Texas has emerged as a stronghold for conservative values, particularly on the issue of abortion.
Dallas, TX — In the heart of Dallas, Texas, a simple yet provocative phrase adorns countless front yards: “Abortion is Murder.” These yard signs, easily purchased on platforms like Amazon, have become a visible symbol of the stateâs deep-rooted pro-life sentiment.
Under the leadership of Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas has emerged as a stronghold for conservative values, particularly on the issue of abortion. But what exactly do these three words mean to those who display them, and why do they resonate so strongly in the Longhorn State?
The phrase “Abortion is Murder” encapsulates a belief held by many in Texas and across Red America: that abortion is the moral equivalent of taking a human life.
For supporters, the statement is rooted in the conviction that life begins at conception. From this perspective, an embryo or fetus is a person with inherent rights, and terminating a pregnancy is akin to an unlawful act of killing. This view is often grounded in religious teachings, particularly among evangelical Christians, who make up a significant portion of Texasâ population.
Gov. Greg Abbott, a vocal advocate for pro-life policies, has signed some of the nationâs most restrictive abortion laws, including the Texas Heartbeat Act of 2021, which bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around six weeks. These laws have amplified the visibility of pro-life messaging, with yard signs serving as a grassroots expression of support. For many Texans, displaying such a sign is both a personal declaration of faith and a political statement aligned with the stateâs conservative leadership.
The signs themselves are straightforward, often featuring bold red or black lettering on a white background. Their availability on e-commerce platforms like Amazon has made them an accessible tool for activism, allowing individuals to broadcast their views without crafting custom signage. In Dallas neighborhoods, from suburban enclaves to urban centers, these signs dot the landscape, sparking both solidarity and contention among residents.
To those who oppose the phrase, “Abortion is Murder” is not just a statement of belief but a loaded accusation. Critics argue it oversimplifies a complex issue, ignoring the nuances of reproductive rights, bodily autonomy, and medical necessity. They contend the term “murder” is inflammatory, as it implies criminal intent and disregards the legal status of abortion in certain contexts, even in Texasâ restrictive environment. For pro-choice advocates, the phrase can feel like a judgment, alienating those who support abortion access or have undergone the procedure.
The debate over the phrase reflects broader national divisions. According to a 2023 Pew Research Center poll, 61% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in most cases, while 37% believe it should be illegal in most cases. In Texas, however, public opinion leans more conservative, with a 2022 University of Texas poll showing 45% of residents opposing abortion in most circumstances. These statistics underscore why “Abortion is Murder” resonates in Dallas, where cultural and political conservatism often dominate.
Beyond the moral and legal arguments, the phrase also serves as a cultural marker. In Dallas, yard signs are more than decor; theyâre a way to signal identity in a polarized climate. For some, displaying “Abortion is Murder” is an act of defiance against perceived liberal overreach, particularly following the 2022 Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. For others, itâs a call to action, urging neighbors to reflect on the sanctity of life.
The prominence of these signs has not gone unnoticed. Local media outlets have reported on their prevalence, particularly during election cycles when abortion becomes a flashpoint issue. Community discussions, both online and in person, reveal a spectrum of reactionsâfrom fervent support to outright dismay. Yet, regardless of oneâs stance, the phrase is undeniably effective in its brevity, cutting through the noise to provoke thought and debate.
As Texas continues to navigate its role in the national abortion conversation, “Abortion is Murder” remains a potent symbol of the stateâs values and divisions. In Dallas, under the shadow of Gov. Abbottâs policies, these yard signs are more than wordsâtheyâre a testament to the enduring power of belief in shaping public discourse.Whether viewed as a cry for justice or a divisive oversimplification, the phrase is unlikely to fade from the Texas landscape anytime soon.
Americans in Russia face an increased risk of arbitrary arrest and may be subject to harassment by Russian government security officials, including the Federal Security Service (FSB).
Washington, D.C. — The U.S. Department of State has reaffirmed its highest-level travel advisory for Russia, urging American citizens to avoid travel to the country due to significant security and safety risks. The advisory, classified as âLevel 4: Do Not Travel,â highlights ongoing concerns such as arbitrary enforcement of local laws, wrongful detentions, harassment, and the impact of Russiaâs ongoing military actions in Ukraine.
According to the State Department, Americans in Russia face an increased risk of arbitrary arrest, particularly those involved in activities deemed sensitive by Russian authorities.
The advisory specifically warns that U.S. citizens may be subject to harassment by Russian government security officials, including the Federal Security Service (FSB).
There have been multiple reports of Americans being detained under ambiguous circumstances, sometimes accused of espionage or other serious charges.
The advisory also points to the unpredictable nature of Russian law enforcement and judicial processes. U.S. citizens have experienced prolonged detentions and limited access to consular assistance.
The State Department notes that its ability to provide emergency services to Americans in Russia is severely restricted due to the ongoing reduction of embassy staff and strained diplomatic relations.
With no ceasefire in Ukraine, is the bromance between Trump and Putin beginning to unravel?
In addition to legal and diplomatic challenges, the advisory warns of increased risks stemming from the conflict in Ukraine. The U.S. government has noted that Russian military mobilizations and security operations can occur with little warning, potentially affecting foreign nationals.
The situation remains volatile, with periodic escalations in military activity and heightened security measures in major cities and border regions.
The advisory also cautions travelers about the possibility of limited commercial flight options and the potential for border closures. Since the start of the conflict in Ukraine, several international airlines have suspended flights to and from Russia, complicating evacuation and travel plans for foreign nationals.
The State Department urges Americans currently in Russia to depart immediately using available commercial transportation.
U.S. citizens are further advised to avoid all public demonstrations and to exercise heightened caution in public places. The Russian government has implemented strict laws regarding public assembly and speech, and foreign nationals have been detained for participating in or observing protests. The advisory underscores that Americans may be subject to surveillance and monitoring by Russian authorities, especially in areas frequented by foreigners.
The State Departmentâs guidance reflects ongoing diplomatic tensions between the United States and Russia. The U.S. Embassy in Moscow has reduced its operations and staffing, limiting its ability to assist Americans in distress. Consular services, including passport renewals and emergency assistance, may be delayed or unavailable.
In light of these risks, the State Department encourages U.S. citizens to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) to receive security updates and to maintain regular contact with family and friends. Americans are also advised to have contingency plans for emergencies, including alternative travel arrangements and access to funds.
The travel advisory is part of a broader effort by the U.S. government to ensure the safety of its citizens abroad. The State Department regularly updates its guidance based on evolving security conditions and diplomatic developments. As the situation in Russia remains unpredictable, officials emphasize the importance of vigilance and caution for anyone considering travel to or residing in the country.
While the advisory does not prohibit travel, it serves as a strong warning of the potential dangers. The State Department continues to monitor the situation closely and will update its guidance as necessary to reflect changes on the ground.
Under Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the MID has faced scrutiny for its assertive policies, including the 2014 Crimea annexation and the 2022 Ukraine invasion
This institution plays a pivotal role in shaping Russiaâs international relations, negotiating treaties, and representing the nation abroad. But what exactly happens inside this iconic building, and what is its historical significance?
What Is the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs?
The MID is the government body responsible for implementing Russiaâs foreign policy. Led by the Foreign Ministerâcurrently Sergey Lavrovâit manages diplomatic relations, issues visas, negotiates international agreements, and coordinates with embassies worldwide. The ministry advises the Kremlin on global affairs and represents Russia in organizations like the United Nations and BRICS.
What Occurs Inside the Building?
The Moscow headquarters is a hub of diplomatic activity. Key functions include:
Policy Formulation: Officials draft foreign policy strategies for presidential approval.
Diplomatic Communications: The ministry liaises with foreign embassies and handles crisis diplomacy.
International Negotiations:Treaties, trade deals, and security discussions are conducted here.
Consular Services: Though most public services are handled elsewhere, high-level consular decisions are made in the building.
Press Briefings:Â The MID regularly updates media on Russiaâs diplomatic stance.
History of the Building
The ministryâs main building, one of Moscowâs Seven Sisters Stalinist skyscrapers, was completed in 1953. Designed by architects Vladimir Gelfreikh and Adolf Minkus, its imposing 27-story structure symbolizes Soviet-era grandeur.
Initially, it also housed the Ministry of Foreign Trade. During the Cold War, it was a nerve center for Soviet diplomacy, hosting critical negotiations with the U.S. and Europe. Post-USSR, it became the diplomatic headquarters of the Russian Federation.
The buildingâs interior features marble halls, historic meeting rooms, and Soviet-era dĂŠcor, blending functionality with political symbolism. A 2016 renovation modernized infrastructure while preserving its heritage.
Modern Role and Controversies
Under Lavrov, the MID has faced scrutiny for its assertive policies, including the 2014 Crimea annexation and the 2022 Ukraine invasion. The ministry defends these actions as protecting national interests, while Western nations impose sanctions in response.
Despite tensions, the MID remains central to Russiaâs global engagements, from Middle East diplomacy to energy partnerships with China. Its workâwhether praised or criticizedâcontinues to shape international dynamics.
I met Jean-Michel briefly at a party at Andy Warhol’s Factory. I found him to be aloof if not rude – the price of fame?
New York, N.Y. —Jean-Michel Basquiat, a defining figure of the 1980s New York art scene, used his neo-expressionist paintings to confront systemic racism with unflinching clarity. His work, characterized by raw energy, vibrant colors, and layered symbolism, served as both artistic expression and social critique. Basquiatâs art didnât just reflect the world around himâit challenged it, exposing the deep-rooted racial inequalities that shaped American society.
New York Artists Keith Haring, Any Warhol and Jean-Michel Basquiat in the East Village.
I lived in the East Village in the early 1980’s and met Jean-Michel briefly at a party at Andy Warhol‘s Factory. I found him to be aloof if not rude. I thought maybe because I was white, but then Andy–also white–was his mentor, so that didn’t make sense.
But when you are a famous genius, I guess you can be whatever you wish… Keith Haring and Madonna were around the East Village then as well.
I often saw Keith doodling on the walls of the Astor Place subway station, while Madona and her dancers would circle the neighborhood in a limousine.
Born in Brooklyn in 1960 to Haitian and Puerto Rican parents, Basquiatâs multicultural background informed his perspective. He rose from a graffiti artist, tagging New York City streets under the pseudonym SAMO, to an internationally celebrated painter.
His meteoric ascent in the predominantly white art world was both a triumph and a paradox, as he navigated spaces often hostile to Black voices. This tension fueled his work, which tackled themes of racial injustice, identity, and power dynamics.
One of Basquiatâs most poignant works, Irony of a Negro Policeman (1981), encapsulates his critique of systemic racism. The painting depicts a Black police officer in a stark, almost cartoonish style, surrounded by chaotic lines and fragmented imagery. The title alone underscores the contradiction: a Black man enforcing a system that historically oppressed his community. Basquiatâs use of text and symbols, like crowns and skeletal forms, further amplified the paintingâs commentary on authority and marginalization.
