The Stewardship Report

Home Blog Page 44

Erin’s Exceptional Airplane Adventure

0

VISUAL THEMES THROUGHOUT

  • Erin’s expressions: Nervous excitement → brave → wonder → joy → pride → contentment
  • Erin’s backpack – appears in almost every illustration (visual continuity)
  • Stuffed bunny – her comfort object, shows up periodically
  • The phone – appears when relevant (getting it, checking it, using it)
  • Color progression: Warm California sunshine → bright airport energy → cool airplane interior → aerial views (grand and colorful) → Boston arrival (slightly different light) → cozy warm evening

PAGES 3-4: The Invitation

The phone call came on a sunny afternoon in May.

“We want you to come visit us at the beach house this summer!” Granny’s voice sang through the speaker. “We’ll build sandcastles and collect seashells and stay up late watching the stars!”

Erin’s eyes grew wide. A whole summer in Boston with Granny and Grandpa! She could hardly believe it.

But there was one problem. Mom and Dad both had to work all summer. They couldn’t take a vacation.

“I have an idea,” Dad said, kneeling down to look Erin in the eyes. “What if you flew to Boston all by yourself? You’re in first grade now. You’re getting so grown-up.”

Erin’s stomach did a little flip. Fly on an airplane? All by herself? That sounded scary… but also kind of exciting.


Illustration: Split scene or two-panel approach:

  • LEFT: Erin sitting on the floor/couch with the phone on speaker between her parents. She’s wide-eyed, excited. Maybe she’s hugging a stuffed animal. Sunny afternoon light through windows.
  • RIGHT: Small inset or thought bubble showing Granny and Grandpa’s beach house – white cottage with blue shutters, sandy path leading to the ocean, seagulls in the sky. This is what Erin is imagining.

Color palette: Warm golds and sunny yellows for the LA home, cool blues and sandy beiges for the beach house vision.



PAGES 5-6: Getting Ready

Over the next few weeks, Mom and Dad helped Erin get ready for her big adventure.

They practiced what she would do at the airport. They packed her favorite stuffed bunny in her backpack. They talked about Kenny, the flight attendant who would take care of her the whole way.

The night before the flight, Dad handed Erin a small box.

Inside was a cell phone – her very first one.

“This is for emergencies only,” Mom said seriously. “Keep it safe in your backpack. And when you get to Boston, you’ll give it to Granny and Grandpa. Can you do that?”

Erin nodded, holding the phone carefully in both hands. She felt very grown-up and very responsible.


Illustration: Multiple small vignettes showing preparation OR one larger scene:

  • Erin and parents role-playing at home (maybe using chairs as “airplane seats”)
  • Dad showing Erin how the phone works
  • Close-up of Erin’s hands carefully holding the phone in the box (this could be the focal point)
  • Her packed backpack with stuffed bunny peeking out

Mood: Warm, cozy home setting. Evening/night time (since it’s “the night before”). Soft lamp light. Focus on the tender parent-child moments.



PAGES 7-8: At the Airport

The next morning, they woke up before the sun. The airport was big and busy, with people rushing everywhere pulling suitcases.

“I’m hungry,” Erin said, holding tight to Dad’s hand.

“Then let’s have a special breakfast,” Mom said with a smile.

They found a restaurant with shiny red booths. Erin ordered her favorite: a hamburger platter with crispy fries and a vanilla milkshake so thick she had to work hard with her straw.

“This is the best breakfast ever,” she said, licking milkshake from her upper lip.

Mom and Dad smiled at each other. They wanted Erin to remember this day forever.


Illustration: Bustling airport restaurant scene:

  • Erin in the red booth with her hamburger platter and thick vanilla milkshake (show the milkshake very prominently – maybe with whipped cream and a cherry!)
  • Mom and Dad on either side of her, coffee cups in front of them
  • Background: other travelers, airport windows showing planes outside, departure boards
  • Erin mid-bite or slurping her shake with pure joy on her face

Details to include: Her backpack on the seat beside her, the busy airport energy but their booth feels like a cozy bubble.



PAGES 9-10: Meeting the Team

At the gate, Mom spoke quietly with a woman at the counter. The woman smiled down at Erin and made some notes on her computer.

Then a tall pilot in a crisp uniform walked over. His smile was warm and kind.

“You must be Erin,” he said. “I’m Captain Williams, and I’m going to be flying the plane today. You’re going to have a wonderful trip, I promise.”

Erin felt a little less nervous.

A moment later, a friendly man with a bright name tag came up to them.

“Hi, Erin! I’m Kenny, and I’m going to be your flight attendant today. I’ll be with you the whole way to Boston. We’re going to take great care of you.”

Kenny had kind eyes and an easy smile. Erin decided she liked him.


Illustration: The gate area:

  • FOREGROUND: Captain Williams (Black man, tall, kind smile, pilot uniform with captain’s stripes) crouched or bent down to Erin’s eye level, shaking her hand or giving her a reassuring smile
  • MIDDLE: Kenny (Asian American man, flight attendant uniform, warm expression) standing nearby with clipboard or tablet
  • BACKGROUND: Mom talking to gate agent, the gate podium, other passengers, windows showing the airplane outside
  • Erin looking small but brave between these caring adults

Key: Show the diversity naturally, show the care and professionalism, show Erin feeling safe.



PAGES 11-12: Goodbye & Boarding

It was time to say goodbye.

Mom hugged her tight. “We love you so much. Have the best summer ever.”

Dad’s hug lasted even longer. “Be brave, sweetheart. Call us tonight, okay?”

Erin felt a lump in her throat, but she nodded. Kenny took her hand gently.

“Ready?” he asked.

Together, they walked down the long hallway to the airplane. Erin turned back one last time to wave. Mom and Dad were both waving, big smiles on their faces even though Mom’s eyes looked a little wet.

On the plane, Kenny showed Erin to her seat – right by the window!

The chair was big and comfortable. There was a screen on the back of the seat in front of her where she could watch movies.

“This is going to be fun,” Erin whispered to herself.


Illustration: Could be a two-part spread:

LEFT PAGE: The goodbye moment:

  • Mom hugging Erin tight (maybe Erin’s feet are off the ground)
  • Dad waiting his turn, hand on Erin’s shoulder
  • Other passengers streaming past in soft focus
  • Erin’s face showing mixed emotions – sad to leave but trying to be brave

RIGHT PAGE: Walking to the plane:

  • Kenny holding Erin’s hand gently, walking down the jetway
  • Erin looking back over her shoulder, waving
  • Small figures of Mom and Dad in the distance, waving back
  • The airplane visible through jetway windows

Transition: Show the emotional shift from goodbye to adventure beginning.



PAGES 13-14: Takeoff & Flying

The engines roared to life. The plane rolled down the runway, faster and faster, and then – whoosh! – they lifted into the sky.

Erin pressed her nose to the window and watched Los Angeles get smaller and smaller below.

Once they were high in the air, Kenny came by with a tray.

“Would you like something to drink?” he asked.

“Could I have a Coca-Cola?” Erin asked shyly. Mom and Dad usually only let her have soda on special occasions.

“Of course! This is definitely a special occasion.”

Erin sipped her Coca-Cola and scrolled through the movie options. She picked an animated film about a princess and a dragon.

After a while, she reached into her backpack. The phone was still there, safe and sound. She felt proud that she was taking such good care of it.


Illustration: Inside the plane:

  • Erin in her window seat (SHOW the window prominently with LA getting smaller below)
  • The seat-back screen showing her animated movie
  • Kenny handing her the Coca-Cola on a tray (show the full can and a cup with ice)
  • Her backpack tucked under the seat in front of her
  • Maybe one or two other passengers visible but soft-focus
  • Her stuffed bunny buckled in beside her

Mood: Cozy, safe, exciting. The plane interior should feel spacious and comfortable, not cramped. Erin’s face shows wonder and contentment.


PAGES 15-16: The View

Erin must have dozed off during the movie, because when she opened her eyes, Kenny was gently touching her shoulder.

“Look out the window,” he said softly. “You don’t want to miss this.”

Erin looked down and gasped.

Below her was the Grand Canyon – enormous and orange and carved deep into the earth like a giant had dragged their fingers through rock.

“Wow,” she breathed.

As the plane flew on, she sawDeserts and mountains and winding rivers that looked like silver ribbons. She saw tiny towns and long highways and farmland in perfect squares of green and gold.

America was so big! Erin had never imagined how big it really was.

Kenny came back with a snack – pretzels and apple juice. “We’ll be landing in about an hour,” he told her.

Erin’s heart started beating faster. Soon she would see Granny and Grandpa!


Illustration: This should be SPECTACULAR – the visual highlight of the book:

Option A – Full spread landscape:

  • Bird’s eye view FROM Erin’s perspective looking down
  • Show the patchwork of America: Grand Canyon in oranges and reds, desert in tans, green farmland in geometric squares, silver winding rivers, mountain ranges
  • Small inset or corner showing Erin’s face pressed to the window, eyes huge with wonder
  • Maybe Kenny pointing something out to her

Option B – Split view:

  • LEFT: The view outside (Grand Canyon prominent)
  • RIGHT: Erin’s face at the window, Kenny beside her, both looking down

Key: This should feel HUGE and awe-inspiring. Kids need to feel how big America is, how amazing the view is.


PAGES 17-18: Landing in Boston

The plane tilted downward. The captain’s voice came over the speaker.

“Flight attendants, prepare for landing.”

Erin looked out the window and saw buildings and highways getting closer. Her ears popped as the plane descended.

Then – bump! – the wheels touched the runway. They were down!

Erin gathered her backpack, making sure the phone was zipped safely inside. Kenny walked her off the plane, down a long hallway, and through a special door marked “Unaccompanied Minors.”

“Are you ready?” Kenny asked, squeezing her hand.

Erin nodded, suddenly feeling shy.

Kenny pushed open the door.


Illustration: Two moments:

LEFT PAGE: Landing approach:

  • View from inside looking out window: Boston buildings, harbor, runways approaching
  • Erin’s hands gripping the armrests (excited, not scared)
  • Other passengers preparing to land

RIGHT PAGE: Walking through the airport:

  • Kenny holding Erin’s hand, walking down the concourse
  • Her backpack on her back
  • Signs overhead: “Baggage Claim,” “Ground Transportation,” “Arrivals”
  • The special door marked “Unaccompanied Minors” ahead
  • Erin’s face showing anticipation – almost there!


PAGES 19-20: Reunion!

There they were!

Granny and Grandpa were standing right by the door, holding a huge sign decorated with flowers and glitter that said: WELCOME ERIN!

“There’s our girl!” Grandpa shouted.

Erin ran to them. Granny scooped her up in a hug that smelled like perfume and cookies. Grandpa wrapped his arms around both of them.

“You made it!” Granny said, her eyes shiny with happy tears. “You flew all the way across the country, all by yourself! We’re so proud of you!”

