Adamsâ ICE Collaboration at Rikers: A Disgusting Betrayal
New York, N.Y. — Mayor Eric Adams has plunged New York City into outrage after his administration allowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to establish offices at the notorious Rikers Island jail complex. The move, enacted through an executive order signed by First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro, has been met with disgust and fierce opposition from the City Council, immigrant advocates, and much of the public.
The Council swiftly filed a lawsuit, seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to halt what they call an âunlawfulâ and âcorruptâ action. The complaint accuses Adams of making a âcorrupt bargainâ with the Trump administration: dropping his federal corruption charges in exchange for giving ICE unprecedented access to Rikers, a direct attack on New Yorkâs cherished sanctuary laws.
âOnce again, this City Council is standing firm to protect the rights and safety of all New Yorkers against attacks by the Trump administrationâbecause the cityâs mayor wonât stop placing his own personal interests ahead of the people of our city,â said Council Speaker Adrienne Adams.
The executive order comes after a judge dismissed Adamsâ corruption case, fueling suspicions of a quid pro quo. The Councilâs lawsuit argues that the mayorâs actions not only violate city law but also endanger the safety and trust of immigrant communities, who now face renewed threats of deportation and family separation.
Critics are appalled that Adams would undermine New Yorkâs sanctuary city status, which has long protected undocumented immigrants from federal enforcement. The last time ICE operated on Rikers, thousands were deported, including many with no convictions or only minor offenses. Advocates warn that this move will again deny due process and create a climate of fear.
The situation has become even more chaotic as the Cityâs Law Department refused to defend Adams in the lawsuit, citing conflicts after advising both sides on sanctuary laws. This unprecedented step leaves Adams scrambling for outside counsel and further isolates his administration.
Despite the Adams administrationâs claim that the order is legal and necessary for public safety, the backlash has been swift and severe. The City Council and immigrant advocates insist that the mayorâs actions are a betrayal of New York values, prioritizing his own legal troubles over the well-being of the cityâs most vulnerable residents.
As the legal battle intensifies, New Yorkers are left disgusted and outraged by a mayor who, in their eyes, has traded public safety and trust for personal gain.
Tags: Mayor Eric Adams, ICE, Rikers Island, New York City Council, Trump administration, sanctuary city, immigrant rights, corruption, lawsuit, public safety, Randy Mastro, Adrienne Adams, NYC politics
Chicago, IL — In a resounding victory for inclusive healthcare, theTransgender/Gender Diverse Wellness & Equity Program is making considerable strides in providing comprehensive and affirming services to its community. The program, which focuses on addressing the unique health and wellness needs of transgender and gender-diverse individuals, has become a beacon of hope and a model for other healthcare initiatives nationwide.
Since its inception, the program has been committed to offering a safe, welcoming, and informed environment where individuals can access a range of services tailored to their specific needs. These include primary care, mental health support, hormone therapy, surgical consultations, and preventative care. Central to the program’s success is its team of dedicated healthcare professionals who are not only experts in their respective fields but also deeply committed to understanding and respecting the diverse identities and experiences of their patients.
“Our goal is to provide holistic care that empowers individuals to live authentically and thrive,” says program director Dr. Amelia Reyes. “We recognize that healthcare is not one-size-fits-all, and we are dedicated to meeting each person where they are on their journey.”
The program’s approach extends beyond medical treatment.
It also encompasses vital support services such as counseling, support groups, and educational resources. These offerings help individuals navigate the social, emotional, and practical challenges they may encounter as they affirm their gender identity. Additionally, the program works to raise awareness and promote understanding within the broader community through outreach initiatives and training programs for healthcare providers and community organizations.
One of the program’s most impactful achievements has been its ability to reduce healthcare disparities within the transgender and gender-diverse population. Studies have shown that these individuals often face significant barriers to accessing quality care, including discrimination, lack of insurance coverage, and a shortage of knowledgeable providers. By addressing these barriers head-on, the program is improving health outcomes and enhancing the overall well-being of its patients.
The positive impact of the Transgender/Gender Diverse Wellness & Equity Program is evident in the stories of those it serves.
People like Alex, a young transgender man who found the program after struggling to find a healthcare provider who understood his needs. “Before finding this program, I felt like I had to educate my doctors every time I went in for an appointment,” Alex shares. “Here, I feel seen, respected, and truly cared for.”
The program’s success has garnered recognition from healthcare organizations, policymakers, and advocacy groups. It has received several awards for its innovative approach to inclusive care and its commitment to health equity. Furthermore, the program serves as a training site for medical students and residents, helping to cultivate the next generation of healthcare providers who are equipped to serve the transgender and gender-diverse population.
Looking ahead, the Transgender/Gender Diverse Wellness & Equity Program plans to expand its services and reach more individuals in need. This includes increasing access to telehealth services, developing new programs to address specific health concerns, and strengthening partnerships with community organizations. The program is also committed to ongoing research and evaluation to ensure its services remain effective and responsive to the evolving needs of the community.
“We are proud of what we have accomplished, but we know there is still much work to be done,” says Dr. Reyes. “We remain steadfast in our commitment to advancing health equity and ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to live healthy, fulfilling lives.”
The Transgender/Gender Diverse Wellness & Equity Program stands as a testament to the power of inclusive, affirming healthcare. It not only transforms individual lives but also contributes to a more just and equitable society for all.
The changes, first reported by Bloomberg Government,remove LGBTQ+ identities from a list of protected categories in the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) policy manual, which previously barred intelligence activities targeting people based on race, religion, disability, and other characteristics.
The revisions follow President Donald Trumpâs January 20 executive order mandating the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies across federal agencies. Critics argue the move opens the door to discriminatory surveillance practices, particularly against LGBTQ+ communities already facing heightened political targeting under the administration.
The Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute, condemned the decision, noting the DHSâs track record of âabusive domestic intelligence practices,â including monitoring racial justice activists and journalists.
A Legal Gray Zone
The updated manual now prohibits intelligence activities based solely on ârace, ethnicity, sex, religion, country of birth, nationality, or disabilityâ â conspicuously omitting âsexual orientationâ and âgender identity.â
However, legal experts dispute this rationale, pointing to the Trump administrationâs simultaneous efforts to narrow anti-discrimination protections, such as denying federal recognition of transgender identities and halting investigations into LGBTQ+ workplace complaints.
âRemoving these guardrails creates ambiguity,â said Don Bell, policy counsel at the Project on Government Oversight. âIf you can violate one communityâs rights, thereâs no limit to what the government might justify.â
Historical Parallels and Political Context
The policy shift occurs alongside other anti-LGBTQ+ measures, including bans on transgender military service and gender-affirming care for minors.
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, appointed by Trump in November 2024, has a history of opposing LGBTQ+ rights, including signing bills barring transgender athletes from school sports and revoking state contracts with transgender advocacy groups.
Advocacy groups draw parallels to the 1950s âLavender Scare,â when thousands of LGBTQ+ federal employees were purged over unfounded security concerns. Recent reports also indicate a resurgence of McCarthyist tactics, with federal agencies compiling lists of DEI program participants and LGBTQ+ employee resource group leaders.
Surveillance Risks and Community Response
LGBTQ+ advocates warn that the policy change could exacerbate existing vulnerabilities. RenĂŠ Kladzyk, a senior investigator, highlighted how health records, DMV data, and social media activity have been weaponized to target transgender individuals in states like Florida and Texas.
Facial recognition technology, which frequently misgenders trans and nonbinary individuals, further raises concerns about misuse.
Organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation urge proactive measures, including encrypted communication and secure data practices. âWhen the government decides who is ârightâ or âwrong,â surveillance becomes a tool of oppression,â Bell added.
The DHSâs policy revision reflects a broader ideological campaign against LGBTQ+ rights, framed as a rejection of âradical DEI.â
While the administration insists the changes streamline bureaucracy, civil liberties groups emphasize the human cost: eroded privacy, institutionalized discrimination, and a chilling effect on marginalized communities.
As one advocate tweeted, âThis isnât just about policy â itâs about whether weâre seen as people or targets.â
Vance used the visit to accuse Denmark of neglecting Greenlandâs security and infrastructure, framing U.S. stewardship as a benevolent alternative
Washington, D.C. — The Trump administrationâs renewed campaign to acquire Greenland has sparked global debate over the feasibilityâand ethicsâof territorial expansion in the 21st century.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly declared that the U.S. âneeds Greenlandâ for national security and âworld peace,â citing its strategic Arctic position and untapped mineral wealth.
Yet Greenlandâs government, Denmark, and international observers dismiss the idea as a relic of colonial-era geopolitics, with experts warning that military action woulddestabilize NATO alliances and violate international norms.
Strategic Stakes in the Arctic: Greenlandâs geographic significance cannot be overstated.
Located between North America and Europe, the island hosts the U.S.âs northernmost military base, Pituffik Space Base, critical for missile defense and Arctic surveillance.
Melting ice has also opened shipping routes like the Northern Sea Passage, intensifying competition among the U.S., Russia, and China for control over resource-rich Arctic territories.
Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance argue that without U.S. dominance, rivals like China and Russia will exploit Greenlandâs waterways and rare earth minerals, which are vital for technology and defense industries.
However, Greenlandâs 56,000 residents, predominantly Indigenous Inuit, overwhelmingly oppose annexation. This population is the size of New York City Astoria.
Regardless of size, Greenlanders are not interested.
A January 2025 poll found 85% reject becoming part of the U.S., with many viewing Trumpâs rhetoric as dismissive of their sovereignty. âGreenland belongs to Greenlanders. We cannot be bought,â Prime Minister Mute Bourup Egede asserted, echoing widespread sentiment.
Diplomatic Backlash and Scaled-Back Visits
The administrationâs approach has strained relations with Denmark, a NATO ally. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen condemned Trumpâs âunacceptable pressure.â
Greenlandâs caretaker government criticized Vice President Vanceâs March 28 visit to Pituffik Base as âaggressiveâ and uninvited. Originally planned as a cultural trip for Second Lady Usha Vance, the itinerary was pared down to a military briefing after protests, avoiding public engagements in Nuuk, Greenlandâs capital.