His works often blended historical references with contemporary issues.
In Untitled (History of the Black People) (1983), Basquiat reimagined the African diaspora, drawing on Egyptian iconography and slave trade imagery to trace a narrative of exploitation and resilience. The paintingâs fragmented composition mirrors the disjointed experience of Black identity in a racially divided society. By juxtaposing ancient motifs with modern struggles, Basquiat highlighted the enduring impact of systemic racism across centuries.
Basquiatâs styleârooted in graffitiâs spontaneity and neo-expressionismâs emotional intensityâgave his social critiques visceral power. His canvases, filled with scribbled text, distorted figures, and bold colors, demanded attention. Pieces like Defacement (The Death of Michael Stewart) (1983) directly addressed racial violence. Inspired by the death of a young Black artist at the hands of police, the painting features two officers looming over a skeletal figure, a raw indictment of police brutality and institutional racism.
The art worldâs reception of Basquiat was complex. While collectors and galleries celebrated his talent, some critics dismissed his work as primitive or overly political. This criticism often reflected the very biases Basquiat sought to expose. His ability to infiltrate elite spaces while remaining an outsider gave his art a unique vantage point, amplifying its critique of systemic inequities.
Basquiatâs influence extended beyond the canvas.
His collaborations with Andy Warhol and his friendships with figures like Madonna and Debbie Harry bridged the art world and popular culture. Yet, he remained acutely aware of his position as a Black artist in a white-dominated industry. His paintings often included references to commodification, such as price tags or brand logos, critiquing how Black bodies and culture were exploited.
Today, Basquiatâs legacy resonates in museums, galleries, and public discourse.
Major exhibitions, like the 2017 retrospective at the Brooklyn Museum, have reframed his work as a vital contribution to conversations on race. His paintings fetch millions at auctions, with Untitled (1982) selling for $110.5 million in 2017, a testament to his enduring impact. Yet, his artâs value lies not in its price but in its ability to provoke and educate.
Scholars and curators continue to unpack Basquiatâs symbolism.
His use of crowns, for instance, is widely interpreted as a reclaiming of dignity for Black figures, from jazz musicians to everyday people. His work also draws parallels with contemporary movements like Black Lives Matter, which echo his calls for racial justice. As curator Dieter Buchhart noted, âBasquiatâs art is a mirror held up to society, forcing us to confront uncomfortable truths.â
Basquiatâs life was tragically shortâhe died of a drug overdose in 1988 at age 27âbut his impact endures. His paintings remain a powerful lens through which to view systemic racism, blending beauty with brutal honesty. From New Yorkâs subway walls to the worldâs most prestigious galleries, Basquiatâs voice continues to challenge, inspire, and demand change, cementing his place as one of the 20th centuryâs most visionary artists.
âIf we turn our back, she will die.â – Sam Bassett
New York, N.Y. — Storme, a documentary by Sam Bassett based on the life and times of Stonewall VeteranStorme DeLarverie screened last week to a receptive audience in Manhattan.
The film âStormeâ screened this week in Manhattan. Photo: Linda Troller.
The Storme film is a triumphant tribute to a great American original. The screening featured a Tape Sculpture Monument dedicated to Storme along Eleventh Street in the East Village.
The filmâs producer and director Sam Bassettdescribed the significance of the momentary Monument to me:
“The Tape Monument is dedicated to Storme, as well as the past, present, and future. United we stand for greatness, creativity, compassion, and follow through.
“It means to me âRosa Parks equals Viva Storme DeLarverie equals Martin Luther King equals Barack Obama equals our united future.â I say, âHistory makers step forward. Support and respect!â
From the documentary, âStorme.â Photo: Linda Troller.
Sam had hoped to have Storme present, but she is not able to leave her new home in a senior center in Brooklyn, after recently vacating her decades-long home in the Hotel Chelsea. The director spoke with me after the screening, stating:
“I am feeling so drained from not being able to do more to get Storme out of that home. She is very sane. The people around her in the home in Brooklyn are âgone.â I do not believe Storme has dementia. She is just a bit old, but there. NOT dementia.
“I think this diagnosis is shocking and wrong. They give that diagnosis in this case because Storme is just too cool to bother with certain memories. She is a true artist, and thatâs how true great artists roll.”
Sam Bassett is a long-time friend of Stormeâs. Photo: Linda Troller.
After the screening, Sam spoke to those gathered to reflect on Stormeâs legacy about freedom. The Chelsea Hotelâs legendary Stanley and Phyllis Bard then spoke of the importance of protecting special people that through their sensitivity change, and shape the world.
Sam told me:
“I have directed, produced, and edited seven feature films. The Storme film I completed in 2008. Last week was the first time I screened it for the public which was very lovely to see the film on the big screen.
“My film work is all about thinking and understanding life to a higher degree. Because of this, the film work has been slow to be excepted. As I said, the Storme film I finished in 2008.
From the documentary, âStorme.â Photo: Linda Troller.
“One man doing everything in his power to create history for the people by the people. Ahead of the curve”.
Sam has a vision for Stormeâs future, which entails getting her out of the public nursing home and back to the Chelsea Hotel, surrounded by her community. He told me in his artistic style:
“We can do this. We will do this. Will require a meal service, nurse visiting. Possibly a nurse that’s stays with her at times.
I made a feature film of the poet, filmmaker, photographer Ira Cohen. He now has a full time nurse who takes care of him and is rock and roll. Life saving and elegant creating.
From the documentary, âStorme.â Photo: Linda Troller.
“Storme returns to the Hotel Chelsea. We set her up proper. Allow her to sit in the lobby and have polite conversation. Meals delivered. Let people cherish her. Let her history spread to the people. We create history and our civil rights legend will live until 115 years old. Miracles happen. Let’s make as many beautiful miracles as possible.
“The Hotel Chelsea truthfully is very much like a nursing home. Very similar in truth to the nursing home she is in now. Itâs just the rules and style of the Brooklyn nursing home are for death, not life. Not civil rights legend status characters.
“It is not dignified and its heart breaking. Storme would never complain in this moment. She is too selfless. Too elegant to complain. She is so rare, a beautiful butterfly. But like all beautiful butterflies they are delicate. If we turn our back, she will die.
“I believe itâs in our power to pull this off and then sit back and enjoy the golden years, properly supported and taken care of. Elegantly marching in dignity to our golden age.
Sam wrote me after my story in The Huffington Post, “Storme sends her love and thanks you for your efforts. Big moment in history. Torch holders step forward.”
The civil rights activist who probably threw the first punch in the Stonewall Riot that sparked Gay Rights.
New York, N.Y. — I know dementia. My father and grandmother both died with it. But they had both resources and families to protect them – and neither were living cultural and historical treasures.
None of which can be said for the civil rights activist who probably threw the first punch in the Stonewall Riot that sparked Gay Rights.
Storme DeLarverie lived at the Hotel Chelsea for decades. Photo by Sam Bassett.
It is sad for any elderly to be poor in New York City, with no family and few friends. It is especially sad to have historic figures languish with little support from their own communities, in this case my own community – the LGBTQ+ community.
I am particularly saddened by this situation and have reached out to leaders in the LGBTQ+ community to see how they can help Storme.
And how they can help protect others who have paved the way for Gay Rights.
I also reached out to gay and gay-friendly elected officials to hear their thoughts and ideas on safeguarding leaders like Storme when they become impoverished and incapacitated. Would declaring such aging leaders official “Living Treasurers” make a difference?
Storme DeLarverie thrived on the atmosphere created by the many writers,musicians, artists, and actors at the Hotel Chelsea. Photo by Sam Bassett.
The New York Timescovered StormĂŠ’s plight in an article June 27, 2010 entitled, “A Stonewall Veteran, 89, Misses the Parade,” when she was not allowed out to ride in the lead car of the Pride parade last month. The Timesreported:
At noon on Sunday, thousands of marchers filled Fifth Avenue for New York City’s annual gay pride parade. Nearly six miles away, on the sixth floor of a nursing home in Brooklyn, the frail, white-haired woman in beige pajamas and brown slippers in Room 609 sat motionless at the edge of her bed, staring out her window.
…And many of those who marched down Fifth Avenue on Sunday would be hard pressed to realize that this little old lady — once the cross-dressing M.C. of a group of drag-queen performers, once a fiercely protective (and pistol-packing) bouncer in the city’s lesbian bars — was one of the reasons they were marching.
In 2009, a social services group, the Jewish Association for Services for the Aged (JASA), was appointed her legal guardian by a judge. In March, she was hospitalized after she was found disoriented and dehydrated at the Chelsea Hotel, her home for decades. No one occupies her room on the seventh floor of the hotel, but it remains unclear if she will ever return.
A small group of friends, including some of her neighbors at the Chelsea Hotel, visit her regularly. A social worker with the nonprofit group SAGE, which provides services to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender older people, has been assisting Ms. DeLarverie since 1999, when she was at risk of eviction from the hotel.
One of her neighbors, photographer and documentarian Sam Bassett, asked to speak with me recently about StormĂŠ.
As a gay man, I was shocked to learn that the woman who had committed her life so that one day I might marry my partner had completely lost her ability to care for herself.
Storme DeLarverie. Photo by Sam Bassett.
With no family and insufficient support from the LGBT community, the court granted her guardianship to the Jewish Association for Services for the Aged (JASA).
I spoke at length with JASA’s Director of Adult Protective and Guardian Programs, Cecille Hershkovitz, and one of their outside attorneys, Susan Robbins of Miller Canfield.
It is a challenge for any senior to grow older in New York City.
When there is no family, no money, and few friends, it becomes more difficult for any elderly person. When dementia is added, the situation becomes critical, and the City intervenes, hopefully for the best of the person.
Through appointment by the New York City courts, JASA was appointed the guardian for Storme – providing her with crisis intervention, financial management, intensive case management, and oversight of daily activities. This program is funded by the New York City Human Resources Administration.
Attorney Susan Robbins who works with JASA focuses primarily on guardianship work and knows her stuff. She represents all three not-for-profit community guardian programs in New York City which are funded by the city to provide guardianship services to elderly and incapacitated persons.
Storme needs more support, I believe. Where can it come from? SAGE?
Susan was court-appointed counsel for prominent New York City philanthropist Brooke Astor.
“My clients say that my background as a social worker allows me to understand the unique challenges of acting as a guardian.” What Susan cannot do is wave a wand to produce additional funds to give Storme more support.
Incorporated by lesbian and gay activists and aging service professionals in 1978 as Senior Action in a Gay Environment, SAGE (now Services & Advocacy for GLBT Elders) is the world’s oldest and largest non-profit agency addressing the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender elders.