Kenny waved goodbye. “Have a wonderful summer, Erin!”

“Thank you, Kenny!” Erin called back.

Hand in hand in hand, the three of them walked toward the exit, talking and laughing all at once.


Illustration: THE BIG EMOTIONAL MOMENT – make this LARGE and joyful:

  • Granny and Grandpa (Irish American features, warm clothing, Grandpa maybe in a cardigan or cap, Granny with silver hair) holding their big “WELCOME ERIN!” sign (show the glitter and flowers!)
  • Erin RUNNING toward them or mid-hug (maybe her feet are off the ground as Granny lifts her)
  • Their faces full of pure joy and relief
  • Kenny in the background, waving, smiling (his job complete)
  • Other families reuniting in soft focus background
  • Arrival area: baggage carousels, other travelers, welcome signs

Mood: PURE JOY. This is the emotional payoff. Big smiles, warm colors, movement, love.


PAGES 21-22: That Night

That evening, Granny made Erin’s favorite dinner – spaghetti with lots of parmesan cheese. They ate at the big wooden table that looked out toward the ocean.

“Time to call your parents,” Grandpa said when the dishes were cleared.

Erin carefully pulled out her phone – the one she’d kept safe the whole trip.

She dialed the number all by herself. When Mom answered, Erin could hear the smile in her voice.

“I made it!” Erin said. “I saw the Grand Canyon from the sky, and Kenny gave me Coca-Cola, and Captain Williams was so nice, and I didn’t lose my phone, and–”

She told them everything, the words tumbling out in a happy rush.

When she finally said goodbye, Granny kissed the top of her head.

“You were so brave today,” she said.

Erin smiled. She had been brave. And now she had a whole summer of adventures ahead.

Through the window, she could hear the ocean waves and smell the salty air.

Tomorrow, she and Granny and Grandpa would go to the beach.

But tonight, she was exactly where she wanted to be.


Illustration: Cozy evening scene at the beach house:

  • The three of them at the wooden dining table by a window
  • Outside the window: twilight sky, ocean visible, maybe a lighthouse in the distance
  • Empty spaghetti plates, parmesan shaker
  • Erin holding HER phone to her ear, smiling huge
  • Granny and Grandpa watching her with tender expressions
  • Warm lamplight inside
  • Maybe her stuffed bunny on a chair nearby
  • Small details: seashells on windowsill, beach house decor

Final touch: Maybe a small closing image at the bottom – Erin’s backpack by the door, beach toys waiting for tomorrow, the ocean waves visible through the window.

Mood: Safe, warm, loved, HOME. The adventure is complete, summer is beginning.


THE END


Erin’s Exceptional Airplane Adventure (Feb. 5, 2025)


Trump Threatens Iran with “Obliteration” in Response to Assassination Plots


Experts Question Legality

Washington, D.C. — President Donald Trump sparked global controversy this week after declaring he had left instructions for the U.S. to “obliterate” Iran if he were assassinated by operatives linked to Tehran. The remarks, made during the signing of an executive order reinstating his “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, raised alarms about the feasibility and legality of such a posthumous directive.  

The Threat and Its Context  

During a press event on February 4, Trump stated: “If they did that, they would be obliterated. That would be the end. I’ve left instructions. If they do it, they get obliterated. There won’t be anything left.” He framed this as a deterrent against alleged Iranian assassination plots, referencing a 2024 Justice Department indictment of an Iranian national, Farhad Shakeri, accused of planning to survei and kill Trump on behalf of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).  

The threat comes amid heightened tensions following Trump’s 2020 drone strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, a revered figure in Iran. Tehran has repeatedly vowed retaliation, and U.S. intelligence agencies have tracked multiple alleged Iranian plots against Trump and former officials like Mike Pompeo and John Bolton.  

Executive Order and “Maximum Pressure” Strategy  

Trump simultaneously signed an executive order to intensify economic sanctions, aiming to reduce Iran’s oil exports to zero and enforce a “snapback” of U.N. sanctions.

The order directs the Treasury and State Departments to target entities violating existing sanctions, including shipping and insurance sectors.

While specifics of the order remain undisclosed, Trump claimed it would “neutralize Iran’s terrorist network” and prevent nuclear weapon development.

Critics, however, note that his prior “maximum pressure” campaign during his first term failed to curb Iran’s nuclear advancements, instead accelerating uranium enrichment to near-weapons-grade levels.  

Legal and Strategic Skepticism  

Experts dismissed Trump’s “dead man’s switch” claim as legally unenforceable. Under U.S. law, a president cannot bind their successor to military action. If Trump were assassinated, Vice President J.D. Vance would assume office and retain sole authority over defense decisions.

Analysts compared Trump’s remarks to the U.K.’s “letters of last resort”—secret nuclear strike instructions given to submarine commanders—but emphasized that no such mechanism exists in the U.S. system.  

Iranian officials dismissed the threats as “propaganda,” while state media praised Trump’s cuts to U.S. foreign aid, claiming it weakened pro-democracy activists opposing the regime.

Meanwhile, Iran’s currency plummeted to a record low of 850,000 rials per dollar, reflecting economic instability exacerbated by sanctions. 

Domestic and International Reactions  

  • Mixed Responses: Social media reactions ranged from dark humor to conspiracy theories, with figures like Alex Jones suggesting the threat could be exploited by a “deep state” to frame Iran for a hypothetical Trump assassination.  
  • Diplomatic Signals: Despite tensions, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has cautiously left the door open for negotiations, while reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian urged moderation in domestic crackdowns.  
  • Regional Implications: Gulf allies like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, once staunch supporters of Trump’s sanctions, have recently pursued détente with Iran, complicating U.S. efforts to isolate Tehran.  

Historical Precedent and Risks

Trump’s rhetoric echoes his 2020 vow to respond to Iranian aggression with disproportionate force.However, military action—whether conventional or nuclear—risks escalating into a broader conflict. Israel, which has destroyed much of Iran’s air defenses, could see an opening for strikes on nuclear facilities, though experts warn this might destabilize the region further.  

While Trump’s threats underscore his confrontational approach to Iran, their practical impact remains dubious. The administration’s renewed sanctions may deepen Iran’s economic crisis but are unlikely to halt its nuclear program without diplomatic engagement. As one Iranian analyst noted, “The world has seen this movie before—maximum pressure failed once. Why would it work now?”


Trump Threatens Iran with “Obliteration” in Response to Assassination Plots (Feb. 5, 2025)

Why New England, N.Y. Should Secede from U.S., Join Canada

0

New York, N.Y. — As political and cultural divisions in the United States continue to deepen, an increasingly serious question arises: Should New England and New York break away from the U.S. and join Canada? While once a fringe idea, the notion of secession has gained traction in response to rising authoritarianism, economic instability, and social policies that conflict with the values of the Northeast.

Political and Cultural Alignment with Canada

New England and New York have long been among the most progressive regions in the U.S., embracing policies that prioritize healthcare access, climate action, and human rights.

Meanwhile, under Donald Trump and a Republican-controlled Supreme Court, the U.S. has seen rollbacks on abortion rights, LGBTQ+ protections, and environmental regulations—policies that stand in stark contrast to those supported by the majority of New Englanders and New Yorkers.

Canada, by comparison, offers universal healthcare, strong climate policies, and a government that better reflects the values of these northeastern states.

Becoming part of the Canadian Federation could ensure political stability, protect civil liberties, and allow for better governance aligned with the region’s priorities.

Economic and Trade Benefits

New York and New England represent some of the most economically powerful areas in the U.S., with industries ranging from finance and biotech to education and tourism. By joining Canada, the region could benefit from closer trade ties with an economy that is already deeply interconnected. The Canadian dollar’s relative stability compared to a potentially volatile U.S. economy under continued conservative leadership further strengthens the case for integration.

Border and Infrastructure Advantages

Geographically, New England and New York already share extensive borders with Canada, making integration more feasible. Many residents travel frequently between the two countries, and cities like Boston and New York maintain deep economic and cultural ties with Canadian cities like Toronto and Montreal. A transition could be structured similarly to Quebec’s status, allowing for some regional autonomy while benefiting from national policies.

A Peaceful and Rational Secession

Unlike other secession movements in the U.S., a Northeast-Canada union would be based on shared values rather than ideological extremism. Such a move could be negotiated diplomatically, with economic and political agreements ensuring a smooth transition. The process would require referendums, legal agreements, and international recognition—but given the region’s alignment with Canada, it is a serious proposal worth considering.

As the political divide in the U.S. grows wider, the idea of New York and New England joining Canada may no longer be a radical fantasy, but a practical solution for those seeking a government that truly represents their values.

Why New England, New York Should Secede from U.S. to Join Canada (Feb. 1, 2025)


#NortheastSecession #JoinCanada #NewEnglandExit #NewYorkToCanada #SecedeToCanada #BetterTogether #USPolitics #PoliticalDivide

Luce Publications Launches Global, Inclusive Children’s Book Series


By Liz Webster


Liz Webster, Senior Editor

New York, N.Y. — The James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation announced the formal launch of Luce Publications, a children’s literature imprint devoted to empathy, inclusion, and global citizenship, with paperback distribution through Amazon beginning in 2025.

A values-driven children’s literature initiative emphasizes empathy, global curiosity, and emotional literacy through accessible storytelling and distinctive illustration.

The new imprint consolidates more than twenty children’s titles developed and published over several years through The Stewardship Report, now unified under a single editorial and visual philosophy. The books will be made available in affordable paperback editions priced under US$15, expanding access for families, schools, and nonprofit literacy programs.


A Coherent Moral Universe for Young Readers

Unlike standalone children’s titles, the Luce Publications catalog is designed as a cumulative worldview. Across stories addressing travel, disability, fear, kindness, bullying, and belonging, children encounter difference as normal and curiosity as instinctive. These narratives avoid didactic instruction, allowing values to be absorbed through repetition and familiarity.


 The “And It’s Okay” Series by Dr. William M. Bauer

Among the cornerstone offerings is the “And It’s Okay” series by Dr. William M. Bauer [Luce Index™ score: 90/100], a licensed clinical counselor and former educator whose work centers on children and adults with disabilities. Born with a severe hearing impairment, Bauer has devoted his career to helping children understand physical, emotional, and social differences without stigma.

The series addresses a wide range of conditions and life circumstances, including autism, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, epilepsy, juvenile diabetes, depression, learning disabilities, foster care, adoption, family incarceration, immigration status, and parental divorce. Educators report that the books function as conversation starters, enabling children to ask questions, express empathy, and normalize difference within classroom settings.



Jim Luce’s Global and Inclusive Storytelling

The imprint also features an extensive body of work by Jim Luce [Luce Index™ score: 90/100], drawing on his experiences as the founder of Orphans International Worldwide and as a parent to adopted and foster children from multiple regions. His stories include Donny the Big, Bad Bully, Juan Carlos the Maid’s Son — and President, Make Way for Shih Tzu!, and The Special World of Mathew James.

