, parties, and events.
Other major NYC Pride events include Youth Pride on June 29, PrideFest street fair on June 30, and more.
So mark your calendars for Sunday, June 30th to attend or watch the massive and vibrant 2024 NYC Pride March, a celebration of LGBTQ+ pride, rights, and community.
Photo: Joro Spider – Trichonephila bu]y Christina Butler.
I have witnessed Joro spiders in Japan. A large, brightly colored invasive species called the Joro spider is on the move in the United States. They are very scary.
New York, N.Y. Populations have been growing in parts of the South and East Coast for years, and many researchers think it’s only a matter of time before they spread to much of the continental U.S. But spider experts say we shouldn’t be too worried about them.
Scientists instead worry about the growing prevalence of invasive species that can do damage to our crops and trees — a problem made worse by global trade and climate change, which is making local environmental conditions more comfortable for pests that previously couldn’t survive frigid winters. This shy spider, however, poses little risk to humans.
What is the Joro spider?
The Joro spider is one of a group of spiders called orb-weavers, named for their wheel-shaped webs. They’re native to East Asia, have bright yellow and black coloring, and can grow as long as eight centimeters when their legs are fully extended.
Where are they headed?
Scientists are still trying to figure that out. A satellite population has taken hold in Baltimore over the last two years. The species will become more prevalent in the Northeast, an eventual outcome suggested by research.
Can they fly?
The babies can: using a tactic called “ballooning,” young Joro spiders can use their webs to harness the winds and electromagnetic currents of the Earth to travel relatively long distances. But you won’t see fully-grown Joro spiders taking flight.
What do they eat?
Joro spiders will eat whatever lands in their web, which mainly ends up being insects. That could mean they’ll compete with native spiders for food, but it might not all be bad — a Joro’s daily catch could also feed native bird species.
Are they dangerous to humans?
Joro spiders have venom like all spiders, but they aren’t deadly or even medically relevant to humans. At worst, a Joro bite might itch or cause an allergic reaction. But the shy creatures tend to stay out of humans’ way
Joro spiders are nothing in the end to fear. Unless, like me, you suffer from arachnophobia. In that case, when you see their hairy eight legs, take off on your own two!
From scrubbing gentle giants in Rambukkana to climbing ancient Sigiriya fortress, two decades of travel reveal an island of resilience and wonder.
New York, N.Y. — Over the past twenty years, my journeys to Sri Lanka have woven a tapestry of moments that linger with startling clarity.
This teardrop-shaped island in the Indian Ocean, shaped by Buddhist serenity, colonial echoes, and scars of civil strife, offers more than picturesque landscapes—it gifts travelers with profound human and historical connections. Whether bathing elephants in sanctuary rivers or hearing whispers of tragedy near Jaffna, these experiences underscore Sri Lanka’s resilient soul and the imperative of mindful exploration.
Sanctuaries and Spirits: Wildlife as Lifelines
At the elephant sanctuary in Rambukkana, I joined mahouts scrubbing retired logging elephants with coconut husks in a shallow river—a ritual balancing tourism and survival. Unlike Thailand’s criticized elephant ventures, this sanctuary provides critical refuge.
Watching the herd lumber daily across a road to bathe in the Maha Oya River felt like witnessing communal therapy. Further southeast, Yala National Park delivers African-style safaris in miniature, where leopards and crocodiles roam British-era preserves. Later, feasting on grilled fish at a beach hut in Unawatuna Bay, I grasped how deeply nature sustains Sri Lanka’s coastal communities.
Unawatuna Beach is like a paradise with relaxation, adventure, and natural beauty all in one place.
Sigiriya’s metal stairs up Lion Rock, an ancient citadel. Photo credit: Maciej Cisowski / pexels.com.
Sacred Stones, Silent Stories
History breathes here. At Sigiriya, I climbed 600 feet (50 floors!) of vertigo-inducing metal stairs up Lion Rock, an ancient citadel where frescoes defy monsoons.
Near Jaffna, a windswept coastal well bore witness to darker chapters: Tamils targeted during the civil war.
Standing there, ocean winds seemed to carry ancestral laments—a reminder that beauty and pain intertwine in Sri Lanka’s soil.
Culture in a Cup of Tea
Tea plantations near Kandy, legacy of British rule, unfold like terraced quilts. A local guide unraveled leaves’ secrets: how Ceylon tea fueled empires and still steeps cultural identity. Beyond agriculture, human bonds flourished. At a Muslim preschool outside Rambukkana, giggling children bridged language gaps through play. Even tuk-tuk rides became adventures; one driver’s plea led to a bumpy, ill-advised journey from Colombo to Galle. His earnest hustle mirrored a nation persevering through economic turbulence.
Green Tree on Mountain Under Cloudy Sky at Nuwara Eliya, CP, Sri Lanka. Photo credit: Alex P. / pexels.com.