Vance used the visit to accuse Denmark of neglecting Greenlandâs security and infrastructure, framing U.S. stewardship as a benevolent alternative. âOur argument is with Denmarkâs leadership, not the people of Greenland,â he stated, though locals like trainee electrician Daniel Rotwein retorted, âHe canât just take it like that.â
Historical Precedents and Legal Hurdles
The U.S. has eyed Greenland since 1867, with failed purchase attempts in 1946 and 2019. While Trump cites historical land acquisitions like the Louisiana Purchase, modern international law prioritizes self-determination. Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory since 1979, is navigating its own independence movement, complicating any U.S. bid.
Legal experts stress that annexation would require Denmarkâs consent, which is politically untenable. Phillip Lipscy, a University of Toronto professor, noted that unilateral military action would âsignal the U.S. can no longer be trusted,â jeopardizing trade and security partnerships. Even within the U.S., 68% of Americans oppose the takeover, per a Wall Street Journal poll.
Military Force: A Bluff or Real Threat?
Trumpâs refusal to rule out military options has drawn alarm, but analysts consider it unlikely. Russiaâs Vladimir Putin called the rhetoric âunsurprisingâ but warned of countermeasures if the U.S. escalates Arctic militarization.
Domestically, Trump faces legal roadblocks: Federal judges recently blocked parts of his agenda, including fast-tracked deportations and dismantling agencies, signaling judicial pushback against overreach.
Moreover, NATOâs collective defense framework complicates aggression toward Denmark. Frederiksen emphasized that Greenlandâs security is intertwined with NATOâs mutual commitments, urging cooperation over coercion.
WhileTrumpâs fixation on Greenland underscores the Arcticâs growing geopolitical importance, the path to acquisition is fraught. Military action would alienate allies, violate sovereignty norms, and face domestic legal challenges.
Greenlandâs coalition government, formed in March 2025 to counter external pressure, exemplifies local resolve. As global powers vie for Arctic influence, the U.S. may achieve more through diplomacy and investmentânot forceâto secure its interests.
For now, Greenland remains a symbol of 21st-century sovereignty battles, where soft power and international law outweigh territorial conquest.
New York, N.Y. — I am frustratedâdeeply, viscerally frustrated. The world I see around me is spiraling into chaos, teetering on the edge of an authoritarian abyss that threatens to undo the social democratic order weâve built since World War II.
Like the child in the fable, I want to scream, âThe emperor wears no clothes!ââto pierce through the denial and complacency that allow this darkness to spread. I am ready to do anythingâeven lay down my lifeâto alleviate the horrors of war in Palestine, Ukraine, and soon, perhaps, Taiwan. But I know that dying for a cause is not enough. We need action, strategy, and hope to rally the forces of good against this decline of civilization.
A World in Crisis
The state of the world is dire. Authoritarianism is rising, cloaked in populism and nationalism, eroding the democratic institutions we once took for granted. In the United States, the divide is no longer just politicalâitâs existential. Itâs not about Democrats versus Republicans; itâs about democracy versus tyranny, freedom versus control. Globally, we see the same pattern: leaders consolidating power, silencing dissent, and fueling division. The wars in Palestine and Ukraine are stark reminders of the human costâthousands dead, millions displaced, and a looming threat in Taiwan that could ignite yet another catastrophe.
I feel powerless joining the crowds of protesters worldwide. My strength lies elsewhere: in my mind, my voice, and the legacy of my family, which has long stood for truth and justice. I want to leverage these assets to shout from the rooftops, to spotlight this decline, and to inspire resistance. But itâs hard to see a bright future without firm action, decisive plans, and great leaders. We need a Moses to lead us out of this wilderness, yet the figures who could rise to the occasionâBarack Obama, George Soros, Oprah Winfreyâseem muted or underutilized. Where are the voices to rally us?
The Hope and Challenge of Goodness
Mahatma Gandhiâs words hearten me: âIn the end, goodness always prevails.â I cling to this belief, finding solace in its promise. Yet history teaches us a harder truth: goodness doesnât triumph passively. It prevails through struggle, sacrifice, and relentless effort. The abolition of slavery, the defeat of fascism, the expansion of civil rightsâthese victories were won by people who refused to yield, who turned their frustration into action. Today, we face a similar test. Without a concerted push, the darkness I seeâwar, oppression, and the erosion of democratic valuesâwill only deepen.
Leveraging My Legacy
As heir to the Luce family legacy, I carry a responsibility to act. My ancestors used their influence to shape discourse and champion justice, and I must do the same. My platform as editor-in-chief of The Stewardship Report and leader of the James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation gives me tools to amplify this fight. I cannot march in every protest, but I can write, speak, and fund initiatives that confront authoritarianism head-on. My voice can pierce the silence; my legacy can ignite change.
But what does that look like in practice? How do we turn frustration into impact? Below, I explore the messed-up state of the world and propose remediesâsteps we can all take to resist this decline and rebuild a civilization worth believing in.
The Woe of Our World
The Rise of Authoritarianism
Across the globe, authoritarian leaders are dismantling democratic norms. Elections are undermined, judiciaries are co-opted, and media are muzzled. In the U.S., weâve seen attempts to subvert the 2020 election, attacks on voting rights, and a growing acceptance of disinformation. Elsewhere, Russiaâs invasion of Ukraine, Chinaâs threats to Taiwan, and the suppression of dissent in places like Hungary and Turkey paint a grim picture. This isnât just politicsâitâs a systematic assault on freedom.
The Human Toll
The wars in Palestine and Ukraine are not abstract conflictsâthey are tragedies of flesh and blood. In Gaza, civilian deaths mount as infrastructure crumbles; in Ukraine, cities lie in ruins. Taiwan looms as the next flashpoint, with global consequences. These arenât isolated events but symptoms of a world where power trumps humanity, where authoritarian regimes gamble with lives to expand their reach.
The Silence of Influence
I look to figures like Barack Obama, whose eloquence and insight could galvanize us, yet he remains largely quiet post-presidency. George Soros, with his wealth and networks, could fund a democratic resurgence, but his efforts feel scattered. Oprah Winfrey, with her cultural sway, could shift narratives, yet sheâs not fully engaged in this fight. Their potential is immense, but their silenceâor limited actionâleaves a void we must fill ourselves.
Remedies to Overcome the Darkness
We cannot wait for a savior. If Moses isnât coming, we must each become leaders in our own right. Here are concrete steps to resist authoritarianism and restore hope:
1. Amplify Truth Through Writing and Media
What I Can Do: As a writer and editor, I can use The Stewardship Report to expose authoritarian tactics, highlight voices from war-torn regions like Palestine and Ukraine, and call out the decline of democratic values. My family legacy gives my words weightâpeople listen when a Luce speaks.
What You Can Do: Share credible stories, support independent journalism, and challenge disinformation. Truth is our first defense.
2. Build Grassroots Power
What I Can Do: Through the James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation, we can fund grassroots effortsâscholarships for activists, support for democratic movements, aid for war refugees. My influence can seed change at the community level.
What You Can Do: Organize locally. Attend town halls, support candidates who defend democracy, or start a discussion group. Change begins where we stand.
3. Forge Alliances Across Divides
What I Can Do: I can reach out to unlikely alliesâconservatives who value liberty, business leaders who see stability in democracyâusing my platform to bridge gaps. Unity is our strength.
What You Can Do: Talk to someone you disagree with. Find common ground on freedom and justice. Authoritarianism thrives on division; we must counter it with connection.
4. Inspire Through Sacrifice and Example
What I Can Do: Iâm willing to give everythingâmy time, my resources, even my lifeâto this cause. By showing that commitment, I can inspire others to act. My legacy isnât just a nameâitâs a call to courage.
What You Can Do: Take a stand, however small. Volunteer, donate, or speak out. Every act of defiance weakens the darkness.
5. Demand Leadership
What I Can Do: I can write open letters to Obama, Soros, Winfrey, and others, urging them to leverage their platforms. My voice, tied to the Luce name, might break through.
What You Can Do: Petition influential figures in your sphereâcelebrities, CEOs, politicians. Demand they use their power for good.
6. Foster Global Solidarity
What I Can Do: My foundation can partner with international groups fighting for peace and democracy, amplifying their work and connecting it to our struggles.
What You Can Do: Support global causesâdonate to Ukrainian relief, advocate for Palestinian rights, or raise awareness about Taiwan. Weâre in this together.
A Final Call
I refuse to let this darkness win. Gandhiâs promise of goodness prevailing isnât a guaranteeâitâs a challenge. We need action, not just hope; leaders, not just dreams. Iâll use my mind, my voice, and my legacy to fightâwriting, funding, and screaming until the world hears. If I could stop the wars in Palestine, Ukraine, and Taiwan with my life, Iâd do it in an instant. But living to resist, to build, to inspireâthatâs the harder, truer sacrifice.
Join me. Use your own assetsâyour voice, your skills, your passionâto push back. We donât need one Moses; we need millions. Together, we can rally the forces of good, resist this decline, and reclaim civilization. The emperor may wear no clothes, but we can weave a new garmentâone of justice, freedom, and hope.
Letâs begin.
Jim Luce is the editor-in-chief of The Stewardship Report and president and CEO of the James Jay Dudley Luce Foundation. He is a writer, philanthropist, and advocate for global citizenship and social justice.
Spoiler Alert: Its the ‘Xennials,’ spanning analog to digital
New York, N.Y. — Born of the Baby Boomers, the Xennials born between 1977 and 1983 — roughly, forty-year-olds. Book-ended by AOC (b.1989, age 35) and ‘old man’ Hakeem Jeffries (b. 1970, age 54).
The elders have guided us, but will not save us now – they no longer have the energy. Barack, The Dalai Lama, Oprah, Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, JB Pritzker, Bill Gates, George Soros. Their moment has come and gone. We learned from them, but we are now on our own.
b. 1981, age 44 – European Parliament Member for Hungary Peter Magyar
b. 1982, age 43 – ex-U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg
b. 1976, age 48 – New York State Public Advocate Jumaane Williams
b. 1970, age 54 – House of Representatives Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries
I myself was born in 1959 – maybe too old and tired now to save humanity… I tried my hardest, but it’s truly a big job. I thank god for the new generation!