Central to the catalog is the Clover, the Magic Flying Dog travel series, in which young protagonists explore cultural landmarks such as the Pyramids of Giza, the Eiffel Tower, Machu Picchu, the Amazon rainforest, and the Great Wall of China. These stories frame the world as interconnected and personal, fostering global awareness without exoticism or moralizing.


A Distinctive Visual Language

Luce Publications has developed a recognizable illustration style characterized by soft watercolor realism, gentle linework, and composite characters rather than identifiable likenesses. Each book includes a small red heart near the page number as a unifying visual motif, and many titles feature a subtle shih tzu “easter egg,” reinforcing continuity across the catalog.


Teaching Responsibility Through Humor

Among the catalog’s newest additions is a social-emotional learning story that tackles civic responsibility with levity and relatability. Set against the backdrop of New York City sidewalks, the narrative follows a young protagonist who discovers that even small acts of negligence—leaving trash, ignoring litter, overlooking a neighbor’s dropped groceries—ripple outward in visible ways.

When neighbors begin reacting with mounting frustration, the child organizes a small-scale “clean-up crew” with friends, transforming what could have been a lecture into a kid-led initiative. The story emphasizes responsible decision-making and social awareness without moralizing, instead allowing humor and natural consequences to drive the lesson home.

The book reinforces a core tenet of SEL: understanding that personal choices affect the wider community, and that taking responsibility doesn’t require perfection—just awareness and willingness to act. By grounding abstract concepts like “civic-mindedness” in the concrete details of city life, the story makes stewardship tangible for young readers.


Institutional and Philanthropic Reach

By offering a cohesive series rather than isolated titles, the imprint positions itself as a scalable literacy and social-emotional learning initiative. Educators, librarians, and nonprofit partners can integrate the books into curricula, counseling environments, and community programs with confidence and minimal vetting.

“A single children’s book can be charming,” said Senior Editor Liz Webster. “A sustained body of work becomes cultural influence. These books quietly shape how children understand fear, kindness, and difference at the age when values take root.”


Looking Ahead

With paperback distribution expanding in 2025, Luce Publications plans continued development of its existing series alongside new titles aligned with its stewardship-driven mission. Translation partnerships and institutional sponsorships are under active consideration.


#LucePublications #ChildrensBooks #GlobalCitizenship #InclusiveEducation #Stewardship

TAGS: Luce Publications, Children’s Literature, Inclusive Education,
Global Citizenship, Stewardship Report, Empathy in Education


 

Jewish Women Respond to Trump Order on Antisemitism

National Council of Jewish Women Statement in Response
to the Trump Administration’s Executive Order on Antisemitism

Washington, D.C. – Today, the following statement in response to the Trump administration’s Executive Order, “Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism,” was released by National Council of Jewish Women CEO Sheila Katz:

Jews in America are living in fear — afraid in their schools, their synagogues, and even walking down the street. Parents hesitate to send their children to campus, students face harassment simply for being Jewish, and Jewish women are increasingly being sexually harassed and threatened with assault. No one should have to live this way.

National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) appreciates the Trump administration’s willingness to address antisemitism by requiring universities and government agencies to examine and use all legal tools available to protect Jewish students and the Jewish community.


“At the same time, we know that the fight against antisemitism cannot come at the expense of fundamental rights. As the government implements this approach, we emphasize the urgent need to uphold free expression and peaceful protest while ensuring Jewish students are truly safe on campus. Our nation must foster welcoming campus environments for all — regardless of religion, gender, political affiliation, and national origin.


“We are deeply alarmed by the explicit targeting of students on foreign visas, whom the executive order refers to as “alien students,” and the emphasis on their deportation. This xenophobic rhetoric echoes historical patterns of discrimination that Jews have faced for centuries, raising profound concerns for us.

Antisemitism exists in many forms and permeates society. Policies designed to protect Jewish communities should address antisemitism in all of its manifestations and from all corners of society. Antisemitism should never be weaponized.

“NCJW remains steadfast in our advocacy for meaningful, lasting efforts to combat antisemitism.

This includes building bridges across communities, holding universities and institutions accountable when they fail to act, and strengthening education about Jewish history, identity, and contributions. Jewish women, children, and families deserve a future where they can live without fear — and we will not stop working toward that future.

###

National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) is the oldest Jewish feminist civil rights organization working for equity and justice for women, children, and families in the United States and Israel. Through the efforts of our 225,000 grassroots advocates and 49 local sections, NCJW combines education, direct service, and advocacy to affect lasting social change at the local, state, and national levels. We approach our work through the intersections of gender, economic, and racial justice to center those most impacted in a uniquely Jewish way. Learn more at NCJW.org, and on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram.

‘High Threat’ Undocumented Migrants Sent to Guantánamo


Washington, D.C. — A small number of migrants were transferred from Texas to a detention facility in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, on Tuesday via U.S. military aircraft, U.S. defense officials told VOA.

Fewer than 20 migrants, which the administration has deemed to be “high threat,” are being transported on the first C-17 flight from Fort Bliss, one defense official said, speaking to VOA on background, a method often used by U.S. officials to remain anonymous, before the flight landed in Cuba.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Tuesday posted photos on X of some of the migrants as they prepared to board the military cargo plane, calling them “the worst of the worst,” and warning the effort to deport them is just getting started.

The Department of Homeland Security later said all of the migrants on the military flight from Texas to Guantánamo Bay were members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan street gang with transnational reach. Officials did not say when or how they were first taken into custody.

The White House has announced plans to designate Tren de Aragua as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Since President Donald Trump‘s executive order last month, the Pentagon has deployed 300 Marines to Guantanamo to expand the facilities to support holding operations for undocumented immigrants. According to media reports, they have set up tents to house the migrants inside a fenced area at a separate part of the naval base. Those facilities are not yet ready for migrants, according to Fox News.

“The number of service members will continue to fluctuate as additional forces are tasked to deploy and will be scaled, based on the requirements of the Department of Homeland Security, which is the lead federal agency,” U.S. Southern Command, which overseas operations in South America, Central America and the Caribbean, announced in a statement on Monday.

The migrants who arrived Tuesday will be held at the U.S. detention facility, according to a U.S. official who spoke on background. The facility is known mostly for housing military prisoners and terror suspects, including those involved in the September 11, 2001, attacks and members of the Taliban.

“If you’re a violent gang banger, and you’ve been taken out of our country, and we’re waiting to bring you to your country, we’re going to put you in a cell box built for al-Qaida,” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told Fox News this week.

In his executive order last month, Trump instructed the departments of Defense and Homeland Security to prepare the U.S. naval base to hold up to 30,000 migrants.

“Some of them are so bad we don’t even trust the countries to hold them because we don’t want them coming back. So, we’re going to send them out to Guantanamo,” Trump said.

In January 2002, a Navy petty officer took pictures from Camp X-Ray of the first prisoners to arrive at Guantánamo. Photo by Petty Officer 1st class Shane T. McCoy/U.S. Navy.

Closing Guantanamo

Democratic administrations under Barack Obama and Joe Biden had sought to close the detention camp, which was built by the George W. Bush administration in 2002 following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan that began shortly after the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

Sue Hendrickson, president and C.E.O. of Human Rights First, said in a statement that sending migrants to Guantanamo would create a human rights catastrophe.

“The Trump administration may find the symbolism of sending migrants to Guantanamo darkly appealing; its practical result would be more injustice, waste and self-inflicted loss of credibility,” Hendrickson said.

At its height during the Global War on Terror, the detention facility held about 680 prisoners. As of January 6, there were just 15 detainees at the facility, according to the Pentagon.

Before being used to detain terror suspects, the U.S. naval facility was also used to house migrants from Cuba and Haiti in the early 1990s.


‘High Threat’ Undocumented Migrants Sent to Guantanamo (Feb. 4, 2025)

Macron Asks U.N. to Consider Peacekeeping Force for Haiti

0

New York, N.Y. French President Emmanuel Macron has asked the United Nations to consider sending a peacekeeping force to Haiti. The suggestion was made in a letter Macron sent to the U.N. after meeting with Leslie Voltaire, president of Haiti’s Transitional Presidential Council at the Elysee Palace in Paris.


Macron Asks U.N. to Consider Peacekeeping Force for Haiti (Feb. 4, 2025)

Haiti: ‘I Was Deported to a Country I Never Lived In’


Members of a Haitian family return from the Dominican Republic carrying the few possessions they have.

Port-au-Prince, Haiti — Migrants who have been deported from the Dominican Republic to Haiti – the two Caribbean nations that share the island of Hispaniola – have been talking to the United Nations about the challenges of returning to a crisis-ridden country they barely know.


Mireille

Pregnant and exhausted and clutching a small bag with all that was left of her belongings, Mireille* stood under the relentless Haitian sun, not sure what to do next.

She had just been deported from the Dominican Republic, a country she had called home since she was eight years old.

Over the years she has seen Haiti, the land of her birth, overcome by gang violence as well as humanitarian, political and economic crises.

Mireille gazes through the protective bars at the GARR facility, reflecting on her journey back to Haiti.
Mireille gazes through the protective bars at the GARR facility, reflecting on her journey back to Haiti. © IOM/Antoine Lemonnier.

“I was deported to a country I never lived in,” she said, filled with a mix of anger and despair.

The Dominican Republic had been her home for nearly three decades. It was where she built her life, forged relationships and created memories. But overnight, she became an outsider, stripped of her dignity and forced to return to a country she didn’t know.

Mireille’s ordeal began in the early hours of the morning, five days before she crossed the border into Haiti when she was taken to a crowded and uncomfortable detention center, where she stayed for several days before being transported to the border.

A deportation truck arrives at the Belladère border crossing between the Dominican Republic and Haiti.
A deportation truck arrives at the Belladère border crossing between the Dominican Republic and Haiti. © IOM/Antoine Lemonnier.

“I arrived in Haiti feeling scared and unsure of what to do,” Mireille said. “I barely know this country, and I’m struggling to figure out where to start. It’s disorienting and difficult.”

Guerson and Roselène

Guerson and Roselène* had spent over a decade in the Dominican Republic, building their lives in Loma de Cabrera, not far from the border with Haiti.

Guerson worked as a mechanic at a small garage fixing cars, motorbikes, and agricultural equipment. His hands, often smeared with grease, were a source of pride. “People trusted me with their vehicles,” he said. “It was hard work, but I could provide for my family.”

Roselène, meanwhile, managed their modest home. She prepared meals and supplemented the family income by selling patés and fried plantains to neighbors.

A simple life

Their daily life was simple but stable. Their son Kenson attended a local preschool, and Roselène spoke of her pride seeing him learn to write his name.

Then the Dominican authorities arrived. “My children didn’t understand,” said Guerson. “Kenson asked if we were going on a trip. I didn’t know how to answer him.”