Colonial Echoes and Coastal Calm
Luxury, too, tells stories. The Galle Face Hotel in Colombo exudes Raj-era grandeur, its halls echoing with tales of diplomats and dreamers. Nearby, Galle’s Dutch fort—a UNESCO World Heritage site—guarded our beach resort weekend, where crashing waves soothed urban fatigue. These oases, like Kandy’s highland retreats, honor Sri Lanka’s ability to cradle travelers amid turmoil.
The splendid and incomparable Galle face Hotel – my favorite stay in Sri Lanka.
Journeying with Intention
Sri Lanka demands respect: Shoulders covered at temples, hushed tones near Buddha statues or Koran verses, no jokes about Ganesha or faith. This mindfulness isn’t restraint—it’s gratitude. The nation’s magic lies not just in emerald hills or sapphire seas, but in its people’s grace amid hardship. As tourism rebuilds post-crisis, visiting sanctuaries and heritage sites ethically becomes an act of solidarity.
Over two decades, Sri Lanka imprinted indelible memories: bathing elephants at Rambukkana sanctuary, climbing Sigiriya fortress, and hearing war echoes near Jaffna. From tea highlands to Yala safaris, the island blends natural wonder with resilience. This story celebrates human connections—tuk-tuk drivers, temple guides, and children—while emphasizing respectful travel in a Buddhist-majority nation where history and hope converge.
20 Years Ago, the Incredibly Strong Children of Orphans International Sumatera
New York, N.Y. Twenty years ago, the children of Orphans International Sumatera faced unimaginable loss and hardship in the wake of the Great Indian Ocean Tsunami. They were just twelve and thirteen years old, yet their incredible strength and resilience have transformed their lives in ways that inspire us all.
Today, these survivors have grown into accomplished adults, many having graduated from college and built their own families. Their remarkable journeys were made possible through the compassion and generosity of donors worldwide who supportedOrphans International Worldwide, an organization that stepped in to become their family when they lost everything.
Meet Bahrizal, Dina, Farouk, Ishak, Rahmiana, Rizki, Wirda, and Wayhu!
Bahrizal
Dina
Farouk
Ishak
Rahmiana
Rizki
Wirda
Wayhu
Call to Action:
Orphans International is now embarking on a new mission to build a home for formerly “untouchable” (dalit) children in Bihar, the poorest province of India, located near the Nepalese border far north of Calcutta. This initiative aims to provide these children with the same support and opportunities that transformed the lives of the tsunami survivors in Aceh. If you would like to contribute to this project, you can here.
Support the Cause: Donate to help build a new home for dalit children in Bihar and share this project within your networks using our social media hashtags. Join us in celebrating the incredible journeys of these young survivors and supporting the next generation of children in need. Together, we can create a legacy of hope and transformation!
Photo: Office of the President of Russia. Президент России Владимир Путин с Председателем Государственных дел КНДР Ким Чен Ыном перед началом посещения космодрома Восточный.
North Korean missiles have been turning up in Ukraine, indicating growing cooperation between Pyongyang and Moscow, according to a report released by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency on May 29.
Washington, D.C. The Biden administration this week warned North Korea against providing Russian President Vladimir Putin “a platform to promote his war of aggression” against Ukraine ahead of his possible trip to Pyongyang.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un invited Putin to Pyongyang when he visited Russia in September, and preparations are being made for his trip, the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry said without providing a specific date, Russian news agency Tass reported May 30.
Tass quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko as saying preparations for Putin’s visit to North Korea as well as to Vietnam are at “an advanced stage.”
VOA contacted the Russian Embassy in Seoul, asking if dates are set for Putin’s visit to Pyongyang, but did not receive a reply.
There was speculation that Putin would visit North Korea after he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in May.
In response to Rudenko’s remarks about Putin’s trip to Pyongyang, a U.S. State Department spokesperson said in an email to VOA’s Korean Service Tuesday, “As Russia continues to seek international support to sustain its illegal and brutal war against Ukraine, we reiterate that no country should give Putin a platform to promote his war of aggression and otherwise allow him to normalize his atrocities.”
The spokesperson continued, using the abbreviation for North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, that “deepening cooperation between Russia and the DPRK should be of great concern to anyone interested in maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.”
The spokesperson added, “The DPRK has and continues to provide material support to the Russian Federation for their aggression in Ukraine.”
Kim Yo Jong, Kim Jong Un’s powerful sister, denied on May 17 that North Korea was engaged in arms dealings with Russia.
The report shows the pictures of what it says is debris from a North Korean short-range ballistic missile found in Kharkiv in January that Russia used against Ukraine. Pyongyang has been providing ballistic missiles to Moscow since November in addition to shipping hundreds of containers full of ammunition to Russia in August, the report said.