New York, N.Y. — Dealing with authoritarian leaders requires global leaders who are internationalist. On this rapidly changing playing field, with democratic institutions on fire around the world, it is extremely hard to keep up. Here is one writer’s attempt:
Enemies of the People: Global Tyrants Who Strangle Liberty (March 8, 2025) Named as Top 20 Authoritarian or Fascist Figures (Jim Luce, 2025) Enemies of the People: Global Tyrants Who Strangle Liberty (March 8, 2025) Named as Top 20 Authoritarian or Fascist Figures (Jim Luce, 2025) Rodrigo Duterte Enemies of the People: Global Tyrants Who Strangle Liberty (March 8, 2025) Named as Top 20 Authoritarian or Fascist Figures (Jim Luce, 2025) Teodoro Obiang Nguema Enemies of the People: Global Tyrants Who Strangle Liberty (March 8, 2025) Named as Top 20 Authoritarian or Fascist Figures (Jim Luce, 2025) Viktor OrbĂĄn Enemies of the People: Global Tyrants Who Strangle Liberty (March 8, 2025)
The global political landscape continues to evolve, with some countries experiencing shifts towards more authoritarian governance while others maintain or strengthen their democratic institutions. The role of liberal democratic – internationalist leaders in addressing global challenges and promoting democratic values remains crucial in this complex and dynamic environment.
There IS goodness in the world – one merely needs to know where to look for it. The Stewardship Report: Connecting Goodness
Biden accused the administration of taking a âhatchetâ to the Social Security program, warning that these actions threaten the stability of benefits for retirees and people with disabilities.
Chicago, IL — Former President Joe Biden delivered a forceful and optimistic defense of Social Security and American values in his first major public speech since leaving office, sharply criticizing President Donald Trumpâs actions during the first 100 days of his new term.
Biden, who has long championed Social Security and retirement security, expressed concern over significant staffing cuts and policy overhauls initiated by the Trump administration. He noted that more than 7,000 experienced employees have already been dismissed, with the agency facing further reductions. Biden accused the administration of taking a âhatchetâ to the Social Security program, warning that these actions threaten the stability of benefits for retirees and people with disabilities.
Biden argued that such drastic reforms risk undermining the core values that distinguish the United States, emphasizing that ânobodyâs kingâ and that the nation cannot continue to function in a state of deep division.
Throughout his nearly 30-minute address, Bidenâs tone was both passionate and positive. He highlighted his own administrationâs efforts to protect and strengthen Social Security, drawing a sharp contrast with Trumpâs record. âNot on my watch,â Biden declared, recalling his refusal to support Republican-led attempts to cut benefits during his presidency.
He underscored the importance of empathy and unity, lamenting the growing polarization in American society and urging the country to reaffirm its commitment to supporting its most vulnerable citizens.
The Social Security Administration responded to Bidenâs remarks by accusing him of misleading the public about the nature of the reforms, insisting that the changes are designed to improve efficiency and sustainability. The White House also pushed back, with spokesperson Steven Cheung criticizing Bidenâs speech and reaffirming Trumpâs stated commitment to protecting Social Security and eliminating taxes on benefits. Steven Cheung
Despite these rebuttals, Bidenâs message resonated with many in the audience, who cheered his defense of retirement and disability benefits. His speech served as a rallying call for those concerned about the future of Social Security and a reminder of the stakes involved in ongoing policy debates.
Biden concluded by urging Americans to stand together in defense of fundamental rights and social programs, warning that the nationâs identity and values are at risk if such protections are eroded. âWhat makes us distinct from the rest of the world? Basic, in my view, fundamental American values,â he said. âYou canât go on like this, as a divided nation⌠Iâve been doing this a long time. Itâs never been this divided.â
The positive tone of Bidenâs address, combined with his sharp critique of the Trump administrationâs actions, set the stage for continued debate over the direction of American social policy and the future of programs like Social Security.
Steven Cheung has worked with Donald Trump on all his presidential campaigns.
Washington, D.C. — In the combative arena of Donald Trumpâs political machine, few figures embody the campaignâs aggressive ethos as vividly as Steven Cheung, the White House Communications Director dubbed the âSumo Wrestlerâ for his relentless, confrontational style.
Cheung, a long-time Trump loyalist, has been a fixture in the former presidentâs orbit since the 2016 campaign, steering the communications strategy through a storm of controversies with a brashness that mirrors Trumpâs own. Yet, his tenure is marred by allegations of misconduct and a polarizing approach that critics argue undermines the dignity of his office.
Cheungâs journey to the White House began in an unlikely setting: the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), where he honed his skills in high-stakes public relations. His appetite for combat was evident early on, managing media for fighters whose brash personas foreshadowed the tone heâd bring to Trumpâs campaigns.
By 2016, Cheung had joined Trumpâs team, quickly earning a reputation for his willingness to clash with reporters and deflect criticism with sharp-tongued retorts. His aggressive tactics, often laced with mockery, became a hallmark of Trumpâs media strategy, amplified on platforms like X, where Cheungâs meme-heavy posts aim to galvanize supporters but frequently alienate detractors.
As White House Communications Director in Trumpâs second term, Cheungâs influence is undeniable.
He shapes a social media presence that thrives on provocation, prioritizing viral moments over substantive policy discussions. Critics point to his casual, sometimes crude style as emblematic of a broader erosion of decorum in political discourse. âCheungâs approach is less about informing the public and more about owning the libs,â said political analyst Laura Bennett. âItâs a strategy that plays well with Trumpâs base but risks alienating anyone seeking clarity or civility.â
Cheungâs tenure has not been without scandal.
In 2024, reports surfaced alleging he physically confronted an Arlington National Cemetery employee during a Trump campaign event, an incident tied to accusations of exploiting Gold Star families for photo opportunities. The episode, widely discussed on X, fueled outrage among veteransâ groups and intensified scrutiny of Cheungâs conduct. While he dismissed the allegations as âfake news,â the incident cemented his image as a lightning rod for controversy, unapologetic even in the face of serious accusations.
His defenders, however, see Cheungâs aggression as a necessary counterweight to a hostile media landscape. âSteven doesnât play by the establishmentâs rules, and thatâs why heâs effective,â said a Trump campaign insider. âHe fights fire with fire, and in Trumpâs world, thatâs what wins.â Supporters argue that Cheungâs outsider statusâhis lack of traditional political polishâmakes him uniquely suited to channel Trumpâs populist energy, particularly on X, where his posts often rack up thousands of reposts from loyalists.
Yet, Cheungâs combative style raises questions about its long-term impact.
Political strategists warn that his reliance on divisive rhetoric could deepen polarization, making governance harder in an already fractured nation. âCheungâs tactics might rally the base, but they donât build coalitions,â said Bennett. âWhen every statement is a jab, you risk losing the ability to persuade.â His approach also draws criticism for sidelining policy substance in favor of spectacle, a charge that resonates as Trumpâs administration navigates complex challenges like economic recovery and international relations.
Cheungâs personal history adds another layer of complexity.
Raised in California, he entered politics with a scrappy, underdog mentality, traits that align with Trumpâs narrative of battling elites. But his past, including his UFC days, has been scrutinized for clues about his combative nature. Critics argue that his âSumo Wrestlerâ moniker, while a nod to his tenacity, trivializes the gravity of his role. âThis isnât a cage fight,â said Democratic strategist Mark Rivera. âThe White House demands more than bravado.â
As Trumpâs second term unfolds, Cheung remains a polarizing figure, embodying the unyielding spirit of a campaign that thrives on conflict. His supporters see him as a fearless warrior in a media war; his critics, a symptom of a coarsening political culture. Whether his approach will sustain Trumpâs agenda or backfire remains unclear, but one thing is certain: Steven Cheung, the âSumo Wrestler,â is not stepping out of the ring anytime soon.
Caligulaâs court is remembered as a cautionary tale of absolute power gone awry
New York, N.Y. — Caligulaâs reign as Roman emperor from 37 to 41 CE stands as one of the most notorious periods in the history of the Roman Empire. Officially known as Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, Caligulaâs court quickly devolved into a spectacle of cruelty, corruption, and chaos, leaving a legacy that has haunted the annals of imperial rule.
The Rise of Caligula: Hope Turns to Horror
When Caligula first ascended to power, Rome was eager for change. The oppressive final years of Tiberius had left the city weary, and Caligulaâs early actsâabolishing treason trials, recalling exiles, and distributing generous giftsâwere met with widespread relief and celebration. He initiated ambitious building projects, including aqueducts and public works, and improved the cityâs infrastructure. For a brief moment, it seemed Rome had found a benevolent leader.
However, this optimism was short-lived. Within months, Caligula suffered a severe illness that, according to ancient sources, fundamentally altered his personality. Whether the result of epilepsy, a nervous breakdown, or another affliction, his recovery marked the beginning of a reign defined by paranoia, extravagance, and violence.
The Descent into Madness and Tyranny
After his illness, Caligulaâs behavior became increasingly erratic and cruel. He revived the dreaded treason trials, executing senators and confiscating their estates under fabricated charges. His cruelty extended to all levels of society, and he was known to levy harsh taxes on everything from lawsuits to weddings, plunging Rome into a financial crisis.
Caligulaâs court became infamous for its atmosphere of fear. He humiliated senators, forced them to grovel and kiss his feet, and seduced their wives at public dinners. His eccentricities turned dangerousâhe dressed as a god, demanded worship, and even ordered his statue to be erected in the Temple at Jerusalem, nearly provoking a revolt in the province.
Scandal, Excess, and Public Outrage
Caligulaâs spending was lavish and reckless. He built extravagant palaces and floating pleasure barges, and his personal indulgences quickly depleted the treasury. When funds ran short, he resorted to blackmail and the confiscation of property from Romeâs wealthiest families. His bizarre public spectacles, such as constructing a pontoon bridge across the Bay of Baiae to defy a prophecy, further alienated the elite and the common people alike.
His military campaigns were equally farcical. In one infamous episode, he led his army to the shores of Gaul, only to order them to collect seashellsâdeclaring them the spoils of a conquered ocean. Such actions eroded any remaining respect for his leadership.
Collapse of Order and Assassination
By 41 CE, Caligulaâs reign had become unbearable for Romeâs elite. Plots against his life multiplied as his paranoia and violence spiraled. The final blow came in a conspiracy led by his own Praetorian Guard, who assassinated him in the palace. To prevent reprisals, his wife and daughter were also killed. Caligulaâs death was met with relief rather than mourning, and his uncle Claudius was hastily installed as emperor.
Lasting Legacy
Caligulaâs court is remembered as a cautionary tale of absolute power gone awry. His brief reign left Rome destabilized, its institutions weakened, and its people traumatized by the excesses and brutality of his rule. The chaos and corruption of Caligulaâs court serve as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by unchecked authority and the fragility of order under a tyrant.