Programs like Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders are an important safety net for LGBT elders.
SAGE works with LGBT elders to address and overcome the challenges of discrimination in senior service settings, while also being an essential component in the creation of informal care-giving support, and development of new “family” networks.
Storme DeLarverie is now in a nursing home in Brooklyn. Photo by Sam Bassett.
I reached out to SAGE’s very capable executive director Michael Adams, in Chicago for a SAGE event. Mike told me what SAGE was doing in regard to StormĂŠ DeLarverie.
“Storme’s story is a powerful reminder of the difficulties of getting old in a county that too often fails to provide for our elders and in a system that, until recently, has consistently ignored the particular needs of LGBT older people.
“As in the cases of so many other LGBT elders, SAGE has been there for StormĂŠ when there was nobody else. We have worked closely with Storme for many years, starting 11 years ago when we worked to ensure that she was not evicted from her home in the Chelsea Hotel.
“In the decade since, a SAGE social worker has provided many different forms of assistance to ensure that Storme could live at home for as long as possible. Unfortunately, that is no longer possible.
“While we have faith in the nursing care provided by our partners at JASA, we know from our work with thousands of LGBT elders over 32 years that the supports available for our community’s pioneers are woefully inadequate.
Storme DeLarverie. Photo by Sam Bassett.
“SAGE does the best that it can with limited resources and has made a huge difference in StormĂŠ’s quality of life over the past decade.
But the real solution lies in a dramatic increase in the resources available to LGBT elders from our own community and from government. Only then will heroes like StormĂŠ get the heroic treatment they deserve.”
“Storme’s plight is so sad. It highlights the reason why LGBT seniors have special needs. Having met StormĂŠ on a number of occasions, I know how special she is.
“Her contributions to the movement are monumental. I worry that someday I might be in the same position. I’m sure however, that JASA will help her get through this difficult time.”
Then I reached out to an old acquaintance, Gay City News columnist David Noh. David said:
“The impassioned efforts of people like StormĂŠ to effect lasting change stand in marked contrast to this country’s current attitude of passivity and unquestioning acceptance in the face of blatant government mendacity (the Bush era), corporate greed, and senseless war.
“The plight of a true hero like Storme is everyone’s worst nightmare come true, something that crosses the minds of many in our community, especially those who may be living outside the conventional framework of family (although the acquisition of children is no 100% guarantee, either, of loving care in one’s advanced years, as certain examples have shown me).
“It’s a horrendous scandal that this should happen to StormĂŠ and an indictment of this ever more age-ist and elitist country’s attitude towards the elderly and disenfranchised. The idea of deeming people “National Treasures” is a laudable one, and something that has gone in, say, Japan, for years.”
I e-mailed my friends at the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Law Association of Greater New York (LeGaL), an association of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) legal community in the New York metropolitan area. LeGaL Interim Executive Director Brad Snyder responded:
As an association of LGBT lawyers, we are always concerned when we hear about the challenges facing members of our community, especially the senior community and those who have given so much to the cause of equality. That is one of the reasons while we are currently working with our community partners to develop legal assistance projects specifically aimed at assisting LGBT seniors.
Last weekend the 2008 documentary by Sam Bassett on the life of Storme DeLarverie was screened for the first time, here in New York City.
Of course, the man better connected than anyone in the gay and lesbian community is my friend Dirk McCall, who I met as a poll watcher for Jessica Lappin ions ago. He now heads the Bronx Community Pride Center. Dirk told me:
“I am saddened to hear this sad news about StormĂŠ, who has been a friend and inspiration for years. We must stand up for the pioneers of our movement and something must be done to ensure she is being treated with dignity and respect.
“Social isolation of LGBT seniors highlights why we need an LGBT retirement/assisted living facility in NYC and the need for intergenerational programs to make sure we are not left alone in our times of need.
“We need to organize now both for Storme as well as for our own sake. This should certainly be a call to arms.”
One friend suggested an effort be made to move StormĂŠ to the Lillian Booth Actors’ Home of The Actors Fund in Englewood, New Jersey. This friend is approaching New Jersey Congressman Steve Rothman and Bergen County Executive Dennis McNerney for assistance.
Storme DeLarverie. Photo by Sam Bassett.
JASA’s Cecille Hershkovitz told me that she hoped as many friends from the GLBT as possible would visit Storme because human interaction is vital to mental and physical well being.
Attorney Susan Robbins suggested the possibility of the GLBT community creating a fund specifically to cover additional health aides for GLBT leaders so that they could get out of their facilities more frequently.
Perhaps SAGE would be the best vehicle for such a fund. I understand as little as $10,000 per year could make a significant impact in the life of someone such as StormĂŠ.
I acknowledge the assistance SAGE has given, but I find it an outrage that our community cannot do more to support our leaders.
We need to make sure that our living cultural and historic treasures are not warehoused until they die. Alone and forgotten.
Warning for U.S. citizens: Do not travel to Russia due to the consequences of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russian military forces. U.S. citizens may face harassment or detention by Russian security officials, arbitrary enforcement of local laws, and limited flights into and out of Russia.
New York, N.Y. â As Russiaâs capital and largest city, Moscow stands as a symbol of national power, history, and cultural pride. Home to over 12 million people, it is the countryâs political nerve center, economic engine, and a global hub for arts, education, and diplomacy.
But what defines this sprawling metropolis, and how has it shapedâand been shaped byâRussiaâs turbulent past and present?
Political Powerhouse: The Kremlin and Beyond
Moscowâs political significance is anchored by the Kremlin, a fortified complex that has been the seat of Russian authority since the 15th century. Today, it houses the presidential administration, key government offices, and historic cathedrals. Nearby, the State Duma (Russiaâs parliament) and the Russian White House (government headquarters) reinforce the cityâs role as the nationâs decision-making core.
The city also hosts foreign embassies and international organizations, making it a focal point for global diplomacy. Events like the annual Moscow Conference on International Security highlight its geopolitical influence.
Economic Engine of Russia
Moscow contributes nearly 25% of Russiaâs GDP, driven by finance, technology, and energy sectors. The Moscow Exchange is the countryâs largest financial market, while corporate giants like Gazprom and Rosneft have headquarters here. Despite Western sanctions, the city remains a key player in global trade, with its skyscraper-filled Moscow International Business Center (MIBC) symbolizing its economic ambitions.
Yet, wealth disparity is visibleâluxury boutiques in Tverskaya Street contrast with Soviet-era residential districts, reflecting economic divides.
Cultural and Historical Legacy
Moscowâs cultural identity is deeply tied to its landmarks:
Red Square & St. Basilâs Cathedral â Iconic symbols of Russia, blending medieval and imperial history.
Bolshoi Theatre â A world-renowned stage for ballet and opera.
Tretyakov Gallery & Pushkin Museum â Housing Russiaâs finest art collections.
Moscow Metro â A subterranean palace of Soviet-era architecture.
The city has also nurtured literary giants like Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, while modern Moscow thrives with theaters, film festivals, and a vibrant nightlife.
Urban Development & Challenges
Moscow has transformed dramatically since the Soviet era. Major projects like Zaryadye Park (a futuristic urban space near the Kremlin) and the Moscow Central Circle (a revitalized railway system) showcase modernization efforts. However, challenges persist:
Traffic congestion, despite an extensive metro system.
High cost of living, especially in elite districts.
Political tensions, with the city often at the center of protests and crackdowns.
Moscow in the 21st Century
Today, Moscow balances tradition with global ambitions. It hosts major events like the 2018 FIFA World Cup and competes with cities like London and New York in finance and culture. Yet, its identity remains unmistakably Russianâa city where golden domes stand beside glass towers, and where history weighs heavily on contemporary politics.
Taipei — A recent poll conducted by the National Taiwan University reveals a startling figure: nearly 90% of Taiwanese citizens support the right of terminally ill patients, for whom pain is untreatable, to seek physician-assisted death.
How can a society steeped in traditions that emphasize the sanctity of life embrace such a concept? Is this an enlightened step towards autonomy or a symptom of deeper societal suffering?
The figures are hard to ignore.
The poll, which surveyed a representative sample of the Taiwanese population, indicates a dramatic shift in public sentiment.
While cultural norms in Taiwan have traditionally emphasized preserving life at all costs, the poll suggests that the public is now more willing to consider individual suffering and personal choice.
“We’re seeing a significant number of people who believe that an individual should have the right to choose how they end their life, especially when faced with unbearable pain and a terminal illness.”
But where does this shift originate?
Some argue that increased awareness of patient rights and the desire for self-determination are driving forces. Others suggest that the rising rates of chronic illnesses and an aging population have brought the issue of end-of-life care to the forefront.
“We’re living longer, but not necessarily healthier,” says Ms. Chen, a social worker who specializes in geriatric care. “Many of my patients suffer from debilitating conditions that rob them of their quality of life. It’s not surprising that people are starting to question whether prolonging life at all costs is always the best option.”
Yet, the idea of euthanasia remains deeply controversial.
Religious organizations and some conservative groups have voiced strong opposition, arguing that it violates the sanctity of life and could lead to abuses. They warn that vulnerable individuals, such as the elderly or those with disabilities, could be pressured into ending their lives prematurely.
“We cannot open the door to euthanasia,” says Reverend Wang, a prominent religious leader. “Life is a sacred gift, and we must do everything in our power to protect it. There are alternatives, such as palliative care, that can alleviate suffering without resorting to ending a life.”
Indeed, the availability and quality of palliative care in Taiwan remain a concern.
While some hospitals offer excellent palliative care services, many patients, especially in rural areas, lack access to adequate pain management and psychological support. This raises questions about whether the push for euthanasia is, in part, a reflection of the failure to provide compassionate and comprehensive care for the dying.
“If we truly want to address the issue of end-of-life care, we need to invest in palliative care,” says Dr. Lee, a palliative care physician. “We need to ensure that all patients have access to the resources they need to live their final days with dignity and comfort.”
As Taiwan grapples with this complex issue, it is clear that there are no easy answers.
The poll results reflect a society struggling to reconcile traditional values with modern realities. The debate over euthanasia forces us to confront fundamental questions about life, death, and the limits of human autonomy.
CALL TO ACTION: Advocate for improved palliative care access and resources in your community.
