Hungary’s decision to leave the ICC is the latest in a series of moves aligning
Orban with authoritarian and nationalist leaders who reject global accountability
Budapest — In a move that has sparked international outrage, Hungary announced its decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) just as it hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Gaza.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, known for his defiance of international norms, welcomed Netanyahu with open arms, praising Israel’s stance against what he called the “hypocrisy” of the international justice system.
Hungary’s decision to leave the ICC is the latest in a series of moves aligning Orban with authoritarian and nationalist leaders who reject global accountability. The announcement was made during a joint press conference in Budapest, where Netanyahu called Hungary’s withdrawal “a courageous stand for truth” and thanked Orban for his “unwavering friendship.”
The ICC had issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, citing evidence of war crimes in Gaza. While many European nations have supported the court’s actions, Hungary has taken the opposite approach, positioning itself as a haven for those facing international scrutiny. The move has drawn sharp criticism from human rights organizations, who accuse Orban of undermining global justice for political gain.
A Safe Haven for War Criminals?
Hungary’s withdrawal from the ICC raises pressing concerns about the erosion of international law and justice. The ICC, established to prosecute war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity, has faced increasing challenges from nationalist governments unwilling to submit to its authority. Orban’s decision signals a broader rejection of international accountability—one that could embolden other leaders accused of human rights abuses.
“By abandoning the ICC, Hungary is declaring itself a safe space for impunity,” said Balázs Csekő, a Budapest-based legal expert.
“This decision is not just about Israel; it’s about creating a precedent where
political leaders can act without fear of legal consequences.” – Balázs Csekő
Critics argue that Hungary’s withdrawal will undermine global efforts to hold war criminals accountable. Amnesty International denounced the move as “a blatant attempt to shield perpetrators of war crimes from justice.” Meanwhile, the European Union, of which Hungary is a member, has yet to issue an official response but is reportedly reviewing potential consequences for Orban’s government.
Netanyahu’s European Tour Amid Arrest Warrant
Netanyahu’s visit to Hungary is part of a broader diplomatic push to rally support against the ICC’s ruling. Since the arrest warrant was issued, Netanyahu has sought allies willing to reject the court’s legitimacy, painting the ICC’s actions as politically motivated.
During the press conference, Netanyahu reiterated his stance that Israel is being unfairly targeted by the international community. “The ICC’s decision is a disgrace,” he said. “Hungary understands that this is not about justice but about demonizing Israel. I thank Prime Minister Orban for his moral clarity.”
Orban, who has long positioned himself as a defender of “Christian Europe” against liberal international institutions, framed Hungary’s departure from the ICC as a defense of sovereignty. “No foreign court will dictate our policies,” he declared. “Hungary stands with its allies against unjust persecution.”
A Dangerous Trend for Global Justice
Hungary’s move has fueled concerns that other nationalist governments could follow suit, further weakening the ICC’s authority. Countries like Russia, China, and the United States have already refused to recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction, while others, such as the Philippines, have withdrawn in response to investigations into their leadership.
International law experts warn that Hungary’s decision could embolden leaders accused of war crimes to ignore legal accountability. “If more countries abandon the ICC, it will become a toothless institution,” said Dr. Elisa Werner, a legal scholar at the University of Vienna.
“This is exactly what authoritarian leaders want—a world where they
can commit atrocities without consequences.” – Dr. Elisa Werner
The controversy has also deepened the rift between Hungary and its European allies. The EU has long criticized Orban’s government for undermining democratic values, cracking down on press freedoms, and eroding judicial independence. Now, with Hungary effectively rejecting international law, pressure is mounting for Brussels to take action.
What Happens Next?
Hungary’s withdrawal from the ICC is not immediate. The process requires formal notification and takes one year to finalize. In the meantime, legal experts argue that Hungary remains bound by ICC obligations, including the potential arrest of individuals facing warrants. However, given Orban’s stance, enforcement within Hungary’s borders is unlikely.
For Netanyahu, the diplomatic win in Hungary may be short-lived. While Orban stands by him, much of Europe does not. Nations such as France, Germany, and Spain have affirmed their commitment to the ICC, meaning Netanyahu still faces significant legal risks when traveling.
For the international justice system, Hungary’s exit is a troubling sign of weakening global accountability. Whether the ICC can withstand these political attacks—or whether more nations will follow Hungary’s lead—remains to be seen.
Hungary Shields Netanyahu, Exits International Criminal Court (April 4, 2025)
#Hungary #Netanyahu #ICC #Israel #Orban #JusticeDenied
#HumanRights #WarCrimes #InternationalLaw #BreakingNews
Tags: Hungary, Benjamin Netanyahu, Viktor Orban, International Criminal Court,
ICC, Israel, war crimes, human rights, international law, justice
Discover more from The Stewardship Report
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