Caligula: The Court of Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (April 16, 2025)
New York, N.Y. —Rapper and musicianLil Nas X has disclosed that he is experiencing partial facial paralysis, sharing a series of Instagram videos from a hospital bed on Monday. The 26-year-old star revealed that he has âlost controlâ of the right side of his face but maintained his characteristic humor throughout the ordeal.
âThis is me doing a full smile right now,â he joked in one video while attempting to grin unsuccessfully. âBro, I canât even laugh right.â
Despite the setback, Lil Nas X reassured his followers that he is âOKâ and encouraged them to stay upbeat: âStop being sad for me! Shake your ass for me instead!â
In another post, he lightheartedly commented on his appearance: âIâmma look funny for a lil bit but thatâs it.â The Grammy-winning artist also shared a video panning across his face, quipping, âWe normal over here; we get crazy over here!â
The cause of his condition remains undisclosed, but fans have speculated it could be Bellâs Palsy or Ramsay Hunt Syndromeâboth conditions that can cause temporary facial paralysis due to nerve inflammation or infection.
Bieber notably canceled parts of his 2022 tour after being diagnosed with Ramsay Hunt Syndrome, which left him unable to move one side of his face temporarily. Contostavlos has spoken about her experiences with Bellâs Palsy following nerve damage from an accident
Messages of support poured in for Lil Nas X from fans and celebrities alike.
Actress Taraji P. Henson wrote, âGet well baby,â while comedian Wanda Sykes reminded him to rest: âSometimes your body tells you to sit down somewhere.â
Despite this health scare, Lil Nas X remains optimistic and focused on recovery.
On Tuesday morning, he updated fans via Instagram Stories about slight improvements in mobility on the affected side of his face.
This incident comes as the artist promotes his latest EP Days Before Dreamboy, which serves as a precursor to his highly anticipated second studio album Dreamboy. Speaking about the creative process last month, he admitted that it had been a challenging journey as he worked through personal struggles and artistic expectations.
Lil Nas X has consistently been open about his life and experiences since rising to fame with his record-breaking hit Old Town Road. As an openly gay artist who came out publicly in 2019, he has used his platform to advocate for LGBTQ+ rights and self-expression.
The music community eagerly awaits further updates on both his health and upcoming projects as Lil Nas X continues to recover at home with characteristic resilience and humor.
Mexico City — As U.S. President Donald Trumpâs policies reshape the landscape of American society, a growing number of U.S. citizens are crossing the border into Mexicoânot as tourists, but as expatriates seeking an alternative to life in the United States.
Trumpâs administration, marked by its stringent anti-migrant stance and rejection of progressive “woke” ideologies, has prompted a notable migration trend. For many, Mexico offers not just a reprieve but a new home, driven by dissatisfaction with the political and social climate north of the border.
Even before Trumpâs inauguration in January 2025, Mexico was a popular destination for American expatriates.
According to a 2023 estimate by the Association of Americans Resident Overseas, roughly one-fifth of the more than five million US citizens living abroad resided in Mexico. The countryâs appeal has long rested on its warm climate, rich culture, and affordable cost of living. However, recent years have seen a shift in motivation. Alongside traditional draws, Americans are now citing Trumpâs policiesâranging from immigration crackdowns to rollbacks on diversity initiativesâas key reasons for their departure.
Take Oscar Gomez, a U.S. citizen who relocated to Mexico in early 2025.
With seven suitcases and his dog in tow, Gomez left behind a life in Arizona, driven by what he describes as an increasingly hostile environment. âThe rhetoric, the discriminationâitâs not the America I grew up in,â he told FRANCE 24. âMexico feels freer now, ironically.â Gomez is far from alone. Stories like his echo across border towns and expat communities, where Americans are settling in greater numbers.
Trumpâs administration has made no secret of its priorities.
Since taking office, the president has doubled down on promises to curb illegal immigration, tighten border security, and dismantle what he calls âwoke indoctrinationâ in schools, workplaces, and public life. These moves have won him support among his base but alienated others who see them as an attack on civil liberties and inclusivity. For some, the erosion of rightsâcoupled with government cutbacks and a polarized national discourseâhas become unbearable.
Mexico, by contrast, has emerged as a refuge.
Its proximity to the U.S. makes it an accessible escape, while its more relaxed pace of life and lower costs provide practical incentives. Expatriates also point to a sense of acceptance they feel is diminishing back home. âHere, Iâm not judged for who I am or what I believe,â said Sarah Mitchell, a former teacher from California who moved to Oaxaca in February. âThe U.S. feels like itâs closing in on itself.â
Data backs up these anecdotes.
While exact figures for 2025 are still emerging, migration experts note a steady uptick in Americans applying for residency in Mexico since Trumpâs election. Real estate agents in cities like San Miguel de Allende and Puerto Vallarta report a surge in inquiries from US buyers, many of whom cite political discontent as a factor. âItâs not just retirees anymore,â said Maria Lopez, a realtor in Guadalajara. âWeâre seeing younger families, professionalsâpeople who want out.â
The trend has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Trump has dismissed the exodus, calling it âa loss we can affordâ in a recent speech. His administration argues that those leaving are a minority unwilling to embrace his vision of a stronger, more unified America. Critics, however, see it as a sign of deeper fractures. âWhen citizens feel they have to flee their own country, thatâs not a win,â said political analyst David Rivera. âItâs a warning.â
For now, Mexico remains a willing host. The country has historically welcomed American expats, and its government has yet to signal any policy shift despite the growing influx. Still, challenges loom. Some Mexican locals worry about rising costs and cultural shifts in areas with large expat populations, though tensions remain low for the time being.
As Trumpâs presidency unfolds, the flow of Americans southward shows no signs of slowing. Whether driven by ideology, economics, or a search for peace, these expatriates are redefining the U.S.-Mexico relationshipâone suitcase at a time.
Mahdawi, a legal permanent resident with a green card since 2015, arrived at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office in Colchester expecting a routine interview to finalize his U.S. citizenship. Instead, he was handcuffed and detained, sparking outrage among advocates and Vermontâs congressional delegation.
Mahdawi, who has lived in the U.S. for a decade, was a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University until March 2024. He co-founded the Palestinian Student Union with Mahmoud Khalil, another Palestinian activist recently detained by ICE.
His arrest is seen as part of a broader Trump administration crackdown targeting students involved in campus protests against Israelâs war in Gaza. Khalil, arrested in March, faces deportation as a ânational security risk,â a charge Mahdawiâs lawyers fear may be applied to him.
âThe Trump administration detained Mohsen Mahdawi in direct retaliation for his advocacy on behalf of Palestinians and because of his identity as a Palestinian,â said Luna Droubi, Mahdawiâs attorney, in a statement. âHis detention is an attempt to silence those who speak out against the atrocities in Gaza. It is also unconstitutional.â
Video footage captured by Christopher Helali, a friend, shows Mahdawi being led away in handcuffs, flashing a peace sign.
Helali described Mahdawi as a peaceful demonstrator who worked to foster dialogue about Palestinian struggles.
âHe was nervous but resolute in attending the interview because he did nothing wrong,â Helali said. The video, widely shared on social media, has fueled public anger over the incident.
Vermont Senators Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch, along with Representative Becca Balint, issued a joint statement condemning the arrest as âimmoral, inhumane, and illegal.â They demanded Mahdawiâs immediate release, emphasizing that he is a legal resident entitled to due process. âInstead of taking one of the final steps in his citizenship process, he was handcuffed by armed officers with their faces covered,â the statement read.
Mahdawiâs legal team has filed a habeas corpus petition in Vermontâs federal district court, seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent his transfer from the state or deportation. A Vermont District Court judge issued an order on Monday barring his removal from the U.S. pending further legal proceedings. However, concerns persist about his whereabouts, as ICE has not disclosed his current location.
Advertising image for ICE: “Start your #LawEnforcement career as an #ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Deportation Officer.” Photo credit: ICE.
Legal experts call the arrest unprecedented.
âThe arrest of a lawful permanent resident, who has not been charged with a crime, at a naturalization interview is highly unusual,â said Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrantsâ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School. âThis sends a chilling message that non-citizens must be silenced, undermining First Amendment protections.â
Mahdawi, born in a West Bank refugee camp, has been accepted into a masterâs program at Columbiaâs School of International and Public Affairs. His family remains in the West Bank, where escalating violence has raised fears about his potential deportation. Advocacy groups, including Jewish Voice for Peace, have decried the arrest as an attack on free speech and Palestinian rights.
The incident follows a pattern of ICE targeting pro-Palestinian activists.
Khalilâs detention in Louisiana and a Turkish studentâs arrest at Tufts University highlight the administrationâs aggressive stance. Critics argue that these actions, coupled with threats to defund universities like Columbia, aim to suppress dissent on college campuses.
As Mahdawiâs case unfolds, supporters rally online with hashtags like #FreeMohsen and #JusticeForPalestinians, urging action. The Council on American-Islamic Relations called for his release, labeling the detention a âblatant attackâ on free speech.With legal battles looming, Mahdawiâs arrest underscores tensions over immigration policy and political expression in the U.S.
New York, N.Y. — A growing coalition of civil rights organizations, legal experts, and student advocates is raising alarms over the use of a âdistorted definitionâ of antisemitism that, they argue, is being weaponized to suppress advocacy for Palestinian rights in the United States.
At the center of this controversy is the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which critics say conflates legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies with anti-Jewish hate, leading to widespread censorship and repression.
Since 2014, Palestine Legal has documented over 1,700 incidents in which individuals and groups advocating for Palestinian freedom have faced false accusations of antisemitismâmore than half of all suppression cases the organization has handled in that period. These incidents range from students being censored or disciplined on campus, to church groups and activists facing smear campaigns for supporting boycotts or calling attention to human rights abuses in the region.
The push to codify the IHRA definition into U.S. law and institutional policy has intensified in recent years, particularly following the escalation of violence in Gaza and the resulting surge in advocacy for Palestinian rights.
According to Palestine Legal, this effort is part of a broader strategy by Israel lobby groups to shield Israel from criticism by branding nearly all support for Palestinian rights as antisemitic. Seven out of the eleven examples of contemporary antisemitism cited in the IHRA definition focus specifically on Israel, blurring the line between anti-Jewish bigotry and political speech.