Tags:Â euthanasia, end-of-life care, bioethics, healthcare, Taiwan, Taiwan policy, patient rights, palliative care
Social Media Blurbs
X (Twitter): Taiwan sees surge in euthanasia support for terminally ill patients. Is this progress? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. bit.ly/XYZ #Taiwan #EuthanasiaDebate
Bluesky: Wow, almost 90% in Taiwan support euthanasia for terminally ill! What do you think? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. bit.ly/XYZ #Taiwan #EndofLifeCare
LinkedIn: A new poll in Taiwan reveals significant support for euthanasia among terminally ill patients. This has major implications for healthcare policy and the rights of individuals facing end-of-life decisions. How will this affect healthcare in Taiwan? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. #Healthcare #Bioethics #TaiwanPolicy [bit.ly/fullURL]
Truth Social: Taiwan poll: High support for euthanasia in terminal cases. Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. bit.ly/XYZ #Taiwan
Mastodon: Taiwan is grappling with a major shift in public opinion. A new poll shows nearly 90% support euthanasia for the terminally ill. What does this mean for patient rights and palliative care? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. bit.ly/XYZ #Taiwan #EuthanasiaDebate
Instagram: Taiwan poll reveals strong support for euthanasia among terminally ill. What are your thoughts? Share in the comments! Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. #Taiwan #Euthanasia #EndofLife #Bioethics #Healthcare Link in bio!
Facebook: A recent poll in Taiwan shows a surprising level of support for euthanasia among terminally ill patients. Is this a sign of progress, or are there ethical concerns? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. Join the discussion: [bit.ly/fullURL] #Taiwan #EuthanasiaDebate #EndofLifeCare
Reddit: New poll: Almost 90% in Taiwan support euthanasia for the terminally ill. Is this a victory for individual autonomy or a step too far? Euthanasia support soars in Taiwan. bit.ly/XYZ #Taiwan
New York, N.Y. â Fueled by increasingly divergent state laws on issues such as abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and censorship, a new wave of internal migration is reshaping the American landscape.
Citizens feeling disenfranchised or threatened by policies in their home states are seeking refuge in states with more aligned values, creating what some are calling âpolitical refugees.â
This phenomenon reflects a growing polarization within the U.S., where state governments are increasingly at odds on fundamental issues of personal freedom and civil rights. As a result, individuals and families are making the difficult decision to uproot their lives and relocate in search of a more welcoming and secure environment.
Fleeing Restrictions: Abortion and Reproductive Rights
The overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022 has triggered a surge in migration related to abortion access. With many states enacting near-total bans or severe restrictions on abortion, individuals seeking reproductive healthcare are now forced to travel across state lines to access these services.
This has led to a situation where some states serve as safe havens, offering comprehensive reproductive care, while others have become âabortion deserts,â prompting women and families to relocate to ensure access to essential healthcare services.
The resulting migration has strained resources in some states and created new challenges for those seeking care.
LGBTQ+ Rights Under Attack: Seeking Inclusive Communities
In addition to abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights are also a major driver of interstate migration. As some states enact laws targeting transgender individuals, restricting gender-affirming care, and limiting LGBTQ+ protections, many members of the community are seeking refuge in states with more inclusive and supportive environments.
This migration is particularly pronounced among young people and families with transgender children, who are seeking communities where they can live openly and without fear of discrimination. The exodus of LGBTQ+ individuals and families from certain states underscores the growing divide in attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights and the impact of state-level policies on individual lives.
Censorship and Free Speech: Finding Intellectual Freedom
Concerns over censorship and restrictions on free speech are also contributing to the trend of political migration.
As some states enact laws banning books from schools and libraries, limiting discussions of certain topics in the classroom, and restricting protests, individuals who value intellectual freedom are seeking refuge in states with stronger protections for free expression.
This migration is particularly relevant for educators, writers, and artists, who may feel stifled or threatened by censorship laws in their home states. The movement towards states with greater intellectual freedom highlights the importance of diverse perspectives and open dialogue in a democratic society.
The Future of Federalism: A Nation of Red and Blue Islands?
The trend of political migration raises questions about the future of federalism and the increasing polarization of American society. As individuals sort themselves into states with aligned values, the U.S. risks becoming a nation of red and blue islands, with limited interaction and understanding between different ideological groups.
This could lead to further political fragmentation and make it more difficult to find common ground on pressing national issues. Whether this trend will continue or whether there will be a renewed emphasis on national unity remains to be seen, but the experiences of those seeking refuge across state lines offer a sobering reminder of the challenges facing the country.
Doha, Qatar âSince its launch in 1996, Al Jazeera has played a pivotal role in transforming the media landscape of the Middle East, fostering open dialogue and providing a platform for diverse voices. Financed by the Qatari government, the Arabic-language channel quickly gained prominence by broadcasting uncensored news and a wide range of perspectives.
Al Jazeera has been instrumental in promoting freedom of expression and providing a voice to the voiceless.
By challenging traditional narratives and broadcasting stories that were previously ignored, it has empowered individuals and communities across the region. The network’s commitment to covering a wide range of issues, from human rights to social justice, has helped to raise awareness and promote positive change.
The launch of Al Jazeera English in 2006 marked a significant step in the network’s global expansion.
The new channel aimed to provide in-depth coverage of international events, with a focus on the Global South. It has since become a respected source of news and information, known for its high-quality journalism and its commitment to covering stories from a variety of perspectives.
During the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011, Al Jazeera played a crucial role in broadcasting information and documenting events on the ground.
Its coverage helped to inform the world about the aspirations of the Arab people and the challenges they faced.
While the network’s coverage was not without its critics, it is undeniable that it helped to amplify the voices of those who were seeking change.
Despite facing numerous challenges and pressures, Al Jazeera remains committed to its mission of providing independent and objective news.
It has weathered political storms, cyberattacks, and smear campaigns, and continues to be a vital source of information for millions of people around the world. The network’s resilience and its unwavering commitment to journalistic principles are a testament to its enduring value.
Al Jazeera has undoubtedly made a significant contribution to promoting dialogue, understanding, and progress in the Middle East and beyond. Its commitment to providing a platform for diverse voices and its unwavering dedication to journalistic excellence have earned it a place as a leading global media organization.
Has Al Jazeera been a positive force in the Middle East? Its commitment to diverse voices and journalistic integrity suggests that it has.
Tags: Al Jazeera, media, Middle East, Qatar, journalism, positive impact, news, politics, international relations
“Al Jazeera: A Decade of Impact” – A retrospective on Al Jazeera’s achievements.
Cover Image Suggestion:
Image of Al Jazeera’s Doha headquarters with a collage of positive news stories and diverse voices.
Social Media Blurbs
X:
Al Jazeera: A force for progress in the Middle East? A look at its positive impact on global media. Read more: [bit.ly/AlJazeeraStory] #AlJazeera #PositiveNews
Bluesky:
Has Al Jazeera been a positive force in the Middle East? 🤔 Examining its contributions to dialogue and empowerment. [bit.ly/AlJazeeraStory] #AlJazeera #Media
LinkedIn:
Al Jazeera’s Positive Impact: A business or societal impact case study. Explore the network’s influence, contributions, and impact on global media. #AlJazeera #MiddleEastMedia #MediaInfluence [Full Link to Story]
Truth Social:
Al Jazeera: A Force for Progress? Examine its positive impact on global media. Read the full story: [Link to Story] #AlJazeera
Mastodon:
Al Jazeera’s journey is marked by its commitment to progress. Has it been a positive force in the Middle East? 🤔 Explore the story: [Link to Story] #AlJazeera #MediaAnalysis
Instagram:
Al Jazeera: A Force for Progress in the Middle East? 🤔 Read more about its impact on global media. Link in bio! #AlJazeera #MiddleEast #PositiveNews #Qatar #News
Facebook:
Al Jazeera: A force for progress in the Middle East? Explore the network’s positive contributions, and impact on global media in our in-depth analysis. Read the full story and share your thoughts! #AlJazeera #MiddleEastMedia #MediaInfluence [Full Link to Story]
Reddit:
Al Jazeera: Has It Been a Positive Force? The network aimed to foster dialogue in the Middle East, but has it lived up to its promise? What do you think? [Link to Story] #AlJazeera #Media
I have highlighted the words “broadcast” and “movements” and “correspondents” to be linked to LucePedia.
New York, N.Y. — Foot traffic at Target stores has declined for ten consecutive weeks, coinciding with the companyâs rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policiesâa decision that has sparked nationwide boycotts, investor lawsuits, and broader questions about the future of corporate DEI commitments.
Targetâs DEI Rollback Sparks Backlash
In January 2025, Target announced it would end its three-year DEI goals, discontinue external reporting to initiatives such as the Human Rights Campaignâs Corporate Equality Index, and conclude its Racial Equity Action and Change (REACH) initiatives. The company also restructured its supplier diversity program, moving away from its previous $2 billion commitment to Black-owned businesses.
The decision was framed as a strategic shift to align with a changing business environment. âMany years of data, insights, listening and learning have been shaping this next chapter in our strategy,â wrote Kiera Fernandez, Targetâs chief community impact and equity officer, in a memo to employees.Â
Target emphasized it remains committed to âcreating a sense of belonging for our team, guests and communities through a commitment to inclusion,â but critics argue the rollback signals a retreat from meaningful DEI action.
Nationwide Boycott and Declining Foot Traffic
The rollback triggered immediate backlash. More than 200,000 people participated in a nationwide boycott, many inspired by a 40-day âTarget Fastâ led by Rev. Jamal Bryant, a prominent Atlanta pastor. The boycott coincided with Lent and called on shoppers to support Black-owned businesses instead.
Data from analytics firm Placer.ai shows that Targetâs foot traffic fell by 9% year-over-year in February and 6.5% in March, marking ten straight weeks of decline. The slump began the week after the DEI rollback announcement and has continued despite the end of the Lenten boycott. Meanwhile, competitors like Costco, which have maintained their DEI programs, have seen steady increases in store visits.
Investor Lawsuits and Financial Impact
The fallout extends beyond customer visits. Targetâs stock dropped 12% after the DEI rollback, with investors filing lawsuits alleging the company misrepresented the risks associated with cutting DEI initiatives. Plaintiffs claim Target failed to warn shareholders about potential backlash and legal exposure, leading to avoidable financial losses. Legal experts predict that settlement costs could further impact the companyâs earnings in upcoming quarters.
Broader Corporate Implications
Targetâs experience has become a case study in the risks and complexities of altering corporate DEI strategies. The company faces pressure from both political leaders advocating for reduced diversity efforts and customers demanding inclusive practices. While some companies, such as Walmart and McDonaldâs, have also scaled back DEI programs, others like Costco have resisted, and are seeing positive results in customer engagement.
Meetings between Target executives and civil rights leaders, including Al Sharpton, signal ongoing dialogue, but as of late April, Target has not reversed its DEI rollback. The companyâs future strategy remains under scrutiny from investors, customers, and advocacy groups alike.
Key Data and Trends
Retailer
DEI Policy Change
Foot Traffic Trend (FebâApr 2025)
Target
Rolled back DEI
Down 9% (Feb), 6.5% (Mar), 4.7% (Apr week)
Costco
Maintained DEI
Up 7.5% (Feb), 16 weeks of growth
Walmart
Reduced DEI
Up 2.7% (Apr week)
Whatâs Next for Target?