The family was herded onto a truck “I held my baby so tightly. I was afraid we wouldn’t survive the journey,” Guerson recalled.

Crossing the border into Haiti felt like stepping into chaos.

The town of Ouanaminthe, already struggling with a sharp increase in deportations, lacked the capacity to respond to the growing crisis.

Families stood on dusty roads, clutching bags and children, unsure of where to go.

“We stood there for hours, lost,” Roselène said. “The children were hungry. I didn’t know how to comfort them because I had nothing left to give.”


Crisis country

Mireille, Guerson and Roselène are just three of the more than 200,000 Haitians who were forcibly repatriated to their homeland in 2024, some 97 per cent of them from the Dominican Republic.

Nearly 15,000 people were returned from across the border in the first two weeks of January alone.

They returned to a country in crisis.

Guerson (left) and Roselène are beginning a new life in Haiti.
Guerson (left) and Roselène are beginning a new life in Haiti. © IOM/Antoine Lemonnier.

Armed groups now control large parts of the country, including key roads in and out of the capital, Port-au-Prince.

The years of violence have displaced over 700,000 people, forcing families into precarious shelters including abandoned schools and churches. In these places, access to food, water and healthcare is limited, leaving many extremely vulnerable.

Nearly 5.5 million people, half of Haiti’s population, require humanitarian aid to survive.

Safety net across the border

Fortunately, when migrants cross over the border into Haiti, they are not alone.

The U.N.’s International Organization for Migration (IOM) works with the Support Group for the Repatriated and Refugees (Groupe d’Appui aux Rapatriés et Réfugiés, GARR) to ensure the returnees have access to a range of services to meet their immediate needs, including psychosocial support, health referrals, for example pre-natal care, and the distribution of basic items such as clothing, hygiene products, and toiletries.

Temporary accommodation is also available for the most vulnerable, so they can rest and take stock before moving forward with their lives.

IOM staff prepare to assist deported Haitians as they re-enter their home country.
IOM staff prepare to assist deported Haitians as they re-enter their home country. © IOM/Antoine Lemonnier.

For unaccompanied children, family reunifications are organised and in cases of gender-based violence, survivors are provided with specialised care.

IOM also works with the Office National de la Migration (ONM), Haiti’s government agency for migration.

ONM leads the registration process, ensuring that each individual is accounted for and works with IOM to assess vulnerabilities and provide individual assistance.

The future remains unclear for many returnees in a country where the vast majority of people struggle to get by on a daily basis.

Guerson and Roselène remain somewhat hopeful that they will return to the Dominican Republic someday. “In the meantime, I will find a way to work,” Guerson said softly, his words conveying uncertainty. “I do this for my children.”

*Names have been changed for their safety


Haiti: ‘I Was Deported to a Country I Never Lived In’ (Feb. 3, 2025)

National Black History Month: Celebrating Heritage, Contributions


Monthly Feature: February


New York, N.Y. — Every February, the United States comes alive with vibrant celebrations, educational events, and heartfelt tributes during National Black History Month.

This annual observance, which began as a week-long event in 1926, has grown into a month dedicated to honoring the rich heritage, remarkable achievements, and enduring resilience of African Americans. It’s a time to reflect on the past, celebrate the present, and inspire a future where equality and recognition flourish.


Begun in 1926, this month is dedicated to honoring the rich heritage,
remarkable achievements, and enduring resilience of African Americans


National Black History Month traces its roots to historian Carter G. Woodson, who launched “Negro History Week” nearly a century ago. Woodson chose February to coincide with the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, two towering figures in the fight for freedom and justice.

In 1976, this week expanded into a month-long celebration, officially recognized by the U.S. government, thanks to the tireless advocacy of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH), which Woodson founded. Today, it’s a cornerstone of cultural awareness, embraced by schools, communities, and leaders nationwide.



Why does it matter?

National Black History Month shines a spotlight on the contributions of African Americans often overlooked in mainstream narratives.

It’s a chance to honor inventors like Garrett Morgan, who created the traffic light, and cultural icons like Maya Angelou, whose words continue to inspire.

It’s also a reminder of the struggles—slavery, segregation, and systemic inequality—that African Americans have overcome, fostering a deeper understanding of their pivotal role in shaping the nation.

In 2025, with the theme “African Americans and the Arts,” the focus is on creativity, from jazz legends to contemporary filmmakers, showcasing the boundless impact of Black talent.

The importance of this month resonates far beyond history lessons.

It’s a call to action for unity and progress. Schools host events, museums unveil exhibits, and communities gather to celebrate. It’s a time when people of all backgrounds can learn, appreciate, and amplify Black voices. According to a recent survey by the National Education Association (NEA), 78% of educators say teaching Black history fosters empathy and critical thinking in students—skills vital for a harmonious society.

Famous figures have long championed this celebration.

Former President Barack Obama, during his tenure, issued annual proclamations calling Black History Month a time to “celebrate the countless contributions of African Americans.”

Oprah Winfrey, a media mogul and philanthropist, has consistently supported events tied to the month, once saying, “Understanding our history is key to unlocking our potential.”

Musical icon Stevie Wonder has performed at commemorative concerts, while athletes like Serena Williams use their platforms to highlight its significance, often sharing messages of pride and empowerment on social media.

Hollywood has also joined the chorus.

Actor Chadwick Boseman, before his passing in 2020, spoke passionately about the need to recognize Black history year-round, but especially in February.

Modern stars like Zendaya and John Legend continue that legacy, attending galas or posting tributes that reach millions.

Even global leaders, such as Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have acknowledged the month, reflecting its international influence as Canada and the U.K. host their own versions in February and October, respectively.

This year’s celebrations promise to be particularly uplifting.

Cities like Atlanta and Washington, D.C., are planning art festivals, while virtual events ensure accessibility for all.

Libraries are expanding collections of Black-authored books, and organizations like the NAACP are hosting workshops to engage younger generations.

It’s a collective effort to ensure the stories of trailblazers—past and present—aren’t just remembered, but celebrated with joy and gratitude.

National Black History Month isn’t just a look back; it’s a leap forward.

It inspires future leaders, artists, and innovators by showing what’s possible when talent meets opportunity.

As Woodson once said, “If a race has no history, it has no worthwhile tradition.” This February, Americans are invited to join the festivities, learn something new, and honor a legacy that continues to shape a brighter, more inclusive tomorrow.



Join the celebration this February!

Explore African American history, attend local events, read works by Black authors, or share stories of inspiring figures on social media with #BlackHistoryMonth.

Let’s honor the past and amplify Black voices together—every step you take helps build a more inclusive future!”


#BlackHistoryMonth #CelebrateBlackExcellence #AfricanAmericanHeritage

Tags: Black History, African American Culture,
Heritage Celebration, Education

New York Highlights Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month


Monthly Feature: February


Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month Shines Spotlight on Healthy Relationships in New York


One in three teens experiencing some form of dating abuse before age 18


New York, N.Y. — As April unfolds, communities across New York and the nation turn their attention to Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month (TDVAM), a time dedicated to raising awareness about the pervasive issue of dating violence among adolescents.


Observed annually in February at the national level, New York extends its focus into April to amplify efforts, educate young people, and foster healthier relationships. With one in three teens experiencing some form of dating abuse before age 18, this initiative underscores the urgency of prevention and support.

Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month, established through advocacy efforts and reinforced by the Violence Against Women Act, aims to break the cycle of abuse by equipping teens with knowledge and resources.


In New York, the Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence (OPDV) leads the charge, offering tools like the Healthy Relationship Quiz and campaigns such as “Choose Your Own Adventure: Spot the Flags.” These initiatives help teens identify red flags—such as controlling behavior or emotional manipulation—and green flags, like mutual respect and trust, in their relationships.



Dating violence encompasses physical, emotional, sexual, or digital abuse within a romantic relationship.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it affects millions of U.S. teens, with girls, transgender, and gender-nonconforming youth at higher risk. Beyond immediate harm, the long-term effects can include depression, substance abuse, and patterns of violence in future relationships.


In New York, where every county has a domestic violence program, resources are readily available, yet awareness remains critical to ensuring teens know where to turn.

What should New Yorkers be aware of this month?

The signs of abuse aren’t always obvious. Physical violence, like hitting or pushing, is clear, but emotional abuse—constant criticism, isolation from friends, or threats—can be subtler.

Digital abuse, such as monitoring a partner’s phone or sharing private images without consent, has surged with technology’s role in teen lives.

OPDV emphasizes that one supportive adult can make a difference, offering a lifeline to a teen hesitant to speak out.


For teens navigating these challenges, experts share practical advice.

“Trust your instincts,” says Dr. Maria Gonzalez, a counselor with the New York State Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline. “If something feels off, talk to someone you trust—a friend, parent, or teacher.”

Setting boundaries, communicating openly, and recognizing when to leave a relationship are key skills. Teens are also encouraged to reach out to the hotline at 800-942-6906 or text 844-997-2121 for confidential support.



The importance of TDVAM lies in its dual focus: prevention and empowerment.

Healthy relationships built on respect and equality benefit not just individuals but entire communities. Governor Kathy Hochul, in a recent proclamation, highlighted the state’s commitment to ending teen dating violence, noting that education and early intervention can stop abuse before it escalates.

With 10% of adolescents reporting physical violence from a partner annually, according to youth.gov, the stakes are high. In New York, programs like the One Love initiative empower teens to spot unhealthy dynamics and take action.


Why does this matter now?

The rise of technology-facilitated abuse—cyberstalking or coercive control via social media—adds urgency. Teens spend hours online, making them vulnerable to new forms of harm.

TDVAM’s 2025 theme, “Respect That,” chosen by the love is respect Youth Council, emphasizes dignity and autonomy in relationships, resonating with New York’s diverse youth population.


The call to action is clear: get involved.

Wear orange on February 11—extended into April in New York—to show solidarity, a tradition rooted in the state’s Wear Orange Day. Share resources on social media with hashtags like #TDVAM2025 and #RespectThatNY.

Parents, educators, and peers can start conversations about consent and boundaries.

Visit opdv.ny.gov for toolkits, or join events like OPDV’s upcoming discussion on masculinity and allyship at John Jay College. Every step counts toward safer futures.

In a state as vibrant as New York, TDVAM is more than a month—it’s a movement.

By raising awareness, offering support, and encouraging action, it aims to ensure every teen knows they deserve respect, safety, and love.

New York Highlights Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month (Feb. 2, 2025)


Talk to a Teen Today. Encourage adults—parents, teachers, or mentors—to start a conversation with a teen about healthy relationships, consent, and recognizing red flags. This fosters open dialogue and builds trust.

Wear Orange and Share. Urge people to wear orange on April 11 (New York’s extended Wear Orange Day) and post on social media with hashtags like #TDVAM2025 or #RespectThatNY, spreading awareness and resources.