Civil rights advocates warn that the adoption of the IHRA definition has already had a chilling effect on free speech, especially on college campuses. Palestinian-American students and their allies have reported being doxxed, harassed, and punished for expressing support for Palestinian rights, with universities often justifying their actions by referencing the IHRA definition.Â
In a recent coalition letter to the Department of Educationâs Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Palestine Legal and 13 other organizations urged the agency to reject the codification of the IHRA definition, arguing that it would only intensify anti-Palestinian racism and undermine First Amendment protections.
The letter also draws parallels between efforts to codify the IHRA definition and right-wing campaigns to ban Critical Race Theory, noting that both are driven by similar groups and serve to restrict academic freedom and the ability to address systemic oppression.Â
âOCR must reject right-wing lobbying efforts that seek to address one form of racism while perpetuating another,â said Lina Assi, Advocacy Manager at Palestine Legal.
âThe codification of the distorted IHRA definition will only serve as a tool of repression that will intensify the anti-Palestinian racism that activists and students are currently experiencing across the country.â
Despite these challenges, there is growing resistance to the IHRA definition.
Academics, activists, and even some Jewish organizations have proposed alternative definitions, such as the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which seeks to clarify the distinction between antisemitism and legitimate criticism of Israel. These efforts aim to protect the rights of all marginalized groups and ensure that advocacy for Palestinian freedom is not mischaracterized as hate speech.
Palestine Legalâs interactive timeline and resource hub document the evolution of the distorted definition, its impact on individuals, and the ongoing efforts to push back against censorship.Â
The organization emphasizes that advocacy for Palestinian rights is a form of human rights work that should be celebrated, not silenced. As Dima Khalidi, director of Palestine Legal, stated, âWe must expose and counter the false narrative that attempts to tar and silence human rights defenders in order to shield Israel from criticism and accountability.â
As the debate continues, advocates are calling on policymakers, educators, and the public to recognize the dangers of conflating criticism of a nation-state with bigotry against a people, and to uphold the fundamental rights of those working for justice and equality in Palestine and beyond.
Washington, D.C. â In a display that left many observers appalled, President Donald Trump unleashed a barrage of insults and accusations against CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins during a heated Oval Office exchange on Monday.
Collins, CNNâs chief White House correspondent, pressed Trump on whether he would honor the courtâs directive.
Instead of addressing the question, Trump lashed out, deriding Collins.
Trump deriding Collins as a âvery low-rated anchorâ and accused CNN of âhatingâ the country. âNo one watches you anymore; you have no credibility.â
The presidentâs anger escalated as Collins persisted, reminding him of his previous statements that he would comply with the Supreme Court if ordered.
Trump, visibly frustrated, retorted, âWhy donât you just say, âIsnât it great that weâre keeping criminals out of our country?â Why canât you just say that?â He then accused CNN of biased reporting, claiming, âThey donât understand whatâs going on, which is why their viewership is dwindling.â
President Bukele, known for his hardline approach to crime, joined Trump in criticizing the press.
When Collins asked if Bukele would assist in returning Garcia, Bukele dismissed the idea as âpreposterous,â labeling Garcia a âterrorist.â Trumpâs cabinet members, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and advisor Stephen Miller, echoed the administrationâs stance, asserting that Garcia was ineligible for return due to alleged ties to the MS-13 gangâa claim his family and legal representatives dispute.
Collins, undeterred by the presidentâs attacks, addressed the incident on her evening show, âThe Source.â She highlighted that court documents do not support the administrationâs claims of Garciaâs gang affiliation and noted that a federal judge found insufficient evidence to label him a terrorist.
Collins also pointed out that the Justice Department admitted the deportation was a mistake and that the Supreme Court had explicitly ordered the White House to âfacilitateâ Garciaâs return.
The episode drew swift condemnation from press freedom advocates and journalists, who viewed Trumpâs conduct as emblematic of his broader hostility toward the media.
Critics argued that the presidentâs refusal to answer legitimate questions and his personal attacks on reporters undermine democratic accountability and the rule of law.
The White House, for its part, doubled down on its position.
Stephen Miller characterized Collinsâs questions as âextremely presumptuous,â insisting that the U.S. should not dictate how El Salvador manages its citizens. Bondi reiterated that the administration would not pursue Garciaâs return unless El Salvador agreed, despite the Supreme Courtâs ruling.
The confrontation comes amid heightened scrutiny of Trumpâs immigration policies and his administrationâs compliance with judicial orders. It also underscores the ongoing tension between the White House and the press, particularly CNN, which Trump has repeatedly targeted throughout his presidency.
Collinsâs composure and persistence in the face of presidential ire drew praise from colleagues and viewers alike.
The incident served as a stark reminder of the challenges journalists face in holding power to accountâand the lengths to which some leaders will go to avoid answering difficult questions.
Dear Dr. Sami,⨠I am an international student from Germany on a student visa, currently completing my studies an Ivy League university. Last spring, I participated in several protests on campus advocating for Palestinian rights and condemning the devastating civilian casualties in the conflict. As graduation approaches, Iâve grown increasingly anxious. Given the recent news about crackdowns on protest-related activity, I fear being targeted by immigration authorities (ICE). The thought of being arrested in class, unable to graduate, and facing detention or deportation haunts me daily. Iâm torn between staying to finish my degree or returning to Germany immediately to avoid potential repercussions. Could you advise me on how to navigate this? Is my fear of arrest rational, or am I overestimating the risks? Would leaving the U.S. prematurelyâsacrificing four years of workâbe prudent, or are there steps I can take to protect myself while seeing through my graduation? Your perspective would mean the world to me. Sincerely, Terrified
Dear Terrified,
First, let me acknowledge the weight of what youâre carrying right now. It sounds incredibly overwhelming to be facing this uncertainty as you near the end of your senior yearâan achievement thatâs already a testament to your resilience and dedication.
The fears youâre describingâbeing arrested, detained, or deportedâare understandably consuming your thoughts, especially given the news youâve been hearing and the experiences youâve had at the protests.
Itâs natural to feel anxious when youâre caught between your commitment to your values, your education, and the looming possibility of consequences beyond your control. Iâm here to help you sort through these emotions and find a way to move forward with some clarity and calm.
From what youâve shared, your fear isnât irrationalâitâs rooted in real events and observations, like those unfamiliar individuals taking photos, combined with the broader political climate youâre witnessing.
The persistent worry about ICE or law enforcement targeting you reflects a deep sense of vulnerability, which is a completely human response when youâre far from home and navigating a system that feels unpredictable.
The fact that this anxiety is disrupting your ability to focus on your studies tells me how much this is weighing on your heart and mind. Itâs not just about the âwhat ifsââitâs about the toll of living with that constant tension.
That said, itâs hard to know how much of a risk youâre truly facing without more specific information, and that uncertainty itself can amplify your distress.
As a psychotherapist, I canât assess the legal likelihood of arrest or deportationâthatâs something an immigration attorney would be much better equipped to address. What I can do is help you manage the emotional storm youâre in and think through your options so youâre not paralyzed by fear. Letâs start by grounding ourselves a bit.
One thing that might help is breaking this down into what you can control. The idea of being arrested in class or deported is terrifying, but itâs a future scenario, not a certainty in this moment.
When those thoughts spiral, try pausing to breathe deeply for a minuteâslow inhales and exhalesâand ask yourself: âWhatâs happening right now?â This can pull you back from the edge of panic and give you space to think. Itâs not a fix, but it can help you regain some footing.
Youâre also wrestling with a big decision: stay and finish your degree, risking potential repercussions, or leave now and protect yourself at the cost of four years of effort. Both paths come with griefâlosing your sense of safety here or losing the culmination of your hard work.
Thatâs a heartbreaking choice, and itâs okay to feel torn. If you stay, the anxiety might persist, but youâd have your degree in hand, a milestone youâve earned. If you go, youâd regain some peace of mind, but the regret of leaving could linger. Neither is inherently ârightââitâs about what you can live with, emotionally and practically.
Hereâs what Iâd suggest as a starting point: connect with an immigration attorney as soon as possible. They can give you a clearer picture of your legal standingâwhether your participation in the protests could realistically jeopardize your visa, and what protections might be available to you.
Knowing where you stand legally could ease some of the dread and help you make an informed choice rather than one driven purely by fear.
Many universities offer free legal resources for international students, so check with your schoolâs international student office or student services. This step isnât just practicalâitâs a way to reclaim some agency in a situation that feels out of your hands.
In the meantime, letâs work on keeping you steady. Surround yourself with supportâfriends, classmates, or a counselor at your university who can listen without judgment. You donât have to carry this alone.
Writing down your fears, like youâve done here, can also lighten the load a bitâmaybe keep a journal to process whatâs swirling in your head.
And if your focus on studies keeps slipping, try breaking tasks into smaller piecesâ15 minutes of reading, a short break, then another 15. It wonât solve everything, but it might help you inch toward the finish line.
Your fear of arrest isnât baseless, but whether itâs an overestimation depends on factors I canât evaluate as a therapist. The political climate is tense, and the news about crackdowns is real, but not every protester faces the same outcome. An attorney can help you gauge that risk more precisely.
For now, my heart goes out to youâthis is a lot to bear, and your courage in speaking up for what you believe in, even at personal risk, is profound. You deserve to feel safe and supported as you decide whatâs next.
Please donât hesitate to reach out again if you need to talk more. Youâre not alone in this.
New York, N.Y. — Donald Trumpâs political resurgence has reignited debates about existential threats to American democracy.
Many commentators, including some Republicans, now argue that Trumpâs rhetoric and promisesâranging from militarizing police to undermining checks and balancesâpose a greater internal threat than the Vietnam War did in the 1960s.Â
The Vietnam War, while divisive and deadly, never threatened the constitutional order in the way Trumpâs critics claim his actions and words do.
Power of Protest Music in the Vietnam Era
During the Vietnam War, music played a pivotal role in shaping public opinion and mobilizing resistance. Folk artists like Phil Ochs and Pete Seeger, Peter, Paul & Mary,Joan Baez and Bob Dylan. along with countless others, wrote and performed songs that directly challenged U.S. policy and gave voice to the anti-war movement.Â
These songs, from âI Ainât Marching Anymoreâ to âDraft Dodger Rag,â became anthems for a generation questioning authority and demanding change. The protest music movement was not monolithicâsome songs supported soldiers, others condemned the warâbut together, they created a powerful cultural force that helped unify and energize opposition.