About seven months after its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Russia sought to purchase millions of artillery shells and rockets from North Korea, the report said.
Experts said Putin’s trip to Pyongyang will allow him to boost military cooperation with North Korea that began when Kim visited Russia in September.
“Putin, who in the past has openly broached the prospect of bolstering military collaboration with Pyongyang, could use his time in the North to move — or at least discuss moving — arms and military technology agreements toward the finish line,” Daniel DePetris, a fellow at Washington-based think tank Defense Priorities, said in an email.
“North Korean munitions have given him critical time to reconstitute Russia’s own domestic military production so Putin will attempt to keep the North Korean arms spigot flowing,” he continued.
Putin reportedly said Russia will continue to “develop” its relations with North Korea regardless of what others think when he met with the heads of international news agencies on the sidelines of theInternational Economic Forum held in St. Petersburg on Wednesday.
He also said North Korea’s nuclear issue will “gradually be resolved” if Pyongyang does not feel threatened and thanked South Korea for not directly providing weapons to Ukraine, according to Tass.
The same day, Putin warned that Moscow could provide long-range weapons to the West’s adversaries so they could strike Western countries in response to NATO allies, including the United States, allowing Ukraine to use their arms to attack inside Russia.
David Maxwell, vice president of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy, said during a phone interview that Pyongyang is more likely to “act on its own interest” than to heed Moscow if asked to cause provocations on the Korean Peninsula or elsewhere.
Maxwell also said Putin’s possible visit to North Korea could be used as “a propaganda vehicle” for Moscow and Pyongyang.
They will try to “reinforce the reputation of both, especially in terms of alliances” and portray their causes — Russia’s war in Ukraine and North Korea’s threats against South Korea — as somewhat “legitimate” despite causing massive human rights abuses, Maxwell said.
Pyongyang described Putin’s war in Ukraine as “the sacred war of justice” by “the valiant Russian army” engaged in “the special military operation to annihilate neo-Nazis” in a statement released on May 16 by its state-run KCNA.
Photo: Candidates taking the Oath of Allegiance at a Naturalization Ceremony.
46 million people in the U.S were born outside the country.
Washington, D.C. The number of foreign-born people in the United States rose more than 15% from 2010 to 2022, to just more than 46 million, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
That’s more foreign-born people — those who were not U.S. citizens at birth — than ever before, despite slow population growth.
“The increase probably could have been higher in the last decade than it was,” says demographer William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. “This increase hasn’t been as big as it’s been in some of the earlier decades, particularly 1990 to 2000.”
The U.S. foreign-born population rose from 19 million to 31 million, a hike of 12 million, from 1990 to 2000. By contrast, the same group increased just 6.2 million, from 40 million to 46.2 million during the 2010-2022 period.
The slowdown can be attributed to a couple of main factors, Frey says.
“The Trump administration reduced some of the immigration levels with various aspects of their policy, and then, of course, the pandemic,” he says. “But then, at the very tip of the end of this period, it started to go up again, but we’re not really going to see the bulk of that until next year or the year after, when they come out [with] the next couple of reports.”
Despite early indications that the immigration population grew at a faster rate in 2023, Frey expects slower overall population growth in the future.
“Especially among the younger population. In order to improve the labor force prospects, in order to generate more people coming into the labor force, we’re going to have to increase our immigration,” he says. “That’s very political, but I think a sensible economic way to look at it would be to make sure we continue to have reasonable levels of immigration.”
The Census numbers show that the education levels of foreign-born people living in the United States is increasing. In 2010, 68% of people in this group completed high school or higher, while in 2022, that number jumped to 75%.
In the states with the most immigrants — California (26.5%), New Jersey (23.2%), New York (22.6%) and Florida (21.1%) — foreign-born people account for more than one-fifth of the population.
Image: krymr.com. Religious Information Service of Ukraine. Дозвольте сайту відправляти вам актуальну інформацію.
Remembering D-Day: A Call to Action Against Modern Tyranny
New York, N.Y. As we reflect on the 80th anniversary of D-Day, it is painfully evident that we have not fully grasped the lessons of that monumental day. Winston Churchill stood resolutely against Adolf Hitler, defying overwhelming odds to defend freedom and democracy. The world united against the evils of authoritarianism and Nazism, committing immense resources to end their reign.
Today, as we witness Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the echoes of history demand our urgent attention and action.
In 1944, the Allied forces, driven by a profound commitment to justice and liberty, launched the largest amphibious invasion in history. The sacrifice and bravery displayed during the D-Day landings were instrumental in defeating a tyrannical regime. Yet, 80 years later, the world appears to have forgotten the hard-won lessons of that era.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine mirrors Hitler’s aggressive expansion into Poland and France.