Learn the Signs, Save a Life. Prompt individuals to visit opdv.ny.gov or loveisrespect.org to educate themselves on the signs of dating violence and share that knowledge with others, emphasizing early intervention.

Support the Hotline. Inspire people to share or use the New York State Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline (800-942-6906 or text 844-997-2121), ensuring teens know help is available 24/7.


#TDVAM2025, #RespectThatNY, #TeenSafety,
#HealthyRelationships, #NYAgainstAbuse

Tags: Teen Dating Violence, Awareness Month, New York,
Healthy Relationships, Support, Prevention, Education

Empowering Indigenous Communities in Colombia

A Vision for Education and Cultural Preservation


New York, N.Y. — In the lush plains of Colombia’s Meta department, a transformative project is underway to support indigenous communities striving to preserve their cultural heritage while securing access to essential education and infrastructure. Spearheaded by the Acacías Monarca and Villavicencio Monarca Lions Clubs, this initiative focuses on building educational and cultural facilities for three indigenous groups—the Embera Doquera, Nasa, and Pijao communities—each with unique histories, traditions, and aspirations.

The project has drawn international support, including from the New York-based James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation, known for its focus on global youth leadership and cultural preservation. The foundation’s president, Jim Luce, expressed his organization’s commitment to the project, stating, “We are enthusiastic about supporting indigenous Colombians maintain their own community and culture.”

The initiative comes at a critical time for indigenous communities in Colombia, many of whom have faced decades of displacement and marginalization. After extensive assessments and consultations with local leaders, the Lions Clubs have proposed the construction of infrastructure tailored to the needs of each community.



For the Embera Doquera in Lejanías, a preschool and primary school will serve as vital spaces to educate their children and preserve their language and traditions. In Mesetas, the Nasa community plans to establish a “Maloka of Knowledge,” a cultural and commercial center designed to promote tourism and economic self-sufficiency. Meanwhile, the Pijao community near Puerto López envisions a multi-purpose “Bohío,” combining educational, cultural, and commercial functions to revitalize their heritage and support local livelihoods.

Following careful evaluation, the Pijao community has been prioritized for the first phase of implementation due to its strategic location and accessibility.

“This project is not only about infrastructure,” said Alex and Marco, leaders of the Lions Clubs involved. “It’s about creating opportunities for these communities to flourish while preserving the traditions that make them unique.”

Jim Luce praised the Lions Club members’ dedication, saying, “We commend Alex and Marco and the Lions Club for their devotion to bring this concept to fruition.”

The project also aligns with Colombia’s broader efforts to promote peace and reconciliation in regions deeply affected by decades of armed conflict. By investing in education and cultural preservation, the initiative seeks to empower indigenous communities to rebuild their lives and contribute to the nation’s diverse cultural tapestry.

With plans now moving into the design and planning phase, the collaboration between local leaders, global organizations, and the Lions Clubs is setting an inspiring example of how community-driven initiatives can foster resilience and cultural pride.

For the Pijao, Nasa, and Embera Doquera, this project represents more than just physical structures—it is a beacon of hope for a sustainable and culturally rich future.


I Have Tourette’s Syndrome – And It’s Okay!


By Dr. Bill Bauer


My name is Stephen, and I have something called Tourette’s.
Me llamo Stephen, y tengo algo que se llama Tourette.

Illustration 1 note: Stephen smiling gently, welcoming the reader.


Tourette’s is part of my everyday life.
El Tourette es parte de mi vida diaria.

Illustration 2 note: Stephen on the farm in a calm, familiar setting.


Sometimes my body makes movements or sounds that I can’t control.
A veces mi cuerpo hace movimientos o sonidos que no puedo controlar.

Illustration 3 note: Subtle tic depiction (blinking, small movement), respectful and gentle.


SPREAD 4 — NAMING THE EXPERIENCE

English:
These movements and sounds are called tics.

Spanish:
Estos movimientos y sonidos se llaman tics.

Illustration note:
Neutral, explanatory moment — no embarrassment.


SPREAD 5 — CLEARING UP MISUNDERSTANDINGS

English:
People might think I can stop them, but I can’t.

Spanish:
Algunas personas piensan que puedo detenerlos, pero no puedo.

Illustration note:
Stephen with other kids nearby, no teasing, just curiosity.


SPREAD 6 — INSIDE STEPHEN

English:
Trying to stop my tics can make me feel more nervous.

Spanish:
Tratar de detener mis tics puede hacerme sentir más nervioso.

Illustration note:
Quiet, reflective image — Stephen alone but safe.


SPREAD 7 — FRIENDSHIP & ACCEPTANCE

English:
My friends accept me for who I am.

Spanish:
Mis amigos me aceptan tal como soy.

Illustration note:
Stephen playing with friends — bikes, hopscotch, shared joy.


SPREAD 8 — FAMILY & RESPONSIBILITY

English:
I live on a farm and help my family with chores.

Spanish:
Vivo en una finca y ayudo a mi familia con los oficios.

Illustration note:
Feeding chickens, working together — capable, included.


SPREAD 9 — ENERGY & REST

English:
Some days are busy, and by the end of the day, I feel very tired.

Spanish:
Algunos días son muy ocupados, y al final del día me siento muy cansado.

Illustration note:
Stephen sleepy in a chair — relatable, gentle humor.


SPREAD 10 — DREAMS FOR THE FUTURE

English:
When I grow up, I have dreams for my future.

Spanish:
Cuando sea grande, tengo sueños para mi futuro.

Illustration note:
Dreamlike image — Army or dentist imagery can appear softly.


SPREAD 11 — THE MESSAGE

English:
You don’t have to fix me.

Spanish:
No tienes que arreglarme.

Illustration note:
Strong but calm image — Stephen standing comfortably.


SPREAD 12 — THE RESOLUTION

English:
I have Tourette’s — and it’s okay.

Spanish:
Tengo Tourette — y está bien.

Illustration note:
Warm, confident closure. This is the only ending.


#TouretteSyndrome #Neurodiversity #DisabilityInclusion #ChildrensBooks #InclusiveEducation #StewardshipReport #MentalHealthAwareness #KidsBooks #EducacionInclusiva #Neurodiversidad

TAGS: Tourette’s syndrome, neurodiversity, children’s books, disability inclusion, inclusive education,
mental health awareness, Stewardship Report, educación inclusiva, neurodiversidad, libros infantiles


Un libro infantil de The Stewardship Report que ayuda a niños y niñas a comprender el
síndrome de Tourette con empatía, inclusión y aceptación. Ideal para familias y educadores.

 

Juan Carlos the Maid’s Son — and President


Juan Carlos, el hijo de la empleada doméstica — y presidente


By Jim Luce


High in a city tucked into the Andes Mountains, there stood a very big house.
En lo alto, en una ciudad escondida entre las montañas
de los Andes, había una casa muy grande.

In that house lived a rich family—and in a
small room behind it lived a maid and her little son.
En esa casa vivía una familia rica—y en un cuartito detrás
de ella vivían una empleada doméstica y su pequeño hijo.

The little boy’s name was Juan Carlos. His mamá called him ‘Juancho.
El niño se llamaba Juan Carlos. Su mamá lo llamaba Juancho.


Juancho loved the courtyard. He loved the sun. He loved his big, round ball.
A Juancho le encantaba el patio. Le encantaba el sol.
Le encantaba su pelota grande y redonda.

Juancho was still wearing diapers—but he was just learning how to walk.
Juancho todavía usaba pañales—pero estaba aprendiendo a caminar.

One day his mamá said, “Juancho, you must stay here with me.”
Un día su mamá le dijo: —Juancho, debes quedarte aquí conmigo.

“You may not go upstairs where the rich family lives.”
—No puedes subir las escaleras donde vive la familia rica.

Juancho did not understand why. He only knew he liked to explore.
Juancho no entendía por qué. Solo sabía que le gustaba explorar.

One quiet day, Juancho climbed the stairs.
Then he climbed another set of stairs.
Un día tranquilo, Juancho subió las escaleras.
Luego subió otro tramo más.

At the top, he reached the rooftop.
Arriba, llegó a la azotea.

From there, Juancho could see mountains and trees and the whole wide world.
Desde allí, Juancho podía ver montañas, árboles y todo el mundo a su alrededor.

Juancho smiled. He felt happy.
Juancho sonrió. Se sentía feliz.

But his mamá could not find him.
Pero su mamá no podía encontrarlo.

The rich family helped look for him—and soon they found him on the rooftop.
La familia rica ayudó a buscarlo—y pronto lo encontraron en la azotea.

“You must not come up here again,” one man said firmly.
—No debes volver a subir aquí —dijo un hombre con firmeza.

Juancho grew up.
Juancho creció.

He went to school. He loved learning. He asked many questions.
Fue a la escuela. Le encantaba aprender. Hacía muchas preguntas.

Later, he went to the university and studied law.
Más tarde, fue a la universidad y estudió derecho.

He wondered why some people had so much—
and others were told to stay behind.
Se preguntaba por qué algunas personas tenían tanto—
y a otras se les decía que se quedaran atrás.

Juan Carlos became a mayor. Then one day, he became president.
Juan Carlos se convirtió en alcalde. Y un día, se convirtió en presidente.

As president, Juan Carlos said,
“There should be no walls between people.”

Como presidente, Juan Carlos dijo:
—No debería haber muros entre las personas.

“No child should be told where they do or do not belong.”
—A ningún niño se le debería decir dónde pertenece o dónde no.

His mamá hugged him and said, “Juancho, I am so proud of you.”
Su mamá lo abrazó y le dijo: —Juancho, estoy muy orgullosa de ti.

And Juan Carlos hugged her back.
Y Juan Carlos la abrazó también.


✍️ Author’s Note

This story is for every child who wonders why doors are closed, and for every adult who believes they don’t have to be.
Esta historia es para cada niño que se pregunta por qué algunas puertas están cerradas, y para cada adulto que cree que no tienen que estarlo.

✍️ Editor’s Note

In college, the author lived with a host family in Bogota, Colombia that had a maid. Jim was enchanted with the maid’s toddler as neither of them spoke Spanish well and could simply be together, playing in the back yard. Jim was quietly taken aside by the family and told that it was inappropriate to play with a maid’s son as class structure must be maintained or society would collapse.

#ChildrensBooks #PictureBooks #SocialJusticeForKids #LatinAmericanStories
#InclusiveStories #Belonging #ClassAndEquity #StewardshipReport #JimLuce

TAGS: children’s books, picture books, social justice for children, Stewardship Report,
class inequality, Latin American stories, inclusive education, belonging, equity, Jim Luce

Hegseth Moves Against Retired General Milley, Stripping Security Detail


Pete Hegseth Moves Against Retired General Mark Milley,
Stripping Security Detail and Ordering Investigation

Washington, D.C. — In one of his first major acts since taking office, new Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has moved against retired General Mark A. Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revoking his security detail and ordering an inspector general investigation into his conduct. The decision, confirmed by a senior defense official, signals a sharp shift in the Pentagon’s leadership under the new administration.