The Absence of a Modern Anti-MAGA Music Movement
Despite the widespread view among Trumpâs critics that his movement represents an existential threat, there is no comparable wave of anti-MAGA protest music today. Unlike the Vietnam era, where hundreds of songs addressed the conflict and its moral implications, the current political climate has not produced a unifying musical response. This absence is striking given the scale of concern about Trumpâs impact on democracy, national security, and civil liberties.
Why the Silence? Shifts in Culture and Media
Several factors may explain the lack of a modern protest music movement:
Fragmented Media Landscape: In the 1960s, radio and television provided shared platforms for music to reach mass audiences. Today, streaming services and social media have splintered audiences, making it harder for protest songs to gain widespread traction.
Changing Role of Music: Musicâs centrality to youth culture and political activism has diminished. Other forms of expressionâmemes, viral videos, podcastsânow compete for attention.
Political Polarization: The deepening divide in American society may make it harder for protest music to find a unifying message or audience.
Commercial Pressures: The music industryâs focus on profitability and branding may discourage artists from taking overtly political stances that could alienate segments of their fanbase.
What Does This Mean for Political Resistance?
The absence of a unifying anti-MAGA protest music movement raises questions about the evolving nature of cultural resistance. While individual artists occasionally release politically charged songs, there is no equivalent to the folk wave that rallied Americans against the Vietnam War. This may reflect broader changes in how Americans engage with politics and culture, or it may signal a need for new forms of artistic activism.
As the U.S. faces what many see as an unprecedented internal threat, the lack of a musical rallying cry is notable. The Vietnam eraâs protest songs helped galvanize a movement and shape the national conversation.
Today, in the face of a different kind of existential crisis, Americaâs soundtrack is largely silent. Whether this changes in the coming years may depend on both artistsâ willingness to engage and the publicâs appetite for a new wave of protest music.
New Delhi — For generations, the Indian pot belly was a mark of status, comfort, and even humor. In literature and cinema, it signified a life of plenty, often used to depict bureaucrats, indulgent uncles, or politicians in satirical cartoons. In rural India, a protruding belly was once a clear indicator that a person âate well,â a sign of prosperity in a country long familiar with food scarcity.
Today, however, this cultural icon has become a symbol of a mounting health crisis. India is experiencing a surge in obesity, with the pot bellyâtechnically known as abdominal obesityâemerging as a particularly dangerous trend.
India recorded the worldâs second-highest number of overweight or obese individuals, totaling 180 million, second only to China.
A recent study in The Lancet projects that by 2050, this figure could reach 450 million, nearly one-third of Indiaâs expected population. Abdominal obesity, characterized by excess fat around the waist, is more than a cosmetic issue. Medical research since the 1990s has established a strong link between belly fat and chronic diseases such as Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular conditions. Unlike generalized obesity, which involves uniform fat distribution, abdominal obesity is concentrated around the trunk, posing unique health risks.
The National Family Health Survey, which uniquely measures waist and hip circumference, found that about 40% of Indian women and 12% of men have abdominal obesity. Among women aged 30 to 49, nearly half are affected. Urban populations are particularly at risk, with high waist-to-hip ratios serving as critical warning signs.
Indian health guidelines define abdominal obesity as a waist circumference exceeding 90 cm (35 inches) for men and 80 cm (31 inches) for women. The prevalence of this condition is rising rapidly, especially among children, raising alarms among healthcare professionals1.
One key factor behind the increase in belly fat is insulin resistance, where the body struggles to regulate blood sugar due to excess abdominal fat. This not only complicates diabetes management but also increases the risk of heart disease.
Research shows that South Asians, including Indians, tend to have more body fat than Caucasians at the same Body Mass Index (BMI), with fat accumulating around the trunk and under the skin rather than as visceral fat deep within the abdomen.
While this may mean less of the most dangerous visceral fat, studies suggest that inefficient fat storage can lead to fat infiltrating vital organs like the liver and pancreas, further increasing health risks.
The reasons for these fat distribution patterns are not fully understood.
Genetic studies have yet to identify a single responsible gene, but some experts suggest an evolutionary adaptation to historical famines, with the abdomen serving as a primary energy storage site. As food availability has increased, this adaptation may now be contributing to harmful levels of fat accumulation.
In response to the crisis, the Indian Obesity Commission has revised its criteria for obesity among Asian Indians, introducing a two-stage system that considers both fat distribution and associated health risks. The first stage involves high BMI and abdominal obesity without complications, where lifestyle changes such as diet and exercise are recommended. The second stage includes abdominal obesity with health complications, requiring more aggressive interventions, including new weight loss medications like semaglutide and tirzepatide.
Healthcare providers attribute the rise in abdominal obesity to lifestyle changes, including increased consumption of processed foods, takeout meals, and high-fat home cooking. Between 2009 and 2019, India saw one of the fastest increases in per capita sales of ultra-processed foods and beverages globally.
Experts stress that Indians may need to adopt more rigorous lifestyle changes than Western populations. While 150 minutes of weekly exercise may suffice for Europeans, South Asians are advised to aim for 250-300 minutes to counteract slower metabolism and less efficient fat storage. As Dr. Anoop Misra, a leading diabetes specialist, notes, âOur bodies simply arenât as efficient at managing excess fat.â
The Indian pot belly, once a source of pride and humor, now serves as a stark warning. As obesity rates climb, urgent action is needed to address this growing public health emergency.
Tags: urban health, obesity, pot belly, abdominal obesity, public health, diabetes, India, lifestyle, health crisis, South Asia, cultural change, medical research, Indian women, Indian men, exercise, diet, health policy, cardiovascular disease
Boston, MA — In a dramatic escalation of tensions between the Trump administration and higher education institutions, the federal government has frozen $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and contracts allocated to Harvard University.
The unprecedented move comes after the Ivy League school rejected demands from the White House to overhaul its diversity programs and implement stricter policies on campus protests.
The funding freeze was announced late Monday night, hours after Harvard President Alan Garber publicly condemned the administration’s demands as an attack on academic freedom and a violation of constitutional rights.
âThe University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rightsâ — Harvard President Alan Garber
Demands Spark Controversy
The Trump administration had issued a series of directives to Harvard and other elite universities in recent months, citing concerns over rising antisemitism during pro-Palestinian demonstrations linked to the Gaza conflict. Among the demands were calls to abolish diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives; ban masks at campus protests; implement merit-based hiring and admissions practices; and increase oversight of foreign students.
Officials argued that these measures were necessary to ensure compliance with civil rights laws and protect Jewish students from harassment on campuses nationwide. However, critics accused the administration of using antisemitism as a pretext for advancing a conservative agenda aimed at dismantling progressive policies in academia.
Harvard’s Defiance
Dudley Gate at Harvard, named after Governor Thomas Dudley of the Massachusetts Bay Colony who signed the Harvard Charter almost four centuries ago.
Harvardâs refusal to comply with these demands marks a significant act of defiance against the administrationâs broader crackdown on perceived liberal bias in higher education. âNo government has the authority to dictate what universities can teach or whom they can admit,â Garber asserted.
Shortly after Harvardâs rejection became public, the administration announced it would halt all federal funding earmarked for the universityâa decision that could have devastating consequences for research programs and student aid initiatives dependent on government support.
The funding freeze also affects high-profile projects at Harvardâs T.H. Chan School of Public Health, where nearly half of its budget relies on federal grants for groundbreaking research into diseases like cancer and Alzheimerâs. Dean Andrea Baccarelli described the freeze as âa direct assault on scientific progressâ that jeopardizes critical health advancements benefiting millions worldwide.
Broader Implications
Poster: “Criticism of the Israeli Government is NOT Anti-Semitism.”
The standoff between Harvard and the Trump administration is part of a larger battle over free speech and academic independence in American universities. Other institutions are also under scrutiny; Columbia University recently faced a $400 million funding cut for failing to address alleged “antisemitism” during campus protests.
In addition to freezing funds, the administration has begun revoking visas for hundreds of international students and researchers across more than 80 universitiesâactions that critics say are politically motivated and disproportionately target individuals with minor infractions or perceived ideological affiliations.
Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who previously served as Harvardâs president, called the funding freeze âpunitiveâ and âunlawful.â He warned that such actions undermine democratic principles by allowing political agendas to dictate educational policies.
Legal Challenges Ahead
Experts predict that the legality of the funding freeze will be challenged in court. A key issue is whether the administrationâs actions violate constitutional protections for academic freedom and free speech or exceed its authority under federal law.
âThis is an unprecedented situation,â said one legal scholar specializing in presidential powers. âWhile universities undoubtedly need reform in some areas, using federal funds as leverage to impose political demands crosses a dangerous line.â
Political Fallout
The clash between Harvard and the Trump administration has reignited debates about the role of government in regulating higher education institutions. Supporters of the funding freeze argue that taxpayer dollars should not support universities perceived as hostile to conservative values or unwilling to address antisemitism effectively.
However, opponents view it as an alarming example of government overreach designed to stifle dissent and erode academic independence. âThis is not about combating antisemitism,â said one critic from a national civil liberties organization. âItâs about punishing institutions that refuse to conform to a narrow political ideology.â
As legal battles loom and public opinion remains divided, one thing is clear: this high-stakes confrontation will have far-reaching consequences for both higher education policy and broader debates about free speech in America.
This story highlights escalating tensions between academia and government while emphasizing themes of autonomy, constitutional rights, and political retaliation within a shocked yet analytical tone fitting public discourse today.
The Far-Right Group Fueling a Chilling Crackdown on Pro-Palestinian Students
New York, N.Y. — Betar U.S., the American arm of a militant Zionist movement founded in 1923 by Zeâev Jabotinsky, has re-emerged as a powerful force in the United States, aggressively targeting pro-Palestinian activistsâespecially studentsâby collecting and sharing their personal information with the Trump administration.
The group, which describes itself as âloud, proud, aggressive and unapologetically Zionist,â has taken credit for providing the names of noncitizen protesters to federal authorities, urging their deportation under new executive orders aimed at combating antisemitism on college campuses.
From Doxxing to Deportation: Betarâs Tactics
Betar USâs methods have drawn sharp criticism from civil rights advocates, legal experts, and the very students it targets.
The group has publicly posted names, images, and even home addresses of pro-Palestinian activists, claiming these individuals support Hamas or espouse antisemitic views.
In one high-profile case, Betar boasted on social media about adding Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil to its âdeport list,â sharing his whereabouts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and celebrating his subsequent arrest. The group has also distributed âdeport alertsâ and encouraged its followers to harass activists, tactics that many see as thinly veiled threats.