While Targetâs leadership has reiterated a commitment to âbelonging for all,â the companyâs recent policy changes have led to sustained boycotts, negative publicity, and legal action. The coming months will test whether Target can regain consumer trust and stabilize its business, or if the backlash will have lasting effects on its brand and financial performance.
Target Faces 10-Week Decline in Store Visits After DEI Rollback (April 24, 2025)
Their vocal opposition to his policies, combined with strategic legislative maneuvers, has not only galvanized progressive voters but also positioned them as rising stars in a post-Trump political landscape.
Standing Firm Against Trumpâs Agenda
Van Hollen, Booker, and AOC eachhave each taken high-profile stands against Trump, whether through Senate hearings, social media campaigns, or grassroots organizing. Van Hollen, a seasoned legislator, became a leading voice against Trumpâs judicial appointments, while Bookerâs impassioned speeches on racial justice and policing reform drew national attention. AOC, meanwhile, has everaged her massive online following to amplify critiques of Trumpâs economic and immigration policies.
âThese lawmakers didnât just resistâthey offered clear alternatives,â said Dr. Elena Martinez, a political science professor at Columbia University. âThat distinction has helped them build credibility with both activists and moderate Democrats.â
Fundraising and Grassroots Momentum
Their confrontational approach has paid off financially. Van Hollenâs 2022 re-election campaign saw a 40% increase in small-dollar donations compared to 2016. Bookerâs advocacy for criminal justice reform helped him raise over 20millioninthelastelectioncycle.AOC,alreadyafundraisingpowerhouse,shatteredrecordswithher20millioninthelastelectioncycle.AOC,alreadyafundraisingpowerhouse,shatteredrecordswithher18 million haul in 2022, much of it from progressives eager to counter Trump-aligned candidates.
âSmall donors are looking for fighters,â said Democratic strategist Luis Rivera. âVan Hollen, Booker, and AOC have shown theyâre willing to take on Trump directly, and that resonates with the base.â
Media Influence and National Recognition
Beyond fundraising, their visibility has skyrocketed. Bookerâs viral moments during Supreme Court hearings made him a household name, while Van Hollenâs work on voting rights expanded his influence beyond Maryland. AOCâs mastery of digital media kept her at the forefront of political discourse, even as Trump frequently targeted her on social media.
âTheyâve turned opposition into opportunity,â said media analyst Rachel Kim. âBy being unapologetically progressive, theyâve carved out a lane that appeals to younger voters and activists.â
Future Implications for the Democratic Party
As the 2024 election approaches, their strategies may signal a broader shift in Democratic tactics. While some moderates urge caution in confronting Trump directly, Van Hollen, Booker, and AOCâs successes suggest that a more assertive approach could energize the partyâs base.
âThe lesson here is that Democrats donât have to play defense,â said Martinez. âThey can go on the offensive and win.â
Challenges Ahead
Despite their gains, challenges remain. Van Hollen and Booker must balance progressive appeals with broader electability concerns, particularly in swing states. AOC, while influential, faces ongoing scrutiny from conservatives and some centrist Democrats. Yet, their ability to turn Trump-era opposition into political capital suggests theyâll remain key players in shaping the partyâs future.
Tags: Chris Van Hollen, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Donald Trump, progressive Democrats, political strategy, Cory Booker, 2024 election, congressional opposition
Capitulation that would strip Ukraine of territory, sovereignty, and securityâwhile handing Russian President Vladimir Putin nearly everything he wants
New York, N.Y. — President Donald Trumpâs much-touted plan to end the Russia-Ukraine war, now revealed in detail, is drawing fierce criticism for effectively rewarding Russian aggression and forcing Ukraine into a corner.
Rather than offering a genuine path to peace, Trumpâs proposal has been described by analysts and Ukrainian officials as a capitulation that would strip Ukraine of territory, sovereignty, and securityâwhile handing Russian President Vladimir Putin nearly everything he wants.
A Plan That Favors Moscow
Trump, alongside Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has put forward a proposal that would see the United States remove sanctions against Russia, agree to a cease-fire with Russian forces remaining on seized Ukrainian territories, and formally recognize Crimea as part of Russia.Â
The plan would also bar Ukraine from joining NATO, though it would allow for EU membership. In return, Ukraine would receive vague security assurances from the U.S. and promises of reconstruction aidâwithout clear mechanisms or guarantees.
This arrangement would force Ukraine to cede approximately 20% of its land and millions of its citizens, while relinquishing its right to determine its own foreign policy. The proposal also includes the return of confiscated Russian assets and the lifting of sanctions, giving Russia the financial means to rebuild its war-battered military and economy.
Ukraineâs Dilemma: Capitulation or Isolation
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly rejected any deal that involves surrendering Crimea or other occupied territories, calling such concessions unacceptable. Trump, however, has publicly pressured Zelensky to accept the terms, declaring on his Truth Social platform that Ukraineâs leader has âno cards to playâ and should âGET IT DONE.âÂ
The Trump administration has warned that the U.S. might withdraw from negotiations if either party rejects the proposal, a threat seen as an attempt to coerce Kyiv into submission.
The plan leaves Ukraine with two grim choices: accept a deal that legitimizes Russiaâs land grabs and undermines its sovereignty, or risk losing vital U.S. support and facing Russia alone. As one Ukrainian official put it, the proposal âsays very clearly what tangible gains Russia gets, but only vaguely and generally says what Ukraine is going to get.â
A Precedent for Appeasement
Critics warn that Trumpâs plan would not only devastate Ukraine but also set a dangerous precedent for international relations. By legitimizing Russiaâs invasion and territorial annexations, the U.S. would be undermining the post-World War II order that prohibits changing borders by force. This could embolden Moscow to pursue further aggression against its neighbors and destabilize Europe for years to come.
The planâs logic echoes the perils of appeasement, famously denounced by President Ronald Reagan. As Reagan said, âThereâs only one guaranteed way you can have peaceâand you can have it in the next secondâsurrender.â He warned that appeasement âgives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender,â and that âlife is not so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery.â
Ukraineâs Fight for Survival
For Ukraine, the stakes could not be higher. Accepting Trumpâs terms would mean not just territorial loss but a future of insecurity, with Russia poised to strike again once it has regrouped. The plan offers no credible path to lasting peace or justice for the victims of war crimes committed during Russiaâs invasion.
As the world watches, Ukraineâs struggle has become a test of whether international law and the principle of sovereignty still matter. Trumpâs proposal, critics argue, is not a peace plan but a reward for aggressionâa blueprint for surrender dressed up as diplomacy.
New York, N.Y. — Two centuries to the day after France imposed a crippling debt on Haiti in exchange for its independence, a U.N. forum has heard calls for the restitution of what has long been described as a âransomâ extorted under the threat of force from the Caribbean nation that still bears the scars of colonialism and slavery.
The first country ever to free itself from slavery through a successful uprising, Haiti gained independence from France in 1804.
The price for defying the colonial order was steep. On April 17, 1825, besieged by French warships, Haiti agreed to pay an indemnity of 150 million gold francs to the European power.
Officially, the payment was meant to compensate French plantation owners for âlost propertyâ following independence, but the amount far exceeded actual losses.
âFrance forced the winners of Haitiâs independence â the former slaves â to compensate the losers, their former masters,â Monique Clesca, a journalist and activist of Haitian descent, said on Thursday at a meeting on the countryâs independence debt.
The price of freedom: A double debt
This tax on liberty soon plunged worldâs first Black republic into a spiral of debt. When Haiti was no longer able to pay, France pushed its banks to lend it money, what we call a âdouble debt,â Ms. Clesca explained.
By 1914, over three-quarters of the countryâs national budget was still being drained to repay French banks. It was not until 1947 â more than 140 years after independence â that Haiti finally settled its debt.
âFrance committed an enormous injustice that still resonates today,â Ms. Clesca said.
An in-depth 2022 investigation by The New York Times found that Haitiâs payments to France amounted to the modern equivalent of roughly $560 million. Had that money been retained in Haiti and invested domestically, it could have added more than $20 billion to the countryâs economy over time, according to some economists.
Haiti today: The legacy of debt
Though Haiti stands a milestone in the global fight for emancipation, today it today is mired in instability, with armed gangs controlling 85% of the capital, Port-au-Prince. According to the World Bank, it remains the poorest country in Latin America and the Caribbean.
âThe entrenched human rights crises in the Republic of Haiti [are] rooted in legacies of enslavement, colonialism, debt payments, military threats and interventions,â said the advisory body to the U.N. Human Rights Council in a position paper last month.
A belated recognition
Responding to mounting calls for justice, French PresidentEmmanuel Macron on Thursday announced the creation of a joint commission of Haitian and French historians to examine the impact of the 1825 indemnity.
While welcoming the move, Martin Kimani, a member of the Permanent Forum, stressed that the commissionâs effectiveness would depend on its willingness to fully acknowledge the harm caused.
âWe call for restitution of the financial sums extracted through this cost arrangement along with broader reparative measures to address Haitiâs structural underdevelopment and international neglect,â Mr. Kimani said during the meeting, held on the final day of the Forumâs fourth session this week.
According to media reports, so far the French president has stopped short of committing to financial reparations.
Calls for restitution
âThe colonial past creates responsibilities that must be assumed collectively by France and the international community,â said Pierre Ericq Pierre, Haitiâs Permanent Representative to the U.N., who took part in the discussion.
According to the Haitian ambassador, the countryâs enduring inequalities are rooted in its colonial past and the burden of the âransom.â
In his view, restitution would only be far. âThis isnât about revenge,â he said. âItâs about truth and justice.â
Restorative justice
The Haitian people deserve a future free from violence â one that meets basic standards of development, said Gaynel Curry, another member of the Permanent Forum.
In addition to returning the colonial debt, Ms. Curry called for the creation of an international reparations fund for Haiti and establishing an independent inquiry, under the Human Rights Council, to explore avenues of into restorative justice.
New York, N.Y. — Hundreds of thousands of guns are being used by gangs to exert control and spread terror in Haiti, according to the UN’s designated expert on the human rights situation in the Caribbean country.
The island nation has suffered from a series of humanitarian, economic, political and security crises in recent years and it is widely believed that gangs control up to 90% of the capital, Port-au-Prince.
U.N. independent expert on the human rights situation in Haiti, William O’Neill, (second left) talks to officials at a prison in Fort LibertĂŠ, Haiti. Photo credit: BINUH/Oldy Joel Auguste.
William OâNeill: The situation in Haiti regarding guns is absolutely catastrophic. The country is awash in guns, probably in the hundreds of thousands in a population of 11 million.