Milley, who served as the nation’s top military officer from 2019 to 2023, frequently found himself at odds with President Donald J. Trump, particularly in the aftermath of the 2020 election and the January 6 attack on the Capitol. His tenure was marked by tensions with Trump allies, especially over his public statements regarding civilian control of the military and his warnings against political interference in military affairs.

The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said that Milley’s security detail—provided due to concerns over threats against him—would be withdrawn immediately. The official also confirmed that the Department of Defense’s inspector general has been tasked with reviewing Milley’s actions during and after his tenure. While the precise focus of the investigation remains unclear, it follows years of criticism from Trump and his allies, who have accused Milley of overstepping his authority.

A Politicized Reckoning

The move comes amid broader efforts by the new administration to reshape the Pentagon and reassert control over military leadership. Hegseth, a former Fox News host and a longtime supporter of Trump, was confirmed as Defense Secretary earlier this month in a highly contentious Senate vote. His appointment signaled a sharp ideological turn for the Department of Defense, as he has been vocal about purging what he calls the Pentagon’s “woke” culture and restoring loyalty to the commander in chief.

Milley’s clashes with Trump were well-documented. In 2021, Milley confirmed that he had made backchannel reassurances to China in the final months of Trump’s presidency, a move he later defended as an effort to maintain stability and prevent misunderstandings that could have led to conflict. Trump and his allies have called those actions tantamount to treason.

In his farewell speech in 2023, Milley warned against efforts to politicize the military, stating, “We don’t take an oath to a wannabe dictator. We take an oath to the Constitution.” His remarks were widely seen as a rebuke of Trump’s attempts to assert greater control over the military.

Implications for Military Independence

Critics argue that Hegseth’s actions against Milley amount to political retribution and could have a chilling effect on military leaders who seek to maintain independence from partisan influence. “This sets a dangerous precedent,” said a former senior Pentagon official who worked under multiple administrations. “Punishing retired military leaders for perceived disloyalty is the kind of thing we see in authoritarian regimes, not in the United States.”

Supporters of the move, however, argue that Milley had overstepped his authority and that an investigation is necessary to ensure military leaders remain accountable. “Milley acted as though he was above civilian leadership,” said a senior Republican aide on Capitol Hill. “This is about restoring order and ensuring that no one undermines the commander in chief.”

As the investigation unfolds, the decision to revoke Milley’s security protection raises concerns about his personal safety. The retired general has faced threats in the past, particularly after becoming a target of right-wing criticism. It remains unclear whether he will seek alternative protection.

The developments mark a dramatic escalation in the ongoing struggle over the future of the U.S. military’s role in politics. As the new administration consolidates power, the treatment of Milley could serve as a litmus test for how far it is willing to go in reshaping the defense establishment—and whether political retribution will become a new norm in civil-military relations.


#MarkMilley #PeteHegseth #Pentagon #MilitaryPolitics #Trump #CivilMilitaryRelations #NationalSecurity #PoliticalRetaliation #DefensePolicy


Wong Kim Ark: The Case That Defined American Citizenship

How a Young Chinatown Cook Helped Establish Birthright Citizenship in the USA

New York, N.Y. — In the 19th century, a landmark Supreme Court case involving Wong Kim Ark, a young Chinese American cook, forever shaped the future of citizenship in the United States.

In the late 1800s, Wong Kim Ark, born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents, found himself at the heart of a historic legal battle. Despite being born in the U.S., Wong’s citizenship was questioned under the Chinese Exclusion Act—a federal law that severely restricted immigration and discriminated against Chinese immigrants.

In 1895, after a trip to China, Wong was denied reentry to the U.S., with officials claiming that his parents’ Chinese nationality disqualified him from being a U.S. citizen. Wong, however, fought back, taking his case all the way to the Supreme Court.

The court’s 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark affirmed the principle of birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. The ruling clarified that anyone born on U.S. soil—regardless of their parents’ nationality—is a citizen, barring specific exceptions such as children of foreign diplomats. This precedent not only cemented Wong’s citizenship but also safeguarded the rights of countless others, particularly immigrant families and their children.

Wong’s legacy endures as a pivotal moment in American civil rights history. His courage in challenging the government’s discrimination ensured that the Constitution’s promise of equal citizenship applied to all, regardless of race or heritage.

Wong Kim Ark: The Case That Defined American Citizenship (Jan. 28, 2025)


#BirthrightCitizenship, #WongKimArk, #14thAmendment, #ImmigrantHistory, #CivilRights, #ChineseExclusionAct

@HistoryChannel, @ACLU, @ImmigrationPolicy, @CivilRightsOrg, @NationalArchives

RFK Jr.’s Conspiracy Theories: A Threat to Public Health

0

Washington, D.C.Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s rise from environmental advocate to a figurehead of conspiracy theories and misinformation is emblematic of a troubling trend in American politics.

His promotion of discredited vaccine-autism links, claims about COVID-19 as a bioweapon targeting specific ethnic groups, and baseless theories on antidepressants and school shootings showcase a pattern of dangerous pseudoscience.

Even his family has disavowed him, labeling his actions as embarrassing and harmful. His nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services by President Trump raises grave concerns about public health, given his history of undermining scientific consensus.

RFK Jr.’s Conspiracy Theories: A Threat to Public Health (Jan. 28, 2025)


#RejectRFKJr #ScienceOverConspiracies #SayNoToRFKJr @RFKJrUnfit

Eighty Years Since Liberation: World Remembers Auschwitz


New York, N.Y. –– Today marks the solemn 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest Nazi concentration and extermination camp, located in occupied Poland. Ceremonies across the globe pay tribute to the victims of the Holocaust and serve as a poignant reminder of the enduring need to combat hatred, intolerance, and prejudice.

Auschwitz: A Symbol of Human Tragedy
Auschwitz-Birkenau stands as a chilling testament to the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. Between 1940 and 1945, over 1.1 million people perished within its barbed-wire fences. The majority were Jewish men, women, and children, but the victims also included Roma, Soviet prisoners of war, political dissidents, and others whom the Nazi regime deemed undesirable.

Key Events Commemorating the Anniversary
    •    Ceremony at Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial:
A central ceremony is taking place at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, attended by Holocaust survivors, world leaders, and dignitaries. Survivors are sharing their personal stories of resilience and loss, reminding the world of the human cost of hatred. Many participants lay wreaths at the camp’s infamous “Death Wall,” where thousands were executed by firing squad.
    •    Global Observances:
Across continents, Holocaust museums, schools, synagogues, and public spaces are hosting commemorative events. Countries are holding vigils, educational seminars, and exhibitions to honor the victims and ensure that their stories remain alive for future generations.
    •    Focus on Education:
This anniversary highlights the critical role of Holocaust education in fighting antisemitism, racism, and bigotry. Institutions worldwide are renewing efforts to integrate Holocaust studies into school curricula, emphasizing lessons about human rights, tolerance, and the dangers of unchecked hatred.

A Sobering Reminder for Future Generations
As the number of Holocaust survivors continues to dwindle, the responsibility of remembrance increasingly falls on younger generations. Survivor testimonies are being preserved through digital archives, documentaries, and AI-driven technologies, ensuring that their voices endure.

The anniversary serves as a powerful reminder of the fragility of democracy and the catastrophic consequences of ignoring prejudice and systemic hatred. Auschwitz’s liberation by Soviet forces on January 27, 1945, marked a turning point in the world’s understanding of the Holocaust and its horrors, but it also underscored the global responsibility to prevent such atrocities from ever happening again.

Calls to Action
World leaders and human rights organizations are using this occasion to call for vigilance against rising antisemitism, xenophobia, and extremism. With hate crimes and discriminatory rhetoric on the rise in many parts of the world, the anniversary underscores the urgency of upholding the principles of equality and human dignity.

Survivor Testimonies: Stories of Pain and Hope
Many survivors attending today’s events shared their harrowing memories of the camp’s inhumane conditions, the loss of their loved ones, and the resilience that helped them endure. Others spoke of the hope they found in liberation and their determination to build lives of meaning and purpose after the war.

The Ongoing Fight Against Hatred
The Auschwitz anniversary is not only a moment for reflection but also a call to action. Holocaust remembrance is a cornerstone in the fight against modern-day antisemitism, racism, and genocide denial. Educational initiatives and remembrance events aim to foster empathy, understanding, and unity in an increasingly divided world.

As the world remembers the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, it honors the victims of the Holocaust and recommits to the promise of “never again.”


Tags: @AuschwitzMuseum, @HolocaustMuseum, @UNESCO, @UnitedNations, @HumanRightsWatch
Hashtags: #HolocaustRemembranceDay, #NeverAgain, #Auschwitz80, #HumanRights, #FightAntisemitism

China’s Giant Pandas Bao Li, Qing Bao Debut at National Zoo


Washington, D.C. –– The buzz began early one crisp January morning as news spread through Washington, D.C.: the National Zoo was welcoming a new pair of giant pandas, Bao Li and Qing Bao, on loan from China as part of an international conservation program. It was a joyous moment for a city that had long embraced its role as a global center of culture, diplomacy, and now, panda charm.

Families flocked to the zoo to catch the first glimpse of the furry ambassadors. Cameras clicked as Bao Li, a serene and curious female, ventured gracefully into the outdoor habitat, her black-and-white coat a stark contrast against the light dusting of snow. Tian Ming, her playful male counterpart, followed close behind, immediately tumbling into a pile of bamboo with boundless energy.

“They’re even cuter in person!” a child exclaimed, clutching a panda-shaped balloon.

For the zookeepers, the pandas’ arrival was the culmination of months of preparation. Bao Li and Qing Bao had traveled from Sichuan, China, in climate-controlled luxury, accompanied by a dedicated team of caretakers and veterinarians. Now they were adjusting to their new home in the zoo’s state-of-the-art panda enclosure, complete with climbing structures, a flowing stream, and plenty of bamboo imported from around the country.

But Bao Li and Qing Bao were more than just adorable attractions. They symbolized hope in the ongoing fight to protect their species, which had been teetering on the edge of extinction just decades ago. At a ceremony held to celebrate their arrival, dignitaries from China and the United States spoke of the importance of their partnership.

“Bao Li and Qing Bao remind us of the beauty of collaboration,” the zoo’s director said. “They are not just animals in our care; they are teachers, reminding us of the fragile balance of our natural world.”

Over the next few months, the pandas became local celebrities. Social media buzzed with updates on their antics—Bao Li delicately scaling a tree to get a better view of the crowds, Qing Bao gleefully rolling down a grassy hill like a clumsy furball. A live webcam set up in their enclosure attracted viewers from around the globe, who tuned in to watch the pair nap, munch bamboo, and occasionally playfully swat at each other.

