Autocrat’s Playbook Defies Supreme Court, Puts Rule of Law in Crisis
New York, N.Y. — One hundred days into Donald Trump’s presidency, the alarm bells for American democracy are ringing louder than ever.
Yet, however scared you might be, you are not scared enough. From the moment he reclaimed the White House, Trump has meticulously followed the autocrat’s playbook, dismantling checks and balances with chilling precision.
His actions—targeting universities, extorting law firms, prosecuting former aides, arresting a local judge, and attacking the press—reveal a leader unbound by the rule of law. Most alarmingly, he is now defying the United States Supreme Court, a move unprecedented since Marbury v. Madison established judicial authority over two centuries ago. Worse still, he is getting away with it.
The case at the heart of this crisis involves Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a migrant in Maryland raising a family and training as a sheet metal worker.
Trump’s administration, claiming Garcia’s alleged ties to MS-13, has ignored a Supreme Court order to “facilitate” his return from an El Salvadoran prison known for torture.
The justices have also barred Trump from deporting Venezuelans accused of ties to the Tren de Aragua gang to the same facility.
Yet, Trump and his Department of Justice have brazenly disregarded these rulings, asserting that the court’s words don’t mean what they say.
This defiance is not just about one man—it’s about whether any institution can check Trump’s claim to near-limitless power under the guise of a national security “emergency.”
For years, Trump and his allies have labeled unauthorized migration an “invasion,” a term steeped in fearmongering rather than reality.
Migrants, like our ancestors, come seeking better lives, taking jobs—picking fruit, cleaning hotels, roofing houses—that native-born Americans often shun.
Contrast this with Russia’s actual invasion of Ukraine, where the goal is death and conquest, not employment.
Yet Trump has doubled down, issuing executive orders citing migration as an “emergency” to justify mass deportations to foreign prisons.
He’s also declared energy and economic “emergencies” to bypass environmental laws and impose tariffs, despite Congress’s constitutional authority over taxation.
The stakes are highest in Trump’s use of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act, which grants extraordinary powers during a literal invasion.
By labeling MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as “terrorists” and “invaders,” Trump claims authority to act beyond judicial oversight.
The Supreme Court’s resistance in the Garcia case and the Venezuelan deportations marks a critical stand against his autocratic tendencies.
But what happens if the court explicitly orders Garcia’s return or rules the Alien Enemies Act inapplicable absent a declared war? If Trump refuses to comply, the future of our democracy hangs in the balance.
This is the terrifying reality: Chief Justice John Roberts commands no army, no police force. Neither does Congress. Our system relies on the executive—Trump and the military and law enforcement under his control—to honor the Constitution.
If he can unilaterally declare criminal gangs “invaders” to justify extrajudicial powers, what stops him from labeling protesters, journalists, or judges as “enemies of the people”? Why not imprison them or ship them to El Salvador’s torture prison?
These scenarios sound alarmist because America’s normalcy bias assures us such things ‘can’t happen here.’ But that same complacency failed to predict January 6, when Trump’s mob stormed the Capitol.
Lifelong conservative Judge Harvie Wilkinson, appointed by Reagan, warned in a recent opinion: “If today the executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens?”
His chilling conclusion urged the executive to uphold the rule of law “while there is still time.” But time is running out. Trump’s first 100 days have exposed a republic teetering on the edge, with no fines, no jail time, and little public outcry to hold him accountable. Many Americans remain unaware of the crisis unfolding before us.
The question now is whether our institutions—and we, the people—can summon the courage to act. If Trump continues to defy the courts, sideline Congress, and weaponize “emergencies,” the America we know may not survive. We must shed our normalcy bias, recognize the autocrat’s playbook for what it is, and demand accountability before it’s too late. Our democracy depends on it.
#DemocracyInDanger, #TrumpAutocracy,
#RuleOfLaw, #SupremeCourtDefiance
Tags: Trump, Supreme Court, democracy,
autocracy, migration, emergency powers
Discover more from The Stewardship Report
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