The gangs have access to an increasing number of high calibre weapons, and a seemingly endless supply of ammunition and some gangs have weapons that pierce armour. This is very dangerous because the Haitian National police and the multinational security support mission led by Kenya are really relying on their armoured vehicles to provide them protection.
There have been recent incidents in which a Kenyan police officer was injured by a projectile inside his vehicle and it is happened to some of the Haitian National Police officers as well.
The gangs have powerful automatic weapons that fire many rounds per minute as well as sniper rifles which some gang members have been trained on. People can be hit from a long distance, and you can imagine the terror that causes.
A protest is viewed from a police vehicle in downtown Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Photo credit: Š UNOCHA/Giles Clarke.
You are a frequent visitor to Haiti, especially to vulnerable communities there. What are people there telling you about the pervasiveness of guns?
The gangs have weapons that cause immense violence and the people I have met say that it is absolutely terrifying.
Gangs use these firearms, to take territory, to keep out other gangs and to battle with the police, but also to control and dominate people and commit many types of human rights violations simply because they have this power that that literally flows from their possession of firearms. We interviewed some victims, survivors of sexual violence, and it was clear from their testimony that the gangs flaunt their weapons as if to say âdo this or else.â
People face the threat of death unless they comply with the gangs.
Haiti does not make firearms nor ammunition. How are they getting into the country?
They come in primarily from the United States, some directly on small ships that leave overwhelmingly from Florida. There i an increased number from the Dominican Republic, still originating in the US, that come over the border, which is very porous.
There was actually a quite active guns-for-drugs trade with Jamaica which predates the crisis, but even those guns mostly originate in the U.S. Relatively recently, guns have been flowing from Colombia some from FARC and other the Colombian armed groups that were turning a weapons or had the weapons confiscated.
The key is to stop the flow of ammunition, because if the gangs run out of ammunition, then it would not matter what kind of guns they have. They would be finished as they have no popular support.
Thousands of families continue to flee their homes in Port-au-Prince due to gang-related violence. Photo credit: Š UNICEF/Ralph Tedy Erol.
What is being done to stop the trafficking of these weapons?
Not enough. The head of the Haitian frontier police told me they only have 350 officers to guard a 400 km border. They have one drone, insufficient vehicles and admit they cannot even control the official border crossings.
There is a failure at the ports; there is not a single scanner in the whole country. A large metal scanner could check what is coming in these containers. So that is a huge problem.
On the Haitian side, there is a lack of resources and some corruption. On the US side, there is been an ongoing lack of commitment in terms of inspecting outgoing shipments, although inspections have increased a bit lately under domestic pressure in the United States.
The people hate the gangs, so they would be in major trouble if they lost the source of their strength. So, the US needs to increase the inspections much more.
What more needs to be done?
There needs to be more investigation of the trafficking networks in Florida. Recently there have been several prosecutions and heavy sentences, one involving a former Haitian gang leader who had been extradited to the United States.
His trial testimony revealed how he was obtaining guns from the United States that led to others being arrested, including some Haitian nationals in the US. Heavy sentences would be a big deterrent. If traffickers could end up with 10/15/20 years in a federal penitentiary, they might recalculate their risk reward assessment and say, âyou know, it is just not worth it.â
A funeral of the victim of gang warfare takes place in a cemetery in Port-au-Prince. Photo credit: Š UNOCHA/Giles Clarke.
How reliable a partner is the U.S. right now?
I think the U.S. has become more sensitive to this problem and how dealing with it would actually alleviate one of the administrationâs major concerns which is Haitian migrants trying to get into the United States.
People recognize that if there is security in Haiti, then the incentive or desperation to get out of the country would diminish quite a bit.
Bringing stability to a neighbor, which is suffering greatly would allow that country to develop economically and in peace. At the same time, you would reduce this push factor of migration of desperate Haitians wanting to leave the country.
The Dominican Republic also has a huge interest in stability in Haiti, as there are concerns about the violence spilling over. I think the Dominican Republic is stepping up efforts to stop this illegal trafficking to Haiti of arms and ammunition.
It is also important to remember that there is a UN Security Council arms embargo.
There is a legal obligation on all countries to take steps to make sure their extraterritorial obligations on the human rights situation in Haiti are connected to following the arms embargo.
Haiti âAwashâ with Guns Leaving Population âAbsolutely Terrifiedâ (April 23, 2025)
Each year, more than 21 million adolescent girls in low and middle-income countries become pregnant
New York, N.Y. —Teenage pregnancy remains the leading cause of death for girls aged 15 to 19, which countries could help prevent by allowing them to remain in school and ending child marriage, the U.N. World Health Organization (WHO) said on Wednesday.
Each year, more than 21 million adolescent girls in low and middle-income countries become pregnant. About half of these pregnancies are unintended. Nine in 10 adolescent births occur among girls who were married before turning 18.
âEarly pregnancies can have serious physical and psychological consequences for girls and young women,” said Dr. Pascale Allotey, Director of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research at WHO. “(They) often reflect fundamental inequalities that affect their ability to shape their relationships and their lives.â
Too young to give birth
Teen pregnancy carries serious health risks. These include higher rates of infection, complications, and premature birth. It also disrupts education and limits job opportunities later in life. Many young mothers end up trapped in poverty.
To help prevent teenage pregnancy, WHO is calling on governments to offer better alternatives to child marriage. These include improving access to education, financial services and jobs. If all girls finished secondary school, child marriage could be slashed by up to two-thirds, according to the UN Childrenâs Fund (UNICEF).
Stolen childhood
There has been global progress. In 2021, one in 25 girls gave birth before age 20. Twenty years earlier, the rate was one in 15. However, big gaps remain. In some countries, nearly one in 10 girls aged 15 to 19 still give birth each year.
âEarly marriage denies girls their childhood and has severe consequences for their health,â said Dr Sheri Bastien, Scientist for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health at WHO.
She emphasized the power of education in transforming girlsâ futures. At the same time, both boys and girls need to understand the concept of consent “and challenge the major gender inequalities that continue to drive high rates of child marriage and early pregnancy in many parts of the world.â
The WHO guidelines update advice issued in 2011. They promote comprehensive sexuality education which the U.N. agency says is essential so that boys and girls know how to use different types of contraception and where to seek advice.Â
âIt has been shown to reduce early pregnancies, delay the onset of sexual activity and improve adolescentsâ knowledge about their bodies and reproductive health,â WHO said.
Tags:Â Child marriage, teen pregnancy, maternal health, U.N. health agency, gender inequality, education access, adolescent health, sexual and reproductive rights
Mumbai —â In the shadow of Indiaâs rapid economic growth lies a grim reality: entire villages where prostitution is not just a profession but a hereditary fate. Known as âprostitution villages,â these communitiesâscattered across states like Maharashtra, West Bengal, and Andhra Pradeshâare home to generations of women trapped in the sex trade, bound by poverty, social ostracization, and systemic neglect.
A Legacy of Exploitation
For many women in these villages, sex work is not a choice but an inheritance. Families, often from marginalized castes, have been engaged in prostitution for decades, with daughters following their mothers into the trade as early as their teens.
âMy grandmother did this, my mother did this, and now I do it,â says Rekha (name changed), a 28-year-old from a village in Maharashtra. âThere was never another option for us.â
Economic desperation fuels the cycle. With limited education and job opportunities, sex work becomes the only means of survival. Many women earn as little as 2â2â3 per client, barely enough to feed their families.
The Role of Trafficking and Grooming
While some women enter the trade due to family tradition, others are victims of trafficking. Brothel owners and middlemen prey on impoverished families, promising loans or jobs before forcing girls into prostitution. Activists estimate that thousands are trafficked into these villages annually, with many coming from Nepal and Bangladesh.
âThe line between voluntary and forced prostitution is often blurred here,â says Anjali Gopalan, founder of the Naz Foundation, an NGO fighting sex trafficking. âEven if a woman isnât physically locked up, the lack of alternatives makes it coercion by circumstance.â
Government and NGO Interventions
The Indian government has launched initiatives to combat trafficking and rehabilitate sex workers, including vocational training and housing programs.
However, implementation remains inconsistent. Corruption, bureaucratic delays, and underfunding hinder progress, leaving many women without viable escape routes.
Nonprofits like Apne Aap Women Worldwide work to educate women about their rights and provide skills training. âWeâve seen some success in helping women leave the trade,â says founder Ruchira Gupta. âBut without broader societal change, the cycle continues.â
Stigma and the Struggle for a New Life
Even for those who escape prostitution, reintegration into society is fraught with challenges. Deep-rooted stigma ensures that many face discrimination in housing, employment, and even healthcare. âPeople call us âdirtyâ even after we leave,â says Priya (name changed), a former sex worker now working as a tailor. âNo one wants to hire us or rent to us.â
Some women return to the trade simply because society refuses to accept them elsewhere. Activists argue that without addressing stigma, rehabilitation efforts will fail.
Is Change Possible?
Despite the bleak landscape, grassroots movements offer glimmers of hope. Womenâs collectives are forming to demand better legal protection, while some villages have seen a decline in intergenerational prostitution as younger generations access education.
Yet, experts warn that systemic change requires more than piecemeal efforts. âWe need economic opportunities, stricter anti-trafficking laws, and a societal shift in how we view sex workers,â says Gopalan. âOtherwise, these villages will remain prisons for generations to come.â
Tags: India, prostitution villages, sex trafficking, human rights, social stigma, poverty, womenâs rights, exploitation, red-light districts, rehabilitation
Setting Boundaries Will Set You Free: A Guide to Personal Empowerment and Authentic Connection
Understanding the Importance of Boundaries
New York, N.Y. — Boundaries are more than just personal preferencesâthey are essential markers that define where one person ends and another begins.
In Setting Boundaries Will Set You Free, Nancy Levin, a master integrative life coach, underscores that boundaries are fundamental to maintaining emotional, mental, and physical well-being.
Without them, individuals risk being overwhelmed by othersâ expectations, leading to stress, resentment, and burnout.
Levin argues that boundaries are not barriers to connection but the foundation of authentic relationships. By clearly stating our limits, we communicate that our needs and feelings are valid, fostering mutual respect and healthier dynamics in all areas of life.
Why Saying No is DifficultâAnd Necessary
Many people struggle to set boundaries due to fears of conflict, rejection, or being perceived as unkind. Societal and cultural pressures often reinforce the idea that self-sacrifice is virtuous, leaving individuals feeling guilty for prioritizing their own needs. Levinâs book addresses these challenges directly, teaching readers to recognize signs of weak boundariesâsuch as chronic overwhelm, difficulty saying no, and feelings of being taken for granted.
Therapists note that clients rarely identify boundary issues as the root of their struggles. Instead, these problems often manifest as difficulties with self-care, time management, or relationship conflicts. Levinâs step-by-step approach helps readers uncover and address these hidden patterns.