Meanwhile, schools incorporated lessons on pandas into their curriculums, teaching students about conservation and the importance of preserving natural habitats. Local artists created panda-inspired murals, and bakeries sold panda-themed pastries, turning the city into a celebration of black-and-white joy.

As the months went on, Bao Li and Qing Bao’s presence had a ripple effect, drawing attention to other conservation efforts at the zoo. Visitors left inspired not only by the pandas but by the broader message they represented: the possibility of a world where humans and wildlife could thrive together.


Global Backlash Over Proposal to Relocate Palestinians from Gaza


Washington, D.C. — A proposal to relocate large numbers of Palestinians from Gaza has been met with strong opposition from regional allies, legal experts, and activists who have criticized it as impractical, illegal, and harmful.

The controversial idea suggests that hundreds of thousands of residents could be moved to neighboring countries, either temporarily or permanently. Potential destinations mentioned include Jordan, which already hosts over 2.7 million Palestinian refugees, and Egypt. The aim, according to the proposal’s supporters, is to build housing in other areas where displaced Palestinians could “live in peace.”

The proposal has sparked immediate backlash from countries in the region. On Sunday, Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, reaffirmed his country’s firm opposition to any displacement of Palestinians, labeling such actions as unacceptable. Egypt has also voiced its resistance to taking in refugees from Gaza, emphasizing the humanitarian and political challenges such a move would entail.

Gaza, home to approximately 2.3 million people before the ongoing conflict, is already suffering a dire humanitarian crisis. Displacement on the proposed scale has been denounced by international observers as unworkable, with experts warning of the long-term consequences for both the refugees and the host nations.

Critics argue that the focus should remain on sustainable solutions within Gaza, rather than large-scale displacement that risks further destabilizing the region. As tensions rise, the international community continues to call for restraint, humanitarian aid, and long-term strategies for peace.

Global Backlash Over Proposal to Relocate Palestinians from Gaza (Jan. 26, 2025)


Far-Right Groups Seize Momentum Under Trump Administration

0

Washington, D.C. — One week into a new presidential administration, far-right activists and white nationalist groups have expressed optimism about their prospects for the coming years. In online forums and private chat rooms, extremist groups have called this a time to regroup, expand, and push their agendas further into the public sphere.

“Now is the time to build,” read one post on a Telegram channel associated with a white nationalist network. “We have the chance to organize, create institutions, and dismantle anything leftist.”

The previous administration had focused heavily on cracking down on domestic extremist groups, with law enforcement initiatives leading to arrests and dismantling several high-profile organizations. However, shifts in leadership at the federal level have created an opening that far-right groups see as an opportunity to advance their platforms without the same level of scrutiny.

Social media platforms, once quick to ban extremist accounts, now see a quieter resurgence of far-right rhetoric. Some tech companies appear less inclined to report extremist activity, and fringe platforms like encrypted apps or international social media sites have become hubs for their communication.

Groups once considered on the decline are now showing signs of revival.

Far-Right Groups Seize Momentum Under Trump Administration (Jan. 26, 2025)


Trump Maliciously Ends Fauci’s Federally Funded Protection


Washington, D.C. — Former pandemic response leader Dr. Anthony Fauci, who faced significant public backlash and death threats during the COVID-19 crisis, has maliciously lost his federally funded security detail under President Donald Trump’s administration.

Sources close to the situation disclosed the decision to multiple media outlets, stating that Fauci’s protection was initially provided by federal marshals and later transitioned to a private contractor funded by the federal government. The sudden withdrawal has raised concerns about Fauci’s safety, particularly given the ongoing hostility directed toward him by some segments of the public.

Dr. Fauci became a polarizing figure during the pandemic, lauded by some as a voice of science and reason, while others criticized his recommendations as overly restrictive. Threats to his safety became so severe during his tenure that government-funded protection was deemed necessary.

The administration’s decision to terminate this security detail has drawn scrutiny from some observers, who argue that such measures could jeopardize the safety of high-profile public figures facing credible threats. Critics see it as another example of political divisions influencing decisions about personal safety.

As of now, it remains unclear whether Fauci will seek alternative private security arrangements or whether additional measures will be taken to ensure his safety moving forward. Advocates and public figures have called for continued vigilance against threats targeting former officials who played critical roles in managing the pandemic.

Trump Maliciously Ends Fauci’s Federally Funded Protection (Jan. 21, 2025)


When Borders Close: Global Fallout of Trump’s Migrant Crackdown


New York, N.Y. — It was a cold January morning when the first U.S. planes carrying migrants arrived at Mexico City International Airport. The Mexican government, having been briefed just 24 hours earlier, issued a stark refusal: “We will not accept any individuals deported under these terms.” The president of Mexico addressed the press, calling the policy “inhumane” and asserting that the U.S. administration had failed to provide adequate documentation of the individuals’ origins. “We are not a dumping ground for displaced people,” he declared, his tone sharp with defiance.

The Northern Triangle Pushes Back

In Honduras, the president faced a delicate balancing act. U.S. aid constituted a substantial portion of his country’s budget, but the deportation flights presented an unprecedented crisis. His government released a statement rejecting the planes on humanitarian grounds, arguing that the U.S. policy exacerbated the hardships his nation was already facing. El Salvador and Guatemala quickly followed suit, with leaders framing their refusals as a stand against the violation of international norms.

Venezuela and Nicaragua Unite

President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, long critical of U.S. policies, seized the moment to denounce the deportations as “imperial overreach.” He refused to accept any planes, stating, “These are not our people. We do not even have the capacity to house the citizens currently within our borders.” Similarly, Venezuela’s President, embattled by economic sanctions, called the deportations a “humanitarian atrocity” and threatened to escalate tensions by closing the Venezuelan airspace to U.S. aircraft.

The Caribbean’s Bold Move

In Haiti, where migrants were often forcibly returned, Prime Minister Laurent faced mounting domestic unrest. “We cannot bear the burden of returning citizens who left decades ago in search of a better life,” Laurent said. The government issued an official rejection of deportation flights, citing a lack of resources and the deep trauma inflicted on those being forcibly removed. Cuba’s leadership joined in solidarity, refusing entry to any deported individuals without ironclad proof of their Cuban nationality.

Africa and Asia Push Back

From Nigeria to Senegal, African leaders voiced their disapproval. Nigeria’s President argued that the U.S. was shirking its responsibility under international law, stating, “This policy treats human beings as pawns in a geopolitical game.” Senegal, a long-time ally of international human rights organizations, refused to accept any deportees, citing the lack of due process in the U.S. removals.

In Asia, India and China—geopolitical giants often at odds—unexpectedly aligned on the issue. India’s Ministry of External Affairs declared that the deportations violated global norms on the treatment of migrants. China’s Foreign Ministry took a harder stance, accusing the U.S. of “shifting blame for its domestic challenges onto other nations.”

Indonesia, meanwhile, was the most surprising addition to the list of dissenting nations. With its vast archipelago and growing migrant communities abroad, Jakarta rejected the flights outright, citing logistical challenges and concerns over the authenticity of deportation claims.

The Global Impasse

As the deportation planes remained grounded at U.S. military bases, the Trump administration faced mounting criticism. Domestic protests erupted, with activists denouncing the human rights violations tied to mass deportations. International organizations like the United Nations and Amnesty International condemned the U.S. policy as a violation of human dignity, with the Secretary-General calling for an emergency session of the U.N. General Assembly.

In Washington, political allies of the administration scrambled to justify the policy. U.S. officials attempted to broker bilateral agreements, offering aid packages and trade concessions in exchange for cooperation. Yet, the refusals from foreign governments were resolute. Even U.S.-friendly nations, fearing backlash from their citizens, refused to bend.

A Turning Point

As the weeks stretched into months, the crisis deepened. The sight of grounded planes and displaced migrants became a visual symbol of international defiance against unilateral action. The issue underscored the limits of U.S. power in a multipolar world and revealed the strength of global solidarity against perceived injustice.

In the end, the deportation policy faltered under its own weight. International pressure, combined with domestic opposition, forced the administration to scale back its ambitions. The episode became a case study in the complexities of migration and sovereignty, leaving behind a sobering lesson: borders may define nations, but humanity transcends them.

When Borders Close: Global Fallout of Trump’s Migrant Crackdown (Jan. 20, 2025)


The Proud Boys: A Growing Threat to America’s Ideals


New York, N.Y. — It was a late October evening in Portland when the Proud Boys descended on the city, waving flags, chanting slogans, and flashing their signature black-and-yellow insignia. Officially labeled as a “Western chauvinist” organization, the group had grown emboldened in recent years, leveraging political polarization and misinformation to position themselves as defenders of American values. But beneath their patriotic veneer lay a dangerous ideology, one that directly threatened the very principles of freedom, equality, and democracy that define America.

The Roots of Their Hatred

At its core, the Proud Boys are fueled by a toxic mix of white supremacy, hypermasculinity, and anti-democratic beliefs. While they deny being a hate group, their rhetoric and actions tell a different story. Inflammatory statements against immigrants, minorities, and LGBTQ+ individuals have become commonplace in their gatherings and online forums.

One particularly troubling aspect of their ideology is their overt hostility toward the LGBTQ+ community. Members have been documented promoting homophobic slurs and supporting discriminatory policies. During a rally in Orlando, Florida—just miles from the site of the Pulse nightclub massacre—the Proud Boys openly mocked the LGBTQ+ community, holding signs that read, “No More Gay Agenda” and chanting hateful slogans. Their actions were a chilling reminder of the violence and intolerance that the LGBTQ+ community continues to face.

From Words to Violence

The danger posed by the Proud Boys goes far beyond words. Time and again, the group has demonstrated its willingness to resort to violence to achieve its goals. They played a central role in the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, with several members later convicted of seditious conspiracy. The group’s coordinated attacks on law enforcement and elected officials that day revealed their anti-American core: an outright rejection of democratic processes and the rule of law.

In their minds, America isn’t a land of diverse people and ideas—it’s a battlefield where only their vision of dominance and exclusion should prevail. This perspective not only endangers marginalized communities but also threatens the stability of the nation itself.

The LGBTQ+ Community as a Target

The Proud Boys have increasingly targeted drag shows, pride events, and LGBTQ+ gatherings under the guise of protecting children or promoting traditional values. These actions, often organized online, have resulted in violent confrontations and created an atmosphere of fear for LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies.

In one widely publicized incident in 2024, a group of Proud Boys disrupted a drag story hour at a public library in San Francisco, hurling insults and attempting to intimidate attendees. Although local police intervened, the event left many questioning how such open hostility could persist in a nation that claims to value freedom and equality.

This isn’t just about ideological opposition—it’s about creating a climate of fear. For LGBTQ+ Americans, the Proud Boys’ actions serve as a stark reminder that hate remains a potent and dangerous force, one that seeks to undo decades of progress.

An Existential Threat to Democracy

What makes the Proud Boys uniquely dangerous isn’t just their hatred but their explicit goal of dismantling democratic institutions. They actively recruit disillusioned Americans, preying on economic anxiety and cultural grievances to swell their ranks. With their penchant for violence and disdain for democratic norms, they represent a clear and present danger to the United States.