Betarâs spokesperson, Daniel Levy, has openly stated that the group has submitted âhundredsâ of names to the Trump administration, targeting not only students but also academics and naturalized citizens of Middle Eastern descent.
While the Department of Homeland Security denies direct collaboration with Betar, the group insists its dossiers are influencing government action.
Privacy Violations and Chilling Effects
The aggressive doxxing and surveillance campaign orchestrated by Betar U.S. has sparked widespread alarm about privacy violations and the erosion of free speech on American campuses.
Students and faculty profiled by Betar report being mischaracterized, harassed, and subjected to threats, with some experiencing severe anxiety and depression as a result. Critics argue that Betarâs tactics amount to a campaign of intimidation, designed to silence dissent and stifle constitutionally protected protest.
Legal experts warn that the groupâs actions raise serious questions about the balance between public safety and individual privacy. While the Trump administration claims to use âall available technologyâ to vet visa holders, the reliance on information from ideologically motivated outside groups like Betar sets a dangerous precedent. The Anti-Defamation League has listed Betar among organizations promoting extremist or hateful ideologies, a charge Betar dismisses as a smear. See the ADL page describing Betarhere.
Backing, Reach, and Ideological Roots
Ze’ev Jabotinsky, founder.
Betar U.S. is part of a global network with branches in multiple countries, but its recent resurgence in the US has been fueled by the political climate following the October 2023 Hamas attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza. The groupâs ideology is rooted in Jabotinskyâs vision of Jewish militarism and territorial expansion, and it has a long history of militant activism, including past associations with far-right and even âJewish fascistâ elements.
Betarâs renewed activism is closely aligned with the Trump administrationâs hardline stance on campus protests and immigration. The group has found common cause with other pro-Israel organizations, but its willingness to publicly name and target individuals sets it apart as one of the most aggressive actors in the current crackdown on pro-Palestinian activism.
Betar members at Pro-Palestine rallies, Columbia University, New York City.
Civil Liberties at Risk
The legality of the Trump administrationâs deportation orders is hotly contested, with civil rights advocates arguing that they violate the First Amendment and amount to an unlawful assault on free speech.Â
Universities, caught in the crossfire, face mounting pressure to protect their students from doxxing and harassment, even as federal authorities ramp up enforcement actions based on information provided by groups like Betar.
As Betar U.S. continues to push for more deportations and a faster process, the chilling effect on campus activism is unmistakable.The groupâs campaign has not only endangered the privacy and safety of individual students but also raised urgent questions about the role of private organizations in shaping government policy and undermining fundamental rights.
The Oath of Betar
According to the organization’s website, Betar members take an oath â many at a young age â which they vow to follow their entire life. Betarâs ideology follows this oath, which includes:
Only Eretz Israel has the power to solve the problem of the Jewish people and to ease the suffering of the Diaspora.
All decisions stem from this. Is it good for the Jews?
Hebrew is the national language, sole and eternal, of the Jewish people. A Jew who does not know Hebrew â is not a complete Jew.
âIt is good to die for your country.â
Military preparedness. Betar demands that its members understand force and weapons. We are prepared for physical battle and protection.
Opposes arm-chair Zionism â being the type of Zionism which lacks true actualization of oneâs beliefs. We stand up loud and clear.
Buenos Aires ––Argentina is once again confronting its painful legacy as a postwar refuge for Nazi fugitives.
On March 24, the government announced it will declassify a new trove of documents, including banking and financial records, that allegedly facilitated the escape and resettlement of high-ranking officials from Hitlerâs regime in South America.
The decision, confirmed by Cabinet Chief Guillermo Francos, follows a meeting between President Javier Milei and representatives of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a prominent human rights organization dedicated to tracking Nazi war criminals.
The Center presented Milei with a letter from the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, urging Argentina to cooperate in investigations into the role of financial institutionsâmost notably Credit Suisseâin aiding Nazi fugitives.
Unveiling the âRatlinesâ
The files set for declassification are expected to shed new light on the so-called âratlinesââclandestine escape networks that enabled thousands of Nazis and other fascist war criminals to evade justice after World War II. Historians estimate that up to 10,000 Nazis and collaborators fled to Argentina and other countries in the Americas, including Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Notorious figures such as Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele, the âAngel of Deathâ from Auschwitz, were among those who found sanctuary in Argentina before moving elsewhere in South America.
The escape routes often involved complex journeys with some routes receiving unofficial support from Vatican officials.
The escape routes often involved complex journeys through Germany, Spain, and Italy, with some routes receiving unofficial support from Vatican officials. These networks were not only used by Nazis but also by U.S. intelligence to relocate scientists for Cold War projects.
Financial Networks Under Scrutiny
A central focus of the declassified documents is the role of banking and financial operations in facilitating these escapes. The files are expected to include records from Argentinaâs Defense Ministry and financial institutions, potentially revealing how money was transferred to support fugitivesâ new lives in South America.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center has previously obtained a list of 12,000 Nazis living in Argentina, many of whom held accounts at what is now Credit Suisse. There are longstanding suspicions that some of these funds were looted from Holocaust victims.
The Argentine governmentâs move comes amid renewed international scrutiny. The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee has specifically requested Argentinaâs cooperation in investigating Credit Suisseâs alleged assistance to Nazi escapees, citing a 2021 internal probe that found âsignificant connectionsâ between the bank and individuals involved in the ratlines.
Commitment to Transparency
President Mileiâs initiative aligns with his broader commitment to government transparency and historical accountability. The declassified materials will be stored in Argentinaâs General Archive of the Nation and made available for public and academic research. This step mirrors similar efforts in other countries, such as Israelâs recent release of documents related to the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann.
Human rights advocates and historians have welcomed the move as a potential watershed moment. âWeâve long suspected that key financial institutions helped facilitate these escapes, but this access could finally provide concrete evidence,â said Jim Berk, CEO of the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
Happy Nazis. From left: Richard Baer, commander of the Auschwitz death camp, Dr. Josef Mengele and Rudolf Hiss; 1944.
A Painful Reckoning
Argentinaâs role as a haven for Nazi fugitives has long been a source of controversy and national soul-searching. While some Argentine leaders in the 1930s and 1940s welcomed a growing Nazi presence, later governments attempted to investigate and curtail these activitiesâoften with limited success due to political upheaval and the destruction of key records.
The declassification of these documents is seen as a crucial step in addressing this dark chapter of history. It offers the possibility of justice for Holocaust victims and their descendants, and a chance for Argentina to reckon with its past.
As the files are made public, researchers hope to gain a clearer understanding of the networks that enabled war criminals to evade prosecution and the local support systems that protected them. The revelations may also prompt further investigations into the complicity of financial institutions and the fate of assets looted during the Holocaust.
For Argentina, the process is both a moral obligation and an opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to transparency, justice, and the memory of those who suffered under the Nazi regime
Argentina Moves to Declassify Files on Nazi Escape Networks (April 15, 2025)
Tags: Argentina, Nazi fugitives, declassification, ratlines, World War II, banking operations, financial records, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Javier Milei, Holocaust, war criminals, South America, historical archives, Credit Suisse, human rights
Vargas Llosa speaks about Barack Obama’s Nobel Prize, the state of literature, inter-American relations and politics.
New York, N.Y. — Four hundred years ago an Inca princess bore the son of a Spanish Conquistador. Their child, Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, grew up to write the first Spanish-American masterpiece, The RoyalCommentaries (Comentarios reales).
Peruvian author Mario Vargas Llosa explains a finer point to the author (2010).
âComentarios realesâ tell the incredible story of the Inca world turned upside down. The Royal Commentaries, published in Lisbon in 1609 before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth, tell the incredible story of the Inca world destroyed as the Spanish concluded their bloody conquest of Peru.
There was a backlash to the excesses of Iberian power. According to The Royal Commentaries:
“The mestizos, the sons of the conquerors of the empire by the Indian women, were⌠accused of having conspired with Prince TĂşpac Amaruand the other Incas to rise in revoltâŚ
All those of Cuzco of twenty years or more and capable or bearing arms were arrested. Some were condemned to torture.
“As the Spanish prepared to execute the prince in Cuzco, leader of the Inca nation, 300,000 people watched. The majority of the population there was indigenous, vastly outnumbering the Spanish colonizers, and they were very angry.
“The Inca raised his right arm with his hand open, then brought it to his ear, and dropped it gradually to his thigh.
“From this, the Indians understood that they were being told to be silent and the shouting and crying ceased, as they became so quiet that it seemed as if there was not a living soul in the whole city, to the great astonishment of the SpaniardsâŚ
In controlling his own people, TĂşpac showed that he was the legitimate and moral ruler of Peru. However, power often trumps morality, and the civilization based in Cusco was over.
As a boy, Mario Vargas Llosa told the standing room-only crowd in Spanish, he read TheCommentaries but felt little. At the university, however, he got it. He felt connected to the epic book.
Inca Garcilaso de la Vegaâs Coat of Arms.
âI read it and re-read it. I was amazed at the incredible antidotes of ancient times. I could taste the colors of the words,â he said in Spanish.
Mario pointed out how the language used in The Commentaries was a ârevolutionary act,â as it combined the softness of Quechua â the Inca language â with the Europeanâs Spanish, creating a hybrid that changed not only Peru but the world.
âUnderneath this new language hybrid was a feeling of richness and melancholy,â the author explained. This new Spanish captured the mestizoâs world and became used universally.
As an adult, he can now see that the book expressed an ideology of a Latin American identity, of a nationalism not trying to subjugate others, but to unify them.
The evening was launched by a welcome by Susan L. Segal, president and C.E.O. of the Americas Society. Susan came to the Society as a Partner and the Latin American Group Head at JPMorgan Partners/Chase Capital Partners.
The distinguished session, chaired by Alfred Mac Adam, explained Comentarios reales from their respective academic perspectives.
Dr. Thomas Wardof Loyola University in Maryland discussed modern nativist readings of Garcilaso in Peru.
The symposium co-organizer is Daniel Shapiro, Director of the Literature Department at the Americas Society.
An hour long interview in Spanish between Mario Vargas Llosa and Dr. Raquel Chang-RodrĂguez followed. Raquel, who organized the event, is Distinguished Professor at the City College-Graduate Center of CUNY.
The event was co-organized by Daniel Shapiro, Director of Literature at the Americas Society.
Mario Vargas is one of the world literatureâs most important novelists.