Practical Tools for Setting and Maintaining Boundaries
Levinâs book is filled with actionable exercises and techniques designed to help even the most conflict-averse readers. She introduces the âBoundary Pyramidâ to help individuals take inventory of their boundaries and provides scripts for saying no effectively. One recommended strategy is the âsandwich method,â where a refusal is cushioned between two positive statements, making it easier to assert oneself without alienating others.
Role-playing and self-reflection exercises are also encouraged, empowering readers to practice boundary-setting conversations and build confidence. Levin emphasizes that saying no is not selfishâit is a necessary act of self-care that ultimately benefits both parties in a relationship.
The Transformative Power of Boundaries
Setting boundaries is not a one-time event but an ongoing process. Levin shares her personal journey, describing how learning to say no transformed her relationships and improved her health.
She encourages readers to view each boundary as an act of self-love, reinforcing the idea that prioritizing oneâs own needs is essential for thriving.
The bookâs impact extends beyond individual readers. Therapists increasingly recommend Setting Boundaries Will Set You Free as a resource for clients struggling with codependency, people-pleasing, or burnout.
By normalizing the discomfort that can accompany boundary-setting, Levin helps readers move past guilt and embrace long-term well-being.
Expert and Reader Reception
Levinâs work has received praise for its clarity, practicality, and empathy. Readers describe the book as âlife-changing,â especially for those who have avoided boundaries for years.Â
The authorâs background as a life coach and her willingness to share her own struggles make her guidance relatable and accessible.
Therapists highlight the bookâs usefulness in clinical settings, noting that its exercises and frameworks help clients develop assertiveness and resilience.
The consensus is that setting boundaries is a skill that can be learned and practiced, leading to healthier relationships and greater personal freedom.
Setting Boundaries Will Set You Free by Nancy Levin is more than a self-help bookâit is a roadmap to reclaiming agency, cultivating self-respect, and building deeper, more authentic connections. As more therapists and readers turn to Levinâs guidance, the conversation around boundaries is shifting from guilt and avoidance to empowerment and growth.
Tags: Nancy Levin, Setting Boundaries Will Set You Free, self-help, mental health, therapy, self-care, personal development, relationships, book review, empowerment
New York, N.Y. â As the world reflects on the atrocities of World War II. and the Holocaust, a haunting question persists: How did Adolf Hitler, a man responsible for such immense suffering, garner the support of millions?
A page of a coloring book for young child about the Hitler Youth, produced in Germany in the 1930s. Image courtesy of The Wiener Holocaust Library Collections.
Understanding this phenomenon requires a multifaceted approach, examining the socio-economic conditions of post-World War I.
Germany, Hitlerâs manipulation of propaganda, and the psychological factors that made his message so appealing to a disillusioned populace.
The Perfect Storm: Post-War Germany
The seeds of Hitlerâs rise were sown in the aftermath of World War I. Germany, burdened by the Treaty of Versailles, faced economic collapse and widespread social unrest.
The treaty imposed heavy reparations, territorial losses, and military restrictions, crippling the nationâs economy and fueling resentment among its citizens.
Hyperinflation wiped out savings, leaving families destitute, and unemployment soared. This environment of desperation and disillusionment created fertile ground for extremist ideologies to take root.
The Power of Propaganda and Charisma
Hitler was a master of propaganda, skillfully exploiting the German peopleâs grievances and anxieties. He presented himself as a strong leader who could restore Germany to its former glory, promising to overturn the Treaty of Versailles, revive the economy, and unite the nation. His speeches were powerful and emotionally charged, filled with nationalist fervor and scapegoating rhetoric. He blamed Jews, communists, and other minority groups for Germanyâs problems, playing on existing prejudices and fears.
Psychological Factors: Fear, Identity, and Belonging
Beyond economic hardship and political manipulation, psychological factors played a significant role in Hitlerâs rise to power.
The German people, traumatized by the war and economic collapse, were searching for a sense of identity and belonging. Hitler offered them a vision of a strong, unified nation, where they could feel proud and secure. He appealed to their desire for order and stability, promising to restore traditional values and protect them from perceived threats.
The use of fear was also a potent tool, as Hitler stoked anxieties about internal enemies and external threats, creating a climate of paranoia and suspicion.
The Banality of Evil: Conformity and Complicity
It is crucial to remember that the Holocaust was not solely the work of a few fanatical Nazis.Many ordinary Germans, driven by a combination of factors, actively supported or passively condoned Hitlerâs regime. Conformity, obedience to authority, and the desire to fit in played a significant role.
As the Nazi regime consolidated its power, dissent became increasingly dangerous, and many people chose to remain silent rather than risk persecution. The concept of the âbanality of evil,â as articulated by Hannah Arendt, highlights the disturbing reality that ordinary people can participate in horrific acts when they are caught up in a system that normalizes and rewards such behavior.
Understanding how so many people could support Hitler requires examining the complex interplay of socio-economic factors, political manipulation, and psychological vulnerabilities. It serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked nationalism, scapegoating, and the erosion of democratic values.By studying this dark chapter in history, we can learn valuable lessons about the importance of critical thinking, tolerance, and the need to resist all forms of extremism.
With minimal territorial gains and over one million casualties, this battle has become a symbol of the futility and devastation of trench warfare.
Paris â One of the deadliest battles in human history, the Battle of the Somme, remains a stark reminder of the brutality of World War I. Fought between July 1 and November 18, 1916, the offensive resulted in over one million casualties, with little territorial gain for either side. As the world marks 108 years since the battle, historians reflect on its devastating toll and enduring legacy.
The Somme Offensive: A Costly Gamble
Poor communications meant commanders knew little of what was happening on the battlefield.
The Battle of the Somme was launched by Allied forcesâprimarily British and French troopsâto relieve pressure on the French at Verdun and break through German lines.
However, poor planning, inadequate artillery barrages, and strong German defenses turned the offensive into a bloodbath. On the first day alone, the British suffered 57,470 casualties, including 19,240 deadâthe worst single-day loss in British military history.
Trench Warfareâs Deadly Toll
The battle epitomized the horrors of trench warfare. Soldiers faced machine-gun fire, artillery bombardments, and disease in waterlogged trenches. Advances were measured in yards, not miles, as both sides endured relentless attrition.
The introduction of tanks in September 1916 offered brief hope, but mechanical failures and lack of coordination limited their impact. By November, exhaustion and winter weather forced an end to the offensive.
A Questionable Legacy
While the Somme weakened German forces, critics argue it achieved little strategically. The Allies advanced only about six miles at a cost of 420,000 British, 200,000 French, and 500,000 German casualties.
Some historians contend it was a necessary, if brutal, campaign; others see it as a symbol of military incompetence and senseless slaughter.
Remembering the Fallen
Today, memorials like the Thiepval Memorial in France honor the missing. The battle also reshaped military tactics, emphasizing combined arms and air reconnaissance. Yet, its greatest legacy may be as a cautionary taleâa reminder of warâs indiscriminate destruction and the price of failed strategy.
By revisiting this dark chapter, weâre reminded that economic walls rarely protectâthey often imprison.
New York, N.Y. â In the 1930s, Adolf Hitlerâs Nazi regimesought to âliberateâ Germany from the global economy by imposing draconian tariffs and trade restrictions. What followed was an economic disasterâskyrocketing prices, shortages of basic goods, and a backward slide into economic independence that left ordinary Germans paying 600% more for eggs and other staples. Decades later, economists warn that the episode offers a cautionary tale about the dangers of economic isolationism.
The Illusion of Economic Independence
The Nazi government came to power in 1933 promising to restore German greatness by breaking free from international markets. Hitler and his economic architects, including Hjalmar Schacht, believed that reducing reliance on foreign goods would strengthen the Reich. They imposed steep tariffs, restricted imports, and promoted domestic productionâeven when it was wildly inefficient. The policy, known as autarky (economic independence), was supposed to make Germany self-sufficient. Instead, it triggered an economic time bomb.
Shortages, Inflation, and Public Anger
The Nazi slogan “Arbeit, Freiheit und Brot!” (Work, Freedom, and Bread!) was a propaganda phrase used primarily in the early 1930s to appeal to German workers suffering from the Great Depressionâs economic devastation.
Almost immediately, Germans felt the pinch. Essential goods like butter, coffee, and textiles became scarce as imports dried up.
Farmers were forced to sell crops at fixed, state-mandated prices, leading to hoarding and black markets. By 1936, egg prices had surged by 600%, and other staples followed.
The Nazi propaganda machine blamed âforeign speculatorsâ and Jewish businesses, but the real culprit was the regimeâs own destructive policies.
The Collapse of German Industry
Germanyâs industrial sector, once a powerhouse of European trade, suffered under the weight of tariffs and resource shortages.
Factories reliant on imported materialsâsuch as oil, rubber, and metalsâfaced production halts. The much-touted âFour-Year Planâ of 1936 aimed to replace foreign goods with synthetic alternatives, but these were often costly and inferior.
Meanwhile, trade partners retaliated with their own tariffs, shrinking Germanyâs export markets.
A Warning for the Modern World
Economists today see eerie parallels between Nazi Germanyâs failed experiment and modern protectionist movements.
âTrade wars donât create prosperityâthey create poverty,â says Dr. Evelyn Richter, a historian at Columbia University. âThe Nazi case shows how quickly economic nationalism can unravel.â As debates over globalization rage on, the lesson is clear: closing borders to trade may sound appealing, but the consequences can be catastrophic.
Berlin — In the tumultuous years of the 1920s, a figure emerged from the fringes of German society, captivating audiences with his fiery oratory and radical ideas. Adolf Hitler, a name that would later become synonymous with unimaginable horror, honed his skills as a speaker during this period, laying the foundation for his ascent to power.
Adolf Hitler delivers a speech during the Party Congress at Nuremberg in 1935.
The Rise of a Charismatic Speaker
Following Germanyâs defeat in World War I and the subsequent social and economic upheaval, many Germans were disillusioned and sought radical solutions.
Hitler, a relatively unknown figure, found fertile ground for his nationalist and anti-Semitic rhetoric. His speeches, often held in beer halls and public squares, drew increasingly large crowds.
Mastering the Art of Persuasion
Hitlerâs ability to mesmerize audiences was not accidental. He meticulously studied the art of public speaking, understanding how to use emotional appeals, repetition, and carefully crafted language to sway listeners. Historians note his use of simple, direct language that resonated with ordinary Germans who felt alienated by the complex political landscape of the Weimar Republic.
The Message Behind the Oratory
While Hitlerâs speaking style was undoubtedly captivating, the content of his speeches was equally important. He skillfully exploited the widespread resentment towards the Treaty of Versailles, which had imposed harsh reparations on Germany. He also promoted a vision of national renewal and strength, promising to restore Germany to its former glory. His anti-Semitic views, which scapegoated Jews for Germanyâs problems, also found a receptive audience among those seeking someone to blame for their misfortunes.