Former FBI agents have warned that groups like the Proud Boys are leveraging online platforms to spread conspiracy theories and recruit young men. Their rhetoric often mirrors that of authoritarian movements, blending nationalism with a rejection of pluralism.

Confronting the Threat

Addressing the threat posed by the Proud Boys requires a multifaceted approach. First, law enforcement agencies must continue to treat domestic extremism as a top priority, investigating and prosecuting violent actors within the group. Second, policymakers and community leaders must work to counter the narratives of hate and division that fuel the Proud Boys’ ideology.

Education also plays a critical role. Teaching young Americans about the dangers of extremism, the value of inclusivity, and the importance of democratic institutions can help inoculate future generations against the group’s toxic message.

A Call to Action

The Proud Boys represent the antithesis of what America aspires to be: a nation of liberty, equality, and justice for all. Their actions and beliefs are not just anti-LGBTQ+ or anti-minority—they are fundamentally anti-American.

If left unchecked, the group’s influence will continue to grow, undermining the country’s democratic foundations and jeopardizing the safety of marginalized communities. But by standing united against hate and extremism, Americans can ensure that the values of freedom and equality prevail, safeguarding the nation’s future for generations to come.

The Proud Boys: A Growing Threat to America’s Ideals (Jan. 25, 2025)


MAGA Threat to LGBTQ+ Rights and Marriage Equality


New York, N.Y. –– In 2015, the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, a moment many hailed as a definitive victory for equality. Yet, a decade later, the hard-fought progress achieved by LGBTQ+ Americans faces mounting threats, particularly from a resurgent MAGA movement that has woven anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and policy into its political platform.

Donald Trump’s return to the forefront of American politics has brought with it a wave of renewed culture wars, and LGBTQ rights have become a primary target. While some of his rhetoric on LGBTQ issues has been muted compared to his predecessors, his base has aggressively pushed for a rollback of rights and protections, painting marriage equality and gender inclusivity as symbols of a country losing its moral foundation.

Targeting Marriage Equality

At the heart of the MAGA agenda is a quiet but deliberate campaign to undermine Obergefell. While a direct repeal seems unlikely in the short term, MAGA-aligned lawmakers have sought to chip away at marriage equality through legal challenges, state-level restrictions, and federal legislation aimed at “protecting religious freedom.”

Earlier this year, a coalition of Republican lawmakers introduced the so-called “Faithful Families Act,” which would allow businesses and public officials to refuse services to same-sex couples based on religious beliefs. Supporters claim the law defends freedom of religion, but critics argue it is a thinly veiled attempt to relegate LGBTQ+ Americans to second-class citizenship.

Even more alarming, some states have begun to openly question whether Obergefell should be treated as binding precedent. In Texas, Republican legislators have floated proposals that would declare the state’s marriage laws immune from federal oversight, potentially igniting a constitutional showdown.

The potential for the Supreme Court to revisit marriage equality is no longer unthinkable. With a conservative supermajority on the bench, including justices who have expressed skepticism about LGBTQ+ rights, the risk of a legal rollback has become a rallying cry for activists.

A Broader Assault on LGBTQ Rights

Marriage equality is only one front in the MAGA movement’s broader campaign against LGBTQ+ rights. Transgender Americans, in particular, have borne the brunt of this backlash. Across the country, MAGA-aligned state legislatures have introduced a wave of bills targeting transgender individuals, from bans on gender-affirming care for minors to restrictions on bathroom access and participation in sports.

The rhetoric accompanying these measures has been equally troubling. Right-wing media outlets have amplified baseless claims that LGBTQ+ advocacy endangers children, using fearmongering language like “grooming” to stoke public outrage. This demonization of LGBTQ+ individuals has created a climate of hostility, leading to increased harassment and violence against the community.

Even public education has not been spared. The so-called “Don’t Say Gay” laws, first championed in Florida, have spread to other states, effectively erasing LGBTQ+ identities from classrooms. By censoring discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity, these policies send a clear message: LGBTQ+ people do not belong.

A Threat to American Democracy

The MAGA movement’s crusade against LGBTQ+ rights is not merely a social or cultural issue—it is a direct threat to American democracy. The targeting of marginalized groups undermines the nation’s founding promise of equality under the law. It normalizes discrimination and encourages authoritarian tendencies, as leaders scapegoat vulnerable populations to consolidate power.

The parallels to past struggles for civil rights are undeniable. Just as segregationists resisted desegregation under the guise of “states’ rights,” MAGA politicians now seek to justify anti-LGBTQ policies as a defense of “religious freedom” and “parental rights.” The underlying goal is the same: to deny a group of Americans their full humanity and equal protection under the law.

The Road Ahead

Despite these challenges, there is reason for hope. Public support for marriage equality remains high, with polls consistently showing that a majority of Americans—across political lines—support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This broad consensus offers a powerful counterweight to the MAGA agenda.

LGBTQ+ advocates and allies must remain vigilant and organized, using every tool available to defend the progress of the past decade. From grassroots activism to strategic litigation, the fight for equality is far from over.

Elected officials, too, have a responsibility to stand against the MAGA movement’s assault on LGBTQ+ rights. This is not a partisan issue—it is a matter of basic human decency. By enshrining protections like the Respect for Marriage Act and expanding anti-discrimination laws, lawmakers can ensure that LGBTQ+ Americans are not left vulnerable to the whims of political extremism.

A Nation at a Crossroads

The battle over LGBTQ+ rights is a test of America’s commitment to its founding ideals. Will the nation uphold the principles of liberty and equality, or will it succumb to the forces of division and intolerance?

As history has shown, progress is never guaranteed. It must be fought for, defended, and renewed by each generation. The MAGA movement’s threat to LGBTQ+ rights is a stark reminder that the fight for equality is far from over—and that the stakes could not be higher.

America’s future depends on which path we choose.

MAGA Threat to LGBTQ+ Rights and Marriage Equality (Jan. 25, 2025)


Orphans International Sets Global Standards for Orphan Care


Orphans International Worldwide Sets Global Standards for Orphan Care:
A Personal Mission Turned Global Movement

New York, N.Y.Orphans International Worldwide (OIW), founded in 1999, has announced the launch of its Global Standards certification program, a transformative effort to raise the quality of care for orphans worldwide. Drawing on over 25 years of hands-on experience, the organization has developed these standards to address every aspect of orphan care, ensuring that children receive the support they need to thrive.

The impetus for these standards comes from a deeply personal place: OIW’s founder is an adoptive parent whose experiences inspired what is now called “Mathew’s Rule.” Named after the founder’s son, the rule asks: Are the facilities adequate for my own child? This guiding principle leads to questions that lie at the heart of OIW’s standards:

    •    Is the bed clean enough?
    •    Is the food adequate and nutritious?
    •    Is the home lighting sufficient?
    •    Are the bathrooms sanitary?
    •    Are the kitchens appropriate?
    •    How are the laundry facilities?

OIW also evaluates policies on child adoption—whether international, domestic, or both—and places a strong emphasis on protecting children from exploitation.

“We must ask ourselves: Are these children treated with the same dignity and care we would demand for our own?” said Jim Luce.

Ending Exploitation in Orphanages

Orphans International Worldwide (Wikipedia) has a zero-tolerance policy for practices that exploit children. The organization opposes the common practice of having orphans sing and dance to entertain tourists as a means of raising funds. These performances can demean children and rob them of their dignity.

Additionally, OIW advocates for strict measures to prevent forms of child exploitation such as servitude (known as restavek in Haiti and prevalent in Indonesia) and sexual exploitation. The certification process requires orphanages to demonstrate robust policies to safeguard children and to educate communities on ethical standards of care.

A Comprehensive Certification Program

Orphanages seeking OIW certification can apply directly by contacting info@orphansinternational.org. The certification program offers two levels:
    1.    Global Standards Certification
    •    Cost: US$100
    •    Process: Orphanages complete a 100-point questionnaire addressing every aspect of care, from sanitation and nutrition to policies on adoption and protection against exploitation.
    2.    Field Inspection and Top Approval
    •    Cost: US$1,000
    •    Process: Local service organizations, such as Lions, Rotary, and Kiwanis clubs, conduct on-site inspections using a detailed 100-point checklist. These inspections verify conditions and evaluate practices, ensuring that the standards are upheld in practice.

Building on Decades of Experience

Since its founding, OIW has operated its own orphanages or provided support in countries including Haiti, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Peru, Guyana, the Dominican Republic, Ghana, Togo, and Tanzania. This work has shaped OIW’s standards, ensuring they reflect the challenges and best practices of orphan care worldwide.

Orphans International Worldwide has also been recognized for its efforts by the U.S. Congress and the governments of India and Indonesia. Its Global Standards certification builds on this legacy of trust and innovation, offering a path for orphanages everywhere to improve their practices and demonstrate accountability.

Mathews Rule in Action

Mathew’s Rule,” inspired by the founder’s son, encapsulates OIW’s mission. It asks care providers to look at their facilities through the eyes of a parent:
    •    Are the spaces where children sleep, eat, and play safe and sufficient?
    •    Are the children treated with dignity and respect?
    •    Are policies in place to prevent abuse or exploitation?

These questions form the foundation of OIW’s Global Standards, ensuring that no child is subjected to substandard care or unethical practices.

Transparency and Accountability

Certified orphanages are listed in OIW’s Global Registry of Orphan Care Excellence, an online resource for donors, governments, and communities. Each certified orphanage receives a grade (e.g., A, B, or C), which is displayed on a locally produced plaque. The plaque includes the inspection date, the name of the inspecting service club, and the OIW seal of approval.

A Movement for Change

“By asking the hard questions and setting the highest standards, we’re ensuring that no child is left behind,” said Luce. “This is about building a future where every orphan has a chance to thrive.”

Orphanages worldwide are encouraged to apply for certification, which includes:
    1.    Submitting the US$100 application fee and completing the Global Standards questionnaire.
    2.    Requesting an annual field inspection for US$1,000, which includes a locally produced plaque of certification.

To apply, orphanages can contact info@orphansinternational.org.

A Vision for the Future

OIW’s Global Standards certification is more than a checklist—it’s a movement to transform orphan care. Inspired by a parent’s love and backed by decades of experience, it ensures that the world’s most vulnerable children are cared for with the dignity they deserve.

With recognition from the U.S. Congress and international governments, as well as a listing on Wikipedia, OIW is positioned as a global leader in orphan care. Its partnerships with local service organizations and innovative use of artificial intelligence make the program accessible and impactful.

Through its Global Standards program, Orphans International Worldwide is setting a new precedent for orphan care—one rooted in compassion, accountability, and a commitment to every child’s future.

Orphans International Sets Global Standards for Orphan Care (Jan. 24, 2025)