Some critics consider him to have had a larger international impact and worldwide audience than any other writer of the Latin American Boom. A thought leader in literature and literary criticism.
A global citizen, he holds a Spanish passport and lives between Lima and London.
Like many Latin American authors, Vargas Llosa has been politically active throughout his career. Like most Latin American intellectuals, he supported Castro in the early 1960s, but gradually became disenchanted.
Vargas Llosa ran for the Peruvian presidency in 1990 with the center-right Frente DemocrĂĄtico coalition,advocating neoliberal reforms. He has subsequently supported moderate conservative candidates.
Dignified, intelligent, intellectual, with gray hair and gray tie, Mario reminded me of Walter Cronkite, circa 1975. He appeared trustworthy, sober, thoughtful, compassionate â and humorous.
Associated with the Boom avant-garde literary movement in Latin America in the 1960s through such masterworks as The Green House, Conversations in the Cathedral, and The Feast of the Goat,he has written numerous other novels. He also writes essays, plays, and works of literary criticism.
Under the editorship of Raquel Chang-RodrĂguez, a book collecting all papers presented at he symposium will appear in April by the Fondo Editorial of the Pontificia Universidad CatĂłlica del Peru.
A special issue of Review: Literature and Arts of the Americas focusing on the Inca Garcilaso and His Legacy, will be published in November and launched at the Society on November 12, 2009. Review is published by Routledge on behalf of the Society. (Info here)
The Americas Society
âIgnorance of our neighbors is neither sensible nor safe, neither smart nor neighborly, neither good economics, nor good mannersâŚâ
The Americas Society where he spoke is the premier forum dedicated to education, debate, and dialogue in the Americas. The room sparkled under crystal chandeliers,the well-dressed audience reflected in its gilded mirrors.
The Americas Society where he spoke is the premier forum for the Americas.
In 1965, a group of noted businessmen led by David Rockefeller founded the Center for Inter-American Relations.
As the Centerâs mission was articulated in 1970, âIgnorance of our neighbors is neither sensible nor safe, neither smart nor neighborly, neither good economics, nor good mannersâŚâ
The Center for Inter-American Relations was absorbed into the Americas Society in 1985.
Since that time, the Americas Society has played a pivotal role in disseminating the cultural achievements of Latin America, the Caribbean, and Canada in the U.S.
Its mission is to increase public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage of the Americas, as well as the importance of the inter-American relationship.
I asked Vargas Llosa what he thought of Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize. He admitted he was as surprised as anyone, and believed that the prize was awarded for what the world hopes will be, not what is.
I believe that Vargas Llosa fans around th eworld will not be surprised the morning he is awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature.
Tags: Mario Vargas Llosa, Inca Empire, Americas Society, Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Royal Commentaries, Latin American literature, Peruvian history, CUNY symposium, Barack Obama, Nobel Prize, inter-American relations, cultural heritage, literary criticism, mestizo identity, Park Avenue, New York
The LGBTQ+ community in Hungary now faces the prospect of criminalization for simply gathering in public, while the governmentâs use of surveillance technology raises fears of broader repression against all forms of dissent.
Budapest — The Hungarian Parliament delivered a stunning blow to civil liberties on Monday, passing a constitutional amendment that grants the government sweeping authority to ban all public events organized by LGBTQ+ communities.
The move, orchestrated by Prime Minister Viktor OrbĂĄnâs right-wing Fidesz-KDNP coalition, passed with 140 votes in favor and 21 against, strictly along party lines.
The amendment, which required a two-thirds majority, codifies into the nationâs highest law a ban on LGBTQ+ public gatherings, including the popular Budapest Pride parade that draws thousands each year.
Legal scholars, human rights advocates, and opposition politicians have condemned the measure as a grotesque escalation in OrbĂĄnâs campaign against LGBTQ+ rights and a chilling step toward outright authoritarianism.
Jim Luce, head of the Luce Family Charities, stated, “It is definitely and purely and strictly about humiliating people and excluding them, not just from the national community, but even from the community of human beings.”
âChild Protectionâ as a Pretext
The government claims the amendment is necessary to âprotect children,â declaring that childrenâs rights to moral, physical, and spiritual development supersede all other rights except the right to life. This language, critics argue, is a thinly veiled pretext for erasing LGBTQ+ visibility and criminalizing public expression of queer identities.
Hungaryâs so-called âchild protectionâ legislation already prohibits the âdepiction or promotionâ of homosexuality to minors under 18. The new constitutional amendment embeds these restrictions, giving the government unchecked power to ban any event it deems contrary to its narrow definition of family values.
Surveillance and Punishment
The law goes further, authorizing authorities to use facial recognition technology to identify attendees at prohibited events, such as Budapest Pride. Those identified can face fines of up to 200,000 Hungarian forints (about $546), a move rights groups say is designed to intimidate and silence dissent.
Protest and Police Crackdown
The amendmentâs passage was met with outrage and protest. Opposition lawmakers and activists attempted to blockade the entrance to parliamentâs parking garage, binding themselves together with zip ties. Police forcibly removed the demonstrators, underscoring the governmentâs determination to quash resistance.
A Pattern of Repression
This is the 15th amendment to Hungaryâs constitution since OrbĂĄnâs party unilaterally rewrote it in 2011. The new language also asserts that the constitution recognizes only two sexes, male and female, further marginalizing transgender and intersex individuals and reinforcing a previous ban on same-sex adoption.
The government insists the changes are not an attack on individual self-expression but a âclarification that legal norms are based on biological reality.â Critics, however, see a calculated campaign to erase LGBTQ+ people from public life and dismantle the last vestiges of democratic rights.
International and Domestic Backlash
Rights activists, legal scholars, and European officials have condemned the amendment as a grave violation of human rights and democratic norms. The LGBTQ+ community in Hungary now faces the prospect of criminalization for simply gathering in public, while the governmentâs use of surveillance technology raises fears of broader repression against all forms of dissent.
As Hungary cements its anti-LGBTQ+ stance in law, the disgust and alarm among rights defenders is palpable. The countryâs slide toward authoritarianism, critics warn, is acceleratingâand the cost is being borne by its most vulnerable citizens.
Tags: Hungary, LGBTQ, Viktor OrbĂĄn, Budapest, Parliament, Constitutional Amendment, Human Rights, Authoritarianism, Civil Liberties, Pride Parade, Fidesz, Child Protection Law, Facial Recognition, Protest, Europe
The statement, made alongside U.S. President Donald Trump, has ignited alarm over the fate of GarcĂa and the broader implications of the Trump administrationâs aggressive deportation policies, which aim to expel over one million immigrants.
GarcĂa, a 29-year-old father of three, was deported on March 15, 2025, despite a 2019 court order granting him protection from removal to El Salvador, where he faced threats of violence. Having lived in the U.S. since 2011, GarcĂa built a life in Maryland with his U.S.-citizen wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, and their children.
His deportation, which the Trump administration admitted was an âadministrative error,â has become a flashpoint in the debate over due process and human rights.
Bukeleâs remarks came in response to a reporterâs question about GarcĂaâs fate.
âHow can I return him to the United States? Am I going to smuggle him?â Bukele said, dismissing the query as âpreposterous.â He labeled GarcĂa a âterroristâ and claimed he lacked the authority to release him, even within El Salvador.
Kilmar GarcĂa has lived in in Maryland with his U.S.-citizen wife and children since 2011.
The Trump administration echoed this stance, with Attorney General Pam Bondi asserting that GarcĂaâs return was âup to El Salvador,â while Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that U.S. courts cannot dictate foreign policy.
The U.S. Supreme Court, however, ruled on April 10, 2025, that the Trump administration must âfacilitateâ GarcĂaâs return, upholding a lower court order by Maryland District JudgePaula Xinis.
Xinis called GarcĂaâs deportation âwholly lawless,â noting he has no criminal record in the U.S. or El Salvador.
Despite this, Trump officials have doubled down, allegingâwithout substantiated evidenceâthat GarcĂa is a member of the MS-13 gang, designated a terrorist organization.
GarcĂaâs attorneys, led by Benjamin Osorio, vehemently deny these claims, pointing to a 2019 immigration judgeâs finding that GarcĂa faced persecution in El Salvador.
The case has drawn sharp criticism from Democratic lawmakers and immigration advocates, who see it as a troubling precedent. âThe cruelty is the point,â said Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), accusing Bukele and Trump of flouting the rule of law.
Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) demanded sanctions against officials ignoring court orders, warning of a constitutional crisis. Vanessa CĂĄrdenas of Americaâs Voice called the situation âa reminder why immigration is the tip of the spear for Trumpâs assault on democracy.â
GarcĂaâs family, meanwhile, is grappling with despair.
Vasquez Sura, speaking at a rally near the White House, tearfully pleaded, âMy husband is not a criminal. Heâs a loving father. Bring him home.â
Faith leaders and local officials, including Prince Georgeâs County State Attorney Aisha Braveboy, have joined the call, urging accountability for what they describe as a grave miscarriage of justice.
Bukeleâs refusal aligns with his role as a key Trump ally.
Since January, El Salvador has accepted over 200 deportees, mostly Venezuelans, under a $6 million deal to house them in CECOT, a facility criticized for human rights abuses. Trump praised Bukele as a âgreat friendâ during the meeting, even floating the idea of sending U.S. citizens to the prisonâa proposal that alarmed critics like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who called it âun-American.â
Legal experts warn that GarcĂaâs case exposes vulnerabilities in the U.S. immigration system, particularly under Trumpâs use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to bypass due process. âThis is a deliberate catch-22,â said Ilya Somin, a constitutional law professor at George Mason University. âThe U.S. says it canât act because GarcĂa is in El Salvador, and Bukele says he canât act because itâs a U.S. issue. Itâs a mockery of justice.â
GarcĂa remains in CECOT, a facility known for harsh conditions and overcrowding.
As the standoff continues, GarcĂa remains in CECOT, a facility known for harsh conditions and overcrowding.
His attorneys have asked Judge Xinis to hold the Trump administration in contempt, arguing that delays violate the Supreme Courtâs directive. With daily updates ordered but little progress reported, the case underscores broader fears about unchecked executive power and the erosion of judicial authority.
For GarcĂaâs family and supporters, the fight is personal. âKilmar deserves to be here,â Vasquez Sura said, clutching a photo of her husband. âWe wonât stop until heâs home.â As the nation watches, GarcĂaâs fate hangs in the balance, a stark symbol of the human cost of mass deportation policies.