This blatant act of aggression threatens not just Ukraine, but the stability and security of Europe as a whole. If Putin is not stopped, we risk losing the very essence of what D-Day fought to protect: freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.
The international community’s response to Putin’s nuclear threats has been alarmingly tepid. Putin’s warnings of a nuclear Armageddon must be met with unequivocal resolve. We must make it clear that any attempt to use nuclear weapons will result in the complete dismantling of Putin’s military apparatus and his removal from power. This is not merely a confrontation with a regional bully; it is a defense of global democracy and human dignity.
Saving Ukraine is synonymous with saving democracy.
The Ukrainian people are not just fighting for their sovereignty; they are fighting for the principles that underpin free societies everywhere. Their struggle is a poignant reminder of the courage displayed by the Allied forces on D-Day. The urgency to support Ukraine cannot be overstated. The survival of democracy and, by extension, the future of humanity, hinges on our response.
The parallels between the challenges faced by Churchill in the 1940s and those we face today are striking.
Churchill’s unwavering stance against Hitler’s tyranny galvanized a global coalition that ultimately triumphed over evil. Today’s leaders must channel that same resolve to confront Putin’s aggression. We must recognize the tremendous urgency of the situation in Ukraine and commit the necessary resources to ensure its victory.
The lessons of D-Day are clear and compelling.
We must remember the sacrifices made in the name of freedom and honor them by standing firmly against modern-day tyranny. As we commemorate the 80th anniversary of D-Day, let it serve as a clarion call to defend democracy, support Ukraine, and protect the values that define our humanity.
TAGS: D-Day, World War II, Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Putin, Ukraine, invasion, democracy, authoritarianism, nuclear threat, global security, European stability, historical lessons, political action
Photo: When Rishi Sunak said “Stay Home,” he meant it. Covid-19 Press Conference 2020. Photo: Pippa Fowles / No 10 Downing Street.
Rishi Sunak Prioritizes Campaigning Over D-Day Commemoration
London, U.K. The decision by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to forgo a commemoration event for D-Day due to campaign commitments has stirred significant controversy. This choice, which prioritizes political ambitions over paying homage to one of the most critical moments in modern history, has left many questioning the judgment and priorities of the country’s leadership.
June 6, 1944, marked the beginning of the end of World War II.
On this day, over 156,000 Allied troops, including a substantial number from Britain, crossed the English Channel in a daring and hazardous operation that changed the course of history. The sacrifices made on D-Day are etched into the national consciousness as a testament to the bravery and resolve of those who fought for freedom and democracy. The act of crossing the Channel was not just a military maneuver; it was a monumental act of courage and solidarity, embodying the spirit of a nation united against tyranny.
In stark contrast, Prime Minister Sunak’s decision to prioritize his campaign over the D-Day commemoration appears not only tone-deaf but also a significant misstep in recognizing and honoring this crucial chapter in British history. The fact that he is “too busy campaigning” sends a troubling message about his understanding of leadership and the importance of historical memory. Campaigning, while important in a democratic society, pales in comparison to the duty of remembering and honoring those who gave their lives for the freedoms we enjoy today.
The irony is glaring.
In 1944, the entire British military force, alongside their Allies, crossed the Channel under far more perilous circumstances. They faced uncertain futures, brutal combat, and many did not return. Their sacrifice was driven by a commitment to a greater good, a dedication to the values of freedom and democracy. Today, their memory is seemingly overshadowed by the mundane machinations of political campaigning.
Furthermore, the D-Day commemoration is not just a ceremonial obligation but a vital act of remembrance. It serves to educate future generations about the costs of war and the value of peace. Leaders attending such events demonstrate a recognition of their historical responsibilities and an acknowledgment of the sacrifices that underpin their current positions of power. Sunak’s absence, therefore, is more than a scheduling conflict; it is a profound lapse in honoring the very foundations of the society he seeks to lead.
Critics argue that Sunak’s priorities reflect a broader trend in contemporary politics where the immediate and the superficial often overshadow the substantive and the historical. The decision not to cross the Channel to commemorate D-Day could be perceived as a symptom of a deeper disconnect between political leadership and the values they are supposed to embody and uphold.
It is essential for leaders to balance their duties effectively.
While campaigning is undoubtedly crucial in a democratic process, it should not come at the expense of fundamental acts of remembrance and respect. The sacrifice of the D-Day soldiers was not just for their time but for all time. Their bravery and sacrifice are the bedrock upon which modern Britain stands, and it is the duty of its leaders to ensure that such pivotal moments are not forgotten or overshadowed by transient political pursuits.
Prime Minister Sunak’s decision to prioritize campaigning over commemorating D-Day is a regrettable oversight. It is a moment that demands reflection on the values and responsibilities that should guide those in positions of power. As we remember the heroes of June 6, 1944, we must hold our leaders to a higher standard of respect and honor for the sacrifices that shaped our world.