Seeds of a Catastrophe
The impact of Hitlerâs oratory in the 1920s cannot be overstated. He successfully built a devoted following and laid the groundwork for the Nazi Partyâs rise to power in the 1930s. By tapping into the fears and frustrations of the German people, he paved the way for a regime that would unleash unprecedented violence and destruction upon the world.
New York, N.Y. — In an era when words shape wars and elections, Yale philosopher Jason Stanley has emerged as a voice of clarity, decoding the hidden meanings behind political rhetoric.
Since his 2018 bestseller, How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them, Stanley has been a fixture on airwaves, illuminating how language can be weaponized. His latest book, The Politics of Language (Princeton University Press), co-authored with linguist David Beaver, dives deeper, revealing how every word carries a history that politicians exploit to sway hearts and minds.
With a nostalgic nod to the power of straight talk and an upbeat belief in understanding speechâs complexities, Stanleyâs work feels timelier than ever.
Unpacking âHustleâ Speech
Stanley introduces âhustleâ as speech with hidden intentions, a concept central to The Politics of Language. Unlike transparent communication, hustle embeds secret messages, often unconsciously, within wordsâ historical associations. âStraight talk is when everythingâs transparent,â Stanley told Yale News.
âHustle is everything else.â This framework, built over eight years with Beaver, challenges traditional linguistics by grounding meaning in speech practicesâhow words are used over time. For example, a politicianâs phrase like âinner citiesâ may carry racist undertones, veiled by plausible deniability, allowing harmful messaging to slip through unchallenged.
The Emotional Power of Words
Words evoke involuntary images and emotions, Stanley argues, making them potent tools for manipulation. Politicians imbue terms like âMarxistâ with disgust or label immigrants as âverminâ to incite violence.
âEach word is part of a speech practice and has a history,â Stanley said. Repetition amplifies this effect, embedding propaganda in listenersâ minds. Terms like âCRTâ or âDEI,â repeatedly tied to negative emotions, become triggers for dislike, regardless of their actual meaning. Stanleyâs nostalgic reflection on clearer communication highlights the loss of straightforward discourse in todayâs polarized world.
Confronting Harmful Rhetoric
The Politics of Language tackles harmful speech, including slurs, dog whistles, and genocidal narratives.Stanley points to Russiaâs justification for invading Ukraine, where Putin frames Ukrainian identity as âanti-Russian,â a genocidal narrative denying its legitimacy.âWhen you represent others as an existential threat, thatâs genocidal,â Stanley said. His analysis bridges philosophy and linguistics to expose how such rhetoric thrives on non-transparent speech practices, offering a framework to counter authoritarian language globally.
A Philosopherâs Mission in Ukraine
Stanleyâs commitment extends beyond academia. Recently appointed to a visiting teaching position in Kyiv, he taught a course on colonialism and fascism to 300 Ukrainians last August. Donating his salary to Come Back Alive, a Ukrainian military support organization, Stanley sees his work as resistance against authoritarianism. âIâm an anti-fascist,â he said, reflecting on Russiaâs attack on Ukraineâs democracy. His upbeat resolve to educate and engage underscores the bookâs relevance in a world where language fuels conflict and division.
Stanleyâs work evokes a nostalgic yearning for a time when words were less weaponized, yet his optimism shines through in his belief that understanding speech practices can empower us. The Politics of Language is not just a scholarly triumph but a call to listen critically, especially as authoritarian rhetoric rises. As Stanley bridges philosophy, linguistics, and real-world crises, his voice reminds us that decoding language is key to defending democracy.
About Jason Stanley: Jason Stanley is the Jacob Urowsky Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. Before coming to Yale in 2013, he was Distinguished Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Rutgers University. Stanley is the author of Know How; Languages in Context; Knowledge and Practical Interests, which won the American Philosophical Association book prize; and How Propaganda Works, which won the PROSE Award for Philosophy from the Association of American Publishers. He writes about authoritarianism, propaganda, free speech, mass incarceration, and other topics for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Review, The Guardian, Project Syndicate and The Chronicle of Higher Education, among other publications.
Highlighting the importance of visual merchandising in the retail industry
Lisbon â Maison Luce, a Lisbon-based bakery celebrated for its distinctive window displays, continues to captivate passersby with its innovative and artistic presentations. Each display serves not only as a showcase for the storeâs merchandise but also as a vibrant reflection of Lisbonâs culture and artistic spirit.
A Lisbon Landmark
Maison Luce has become a landmark in Lisbon, drawing both locals and tourists to admire its meticulously crafted windows. The store, known for its high-quality bread and unique aesthetic, invests significant time and resources into creating displays that are both visually stunning and emotionally resonant.
âOur goal is to create something that stops people in their tracks,â said Sofia Mendes, the storeâs creative director. âWe want to offer a moment of beauty and inspiration in their day.â
Each window display at Maison Luce tells a story, often inspired by Portuguese history, literature, or contemporary art. The themes change seasonally, keeping the displays fresh and relevant. Recent displays have featured intricate paper cutouts depicting scenes from Portuguese maritime history and vibrant collages inspired by local artists.
The creation of these displays is a collaborative effort involving designers, artists, and the storeâs merchandising team. The process begins with a concept, followed by detailed sketches and the selection of materials. The installation itself can take several days, as each element is carefully placed to achieve the desired effect.
Community and Culture
Maison Luceâs window displays have become an integral part of Lisbonâs cultural landscape. They provide a free and accessible form of art for the community, enhancing the cityâs charm and appeal. Local schools and art organizations often bring students to view the displays, using them as a teaching tool for art and design.
The store also engages with the community through social media, inviting followers to share their photos and interpretations of the displays. This interaction fosters a sense of connection and encourages dialogue about art and culture.
Maison Luce is Much More Than a Bakery
According to the founder, “It is a true home, where each loaf tells a story of humanity, quality, and tradition. We are committed to creating a family-like environment, where customers, staff, and partners share moments inspired by a love for artisanal products. Our promise is to nourish both body and soul, carefully embodying the values that guide us: Responsibility and Generosity.”
The tag line is: Maison Luce is the Spirit of Bread, celebrating life with every bite.
OUR ROOTS
Maison Luce is a family story, a tribute from its founder Julien Letartre to his grandmother Luce. Mother of six children, a successful entrepreneur, and an excellent cook, grandmother Luceâpictured in her iconic white apronâpassed on an inexhaustible âjoie de vivreâ to everyone around her.
Since the start of the project in 2020, this âjoie de vivreâ has been the driving force of the company. There are several references to grandmother Luce in the Maisonâs offerings: âMon Pâtit Chou,â for example, is an iconic product whose name nods to the affectionate nickname grandmother Luce gave her grandchildren and great-grandchildren, as well as other delicious and comforting recipes inspired by Northern France, where she lived her entire life.
Impact on Retail
The success of Maison Luceâs window displays highlights the importance of visual merchandising in the retail industry. In an era dominated by online shopping, physical stores must offer unique experiences that cannot be replicated online. Engaging window displays can attract customers, enhance brand image, and drive sales.
âWe believe that window displays are a powerful tool for creating a memorable shopping experience,â Mendes said. âThey allow us to communicate our brandâs values and connect with our customers on an emotional level.â
Historians warn that preserving such monumentsâeven with plaquesâsanitizes oppression.
New Haven, CT â The ivy-clad walls of Yale University, long celebrated as a bastion of intellectual prestige, now conceal a grotesque monument to hate: the Harkness Memorial Gate.
Erected in honor of 19th-century philosopherJohn M. Harness, the gate has become a flashpoint for outrage as students, scholars, and activists condemn its celebration of a man who championed eugenics and white supremacy. Amid growing protests, Yale faces a damning question: Why does it still glorify bigotry?
A Legacy of Hate
John M. Harness, whose writings were steeped in pseudoscientific racism, argued for the âpurificationâ of the white race through forced sterilization and immigration bans. His work laid groundwork for policies that targeted Black, Indigenous, and disabled communities.
Yet, Yaleâs philosophy departmentâostensibly a hub of critical thoughtâmaintains a gate bearing his name, a slap in the face to marginalized students forced to walk beneath it daily.
âItâs disgusting,â said Priya Vasquez, a junior and organizer with the group Yale Against Eugenics. âEvery time I pass that gate, Iâm reminded that this school would rather preserve a racistâs legacy than protect its students.â
Empty Apologies, No Action
In 2020, following George Floydâs murder, Yale pledged to âreckon with its history of racism.â But critics say the Harness Gate exposes that promise as a lie. While peer institutions like Harvard and Princeton have removed tributes to segregationists, Yale has only added a small plaqueâvague, toothless, and buried in overgrown ivy.
âA plaque isnât justice,â snapped Dr. Marcus Greene, a Black studies professor. âItâs a cowardâs compromise. Either tear it down or admit Yale still reveres white supremacy.â
The universityâs silence speaks volumes. Despite repeated requests for comment, Yaleâs administration has dodged questions, issuing only a boilerplate statement about âongoing discussions.â Meanwhile, the philosophy departmentâwhose website still lists Harness as a âdistinguished thinkerâârefuses to address his vile ideology.
There was a period in our history where eugenics was considered favorably. Here, a pro-eugenics demonstration on Wall Street, NYC, 1915. Photo credit: Wisconsin Historical Society Archives.
Students Fight Back
Protests have erupted weekly at the gate, with demonstrators draping it in black cloth and projecting Harnessâs most racist quotes onto its stone facade. Petitions demanding its removal have gathered thousands of signatures, and activist coalitions are planning a sit-in during alumni weekend.
âWe wonât stop until this thing is rubble,â vowed Derek Nguyen, a graduate student in ethics. âYale canât preach âdiversityâ while forcing students to salute a eugenicist.â
A National Reckoning
Yale isnât alone in facing scrutiny over racist memorials, but its refusal to act sets a dangerous precedent. As colleges nationwide confront ties to slavery and genocide, Yaleâs stubbornness signals complicity. Historians warn that preserving such monumentsâeven with plaquesâsanitizes oppression.
âMemorials arenât neutral,â said Dr. Eleanor Shaw, author of Stone and Blood: Campus Monuments to White Supremacy. âTheyâre endorsements. Every day that gate stands, Yale endorses Harnessâs belief that some lives are worth less than others.â
Whatâs Next?
Pressure is building. Donors are threatening to pull funding, and faculty are drafting resolutions to force a vote on removal. Yet with Yaleâs endowment topping $40 billion, critics fear money will once again trump morality.
For now, the Harness Memorial Gate remains, its engraved Latin motto (âScientia et VirtusââKnowledge and Virtue) a cruel joke. As students march, one question lingers: How much longer will Yale cling to its shame?
